[BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 404.

cubydu

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Does anybody knows config options for cryptonote coin daemon ? I want add upstart script for solo mining in daemon with specific threads and wallet address

With command line options I got this

Code:

[1;37m2014-Jun-21 12:07:53.295266 Core initialized OK
ESC[0mESC[1;37m2014-Jun-21 12:07:53.295389 Starting core rpc server...
ESC[0mESC[1;37m2014-Jun-21 12:07:53.295438 Run net_service loop( 2 threads)...
ESC[0mESC[1;37m2014-Jun-21 12:07:53.295561 Failed to read line. Stopping...
ESC[0mESC[1;37m2014-Jun-21 12:07:53.295777 [node] Stop signal sent
ESC[0mESC[1;37m2014-Jun-21 12:07:53.295684 [SRV_MAIN]Core rpc server started ok
ESC[0mESC[1;37m2014-Jun-21 12:07:53.295858 [SRV_MAIN]Starting p2p net loop...
ESC[0mESC[1;37m2014-Jun-21 12:07:53.295914 [SRV_MAIN]Run net_service loop( 10 threads)...
ESC[0mESC[1;37m2014-Jun-21 12:07:53.295968 [SRV_MAIN]net_service loop stopped.
ESC[0mESC[1;37m2014-Jun-21 12:07:53.296011 [SRV_MAIN]p2p net loop stopped
ESC[0mESC[1;37m2014-Jun-21 12:07:53.296051 [SRV_MAIN]Stopping core rpc server...
ESC[0mESC[1;37m2014-Jun-21 12:07:53.296126 [SRV_MAIN]Deinitializing core...
ESC[0mESC[1;37m2014-Jun-21 12:07:53.296182 [SRV_MAIN]Mining has been stopped, 0 finished
ESC[0mESC[1;37m2014-Jun-21 12:07:53.296377 [SRV_MAIN]Storing blockchain...
ESC[0mESC[1;37m2014-Jun-21 12:07:53.296624 [SRV_MAIN]Blockchain stored OK.
ESC[0mESC[1;37m2014-Jun-21 12:07:53.296678 [SRV_MAIN]Deinitializing rpc server ...
ESC[0mESC[1;37m2014-Jun-21 12:07:53.296721 [SRV_MAIN]Deinitializing cryptonote_protocol...
ESC[0mESC[1;37m2014-Jun-21 12:07:53.296770 [SRV_MAIN]Deinitializing p2p...
ESC[0mESC[1;37m2014-Jun-21 12:07:53.296902 [SRV_MAIN]Node stopped.
ESC[0mESC[1;37m2014-Jun-21 12:07:53.297142 [SRV_MAIN]Mining has been stopped, 0 finished

dga

hero member

Activity: 737

Merit: 511

Quote from: bctx on June 21, 2014, 06:33:52 AM

...
Weird. I'm using two different computers, with two different firewalls, on an internet connection with a 10ms ping time. Sometimes it's all green, then for a few minutes at a time, I get a ton of shares that fail to submit (and a few failed shares in-between from time to time). Not sure what the problem is.

Are you on the latest version? That looks like one or two of the bugs I fixed in some commits last week -- please update your source or binaries if you haven't already. If you have, could you let me know the git revision of your source checkout, or where you got your binary from?

bctx

newbie

Activity: 34

Merit: 0

http://i61.tinypic.com/k3umuc.png
[/quote]

I'm currently still mining on port 7777 with no issues.
[/quote]

Weird. I'm using two different computers, with two different firewalls, on an internet connection with a 10ms ping time. Sometimes it's all green, then for a few minutes at a time, I get a ton of shares that fail to submit (and a few failed shares in-between from time to time). Not sure what the problem is.

ryen123

sr. member

Activity: 292

Merit: 250

Quote from: bctx on June 21, 2014, 05:49:32 AM

Given ExtremePool is the only working pool for Boolberry, I'm assuming others are also experiencing errors with simpleminer submitting shares. Is this a pool issue or a miner issue? I get the errors on port 5555 and 7777 all the same.

I'm currently still mining on port 7777 with no issues.

bctx

newbie

Activity: 34

Merit: 0

Given ExtremePool is the only working pool for Boolberry, I'm assuming others are also experiencing errors with simpleminer submitting shares. Is this a pool issue or a miner issue? I get the errors on port 5555 and 7777 all the same.

http://i61.tinypic.com/k3umuc.png

dga

hero member

Activity: 737

Merit: 511

Quote from: 33zer0w0lf on June 21, 2014, 12:33:54 AM

I have spoken to LucasJones about stratum, the pool he code he released, same that is running @ http://bbr.extremepool.org, does support stratum, so that part is already done. What we are missing is a cpuminer like cpuminer-multi from either LucasJones or Wolf that can mine with the wild keccak algo.

The mining is easy, and I can add that if someone wants - what's needed is getting the scratchpad sync'd to the cpuminer.

crypto_zoidberg

hero member

Activity: 976

Merit: 646

Quote from: YoyodyneSystems on June 21, 2014, 03:10:03 AM

Quote from: thinker-jone on June 21, 2014, 01:15:19 AM

good coin but i have missed.... Tongue

the price is too high for buying.

1/16th the market cap of Monero. I think it's pretty cheap

Plenty of room to grow.

Two very clear "stairs" on the chart the last couple weeks.
90 btc volume today and high volume all week.
Price was stable as someone bought up all the coins the last few days with high volume every day.

It's going up. For sure.

Also would be good to get it on Coinmarketcap.com now. I think it's time.
Just submit that block explorer over there to the CMC submission form. That's all it takes.

I asked Mike to take care about it.
Hope we will be there soon!

YoyodyneSystems

legendary

Activity: 1386

Merit: 1023

Quote from: thinker-jone on June 21, 2014, 01:15:19 AM

good coin but i have missed.... Tongue

the price is too high for buying.

1/16th the market cap of Monero. I think it's pretty cheap

Plenty of room to grow.

Two very clear "stairs" on the chart the last couple weeks.
90 btc volume today and high volume all week.
Price was stable as someone bought up all the coins the last few days with high volume every day.

It's going up. For sure.

Also would be good to get it on Coinmarketcap.com now. I think it's time.
Just submit that block explorer over there to the CMC submission form. That's all it takes.

thinker-jone

newbie

Activity: 48

Merit: 0

good coin but i have missed.... Tongue

the price is too high for buying.

33zer0w0lf

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: btc-mike on June 21, 2014, 01:04:34 AM

Quote from: 33zer0w0lf on June 21, 2014, 12:33:54 AM

I have spoken to LucasJones about stratum, the pool he code he released, same that is running @ http://ultrbooCrybbr.extremepool.org, does support stratum, so that part is already done. What we are missing is a cpumer like cpuminer-multi from either LucasJones or Wolf that can mine with the wild keccak algo.

Is it full stratum? Don't the other CN coins use a broken version of stratum?

that's a good question as far as I am aware it is full stratum, and lucas confirmed the pool code does support startum that we just need a miner that was capable of mining such as minerd

btc-mike

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 1001

Quote from: 33zer0w0lf on June 21, 2014, 12:33:54 AM

I have spoken to LucasJones about stratum, the pool he code he released, same that is running @ http://ultrbooCrybbr.extremepool.org, does support stratum, so that part is already done. What we are missing is a cpumer like cpuminer-multi from either LucasJones or Wolf that can mine with the wild keccak algo.

Is it full stratum? Don't the other CN coins use a broken version of stratum?

33zer0w0lf

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

I have spoken to LucasJones about stratum, the pool he code he released, same that is running @ http://bbr.extremepool.org, does support stratum, so that part is already done. What we are missing is a cpuminer like cpuminer-multi from either LucasJones or Wolf that can mine with the wild keccak algo.

crypto_zoidberg

hero member

Activity: 976

Merit: 646

Hi folk!
Last 3 days i spent experementig with CPU miner optimizations.
I took original optimized code from http://keccak.noekeon.org, spent a lot of time adding macros for wild keccak, spent a lot of time finding a bugs in macros (finding bugs in macros it's real nighmare ), and then i've got some interesting results that i want to share.

On this graph vertical axis shows time spent for calculating 100000 hashes in two different algos and it horizontal axis shows how scratchpad is growing (for about one year).

Green lines it's a windows versions, as you could see optimzed version showed about 25% boost compared with original algo.
But, as the same code makes reverse effect in linux(blue lines) - optimized version works slower.

I guess it because ms compiler sucks

gcc version is faster and doesn't need some manual optimization.
But, as i talked with dga, he also had some linux specific optimizations, that makes 10-15% boost, he is going to contribute it also.

This graph is built on my core i5, i think it would be interesting for all, if we get differen graphs for different CPUs.
HowTo get graph:
1. git pull
2. make -j
3. ./build/release/tests/performance_tests

after few performance tests you'll see something this:

Code:

sz	                 original	 opt       
992                 	2057      	2270      
100992              	2058      	2268      
200992              	2065      	2273      
300992              	2073      	2267      
400992              	2075      	2268      
500992              	2091      	2281      
....

Now wait .... about 30-minutes, until numbers will be close to 100000000 (100MB scratchpad).
After that, just copy this text into any spreadsheets (i used google online spreadsheets) and make a graph from this.

PS: This graph should also explain why some people complain that new build have "bad" hash rate - here you can see how hash calculation is slowing down.

What next:
1. Tomorrow i'll make windows build that use optimized version and works a little faster
2. Also tomorrow we going to release GUI (if apple developer will finally create a bundle for macos precompiled binaries)
2. I'll start to work on stratum pool.

33zer0w0lf

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

hey dga where is the latest repo at with the latest updates?

otila

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

Quote from: dga on June 20, 2014, 12:19:55 PM

- I've pushed the NODELAY change into the open pull request with the reliability fix:

I applied both of those and it works OK (tried also with reconnect (new socket)).

dga

hero member

Activity: 737

Merit: 511

- I've pushed the NODELAY change into the open pull request with the reliability fix:

https://github.com/cryptozoidberg/boolberry/pull/28

It's simple enough that I think it's worth doing now. Whether you see any benefits from this will depend a lot on your system and the timing of writes.

Otila, can you confirm that this is as effective for you as your patch was?

- Thanks for the /4 comment about the scratchpad corruption. That bug is still on my todo list to track down, and that's helpful. I'm relieved to see that the bug masking is still working, but we shouldn't have to fall back to a full restart like that.

otila

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

31233/7810=4

Code:

2014-Jun-20 20:08:32.835339 Job didn't change
2014-Jun-20 20:08:35.149099 Share found: nonce=1236027 for job=766127159120515, diff: 1000000
, PoW:, height:24250, submitting...
2014-Jun-20 20:08:35.444838 ERROR /c/boolberry/contrib/epee/include/storages/http_abstract_invoke.h:112[bool epee::net_utils::invoke_http_json_rpc(const string&, const string&, t_request&, t_response&, t_transport&, unsigned int, const string&, const string&) [with t_request = mining::COMMAND_RPC_SUBMITSHARE::request; t_response = mining::COMMAND_RPC_SUBMITSHARE::response; t_transport = epee::net_utils::http::http_simple_client; std::string = std::basic_string]]RPC call of "submit" returned error: -1, message: Low difficulty share
2014-Jun-20 20:08:35.444892 Failed to submit share!  Updating job.
2014-Jun-20 20:08:36.445021 Connecting bbr.extremepool.org:7777....
2014-Jun-20 20:08:36.695119 Connected bbr.extremepool.org:7777 OK
2014-Jun-20 20:08:36.955066 Getting scratchpad...
2014-Jun-20 20:08:53.493900 Scratchpad received ok, size: 31233 KiB, height=24249
2014-Jun-20 20:08:53.494763 Getting next job...
2014-Jun-20 20:08:53.754985 Job didn't change
2014-Jun-20 20:09:01.027921 Share found: nonce=1653696 for job=292234379635192, diff: 1000000
, PoW:<9f657c02ae13a1cd24b5a0e0bbf850842c2b4d1befeeb29e50a07a995a0f0000>, height:24250, submitting...
2014-Jun-20 20:09:01.315045 ERROR /c/boolberry/contrib/epee/include/storages/http_abstract_invoke.h:112[bool epee::net_utils::invoke_http_json_rpc(const string&, const string&, t_request&, t_response&, t_transport&, unsigned int, const string&, const string&) [with t_request = mining::COMMAND_RPC_SUBMITSHARE::request; t_response = mining::COMMAND_RPC_SUBMITSHARE::response; t_transport = epee::net_utils::http::http_simple_client; std::string = std::basic_string]]RPC call of "submit" returned error: -1, message: Low difficulty share
2014-Jun-20 20:09:01.315138 Failed to submit share!  Updating job.
2014-Jun-20 20:09:01.315175 Too many submission failures.  Something is very wrong.
2014-Jun-20 20:09:01.315204 Excessive failures.  Sleeping 10-ish seconds and restarting...
2014-Jun-20 20:09:11.822174 Mining with 4 threads 
2014-Jun-20 20:09:11.822227 Connecting bbr.extremepool.org:7777....
2014-Jun-20 20:09:12.075822 Connected bbr.extremepool.org:7777 OK
2014-Jun-20 20:09:12.335865 Getting scratchpad...
2014-Jun-20 20:09:30.463601 Scratchpad received ok, size: 7810 KiB, height=24249
2014-Jun-20 20:09:30.464554 Getting next job...
2014-Jun-20 20:09:49.054149 Share found: nonce=4052003 for job=799678992363624, diff: 1000000
, PoW:, height:24250, submitting...
2014-Jun-20 20:09:49.394855 Share submitted successfully!

33zer0w0lf

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: dga on June 20, 2014, 11:41:19 AM

Quote from: otila on June 20, 2014, 10:56:15 AM

patch to disable Nagle's algorithm, reduces simpleminer request latency by ~0.2s-0.5s per request, or up to ~1s per share because it waits for response to block submit instead of sending the getjob command in the same time as doing block submit Undecided

Argh - thanks, I had thought to myself that I should check that and completely forgot.

I'll start testing this now. Appreciate the patch!

(update: I'm going to apply this only within simpleminer for now to keep the risk reduced of changing it globally.)

If CORK isn't an option, I'll go through it and add some manual buffering of the writes and/or change it to writev if needed.

awesome let me know when this fix is out and I will start testing!

Pool is starting to pick up some momentum, should start seeing regular blocks!

http://bbr.extremepool.org

dga

hero member

Activity: 737

Merit: 511

Quote from: otila on June 20, 2014, 10:56:15 AM

patch to disable Nagle's algorithm, reduces simpleminer request latency by ~0.2s-0.5s per request, or up to ~1s per share because it waits for response to block submit instead of sending the getjob command in the same time as doing block submit Undecided

Argh - thanks, I had thought to myself that I should check that and completely forgot.

I'll start testing this now. Appreciate the patch!

(update: I'm going to apply this only within simpleminer for now to keep the risk reduced of changing it globally.)

If CORK isn't an option, I'll go through it and add some manual buffering of the writes and/or change it to writev if needed.

otila

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

patch to disable Nagle's algorithm, reduces simpleminer request latency by ~0.2s-0.5s per request, or up to ~1s per share because it waits for response to block submit instead of sending the getjob command in the same time as doing block submit Undecided

Code:

diff --git a/contrib/epee/include/net/net_helper.h b/contrib/epee/include/net/net_helper.h
index 4f7ebfa..3699858 100644
--- a/contrib/epee/include/net/net_helper.h
+++ b/contrib/epee/include/net/net_helper.h
@@ -159,8 +159,8 @@ namespace net_utils
 					boost::asio::ip::tcp::endpoint local_endpoint(boost::asio::ip::address::from_string(addr.c_str()), 0);
 					m_socket.bind(local_endpoint);
 				}
+				m_socket.set_option(boost::asio::ip::tcp::no_delay(true));
 
-				
 				m_deadline.expires_from_now(boost::posix_time::milliseconds(m_connect_timeout));

I would prefer to have TCP_CORK socket option, does boost have it? Now it just sends more packets than is necessary. Or fix epee..?
Linux 3.14 has tcp_autocorking enabled by default since 3.14..

before:

Code:

2014-06-20T06:34:19.184956Z IP (tos 0x2,ECT(0), ttl 255, id 12996, offset 0, flags [none], proto TCP (6), length 126)
    192.168.1.102.52306 > 216.119.175.87.5555: Flags [P.], cksum 0x4a4e (incorrect -> 0x86f7), seq 3237694011:3237694085, ack 2743690248, win 16384, options [nop,nop,TS val 986498185 ecr 366660], length 74
        0x0000:  4502 007e 32c4 0000 ff06 3ed6 c0a8 0166  E..~2.....>....f
        0x0010:  d877 af57 cc52 15b3 c0fb 4a3b a389 6408  .w.W.R....J;..d.
        0x0020:  8018 4000 4a4e 0000 0101 080a 3acc c489  [email protected]......:...
        0x0030:  0005 9844 4745 5420 2f6a 736f 6e5f 7270  ...DGET./json_rp
        0x0040:  6320 4854 5450 2f31 2e31 0d0a 486f 7374  c.HTTP/1.1..Host
        0x0050:  3a20 6262 722e 6578 7472 656d 6570 6f6f  :.bbr.extremepoo
        0x0060:  6c2e 6f72 670d 0a43 6f6e 7465 6e74 2d4c  l.org..Content-L
        0x0070:  656e 6774 683a 2032 3531 0d0a 0d0a       ength:.251....
2014-06-20T06:34:19.501248Z IP (tos 0x0, ttl 44, id 28904, offset 0, flags [none], proto TCP (6), length 52)
    216.119.175.87.5555 > 192.168.1.102.52306: Flags [.], cksum 0x9588 (correct), ack 3237694085, win 1452, options [nop,nop,TS val 367927 ecr 986498185], length 0
        0x0000:  4500 0034 70e8 0000 2c06 d3fe d877 af57  E..4p...,....w.W
        0x0010:  c0a8 0166 15b3 cc52 a389 6408 c0fb 4a85  ...f...R..d...J.
        0x0020:  8010 05ac 9588 0000 0101 080a 0005 9d37  ...............7
        0x0030:  3acc c489                                :...
2014-06-20T06:34:19.501309Z IP (tos 0x2,ECT(0), ttl 255, id 12997, offset 0, flags [none], proto TCP (6), length 303)
    192.168.1.102.52306 > 216.119.175.87.5555: Flags [P.], cksum 0x4aff (incorrect -> 0x3468), seq 3237694085:3237694336, ack 2743690248, win 16384, options [nop,nop,TS val 986498502 ecr 367927], length 251
        0x0000:  4502 012f 32c5 0000 ff06 3e24 c0a8 0166  E../2.....>$...f
        0x0010:  d877 af57 cc52 15b3 c0fb 4a85 a389 6408  .w.W.R....J...d.
        0x0020:  8018 4000 4aff 0000 0101 080a 3acc c5c6  [email protected].......:...
        0x0030:  0005 9d37 7b0d 0a20 2022 6964 223a 2022  ...7{...."id":."
        0x0040:  3022 2c0d 0a20 2022 6a73 6f6e 7270 6322  0",...."jsonrpc"
        0x0050:  3a20 2232 2e30 222c 0d0a 2020 226d 6574  :."2.0",...."met
        0x0060:  686f 6422 3a20 2273 7562 6d69 7422 2c0d  hod":."submit",.
        ... snip

after:

Code:

2014-06-20T15:45:39.984776Z IP (tos 0x2,ECT(0), ttl 255, id 64704, offset 0, flags [none], proto TCP (6), length 126)
    192.168.1.102.62860 > 216.119.175.87.7777: Flags [P.], cksum 0x4a4e (incorrect -> 0x5aad), seq 2923004606:2923004680, ack 2280487023, win 16384, options [nop,nop,TS val 1019578985 ecr 8629187], length 74
	0x0000:  4502 007e fcc0 0000 ff06 74d9 c0a8 0166  E..~......t....f
	0x0010:  d877 af57 f58c 1e61 ae39 82be 87ed 786f  .w.W...a.9....xo
	0x0020:  8018 4000 4a4e 0000 0101 080a 3cc5 8a69  [email protected]......<..i
	0x0030:  0083 abc3 4745 5420 2f6a 736f 6e5f 7270  ....GET./json_rp
	0x0040:  6320 4854 5450 2f31 2e31 0d0a 486f 7374  c.HTTP/1.1..Host
	0x0050:  3a20 6262 722e 6578 7472 656d 6570 6f6f  :.bbr.extremepoo
	0x0060:  6c2e 6f72 670d 0a43 6f6e 7465 6e74 2d4c  l.org..Content-L
	0x0070:  656e 6774 683a 2032 3531 0d0a 0d0a       ength:.251....
2014-06-20T15:45:39.985071Z IP (tos 0x2,ECT(0), ttl 255, id 64705, offset 0, flags [none], proto TCP (6), length 303)
    192.168.1.102.62860 > 216.119.175.87.7777: Flags [P.], cksum 0x4aff (incorrect -> 0x54d0), seq 2923004680:2923004931, ack 2280487023, win 16384, options [nop,nop,TS val 1019578986 ecr 8629187], length 251
	0x0000:  4502 012f fcc1 0000 ff06 7427 c0a8 0166  E../......t'...f
	0x0010:  d877 af57 f58c 1e61 ae39 8308 87ed 786f  .w.W...a.9....xo
	0x0020:  8018 4000 4aff 0000 0101 080a 3cc5 8a6a  [email protected].......<..j
	0x0030:  0083 abc3 7b0d 0a20 2022 6964 223a 2022  ....{...."id":."
	0x0040:  3022 2c0d 0a20 2022 6a73 6f6e 7270 6322  0",...."jsonrpc"
	0x0050:  3a20 2232 2e30 222c 0d0a 2020 226d 6574  :."2.0",...."met
	0x0060:  686f 6422 3a20 2273 7562 6d69 7422 2c0d  hod":."submit",.
        ...snip

Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 404. (Read 1210783 times)