i have many machine but it just solo by themsleves.
can i use them to mine same block
thanks.
Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 405. (Read 1210753 times)
who can teach me how to mine the bbr with Online mining
i have many machine but it just solo by themsleves.
can i use them to mine same block
thanks.
i have many machine but it just solo by themsleves.
can i use them to mine same block
thanks.
I started a general thread on CryptoNote, please join discussion under:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/general-cryptonote-community-thread-658884.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/general-cryptonote-community-thread-658884.
My question would be, what are you doing with all the coins?? Not that it's any of my business, but the trading volume seems to suggest you are holding them.
A combination of trickle sale and putting them for sale above the current market price.
I don't think we've ever held more than 10000 BBR at once.
Christian
well, as you seem honest, this is nice to know
My question would be, what are you doing with all the coins?? Not that it's any of my business, but the trading volume seems to suggest you are holding them.
A combination of trickle sale and putting them for sale above the current market price.
I don't think we've ever held more than 10000 BBR at once.
Christian
Ignore the haters Christian. Without you, Nvidia users would be still in the dark when it came to mining. This guy has bought more equitable mining software to the table than anyone else. The problem here was using an algo that could be adapted to GPU's without putting in the work to make such any such mining software before release. With a big block reward, and the current price, the boolberry devs should be getting off the asses and making things happen.
My question would be, what are you doing with all the coins?? Not that it's any of my business, but the trading volume seems to suggest you are holding them.
My question would be, what are you doing with all the coins?? Not that it's any of my business, but the trading volume seems to suggest you are holding them.
The plan after that is to integrate long-polling, which should finally bring simpleminer into nearly-full speed parity with solo.
-clap- -clap-
I might be one of the few but Christian, do what you do. You deserve it.
Isn't this like what happened with Prime Coin? People knew a CPU miner existed but no one would claim it and they mined the heck out of it. When did a miner finally get released? When it wasn't profitable.
Isn't this like what happened with Prime Coin? People knew a CPU miner existed but no one would claim it and they mined the heck out of it. When did a miner finally get released? When it wasn't profitable.
I spent some time auditing simpleminer for missing failure tests; only found one. This patch updates it (it should be something nobody would encounter in any normal situation, but I wanted to be sure to cover it in case of weird pool failures / timing so the client wouldn't fail).
https://github.com/dave-andersen/boolberry/commit/903f81cf13f57f023fdc61a55c5f3ab7d49ef1aa
will test overnight and push tomorrow if nobody notices problems.
The plan after that is to integrate long-polling, which should finally bring simpleminer into nearly-full speed parity with solo.
https://github.com/dave-andersen/boolberry/commit/903f81cf13f57f023fdc61a55c5f3ab7d49ef1aa
will test overnight and push tomorrow if nobody notices problems.
The plan after that is to integrate long-polling, which should finally bring simpleminer into nearly-full speed parity with solo.
BBR is go down..what's going on
dev please fork, your coin is too good to be destroyed by one greed idiot.
I agree. Has anyone considered if they would be willing to accept a closed-source fork? I think dev has the capability to provide the software necessary to continue.
What do people think?
From a legal standpoint, the MIT license under which ByteCoin was originally published is pretty permissive.
I would not recommend it. No one would trust a closed source cryptocurrency.
I offered to publish an (open source) nVidia GPU miner provided some stratum support is available. What else do you want?
They still even have a proper binary for Mac and Linux after 1 month launch, Christian. Why do you bother?
It seems like Prof. Andersen having much interests in this coin too, but he's too busy for other things. Sorry but I just see a lot of flaws in this coin. Amazing that it got pump so hard.
Linux compiles normally.
Boolberry was the first CryptoNote coin to even support Mac.
The only person asking for compiling help recently was using Ubuntu 12.04. I provided him with instructions.
Do you need help?
No thanks. I appreciate that but I can compile myself. But for some users could be a problem then if you don't provide a linux binary for them. And then why no new binary version for Mac? Should I compile one and send you dga's version ?
Btw I don't know which one has it first but QCN has even a simple GUI wallet for Mac.
Made a RPC-based GUI is easy. BBR devs want to integrate GI with C-level CryptoNote coin API, which is much harder.
dev please fork, your coin is too good to be destroyed by one greed idiot.
I agree. Has anyone considered if they would be willing to accept a closed-source fork? I think dev has the capability to provide the software necessary to continue.
What do people think?
From a legal standpoint, the MIT license under which ByteCoin was originally published is pretty permissive.
I would not recommend it. No one would trust a closed source cryptocurrency.
I offered to publish an (open source) nVidia GPU miner provided some stratum support is available. What else do you want?
They still even have a proper binary for Mac and Linux after 1 month launch, Christian. Why do you bother?
It seems like Prof. Andersen having much interests in this coin too, but he's too busy for other things. Sorry but I just see a lot of flaws in this coin. Amazing that it got pump so hard.
Linux compiles normally.
Boolberry was the first CryptoNote coin to even support Mac.
The only person asking for compiling help recently was using Ubuntu 12.04. I provided him with instructions.
Do you need help?
No thanks. I appreciate that but I can compile myself. But for some users could be a problem then if you don't provide a linux binary for them. And then why no new binary version for Mac? Should I compile one and send you dga's version ?
Btw I don't know which one has it first but QCN has even a simple GUI wallet for Mac.
Thanks for your input. No one has asked for it, but I will make sure we get some Linux binaries up there.
Crypto_Zoidberg was having problems with his Mac. I will check with him on the Mac binaries.
blah blah blah
You live on a different planet.
Just because someone makes something, doesn't mean they're obligated to share it with everyone else. And if you really believe that, I'm coming to your place for dinner every night.
but isnt it the responsibility of everything else to fix the situation and make it fair again?
If you REALLY want to fix it and make it fair, create your own miner and open source it.
blah blah blah
You live on a different planet.
Just because someone makes something, doesn't mean they're obligated to share it with everyone else. And if you really believe that, I'm coming to your place for dinner every night.
but isnt it the responsibility of everything else to fix the situation and make it fair again?
Lol .. this argument is ridiculous , he deserve it because he freaking did it , it start and stop there.
Still not seeing why he deserves the huge advantage. We don't have to allow it to continue. Or is he entitled to the opportunity to have an advantage? 
He have every right to use his own tools and not share it .. Again , there is nothing more to add to this. Yes he deserve the tool he have built.. lol .. This is retarded even debating this.
blah blah blah
You live on a different planet.
Just because someone makes something, doesn't mean they're obligated to share it with everyone else. And if you really believe that, I'm coming to your place for dinner every night.
The lengths people will go to to justify their greed..
The lengths people will go to to secure their income..
Fixed that for you.
I respect what you do surfer, but this is not a good look.
The lengths people will go to to justify their greed..
The lengths people will go to to secure their income..
Fixed that for you.
Let's say I own an ice cream shop that makes ice cream cones the fastest and the best. Do you expect me to give you your own ice cream shop? If you do, that's called entitlement.
If the society of which you are a part of has a structure built on community outreach, support and the spread of open source(free ice cream) software, then yes, I would not entirely consider this "entitlement". It is breaking the underlined meaning of cryptocoins and if that is what you rally for over all, then I suppose you are a detriment to the community.
He also has a long track record of transparency, and has put countless hours of work into other open source projects that I am certain some of you have taken advantage of.
This does not outweigh the harm this is causing and furthermore he is taking something that was built for the open source community and putting shackles on its growth, deterring miners and bringing a bad name to a coin and everything the devs here have put into it. Its caustic to his name and in my mind will be the one who chose profit over community; a true socialist.
With all that said, I have nothing invested in this coin, but have a lot vested in the community. I have a whopping 10 sent to me from a logo competition and am set to lose nothing. I say all of this not as an investor or miner, but as someone who sees support being brought to this by others. I understand your reason of why he "should" be in the right in doing this, but this does not really transcend into this medium.
I just don't get it .. how is it ''unfair'' ? ''HE'' built a miner and it work well , it just sound like ppl are butthurt because he keep it for himself. Well nothing to be done about it.
Would ''you'' stop your money printing machine and share it with everyone ? .. Doubt it.
It is in his best interest over everyone else .. Well yeah , just like anyone with a massive mining farm... That is just how it works.
He has said himself the changes to adapt the Keccak GPU miner to Wild Keccak are simple. He does not "deserve" the ridiculous advantage.Would ''you'' stop your money printing machine and share it with everyone ? .. Doubt it.
It is in his best interest over everyone else .. Well yeah , just like anyone with a massive mining farm... That is just how it works.
Lol .. this argument is ridiculous , he deserve it because he freaking did it , it start and stop there. And if it is this easy , then he probably isn't the only one that have done it. And they probably just don't say it while mining for themselves.
He deserve it more than you or me, period.
Private optimized miners (gpu or cpu ) are more frequent than most of us believe. The point here is that the developpers of ccminer openly admitted the existence of their private miner and the others miners are angry from this potentially unfair advantage.
If there is an hardfork, there will be some private miners again for sure (cpu only if the algo is more gpu resistant)... but secretive this time : not sure it will be better since ccminer dev have good intention toward bbr.
If there is an hardfork, there will be some private miners again for sure (cpu only if the algo is more gpu resistant)... but secretive this time : not sure it will be better since ccminer dev have good intention toward bbr.
Jump to: