Two identical machines
Even hash rates are within a few MH/s
And yet AMiner, decides to put one on Lara2 for days while the other switches to most profitable as intended
https://i.imgur.com/t8gF99T.jpg
The updated online services show lara as most profitable - but how can it be when the identical set up on the right shows it further down.
The whole software is one big mess as far as I can make out.
How can two identical machines, cards, hashrates, miners, pools everything be showing different profits and mining different alogs.
I'd expect some shenanigans but it's more likely to be incompetence.
Not sure if it's even worth my time trouble shooting going on the past 20 pages of this thread.
But I did reinstall latest miner on both - delete and redo the miners. rerun the benchmarks and yet this still occurs.
So just a heads up - you could very likely be chucking money away, unless you have two machines to check what this software is doing.
Later, and mine safley.
Even hash rates are within a few MH/s
And yet AMiner, decides to put one on Lara2 for days while the other switches to most profitable as intended
https://i.imgur.com/t8gF99T.jpg
The updated online services show lara as most profitable - but how can it be when the identical set up on the right shows it further down.
The whole software is one big mess as far as I can make out.
How can two identical machines, cards, hashrates, miners, pools everything be showing different profits and mining different alogs.
I'd expect some shenanigans but it's more likely to be incompetence.
Not sure if it's even worth my time trouble shooting going on the past 20 pages of this thread.
But I did reinstall latest miner on both - delete and redo the miners. rerun the benchmarks and yet this still occurs.
So just a heads up - you could very likely be chucking money away, unless you have two machines to check what this software is doing.
Later, and mine safley.
I have the same problem, with 2 identical machines with identical GPUs and with identical statistics settings (refresh time is 2 minutes and whattomine selected) looks exactly like in your picture, with very big difference from one rig to the other, and the difference is very big, like 50% more for a different pool. It is strange and not logical.
Also everyone must check real hash rate recorded by the pool and also actual payment because it is a very big difference in the amount you are being paid (you get a lot less, and your hash power goes somewhere) compared to what you see in HashRate in AwesomeMiner (not talking about dolars that you can say it depends on exchage rate when converted, I am talkign about constant hasrate that varies less than 1% in 24 hours and you see it going down a lot on pool recordings.
What do you think, patrike about the 2 issues from above ?
Re Patricks post, yes both on the same time rates and when looking at miner details they showed several days of the totally wrong hash rates being pulled from ahashpool, resulting in miner wasting my time on low profit coins.
I just hand no confidence at all in this software switching, I could use it for single coins but I'd rather just use a batch script for that. So instead of labouring the point and trying to find the issue wasting both our time I'll just move on and use something else.
Good luck with it, I'm sure it's ok when it works correctly, but it's just a constant source of frustration for me,
Reminds me of Calibre ebook management, where its all programer, and no thought to user interface or design.
Laters, and enjoy your mining.
