Hi there. I just wanted to report an issue with the balance tab. For Zergpool, under last 24 hours it never refreshes. It's showing my last 2 payments, one was 3 days ago, and the other was 10 days ago, but they just keep adding up, it doesn't go away after 24 hours. All the other pools work as intended. Thanks, loving the program.
I'm thinking of renaming the "24h Payout" column to "Recent Payouts". Although Awesome Miner uses the 24h-value from the API's - some pools simply return older payouts as well. 
Topic: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners - page 389. (Read 703148 times)
March 21, 2018, 02:15:01 PM
March 21, 2018, 02:12:38 PM
hi, cant see d3pool on online services tab, please help
They have enabled some DDOS protection where their API's only can be access from a web browser. I contacted them a few days ago about this to find a solution. 
March 21, 2018, 02:03:43 PM
Hello - Is there a way to see windows uptime instead of miner uptime or both?
Hi. Today you can only see the Windows Uptime on the Summary tab.I will make a small change to the next release to make it possible to use the "Customize Progress Field" feature to get the Windows Uptime listed there as well.
http://www.awesomeminer.com/help/customizefield.aspx
You will be able to use an expression like this in the next version of Awesome Miner:
Code:
"Windows Uptime: " + string.Format("{0}d {1}h {2}m", TimeSpan.FromSeconds(system.WindowsUptimeSeconds).Days, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(system.WindowsUptimeSeconds).Hours, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(system.WindowsUptimeSeconds).Minutes)
Perfect - Thanks!
I also wanted to mention that I've tried a few other Mining OS's and ended up sticking with yours for the farm. Love the product and how in-touch you are with your customers.
March 21, 2018, 01:01:27 PM
Hi there. I just wanted to report an issue with the balance tab. For Zergpool, under last 24 hours it never refreshes. It's showing my last 2 payments, one was 3 days ago, and the other was 10 days ago, but they just keep adding up, it doesn't go away after 24 hours. All the other pools work as intended. Thanks, loving the program.
March 21, 2018, 11:17:58 AM
March 21, 2018, 11:08:57 AM
AwesomeMiner Coin Updater 0.7
You can find the latest update in the Mega link.
Example minerpool
- Added support for Insight Explorer API
- Added support for any coin at minerpool, see example below or in OP
- Added support for using /api/getdifficulty on Iquidus explorers
- Fixed WebAPI not returning the latest released version
You can find the latest update in the Mega link.
Example minerpool
Code:
{ CoinFullName: "Victorium", CoinShortName: "VIC", Algo: "Ethereum", BlockReward: 6.25, BlockTime: 30, BlockExplorer: "minerpool"}
This latest release appears to have issues with all of cryptoid's coins. Any ideas? Says blockexplorer is not supposed for all the coins I have using that. (was working on the previous 0.6 version).
March 21, 2018, 10:24:23 AM
hi, cant see d3pool on online services tab, please help https://i.imgur.com/u4TdHVa.png
March 21, 2018, 10:16:28 AM
AwesomeMiner Coin Updater 0.7
You can find the latest update in the Mega link.
Example minerpool
- Added support for Insight Explorer API
- Added support for any coin at minerpool, see example below or in OP
- Added support for using /api/getdifficulty on Iquidus explorers
- Fixed WebAPI not returning the latest released version
You can find the latest update in the Mega link.
Example minerpool
Code:
{ CoinFullName: "Victorium", CoinShortName: "VIC", Algo: "Ethereum", BlockReward: 6.25, BlockTime: 30, BlockExplorer: "minerpool"}
March 21, 2018, 09:28:14 AM
Can you please add new FOLM coin ??
Ticker: FLM
Algorithm: PHI1612
https://folm.io/
https://explorer.folm.io/
https://www.livecoinwatch.com/price/Folm-FLM
https://coinlib.io/coin/FLM/Folm
Calculators:
https://folm.io/calculator
https://www.crypto-coinz.net/coin-info/?88-Folm-FLM-PHI1612-calculator/
https://crypt0.zone/calculator/details/FLM
Thanks
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PS
Also today I am having issue with AwesomeMiner showing all zero 0 values.
How to fix this
UPDATE:
-------------------
Fixed after uninstalling and erasing all AM folders.
Fresh install fixed it...
but I had to enter all my configuration all over again.
Ticker: FLM
Algorithm: PHI1612
https://folm.io/
https://explorer.folm.io/
https://www.livecoinwatch.com/price/Folm-FLM
https://coinlib.io/coin/FLM/Folm
Calculators:
https://folm.io/calculator
https://www.crypto-coinz.net/coin-info/?88-Folm-FLM-PHI1612-calculator/
https://crypt0.zone/calculator/details/FLM
Thanks
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PS
Also today I am having issue with AwesomeMiner showing all zero 0 values.
How to fix this
UPDATE:
-------------------
Fixed after uninstalling and erasing all AM folders.
Fresh install fixed it...
but I had to enter all my configuration all over again.
March 21, 2018, 09:07:56 AM
Quark Bug:
There is a bug when using Quark algo. It is not calculating profit correctly. If I set my profit profile to 50MH/s with Quark the coins profit is far higher than if i were to change the coins set algo to something else and set that algo to 50MH/s in the profit profile.
The formula for calculating coins per day (which is part of the profitability calculations) are different on the Quark algorithm compared to almost any other algorithm. For this reason, entering the same coin properties for two coins, specifying Quark as algorithm for one of them and for example X11 on the other, the results will be different.There is a bug when using Quark algo. It is not calculating profit correctly. If I set my profit profile to 50MH/s with Quark the coins profit is far higher than if i were to change the coins set algo to something else and set that algo to 50MH/s in the profit profile.
It might be that some specific Quark-based coin uses yet another formula - please let me know any details if you run into this.
How is the difficulty equation any different? It should all be the same. It is all just a ratio of difficulty and including hashrate and coin value. The way it is calculating right now comes up with completely unrealistic numbers, when "faking it" in another algo the numbers are much more accurate to what is reality.
March 21, 2018, 07:52:59 AM
Good day, tell me how you can solve the following question:
Do not run the mining if a new video card is installed and the driver installation process is in progress.
There are times when you need to install an additional card, and the controlling computer with Awesome mining is far away.
If the mining starts, the drivers are sometimes incorrectly installed and the video card is not detected in the system. In this case, you have to completely reinstall WINDOWS
We need an analogue of the rule, if tasklist /Im Drvinst.exe true -> stop mining; sleep 120sec; start mining;
Do not run the mining if a new video card is installed and the driver installation process is in progress.
There are times when you need to install an additional card, and the controlling computer with Awesome mining is far away.
If the mining starts, the drivers are sometimes incorrectly installed and the video card is not detected in the system. In this case, you have to completely reinstall WINDOWS
We need an analogue of the rule, if tasklist /Im Drvinst.exe true -> stop mining; sleep 120sec; start mining;
March 21, 2018, 05:37:11 AM
In the past Ethminer had an API compatible to Claymore Ethereum miner. If you enable the API of Ethminer and use an External Miner in Awesome Miner where you specify Claymore Ethereum as software - is that configuration working?
hello, patrikeI have a feeling that there's a bug in Awesome Miner with per day/per month profit numbers when dual mining with Claymore ETH Miner.
I guess that Awesome Miner doesn't take into account the profit from mining second coin and shows eth-only profit.
the numbers in "view details" window are correct, but current profit seems to be always lower with the same hashrates as in profit profile, and the difference is almost equal to profit from second coin.
can you please take a look at this. thanks
Is this on version 4.5? If that's the case, please try again on version 4.6 that I will release in a little while.
March 21, 2018, 05:27:58 AM
Hello - Is there a way to see windows uptime instead of miner uptime or both?
Hi. Today you can only see the Windows Uptime on the Summary tab.I will make a small change to the next release to make it possible to use the "Customize Progress Field" feature to get the Windows Uptime listed there as well.
http://www.awesomeminer.com/help/customizefield.aspx
You will be able to use an expression like this in the next version of Awesome Miner:
Code:
"Windows Uptime: " + string.Format("{0}d {1}h {2}m", TimeSpan.FromSeconds(system.WindowsUptimeSeconds).Days, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(system.WindowsUptimeSeconds).Hours, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(system.WindowsUptimeSeconds).Minutes)
March 21, 2018, 04:48:04 AM
Hello - Is there a way to see windows uptime instead of miner uptime or both?
March 21, 2018, 03:37:21 AM
Thanks, this should resolve my issue as well.
I've implemented the change for Remote Agent to enforce a single application instance, to prevent any second instance of the application to start.
Please note that you also have a feature in Awesome Miner where you can delay the autostart of miners. In Options dialog, Advanced section you can for example specify that the Managed Miner autostart shouldn't happen until after 60 seconds for example.
BUG: Not sure what causes it, but sometimes the Awesome Miner Remote Agent randomly toggles the 'Automatically start when windows starts' option.
FEATURE REQUEST: If the Awesome Miner Remote Agent application is running, don't run another instance (and by extension, another duplicate mining instance).
The issue this comes from is that I have a script set to run various tools and other monitoring software prior to launching the Awesome Miner Remote Agent. With both of the above issues, the Agent would launch preemptively, as well as twice. This wasn't related to any software updates, and would sometimes re-enable itself right after I turned auto-launching off and rebooted the computer, but other times it would stay off. The frequency of this occurring was directly proportional to how likely it was for me to walk out the door. /s
I've not been able to reproduce the autostart issue. If you or anyone else figure out more details about this, please let me know.FEATURE REQUEST: If the Awesome Miner Remote Agent application is running, don't run another instance (and by extension, another duplicate mining instance).
The issue this comes from is that I have a script set to run various tools and other monitoring software prior to launching the Awesome Miner Remote Agent. With both of the above issues, the Agent would launch preemptively, as well as twice. This wasn't related to any software updates, and would sometimes re-enable itself right after I turned auto-launching off and rebooted the computer, but other times it would stay off. The frequency of this occurring was directly proportional to how likely it was for me to walk out the door. /s
I've implemented the change for Remote Agent to enforce a single application instance, to prevent any second instance of the application to start.
Please note that you also have a feature in Awesome Miner where you can delay the autostart of miners. In Options dialog, Advanced section you can for example specify that the Managed Miner autostart shouldn't happen until after 60 seconds for example.
March 21, 2018, 03:30:21 AM
Is there any APIs planned for adding/remove groups? Moving miners to groups? And adding/removing miners?
No plans right now, but I always try to improve the API based on feedback. Your requests are noted. Thanks! March 21, 2018, 03:27:49 AM
BUG: Not sure what causes it, but sometimes the Awesome Miner Remote Agent randomly toggles the 'Automatically start when windows starts' option.
FEATURE REQUEST: If the Awesome Miner Remote Agent application is running, don't run another instance (and by extension, another duplicate mining instance).
The issue this comes from is that I have a script set to run various tools and other monitoring software prior to launching the Awesome Miner Remote Agent. With both of the above issues, the Agent would launch preemptively, as well as twice. This wasn't related to any software updates, and would sometimes re-enable itself right after I turned auto-launching off and rebooted the computer, but other times it would stay off. The frequency of this occurring was directly proportional to how likely it was for me to walk out the door. /s
I've not been able to reproduce the autostart issue. If you or anyone else figure out more details about this, please let me know.FEATURE REQUEST: If the Awesome Miner Remote Agent application is running, don't run another instance (and by extension, another duplicate mining instance).
The issue this comes from is that I have a script set to run various tools and other monitoring software prior to launching the Awesome Miner Remote Agent. With both of the above issues, the Agent would launch preemptively, as well as twice. This wasn't related to any software updates, and would sometimes re-enable itself right after I turned auto-launching off and rebooted the computer, but other times it would stay off. The frequency of this occurring was directly proportional to how likely it was for me to walk out the door. /s
I've implemented the change for Remote Agent to enforce a single application instance, to prevent any second instance of the application to start.
Please note that you also have a feature in Awesome Miner where you can delay the autostart of miners. In Options dialog, Advanced section you can for example specify that the Managed Miner autostart shouldn't happen until after 60 seconds for example.
March 21, 2018, 02:53:40 AM
If your external miners just use the given ip address as name, it would be really comfortable to be able to select more than one miner to delete from the miners list the ones you don't use anymore (one is allowed to select and delete), than going to the options tab, external miners, than try to figure out which one is not in use anymore.
I've just implemented this for you. In the next release you will be able to select multiple miners in the list of miners, and remove all of them in a single operation. March 21, 2018, 02:52:59 AM
Question:
Is it possible to enable just some algos for a specific pool ?
For example I noticed that a pool is terrible on some algos and I want to mine just the selected algos on that pool, that I observed they are handled well by the pool.
Thanks.
You can go to Options dialog, Online Services, and configure which of the predefined pools/algorithms to include for the profit switcher.Is it possible to enable just some algos for a specific pool ?
For example I noticed that a pool is terrible on some algos and I want to mine just the selected algos on that pool, that I observed they are handled well by the pool.
Thanks.
Let's say you want to mine Neoscrypt, but not Zpool Neoscrypt. Then you edit the entry for Zpool Neoscrypt and uncheck "Include in Managed Profit Switcher". You can also use the Bulk Edit button if you want to include/exclude many pools from the Managed Profit Switcher at the same time.
March 21, 2018, 02:49:36 AM
Patrick,
Can we choose to order the coins value and online services by profit and not by revenue? Some algos take more power and the profit is lower than the revenue...
I will make Revenue and Profit two separate columns in the next release. This will make it possible to sort on any of them.Can we choose to order the coins value and online services by profit and not by revenue? Some algos take more power and the profit is lower than the revenue...
Will this allow Profit switching to work, based on Revenue? For example if a card is making profit of $2 on NeoScrypt and power cost $1, the Revenue is $1 and the same card is making $1.8 on Eth and the power cost is $0.5, the Revenue is $1.3 I wold like Profit switching to switch to ETH. Right now the logic in profit switching will switch to NeoScrypt. Em I correct?
There are however a bug in version 4.5 (latest public release) where the power cost was ignored in some profit switching scenarios. That's corrected in the development versions like 4.5.5 and will also be part of the public release 4.6.
Jump to: