[BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 453.

azhago

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

Quote from: zeetak on May 27, 2014, 03:27:03 PM

Quote from: emontmon on May 19, 2014, 09:37:34 AM

Quote from: aikklond on May 19, 2014, 04:27:11 AM

Ok people after my communication with crypto_zoidberg, I have taken up the responsibility to help with Branding/Marketing the project.

Stay tuned because we will need the community's opinion on such matters.

I believe this project has the potential to become a significant player in the crypto market.

Until then I advise to keep solo mining, with an average of 350-400 kilohashes I have hit four blocks since launch, so I think its a very good investment to keep at it before pools, inevitably, enter the fray.

wow
with about the same hash power, i have not found a single block since launch.

with 350 kh over 2 computers I have found 2 blocks in the last week.

roooh, lucky guy ! Shocked

nice for you

drawingthesun

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1015

Quote from: emontmon on May 27, 2014, 03:44:53 PM

Quote from: drawingthesun on May 27, 2014, 03:40:32 PM

Quote from: emontmon on May 27, 2014, 03:29:58 PM

Quote from: drawingthesun on May 27, 2014, 02:52:38 PM

Quote from: emontmon on May 27, 2014, 02:49:57 PM

i had assumed that is what the 1% tax was for

Whilst you're correct that the 1% donation should be used for things like building a pool, remember that it is only a donation.

ok?

Well it's not a tax, you seemed to be a little snarky about the 1%. It's not like you're forced to give it up.

Perhaps I interpreted your post in the wrong way.

yes you did. for me it is a tax as it is set to on automatically. the majority of miners will leave it on by default. also, the 1 percent only goes to one wallet and thus we cant chose our developers.

Well a tax is mandatory with no way out.

If there was another developer who wanted to join in on this coin, they could either release their own client with donations set to them instead, or ask the main developer to share the donations. This is open source after all.

Anyway, I'm a little bummed out that there is no pool, I'm back to mining MRO at the moment because I'm too impatient for solo mining. :p

emontmon

member

Activity: 196

Merit: 10

Quote from: drawingthesun on May 27, 2014, 03:40:32 PM

Quote from: emontmon on May 27, 2014, 03:29:58 PM

Quote from: drawingthesun on May 27, 2014, 02:52:38 PM

Quote from: emontmon on May 27, 2014, 02:49:57 PM

i had assumed that is what the 1% tax was for

Whilst you're correct that the 1% donation should be used for things like building a pool, remember that it is only a donation.

ok?

Well it's not a tax, you seemed to be a little snarky about the 1%. It's not like you're forced to give it up.

Perhaps I interpreted your post in the wrong way.

yes you did. for me it is a tax as it is set to on automatically. the majority of miners will leave it on by default. also, the 1 percent only goes to one wallet and thus we cant chose our developers.

this has been hashed out, and currently i am mining this coin. I do not view this 1% donation as a negative at this point. i am sure this coin can always be hard forked if we became unhappy with current developers.

i can not predict the future.

drawingthesun

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1015

Quote from: emontmon on May 27, 2014, 03:29:58 PM

Quote from: drawingthesun on May 27, 2014, 02:52:38 PM

Quote from: emontmon on May 27, 2014, 02:49:57 PM

i had assumed that is what the 1% tax was for

Whilst you're correct that the 1% donation should be used for things like building a pool, remember that it is only a donation.

ok?

Well it's not a tax, you seemed to be a little snarky about the 1%. It's not like you're forced to give it up.

Perhaps I interpreted your post in the wrong way.

emontmon

member

Activity: 196

Merit: 10

Quote from: drawingthesun on May 27, 2014, 02:52:38 PM

Quote from: emontmon on May 27, 2014, 02:49:57 PM

i had assumed that is what the 1% tax was for

Whilst you're correct that the 1% donation should be used for things like building a pool, remember that it is only a donation.

ok?

zeetak

member

Activity: 140

Merit: 12

Quote from: emontmon on May 19, 2014, 09:37:34 AM

Quote from: aikklond on May 19, 2014, 04:27:11 AM

Ok people after my communication with crypto_zoidberg, I have taken up the responsibility to help with Branding/Marketing the project.

Stay tuned because we will need the community's opinion on such matters.

I believe this project has the potential to become a significant player in the crypto market.

Until then I advise to keep solo mining, with an average of 350-400 kilohashes I have hit four blocks since launch, so I think its a very good investment to keep at it before pools, inevitably, enter the fray.

wow
with about the same hash power, i have not found a single block since launch.

with 350 kh over 2 computers I have found 2 blocks in the last week.

drawingthesun

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1015

Quote from: hornyPo on May 27, 2014, 02:57:15 PM

Quote from: drawingthesun on May 27, 2014, 02:45:14 PM

Quote from: hornyPo on May 27, 2014, 02:34:23 PM

I also can t understand why hashrates accumulate.
I guess it will be the same result when several computer calculate with difference addresses.
Or even that find a block have higher probability on differences address because it is possible that
on the differences machine there calculate overlapping hashes. Something wrong in this thinking?

This is the super simplified version.

Mining is the action where your computer guesses for a very low number, the computer randomly guesses for these numbers.

Eventually your computer may guess the right number. Once your computer does that you earn some reward. (Solving a block).

Because the search for these super low numbers is random, you can have any number of computers all searching together, they don't need to be linked together or anything. They stack in the sense that you have more computing power going towards the search.

The address you set as your mining address in the mining program does not matter, you can have each machine mine for a different address or the same address, it makes no difference at all.

With this i go conform. I just replay on this meaning that if you calculate on difference machine you have to use the same address, and then there only accumulate hashes.

If you calculate on a different machine you can use the same address or a different address. It doesn't matter.

Yes the hashrates are combined because it's a random search.

Also: do not worry about overlapping hashes being found on different computers. Trust me, never worry about that again, it's of no concern.

enerbyte

hero member

Activity: 556

Merit: 501

Quote from: azhago on May 27, 2014, 03:04:23 PM

Quote from: superresistant on May 27, 2014, 12:01:07 PM

It is not hard to solo mine. You need a strong CPU or multiple small CPU.

Put computers together on the same address.

A network without pool is perfectly decentralized, therefore very strong.

36hours with 8 xeon L5530, 2 xeon 2687W + 1 [email protected]
Total : 2.6MHs
blocs found : 1 Embarrassed

(instead of 3~5)

I know it's variance, i'm just unlucky, but pools are needed to reduce this variance.
If the difficulty was 10 times lower, with a bloc reward 10 times lower, there is no problems. At this diff, someone with a "little" cpu (like, a 4770K), will hardly find a bloc in a week, as the diff rise every day. It's only profitable to botnet, cpu farm and people with huge (and free) computer access.

+1
i7 4770k 5 days mining= 0 block found!

azhago

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

Quote from: superresistant on May 27, 2014, 12:01:07 PM

It is not hard to solo mine. You need a strong CPU or multiple small CPU.

Put computers together on the same address.

A network without pool is perfectly decentralized, therefore very strong.

36hours with 8 xeon L5530, 2 xeon 2687W + 1 [email protected]
Total : 2.6MHs
blocs found : 1 Embarrassed

(instead of 3~5)

I know it's variance, i'm just unlucky, but pools are needed to reduce this variance.
If the difficulty was 10 times lower, with a bloc reward 10 times lower, there is no problems. At this diff, someone with a "little" cpu (like, a 4770K), will hardly find a bloc in a week, as the diff rise every day. It's only profitable to botnet, cpu farm and people with huge (and free) computer access.

hornyPo

member

Activity: 111

Merit: 10

Quote from: drawingthesun on May 27, 2014, 02:45:14 PM

Quote from: hornyPo on May 27, 2014, 02:34:23 PM

I also can t understand why hashrates accumulate.
I guess it will be the same result when several computer calculate with difference addresses.
Or even that find a block have higher probability on differences address because it is possible that
on the differences machine there calculate overlapping hashes. Something wrong in this thinking?

This is the super simplified version.

Mining is the action where your computer guesses for a very low number, the computer randomly guesses for these numbers.

Eventually your computer may guess the right number. Once your computer does that you earn some reward. (Solving a block).

Because the search for these super low numbers is random, you can have any number of computers all searching together, they don't need to be linked together or anything. They stack in the sense that you have more computing power going towards the search.

The address you set as your mining address in the mining program does not matter, you can have each machine mine for a different address or the same address, it makes no difference at all.

With this i go conform. I just replay on this meaning that if you calculate on difference machine you have to use the same address, and then there only accumulate hashes.

33zer0w0lf

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

I have been in touch with coin dev and dev that made open source pool such as the one I am running http://www.extremepool.org

1. need Cpuminer to incorporate wild keccak
2. need some kind of a bounty to help get pool Dev on board to incorporate this coin if necessary.

I would love to provide the community with a pool.

drawingthesun

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1015

Quote from: emontmon on May 27, 2014, 02:49:57 PM

i had assumed that is what the 1% tax was for

Whilst you're correct that the 1% donation should be used for things like building a pool, remember that it is only a donation.

emontmon

member

Activity: 196

Merit: 10

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: blaaaaacksuit on May 27, 2014, 02:33:58 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: azhago on May 26, 2014, 04:14:42 PM

I htink we need to have pool BEFORE hitting an exchange.
If we hit an exchange, it will be very difficult, or impossible, for "normal miners" to find a bloc in solo.
There is no urge to be listed on an exchange, we can let the community grow before that, and to have proper tools to show to investors too, like pools, standalone mining software with stratum, user friendly (aka noob) wallet GUI etc..

I like the BBR / boolberry name.

this, pool is badly needed Undecided

Pool bounty required.

true
dev should make use of his donations and open some bounties.

i had assumed that is what the 1% tax was for

drawingthesun

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1015

Quote from: hornyPo on May 27, 2014, 02:34:23 PM

I also can t understand why hashrates accumulate.
I guess it will be the same result when several computer calculate with difference addresses.
Or even that find a block have higher probability on differences address because it is possible that
on the differences machine there calculate overlapping hashes. Something wrong in this thinking?

This is the super simplified version.

Mining is the action where your computer guesses for a very low number, the computer randomly guesses for these numbers.

Eventually your computer may guess the right number. Once your computer does that you earn some reward. (Solving a block).

Because the search for these super low numbers is random, you can have any number of computers all searching together, they don't need to be linked together or anything. They stack in the sense that you have more computing power going towards the search.

The address you set as your mining address in the mining program does not matter, you can have each machine mine for a different address or the same address, it makes no difference at all.

surfer43

sr. member

Activity: 560

Merit: 250

"Trading Platform of The Future!"

Quote from: Coindgr on May 27, 2014, 02:36:19 PM

Is it possible to solomine with cpuminer-multi ?? What port to use ?

Not yet, as wild keccak is not implemented in cpuminer-multi at this time.

Coindgr

hero member

Activity: 1034

Merit: 500

Is it possible to solomine with cpuminer-multi ?? What port to use ?

hornyPo

member

Activity: 111

Merit: 10

Quote from: superresistant on May 27, 2014, 12:42:35 PM

Quote from: tacotime on May 27, 2014, 12:14:41 PM

I'm thankful to have more serious developers working on the ByteCoin code like BoolBerry, they've contributed a lot of fixes to the network code we hope to integrate after testing (thanks!).
I hope we can maintain a nice dynamic like LTC and PPC and help keep each other's codebase functional.

I'm 50% Monero / 50% Boolberry. The rest must die.

Quote from: cubydu on May 27, 2014, 12:21:08 PM

Quote from: superresistant on May 27, 2014, 12:01:07 PM

It is not hard to solo mine. You need a strong CPU or multiple small CPU.
Put computers together on the same address.
A network without pool is perfectly decentralized, therefore very strong.

I can't understand. When do I put several computers together on same address hashrate accumulate ?

Yes (sort of).

I also can t understand why hashrates accumulate.
I guess it will be the same result when several computer calculate with difference addresses.
Or even that find a block have higher probability on differences address because it is possible that
on the differences machine there calculate overlapping hashes. Something wrong in this thinking?

blaaaaacksuit

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

Who cares?

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: azhago on May 26, 2014, 04:14:42 PM

I htink we need to have pool BEFORE hitting an exchange.
If we hit an exchange, it will be very difficult, or impossible, for "normal miners" to find a bloc in solo.
There is no urge to be listed on an exchange, we can let the community grow before that, and to have proper tools to show to investors too, like pools, standalone mining software with stratum, user friendly (aka noob) wallet GUI etc..

I like the BBR / boolberry name.

this, pool is badly needed Undecided

Pool bounty required.

sorryforthat

hero member

Activity: 994

Merit: 500

Is there a pool in the works for this coin?

ziplibrary

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Quote from: devphp on May 27, 2014, 01:38:39 PM

Quote from: blaaaaacksuit on May 27, 2014, 01:36:19 PM

Quote from: devphp on May 27, 2014, 01:33:41 PM

Is this coin on any exchange yet?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closed-bbr-boolberry-trading-thread-high-0004-low-0001-last-00022-616391

Just this OTC one.

hm, priced as Monero, and not even on the exchange yet, I guess I'll wait a few days

I'm ziplibrary from ShareXcoin: http://sharexcoin.com/
We planned to add boolberry on sharexcoin but still having some issues compiling the wallet. Will try it again on another platform and let you guys knnow hwne boolberry is added.

Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 453. (Read 1210753 times)