This is why kiddies aren't allowed to drive.
Topic: Basic IQ test on Satoshi's identity (Read 6113 times)
Hawking doesn't have to communicate with people of low IQ. So he doesn't have to be frank about ignorance. Satoshi was in fact very intolerant of idiots. Ditto Steve Jobs and Bill Gates who were both widely reported to belittle idiots into the dirt. I am significantly more kind, patient and tolerant than they were.
I have explained a bit about what intellect is and taught an example herein of how to reduce unsolvable multivariate problems to a solvable core logic by eliminating dependent variables.
I have explained a bit about what intellect is and taught an example herein of how to reduce unsolvable multivariate problems to a solvable core logic by eliminating dependent variables.
Forensic identification
The hysterical goggling of uncausal reflections of Jesus on the bathroom tiles after profusely scrubbing and polishing with Comet.
The hysterical goggling of uncausal reflections of Jesus on the bathroom tiles after profusely scrubbing and polishing with Comet.
All 30% of you. The other 70% know who the dunces are.
The theories on Satoshi's identity that require he is careless fails because he wasn't careless. He was extra cautious. Satoshi was no careless, poor communicator like Dorian. Spend some time reading his posts. Dorian can't even communicate as well as Satoshi wrote.
The most exciting aspect of all this is the real Satoshi may have communicated, "I am not Dorian Nakamoto".
That is plausible and would have amazing implications.
The theories on Satoshi's identity that require he is careless fails because he wasn't careless. He was extra cautious. Satoshi was no careless, poor communicator like Dorian. Spend some time reading his posts. Dorian can't even communicate as well as Satoshi wrote.
The most exciting aspect of all this is the real Satoshi may have communicated, "I am not Dorian Nakamoto".
That is plausible and would have amazing implications.
When you conflate irrelevant details, it exhibits low IQ.
When you post idiotic polls that start with implicit assumptions and end with dumb logic, it tends to suggest that you're just fucking retarded.+1
I like this response.
Sigh. Dunces be gone from me.
Very smart people know me as being a very astute reductionist.
LOL!
One of the reasons I started this thread, was to teach. To help others be smarter. That is empathy.
No, that is the ego shielding itself behind the concept of empathy.
The truth is that even the greatest geniuses can have lack of foresight that is later seen as stupid mistakes. See Tesla. No matter how high IQ/intellect you believe you have, it IS possible that Dorian is the real Satoshi. Is your right hemisphere damaged to the point that you can't intellectually understand that there are an unknown number of unknown variables involved that you haven't considered?
Thank you. This is a much better rendering of the point I was trying to make. I don't even care whether DPSN is SN or not. In fact it seems unlikely to me. But that is not the point.
You made the point well there.
Very smart people know me as being a very astute reductionist.
LOL!
One of the reasons I started this thread, was to teach. To help others be smarter. That is empathy.
No, that is the ego shielding itself behind the concept of empathy.
The truth is that even the greatest geniuses can have lack of foresight that is later seen as stupid mistakes. See Tesla. No matter how high IQ/intellect you believe you have, it IS possible that Dorian is the real Satoshi. Is your right hemisphere damaged to the point that you can't intellectually understand that there are an unknown number of unknown variables involved that you haven't considered?
All those people who vote "no" and have been posting in the recent threads about whether that Japanese guy in CA is the real Satoshi, took the blue pill (i.e. you are losing your sanity).
Those who vote "yes" are just dumb.
Those who vote "yes" are just dumb.
All those people who vote "no" and have been posting in the recent threads about whether that Japanese guy in CA is the real Satoshi, took the blue pill (i.e. you are losing your sanity). Those who vote "yes" are just dumb.
Thank you. I'm too old and lazy to read that fine letters.
High IQ and the ability to make stupid mistakes are not mutually exclusive (unless your trying to infer that Satoshi is a complete idiot). Even the greatest minds have made errors it is only human. That being said it would be a completely and utterly stupid move to make all the effort to remain anonymous and use your name as your handle.
Logic fail. If he is rational and if he made the mistake of putting his real name on the original paper, then he wouldn't bother putting so much effort on being anonymous after that, because he is smart and rational enough to realize he already fucked it up.
He tried. He disappeared.
He disappeared after being PERFECTLY diligent on anonymity for 2 years after you claim he revealed his anonymity by putting his real name on the paper.
I wonder if you even have two pebbles to rub together inside your vacuous cranium.
High IQ and the ability to make stupid mistakes are not mutually exclusive (unless your trying to infer that Satoshi is a complete idiot). Even the greatest minds have made errors it is only human. That being said it would be a completely and utterly stupid move to make all the effort to remain anonymous and use your name as your handle.
Logic fail. If he is rational and if he made the mistake of putting his real name on the original paper, then he wouldn't bother putting so much effort on being anonymous after that, because he is smart and rational enough to realize he already fucked it up.
He tried. He disappeared.
And the stupid won't quit...
Logic. And logic. And logic. And logic.
Of course he would use his own name because he was only contributing an idea. His paper even did not name it bitcoin.
Things only started to become complicated at least several years later when he realized how much a heat he created and how rich he could be... Then he disappeared.
I don't understand how hard this is to think through.
Things only started to become complicated at least several years later when he realized how much a heat he created and how rich he could be... Then he disappeared.
I don't understand how hard this is to think through.
Logic. And logic. And logic. And logic.
You also fail to understand that 60 year old men can't innovate the way a 20, 30, or 40 year old man can.
It is very unlikely that the very creative solution to the Byzantine General's problem (an unsolved open problem since 1975) would come from such an old man.
Which means my clock is ticking and I hear it. I turn 49 this June.
So damn! Why I am losing time here on this forum
It is very unlikely that the very creative solution to the Byzantine General's problem (an unsolved open problem since 1975) would come from such an old man.
Which means my clock is ticking and I hear it. I turn 49 this June.
So damn! Why I am losing time here on this forum
If I said the sky is blue and it insulted you because you think it is not, does that mean I am angry.
That proves the logic of my prior post. But you won't understand, because you do not grasp well formal logic (statement of fact based on you not understanding my prior post).
That proves the logic of my prior post. But you won't understand, because you do not grasp well formal logic (statement of fact based on you not understanding my prior post).
This is most amusing. You're under the delusion I have voted on this poll while I merely made an observation about how you and others in this thread are greatly upset by not receiving a 100% no vote.
You appear to consider yourself highly intelligent while having done nothing but resort to petty insults. From this I can't help but assume you're angry.
Angry enough to insult anyone in this thread intruding on your circlejerk.
However, I am sorry for intruding on the circlejerk going on in this thread. I shall take my popcorn elsewhere.
Enjoy your continued discussion about the great discovery of fitting a square peg into a square hole.
Logic fail.
Useless poll, watch: http://www.bloomberg.com/video/did-newsweek-uncover-the-wrong-nakamato-jQlEjzLuQ~6aEKN4NhDgow.html
They clearly state already, how they "found" him. Best is the explanation, why he must be the right one: "Because there is no reason, why he isn't".
They clearly state already, how they "found" him. Best is the explanation, why he must be the right one: "Because there is no reason, why he isn't".
Add this:
http://www.bloomberg.com/video/can-the-real-dorian-nakamoto-please-stand-up-vSiahPV4ReyViJX2_IJhZw.html
She has no evidence whatsoever. It is circumstantial circus.
If I said the sky is blue and it insulted you because you think it is not, does that mean I am angry.
That proves the logic of my prior post. But you won't understand, because you do not grasp well formal logic (statement of fact based on you not understanding my prior post).
That proves the logic of my prior post. But you won't understand, because you do not grasp well formal logic (statement of fact based on you not understanding my prior post).
This is most amusing. You're under the delusion I have voted on this poll while I merely made an observation about how you and others in this thread are greatly upset by not receiving a 100% no vote.
You appear to consider yourself highly intelligent while having done nothing but resort to petty insults. From this I can't help but assume you're angry.
Angry enough to insult anyone in this thread intruding on your circlejerk.
However, I am sorry for intruding on the circlejerk going on in this thread. I shall take my popcorn elsewhere.
Enjoy your continued discussion about the great discovery of fitting a square peg into a square hole.
Again, I was ashamed to see our community spiral off into zillion threads about who is Dorian.
We have more important work to be doing.
And we don't need an emotional community. We need a rational one.
So I tried to interject a bit of teaching about logic.
As usual, this will fail becauseeveryonemany will shoot the messenger when they don't like the message.
We have more important work to be doing.
And we don't need an emotional community. We need a rational one.
So I tried to interject a bit of teaching about logic.
As usual, this will fail because
Useless poll, watch: http://www.bloomberg.com/video/did-newsweek-uncover-the-wrong-nakamato-jQlEjzLuQ~6aEKN4NhDgow.html
They clearly state already, how they "found" him. Best is the explanation, why he must be the right one: "Because there is no reason, why he isn't".
They clearly state already, how they "found" him. Best is the explanation, why he must be the right one: "Because there is no reason, why he isn't".
If I said the sky is blue and it insulted you because you think it is not, does that mean I am angry.
Just because the statement-of-fact reflects on people and not the sky, does not change the logic.
That proves the logic of my prior post. But you won't understand, because you do not grasp well formal logic (statement of fact based on you not understanding my prior post).
I don't feel anger towards people here, except when they get angry at me when I try to state my logic. Even then, I don't really feel angry, it is more like a feeling of "I'm wasting time, how can I get some positive result from this" realization.
I usually come to the conclusion that the wisest move would be to say nothing, which is what most smart people do.
Yet I've always been chatty and wanted to help people learn. I was often helping my friends with their homework, etc..
Just because the statement-of-fact reflects on people and not the sky, does not change the logic.
That proves the logic of my prior post. But you won't understand, because you do not grasp well formal logic (statement of fact based on you not understanding my prior post).
I don't feel anger towards people here, except when they get angry at me when I try to state my logic. Even then, I don't really feel angry, it is more like a feeling of "I'm wasting time, how can I get some positive result from this" realization.
I usually come to the conclusion that the wisest move would be to say nothing, which is what most smart people do.
Yet I've always been chatty and wanted to help people learn. I was often helping my friends with their homework, etc..
Jump to: