Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 95. (Read 1210749 times)

You again! Why are you so intent in coming here to create confusion and FUD, posting links to your FAKE boolberry acct? It was only a few days back you said

I dont like the direction this project is going and wont be active here anymore.

Why don't you just join the slack channel and involve yourself with the community including Zoidberg who frequents the slack daily.

I think it is 1.5 BTC but yes a waste of money since they must have just paid 1.5 BTC to change it to xbb ... .does the ticker even matter? so long as it is still called boolberry what difference does it all really make?

I'm pretty sure Bittrex will only change ticker for a payment of like 2 BTC, so you would probably have to pay them another 2 BTC to get them to change it back

Please come back and resume development. Unlike 1Blocktologist you have a proven track record as a developer. If you do nothing Boolberry (AEON now has preliminary RingCT code from Monero) will be soon forgotten.

Ask the Boolberry community to defend against the GitHub and branding takeover attempt:

https://twitter.com/BBRcurrency/status/832742460820303873

Thank the Exchanges that have preserved the BBR ticker (poloniex and cryptopia):

https://twitter.com/BBRcurrency/status/832744377302740997

Ask Bittrex to revert the mistake of converting to XBB without widespread community support

https://twitter.com/BBRcurrency/status/832742855399469056

I like this story. CZ is very interesting isn't he.

Not being a coder nor a tech person myself.

What level of coder/designer would you need to be to

1. invent btc
2. invent bbr (these cryptonote coins) from nothing
3. invent bbr (these cryptonote coins) allowing for the fact I have knowledge of BTC.

It is kind of the like

developer trump cards

is bbr in some ways more advanced than xmr ? or are all parts of xmr superior?

It must be cool to be a smart coder and get to study the code and design of things and get a taste or an idea of the brain that is responsible for the creation you study.


I wonder who is overall the most amazing dev on here design and implementation...

GM, VB, CZ, DZ, perhaps it will turn out to be SM or even others who are quiet and just mostly observe perhaps working on their own design?

Coinopoly here is my BBR address:1EpbhsRaeNUgXG54e6wtipTsXjQXfFDgcdEqCdMJEBPhAihjXfATG1bNT6URkYiSXWdo221oKF1CMZA YxijfDww8Nk9b1Vi for the final half of the payment for the redesign.

Don't know where you got that from. I haven't done anything like that. My eyes glaze over trying to read most of the code.

There is little story, the first code of bitcoin protocol is really unorganized, barely unreadable but it works, in the hand of great vision bitcoin developers then it become like now, yes maybe sn has the old wallet but as we all know journey of bitcoin is not easy may he has sold all the bitcoin long time ago.

Now the boolberry code is quite a mess to, so clintar is the one who reorganized the code to be readable.

If you ever read the first boolberry code you may remember the story of bitcoin as well.

That would be interesting. Although would he need dev funding at all? why not just dip into the bitcoin super wallet for a couple of btc now and then?

Although some top level designers and coders on here have said before he is obviously a super level dev ...so perhaps....

if these are wild accusations then please give prove for it too...and do not speak in air....

Imho,

CZ(CryptoZoidberg)=CB(CryptoBender)=Satoshi Nakamoto. Creator and inventor of Bitcoin protocol, Boolberry protocol, who can create protocol pruning and alias system like Boolberry except the inventor itself.

sent

Hey guys,
Is anyone here capable of giving me a slack invite?
Please PM me and ill send you my email adress!

It's maybe time to change your username to Aeon/Monero, maybe even DrMonero what you think?

As for crytozoidberg and the most of the community wanting to stay with the BBR ticker, how would you know this? Have you spoke with him or have you engaged with the community to find out what they thought? I know from being in both the bbr & boolberry slack channels that this has been discussed on numerous occasions within the community that you have played no part in.

You being removed from the /r/boolberry which was a good decision by jwinterm, firstly you where MIA and secondly you only used it to post links to monero and aeon which you seem to be more involved with. I don't see any reason that you should have been left as a mod, same goes for the #bbr twitter acct that you have control over, why would someone who doesn't have faith or belief in a project even want to control it? Simply to use and abuse as you have shown in your tweets.

REMEMBER IT WAS YOUR TWEET THAT GOT 1BLOCKS ATTENTION IN THE 1ST PLACE! So thanks for that 

Most of the project files have Andrey Sabelnikov's name on them, and the libraries used in it and have more futurama references.

This was all detailed back in 2014 amongst Cryptonote/Bytecoin/+forks confusion. Draw your own conclusions from that, but most of the cryptonote networks share the same kind of "genius developer that doesn't want to give it up or help the community because the dev is THE INFALLIBLE DEV [until they aren't]" meme. Monero had similar beginnings and most of the community mindshare went to that project.

In 2017, cryptonote networks are a force to be reckoned with, spearheaded still by Monero, and this is an opportunity for the Boolberry network to become something much greater than it is today in feature set and valuation.

Boolberry has a dual advantage because "the" dev still makes promises to release a much enhanced version, any day now. So there are going to be advanced Boolberry clients on the network in any scenario. Whether my effort is the only effort, whether we collaborate for an accelerated effort, whether we don't collaborate and both have efforts for different but compatible Boolberry clients on the network.


Thanks. There has always been an easy rebuttal along the lines of "CEOs and Product Managers don't code" but since I do code, just wait for it

Andrey Sabelnikov  is that CZ real name? or someone else you refer to?
I think although you may not have contributed any code as yet have at least brought some community back to this coin. I think you deserve props for this anyway.

Yep, king of the botnets makes botnet resistant

Nice, send them my way, we have dev funds for this specific purpose

Would love to chat about some nuances with the epee library. Andrey Sabelnikov and other cryptonote devs have always been tough to collaborate with, from LOOOOOONG before I showed up here. So I don't know why people put so much stock in my collaboration with a person that was assumed Missing In Action.

This is happening, lets speed it up!

You are right, probably the best option is not to reinvent the wheel, but I don't think cz would do the copy paste his work is always original. In LD project cz made db implementation not rocksdb, lmdb, cocoa nor mocca but different thing.