Initially you say that you receive from us an email with your password supposedly open (although we encode all the passwords and can not find them) and we do not send you emails when registering.
I was talking to inkha about his review site. I made that clear by quoting the post I was replying to in my reply.
Now you blame us that that we lied about the time of the withdrawal, being inattentive. Please excuse us, but we start to doubt your honesty.
I'm not accusing you of lying.
YOu found a bug, thanks for you for that, we were not required to pay for it but nevertheless we did not haggle with you and we have added to your's balance as much as you asked, despite we have had very great difficulties with the bankroll at that moment , and we remind you that you said that will not withdraw them at all, as you play, so waiting 24 hours for you will not be a big problem.
I don't mind waiting 24 hours.
I would suggest however that if a 0.5 BTC withdraw is going to cause you problems then you shouldn't be offering a 100x payout with a 0.1 BTC max bet. That allows people to win 9.9 BTC per bet. What are you going to do if someone wins that much?
Not a problem for honesty users and deceitful competitors can wait, the more we do not break our rules.
User dooglus dismisses deceitful rumors about our site, besides, he left us a dishonest assessment on the site
http://bitcoingambling.reviews/ballonbit-com/ and this is after we gave him 1 BTC to his balance for his help. We did not understand the reason for his actions but for today revealed that he owns the site competitor us and the truth came to light. So we reserve the right to pick up our gift back, which he did not have time to withdraw (0.5 BTC) because of new circumstances. If you believe that we have been treated unfairly please type your opinion here to change our mind.
First, I'd like to say that I enjoy your site, think it has great potential and want to see it succeed.
With that being said, I really think you need to step back and give this a little more thought before making any rash decisions.
Yes, Dooglus has opened a new site, however I have no reason to believe he needs to smear any other sites and he's only competing against your site indirectly as he is only operating in Clams (an alt-coin that takes some hoop-jumping to play for actual bitcoin).
If Dooglus had malicious intent, I think he would have quietly exploited your code and destroyed your wallet instead of bringing it to light so that your site is able to move forward.
Please also note that I do not know Dooglus and have brought some concerns to his attention about his site as well (that he has responded to in his just-dice thread).
I think this is more of a problem of miscommunication. The review site that was mentioned here had a few flaws, one of them being passwords being emailed (that you mistook as your site being accused of this) and the inability to edit the reviews without providing new scores.
I am speculating here, but I believe Dooglus gave you a low trust score not because he thought that you couldn't be trusted, but because you are a relatively new site, you are not well known in the bitcoin community, and there's not enough experience or history to really base a good trust rating off of.
Trust is earned and I think you have the opportunity to show that you deserve it. I can only imagine the frustrations of being a gaming site operator and Dooglus can probably share a few stories with you, but going back on your word will never fix this issue and permanently damage your reputation.