This thread inspired me a lot and now I don't prefer any abbreviation or short form of Bitcointalk, I simply use the full name "Bitcointalk" when I tell someone about it. I think we all should prefer to use full name of the site instead of using those abbreviations.
Although I won't count myself as an expert but I think the crypto community as whole is filled with abbreviation and shorted words so actually calling the number crypto community with a reference abbreviation is no bad idea at all. Well am not too familiar with the terms of any of the abbreviation but I think this new update sounds and feel more legit #BTCT but it's a little long for abbreviation though as abbreviation is supposed to be brief, short and simple.
You don't have to be an expert before you make your opinion known, and in the end, you actually made a very sensible one. In fact, if Bitcoin could be BTC and not BC, I do not see the reason for me to call Bitcointalk BCT because in the real Bitcoin of BTC, T was never silenced and they never used the syllable that formed the BCT as many claimed. For this, and to void all controversy, I believe that calling it the full abbreviation of Bitcoin itself makes more sense, and the Talk that is included will just join it as in BTCT.
However, in my view to make it more unique, the last T which stands for Talk could be a bit touched and changed to a small letter, as in BTCt which is what I have been using ever since the recent controversy surfaced. Whether BTCT or BTCt, I am okay with it.
As for the length, there is no perfect way to abbreviate words and phrases, and some might be so ugly as well, all that matters is for them to reflect the gift of their long world. It is not a must that all abbreviations must be 3 letters, and still BTCT which is a 4-letter is never too long as there are longer ones which still fit perfectly in what they are used for.
, although there are those who make the abbreviation statement into a company or oracle.
), although the original designation of bct is bitcointalk.
