I get your point virasog, but I doubt that it would be as dire for bitcoin as you suggest if some of those squiggly lines end up getting broken ($24,800 - ish). .and then bitcoin still ends up bouncing back, even though it wasn't supposed to be able to .. blah blah blah.
Yes, that's called manipulation, where the market makers and whales can give an illusion to the retail that look the 24K level is broken,
It is also called failure to sufficiently/adequately account for bitcoin's not being a mature asset class that may well not be subject to the blah blah blah the squiggly lines try to tell you - especially in terms of the ongoing UPpity price pressures that should be accounted for when an asset (such as bitcoin) is a paradigm-shifting asset that has likely underlying exponential s-curve adoption dynamics that might not be adequately taken into account.
now we are going down and everyone should sell, but usually such manipulation does not last long. Thats why we see "wicks" in the daily and weekly time frame, where the price moves down below important support but before the end of the day/week, recovers back.
And you have the right to rely on squigglies as much as you like to make your arguments about what the shadows on the cave walls mean, and sure traders do that and good luck with that nonsense when the better habits are not to necessarily fuck around with those kinds of short term dynamics that may or may not happen in accordance with what the squiggly lines are suggesting to suppose to happen.
In case, the price closes below the major support, does not recover and stays there in a higher time frame (Weekly), then chances are that the trend is broken.
Yes, and all of that could happen, but then BTC could still end up bouncing back... so then you have to come up with a new theory (or explanation), and hopefully you end up attempting to incorporate the s-curve adoption angle that is going to likely bias your little models to the upside no matter what they are telling you "should happen."
Technical analysis (price action) does work in trading because the trading chart is not representative of the indicators & lines, rather it shows the human behavior and sentiments of the market, but most people do not know how to read them properly.
Yes.. you better figure it out if that is what you are doing...
As you might have noticed I don't fuck around with that stuff or recommend that others do it, and I also frequently like to denigrate people who are seeming to assign too many probabilities to what they suggest the charts are telling them is going to happen, and it is quite likely that my own system that largely relies upon accumulate and HODL and don't fuck around with trying to guess BTC price moves, is outperforming the vast majority of traders... so yeah, maybe you are an exception to the rule and you are outperforming DCA, but still, I doubt that there are too many good ideas that come from assertions that if the $25k support breaks it is going to turn into resistance blah blah blah.. so good luck trading that kind of nonsense in bitcoin.. when likely a much better strategy is to consider that anything around and below the 200-week moving average (which is currently at about $27,700) is a good buy and the lower we go below the 200-week moving average the more you are likely putting yourself into danger if you think that the price is going to go down before it goes up, even if your lil squigglies end up telling you that is what is suppose to happen. and probably your little squigglies don't even account for where we are at in comparison to the 200-week moving average.... so good luck
(you are likely going to need it.. if you keep on playing those kinds of games with king daddy) with any sells that you might make or failure to buy because you are expecting lower prices that may or may not end up happening.