I received this today from Shelby via PM. Submitted here without commment for your consideration:
I written detailed analysis in my protonmail to several of you. But some of you are not in my trusted discussion group.
Bitcoin beginning a parabolic moonshot! Altcoins may crash now until later this year!
Here are the various projections I have for the new ATH price around March 2020:
1. $1154 ÷ $260 × $19666 = $87287 ($260 #3 on April 10, 2013)
2. $1154 ÷ $63 × $3122 = $57187 ($63 long-winded bottom after #3 in 2013)
3. $31 ÷ $1.10 × $19666 = $554223 ($1.10 #3 on Feb 10, 2011)
4. $32 ÷ $0.70 × $3122 = $142720 ($0.70 long-winded bottom after #3 in 20131)
($1154 for #5 and #1 on Nov 30, 2013, Bitstamp, projected to early March 2020)
($32 for #5 and #1 on Jun 8, 2011, Bitstamp, projected to early March 2020)
5. Drawing a line through the #3 in 2011 through the #3 in 2013, also runs through the #5 and #1 on Nov 30, 2013. Drawing a line through the #3 in 2013 through the #3 in 2017, project to approximately $133,000 for the #5 and #1 posited to occur March 2020.
6. A Markov model predicted the volatility range for Bitcoin in 1 year between $3k (our bottom) and $82k:
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-bitcoin-price-prediction-for-2019/answer/John-Young-390Here is some more on that:
https://medium.com/@VidrihMarko/bitcoin-2020-at-one-million-is-this-really-realistic-ca8992a23fbf7. Let’s consider John Mcafee’s unspecified model:
https://micky.com.au/russian-economist-insists-us-sanctions-will-push-bitcoin-to-2m/https://bitcoinexchangeguide.com/john-mcafee-says-point-set-technology-puts-bitcoins-price-at-least-1-million-by-end-of-2020/https://twitter.com/officialmcafee/status/887039604846714881https://twitter.com/officialmcafee/status/1124436476962516994Also realize his $1 million prediction is by the end of 2020, but he not considering the volatility in the price:
https://twitter.com/officialmcafee/status/938938539282190337So crash in the price before the end of 2020 could derail his bet, even though in terms of fundamental valuation he might be correct.
But how could Mcafee be correct? Now look again at @infofront’s chart:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.44351466And read my reply to John Mcafee:
Quote from:
https://twitter.com/iamnotback/status/1126843991637409792If that #3 – #5 (2018–2020) is extension of #1 (≤ 2010) – #3 (2017), not #1 (2014)? (c.f. linked chart)
Quote from:
https://twitter.com/iamnotback/status/1126845026716094464Notice that #1 – #2 has a less steep slope than #3 – #5, thus returning to the rate of ascent of < 2011 for the coming #5, topologically connects patterns within patterns. Nature is fractal.