Hey patrike
I have another thought i don't think any one has asked for yet or may have there is a lot of pages to go though for Awesome Miner .
to save you time can you make a add on or add some kind of template that can update to any custom miner we want to add with full states some like the Generic miner but improved to beadle to add the full miner there a lot of mew soft ware miners coming out that are looking like they will blow a way CM and a few others over time. plus you do some amazing things , I'm not saying that to get you do some thing , you do, the thing that still supersizes me the most is the updates you up pump out an don't ask for more money that a lone keeps me using AM an telling others about how good AM is . not that i won't pay i will ... Again I'm not kissing ass to get to some thing it's the truth until it's not.
Topic: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners - page 447. (Read 703512 times)
January 15, 2018, 08:51:49 PM
January 15, 2018, 07:54:27 PM
For me, DSTM 0.5.8, miner kills itself a few seconds after it launches
Tested on Miningpoolhub
Tested on Miningpoolhub
make sure this installed https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=48145
January 15, 2018, 05:29:38 PM
Sorry in advance 
I know it's tacky.
Is there a way to update the little icons for the coins? Like a file we can add jpegs to or something. The gold ? coin is like half my screen lol.
I know it's tacky.Is there a way to update the little icons for the coins? Like a file we can add jpegs to or something. The gold ? coin is like half my screen lol.
January 15, 2018, 05:26:53 PM
Anybody else having problems benchmarking Neoscrypt?
Whenever I run a precise benchmark and with 'all combined' selected, the miner app will start and the benchmark will run, but I'm getting values of 0. When the benchmark finishes, the section 'Benchmark result' remains blank.
With Neoscrypt often the top coin to mine in MPH, AwesomeMiner will not switch because it doesn't think the algo will produce the most hashing power.
Whenever I run a precise benchmark and with 'all combined' selected, the miner app will start and the benchmark will run, but I'm getting values of 0. When the benchmark finishes, the section 'Benchmark result' remains blank.
With Neoscrypt often the top coin to mine in MPH, AwesomeMiner will not switch because it doesn't think the algo will produce the most hashing power.
This also happens to mine only when benchmarking though, I just take the number when it's mining and add it to the profile manually with a right click. It mines for me just fine for me, shows actual total there.
January 15, 2018, 04:58:46 PM
Anybody else having problems benchmarking Neoscrypt?
Whenever I run a precise benchmark and with 'all combined' selected, the miner app will start and the benchmark will run, but I'm getting values of 0. When the benchmark finishes, the section 'Benchmark result' remains blank.
With Neoscrypt often the top coin to mine in MPH, AwesomeMiner will not switch because it doesn't think the algo will produce the most hashing power.
Whenever I run a precise benchmark and with 'all combined' selected, the miner app will start and the benchmark will run, but I'm getting values of 0. When the benchmark finishes, the section 'Benchmark result' remains blank.
With Neoscrypt often the top coin to mine in MPH, AwesomeMiner will not switch because it doesn't think the algo will produce the most hashing power.
January 15, 2018, 04:26:28 PM
Awesome Miner development version 4.3.4 (preview of 4.4)
In addition to preview preview 4.3.3:
- Claymore Dual Ethereum Miner 10.4
- Correction to miner specific worker name not being passed correctly in profit switching scenarios
Important: Remote Agent must be upgraded as well. Once upgrading to this version, you cannot downgrade to an older version without all configuration being lost.
More important: There is unfortunately a bug in the upgrade mechanism for the Awesome Miner main application in development preview 4.3.3. If you have this development preview, you may need to manually use the MSI file below to upgrade the Awesome Miner main application. The Remote Agent should still be possible to upgrade automatically. Sorry for the inconvenience.
The get access to development versions, open the Options dialog in Awesome Miner. In the General section, enable Check for development versions. Then go to the Menu and click Check for updates.
Direct download links:
http://www.awesomeminer.com/download/setupdev/AwesomeMiner.msi
http://www.awesomeminer.com/download/setupdev/AwesomeMinerRemoteService.msi
In addition to preview preview 4.3.3:
- Claymore Dual Ethereum Miner 10.4
- Correction to miner specific worker name not being passed correctly in profit switching scenarios
Important: Remote Agent must be upgraded as well. Once upgrading to this version, you cannot downgrade to an older version without all configuration being lost.
More important: There is unfortunately a bug in the upgrade mechanism for the Awesome Miner main application in development preview 4.3.3. If you have this development preview, you may need to manually use the MSI file below to upgrade the Awesome Miner main application. The Remote Agent should still be possible to upgrade automatically. Sorry for the inconvenience.
The get access to development versions, open the Options dialog in Awesome Miner. In the General section, enable Check for development versions. Then go to the Menu and click Check for updates.
Direct download links:
http://www.awesomeminer.com/download/setupdev/AwesomeMiner.msi
http://www.awesomeminer.com/download/setupdev/AwesomeMinerRemoteService.msi
January 15, 2018, 03:36:35 PM
Thanks for listening to our suggestions and bug reports, that last update really improved the program. I finally only need one miner for most of my rigs, which makes things a little easier to manage.
January 15, 2018, 03:04:28 PM
I would be nice if in the "online services" tab it had "Enabled Services" and "Displayed Services"
Then you could have a column which showed if that pool/algo was enabled.
I like to disable / limit the number of pools so it does not switch as much, but i'm also interested what those pools are saying their profit is.
Then you could have a column which showed if that pool/algo was enabled.
I like to disable / limit the number of pools so it does not switch as much, but i'm also interested what those pools are saying their profit is.
January 15, 2018, 02:51:56 PM
--user s3c70r , even if in the properties I have "Add to workername" checked, it doesn't pass the workername to command line.
We should read --user s3c70r.Rig02
Miningpoolhub doesnt allow connections without a login followed by a workername. ( login.Workername )
I have a s3c70r.Rig01 defined globally in the profit switching section of options to work around the bug.
Please fix ASAP.
I will investigate. Thanks for reportingWe should read --user s3c70r.Rig02
Miningpoolhub doesnt allow connections without a login followed by a workername. ( login.Workername )
I have a s3c70r.Rig01 defined globally in the profit switching section of options to work around the bug.
Please fix ASAP.
AM isn’t passing my worker names to Nicehash anymore either.
January 15, 2018, 02:43:39 PM
Awesome Miner development version 4.3.3 (preview of 4.4)
- Awesome Miner API method to set coin properties, for setting profitability of custom coins from external applications
- Awesome Miner API method to set coin properties, for setting profitability of custom coins from external applications
excuse my English
How can I use bees to set a non-existent coin in the awesomeminer?
Where can I find a guide?
thank you
January 15, 2018, 02:36:45 PM
--user s3c70r , even if in the properties I have "Add to workername" checked, it doesn't pass the workername to command line.
We should read --user s3c70r.Rig02
Miningpoolhub doesnt allow connections without a login followed by a workername. ( login.Workername )
I have a s3c70r.Rig01 defined globally in the profit switching section of options to work around the bug.
Please fix ASAP.
I will investigate. Thanks for reportingWe should read --user s3c70r.Rig02
Miningpoolhub doesnt allow connections without a login followed by a workername. ( login.Workername )
I have a s3c70r.Rig01 defined globally in the profit switching section of options to work around the bug.
Please fix ASAP.
Same here
January 15, 2018, 02:24:42 PM
I would like to be able to switch between profit mining and specified pool mining easier. Currently I have to go to each miner and enable and disable the profit mining.
Can you make it a right click option?
I actually implemented something similar in the latest development version (4.3.3), but in the Options dialog only. Until it's supported via the right-click menu, please go to Options dialog, External Miners and use the bulk-edit feature.Can you make it a right click option?
I see that now, this will work. thanks!
January 15, 2018, 02:22:42 PM
Two identical machines
Even hash rates are within a few MH/s
And yet AMiner, decides to put one on Lara2 for days while the other switches to most profitable as intended
https://i.imgur.com/t8gF99T.jpg
The updated online services show lara as most profitable - but how can it be when the identical set up on the right shows it further down.
The whole software is one big mess as far as I can make out.
How can two identical machines, cards, hashrates, miners, pools everything be showing different profits and mining different alogs.
I'd expect some shenanigans but it's more likely to be incompetence.
Not sure if it's even worth my time trouble shooting going on the past 20 pages of this thread.
But I did reinstall latest miner on both - delete and redo the miners. rerun the benchmarks and yet this still occurs.
So just a heads up - you could very likely be chucking money away, unless you have two machines to check what this software is doing.
Later, and mine safley.
Even hash rates are within a few MH/s
And yet AMiner, decides to put one on Lara2 for days while the other switches to most profitable as intended
https://i.imgur.com/t8gF99T.jpg
The updated online services show lara as most profitable - but how can it be when the identical set up on the right shows it further down.
The whole software is one big mess as far as I can make out.
How can two identical machines, cards, hashrates, miners, pools everything be showing different profits and mining different alogs.
I'd expect some shenanigans but it's more likely to be incompetence.
Not sure if it's even worth my time trouble shooting going on the past 20 pages of this thread.
But I did reinstall latest miner on both - delete and redo the miners. rerun the benchmarks and yet this still occurs.
So just a heads up - you could very likely be chucking money away, unless you have two machines to check what this software is doing.
Later, and mine safley.
January 15, 2018, 02:05:42 PM
--user s3c70r , even if in the properties I have "Add to workername" checked, it doesn't pass the workername to command line.
We should read --user s3c70r.Rig02
Miningpoolhub doesnt allow connections without a login followed by a workername. ( login.Workername )
I have a s3c70r.Rig01 defined globally in the profit switching section of options to work around the bug.
Please fix ASAP.
I will investigate. Thanks for reporting We should read --user s3c70r.Rig02
Miningpoolhub doesnt allow connections without a login followed by a workername. ( login.Workername )
I have a s3c70r.Rig01 defined globally in the profit switching section of options to work around the bug.
Please fix ASAP.
January 15, 2018, 01:25:05 PM
I would like to be able to switch between profit mining and specified pool mining easier. Currently I have to go to each miner and enable and disable the profit mining.
Can you make it a right click option?
I actually implemented something similar in the latest development version (4.3.3), but in the Options dialog only. Until it's supported via the right-click menu, please go to Options dialog, External Miners and use the bulk-edit feature. Can you make it a right click option?
January 15, 2018, 01:21:00 PM
@patrike
Can you please check if profit switching ignores "power" settings in the profile? Seems as if profit switching only switches for "revenue" not for "profit" as seen in the online services tab.
As seen here...
cryptonight would be more profitable, because it consumes less power - but it is mining yescrypt. I don't care about the few cents, just wanted to show, that there might be a bug.
Btw. - IF there is a bug and you fix it - please make sure, that it won't start any mining with negative profit
Thansk for support
The profit switcher should look at the profit, not revenue. Can you verify that if you right click on the miner and select View Details? Can you please check if profit switching ignores "power" settings in the profile? Seems as if profit switching only switches for "revenue" not for "profit" as seen in the online services tab.
As seen here...
cryptonight would be more profitable, because it consumes less power - but it is mining yescrypt. I don't care about the few cents, just wanted to show, that there might be a bug.
Btw. - IF there is a bug and you fix it - please make sure, that it won't start any mining with negative profit
Thansk for support
January 15, 2018, 01:20:00 PM
Did not get any answer or help
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=55170
January 15, 2018, 01:18:40 PM
Portable (usb) edition possible? I see only install versions.
That's currently not supported. January 15, 2018, 01:15:34 PM
With AM 4.3.3:
It seems like XMRig Nvidia has some bad defaults in it. On two separate systems now with a different mix of GPUs it keeps throwing a GPU out of memory error. This happens with 1080ti, 1070ti and 1050ti based systems.
https://github.com/xmrig/xmrig-nvidia/issues/47
Seems related, but not sure if the default config.json in AppData/Local/AwesomeMiner/ is ok to edit or even the config that's passed to xmrig.
I also had an issue with DSTM (and sometimes ccminer) mixing up GPU ordering in a system with a few 1050ti's and 1 1060. It makes benchmarking tricky since when I'm trying to bench the 1050ti's it will sometimes bench the 1060 instead for certain algorithms.
It seems like XMRig Nvidia has some bad defaults in it. On two separate systems now with a different mix of GPUs it keeps throwing a GPU out of memory error. This happens with 1080ti, 1070ti and 1050ti based systems.
https://github.com/xmrig/xmrig-nvidia/issues/47
Seems related, but not sure if the default config.json in AppData/Local/AwesomeMiner/
I also had an issue with DSTM (and sometimes ccminer) mixing up GPU ordering in a system with a few 1050ti's and 1 1060. It makes benchmarking tricky since when I'm trying to bench the 1050ti's it will sometimes bench the 1060 instead for certain algorithms.
January 15, 2018, 01:04:42 PM
For me, DSTM 0.5.8, miner kills itself a few seconds after it launches
Tested on Miningpoolhub
Tested on Miningpoolhub
You have the same issue as I was having. View my work around in my previous post.
Cheers!
Jump to: