Topic: Best Crypto Casinos! - page 11. (Read 4821 times)

You are right that those third-party review sites have failed to fulfill the demand for perfect reviews. They don't think they are responsible for the review and investment of the gambler hence they are eager to earn as much money as possible by providing fake reviews. So there is no other way except avoiding third party review site.

Well, of course, the Internet is filled with fake and false reviews about everything in general, and in particular about casinos too. 

However, an experienced player who understands when a review is clearly of a primitive advertising nature, and such a review cannot be trusted.  In my opinion, of course, there are more custom-made advertising and fake reviews with positive properties of the casino than there are also custom-made reviews for a specific casino with negative content regarding this casino.  It’s easy to simply advertise your only casino through custom-made positive reviews.  Because you have the only advertising object.  But it’s difficult to scold competitors in this business simply because there are a lot of them and to pay for custom-made negative reviews for many casinos that are your competitors and are more expensive and more difficult.  So there is a difference in which reviews of an advertising nature are more numerous. 
An experienced player, among all this informational rubbish, can always find and roughly understand the real situation with a particular casino, even on the basis of such custom reviews.  And above all, of course, negative content.

My good friend shashan,  I good day to you and it has been a while, happy holidays boss,  well back for the topic of discussion.

Third-party review platforms have failed to meet up with the demand of providing honest reviews on some businesses,  most especially in the area of providing purely,  honest reviews on financial/investment businesses which casinos are one of such business,  and with our experience with top third-party review site where results are doctored and highly untruthful and doesn't reflect the experience of the real site users,  but paid to give good and positive reviews,  such as giving a known scam casino 4-5 star rating,  this is highly miss leading at some point.

I never trust any reviews except the comments/feedback from bitcointalk forum users. Almost all the reviews are fake and they are paid reviews and that's why no-one should rely on these types of reviews.

Over time, reviews of the new casino really begin to become more objective and true to reality.  This is due to the players’ user experience from games in a given casino.  But not only.  After all, casino devs also read reviews from real players, and in some cases have the opportunity to moderate information in these reviews.  But some of the feedback, of course, forces   devs to somehow respond to criticism and correct some game situations or do something else for the convenience of clients.  In this way, an array of objective reviews is gradually formed.
 But for sure, you shouldn’t trust the first reviews.

Those biased and false accusations or issues been thrown out would be ignored sooner or later on which as long there would be no solid evidences about those issues been said then the community would really be just simply forgetting with these things on which it would really be just that normal that there would really be those kind of reputation wrecking kind of comments and  feedbacks specially if they would really be seeing new competition that they are really seeing around. It cant be avoided for those business out there to target or trying to pin down those potential sites that would really be kicking them on the industry.

So for those gamblers who are really that finding out some new sites then it would really be that always wise that you should really be searching up those real time feedbacks
but of course you shouldnt really be believing into those few ones who are obviously that might be biased or something which doesnt give out some solid proofs or what.
If you do want to experience for yourself then go ahead and make use of small amounts.

Looks like you still not including the one you're promoting in your signature. I've been playing on coins.game for about a month now, and I must say that coins.game can be one of the best crypto casinos right now. I know my first week of playing on coins.game was not a good experience but as time goes on, I think I can say that coins.game is one of the best crypto casinos. The bonuses, promos, giveaways and the overall experience of playing on their website are impressive. Also they really care about their community here in BitcoinTalk.

They have an ANN thread, just they don't written "ANN" in the beginning of the title, you can check it here: Seabet.io Online Casino
I like their website's interface it gives a premium experience and but they have very less variety of crypto available to deposit and play. but all of them are widely used by us.
and many promotions are going on there, I participated in there free spin giveaway and won a small amount.

Nice to know about Seabet, grst that you tried to bring it up here in a thread that is discussing about the best cryptocurrency casino and that for far a good place to promote Seabet as you call it,  but one more thing is that I have not seen an ANN thread for this site that you mentioned,  and doing that will help you more in making the casino more visible and can have a thread of it own where you can post all the informations that you want to post.

I am sure you have some exciting promotion to share and even the link to the website,  so by having an ANN thread,  it will help a lot in delivering the exact needed visibility and a place to post those promotions as they drops.

The first reviews from new users about a newly opened casino that is completely new and unknown to players can always be quite biased. 
In addition, the entry of a new casino into the gambling market is always negatively perceived by competitors.  Therefore, the first reviews may well be too negative, even simply because these are custom reviews that are specifically written by users at the request of competing casinos.  Only after some time do more objective reviews appear from real players who already know from their own experience the strengths and weaknesses of this new casino. 
So I wouldn’t trust the first reviews from users since I almost always consider them to be partly biased.

This "thier casino thier rules" thing is not a protection for them to cheat gamblers, they have a TOS, its very public and we gambler agrees with it once we sign up with a site, and as much as we honor that they should do the same. Always remember that a reputable gambling site would not cheat their gamblers, nor attempt to cheat as that one mistake that could ruin their reputation maybe a risk on them in not maintain their profitable operation, so they are very keen to that.

One of the most crucial part when running up a new business is that you should really know on how to interact with the community on which you should really be that making yourself that prepared for whatever
comments and suggestions or even negative reviews or insights towards your casino. Marketing is really just that normal and for a business to have that exposure then it would really be that
in default that you should be having the budget for that because lacking exposure would really be leading on less recognition and awareness of your sites existence.

As for community recommendations and advises then it would really be just that normal that people would be making out those kind of comparison and making up
something comments specially if they've had been able to notice something. It is really that a normal approach i should say.!

Sad to say thier casino thier rules so as a gambler even though we are not using cheats and when coincidence happened then one thing for sure our account will banned bat this is the bad thing cause the casino facilitator must observe and to an observation first before they do any actions to our accounts. But like what I said thier casino thier rules so we can't stop them if they gonna banned forever on the spot when they knew that 2 account will login in one IP address.

You know what? This is what I dislike the most in casinos, the issue of using the IP to judge users and thereby banning them when the IP of accounts clashes is cheating and very gross. Aside from the fact that no good company should ban their customers without prior warning or later information about it, it's so bad for them to still quote IP as a reason for the banning. I know it's in the T&C, but is it fair? Oftentimes, many casinos are just using that as an excuse too, because they know that the users do not have the resources to investigate this, so it's practical nonsense.

Think about it, what happens if someone is using a dynamic IP, which is an IP that wasn't uniquely assigned to the person? It's no news that dynamic IP clashes among persons using it in the same country, that's those who are using the same ISP and might not be in the same state/region, not to mention knowing each other. I believe the issue of using the IP clashes to judge people is so, mean, bad and partial. With many cases where people were victims, they might actually be innocent, and this IP of a thing can't ever hold water when the matter gets to court. There should be other means to judge a user other than this. I mean something like the gadget and the IMEI number or MAC address, but I doubt if casinos would ever have access to these. This calls for more regulations in the gambling sector, and if IP cases for banning is abolished, the casino will be fairer.

We cannot blame the two parties in this, the casinos have to maintain their ground on this by acting appropriately as accordingly because they have already detected it, now we cannot blame anyone for the mistake or error that comes in through our own personal responsibility, even though it's not our fault or we are not being responsible or intentional about the mistakes, that's why we need to be always vigilant in whatever we are doing in other for us not to pay for the consequences of things we shouldn't have.

I also didn’t quite understand what was meant.  Naturally, a new casino advertises its appearance on the online gambling market and advertises in various ways.  Of course, the budget allocated for advertising is important here.  But from experience, I know that when entering the gambling market and starting to advertise itself, a casino should already be sufficiently prepared for the fact that some players will not like it and negative reviews will begin to appear.  This happens with almost any casino.  I am, of course, talking about good, responsible casinos and in no case about fraudulent casinos. 
The first steps on the market for a new casino, with a competent formulation of the question and orientation towards the successful business of this ca sino, should always be carefully read by the devs step by step. 
Only then can this business be successfully promoted.

What do you mean that they dont know on how to maintain it? Do you have any issues with Seabet that hasnt been resolved yet? If it does then it would be better that you should be posting into their ANN thread
instead into this one as long those complaints or issues does have sufficient proofs then it would be good but if not then i dont see any issues. New casinos are really just that good to have
but the only risks that ive been seeing is on the potential scams that might appear on which we know that it isnt something that very new to have and this is why it is really good to have this kind of forum
on which everything could really be that known and could really be able to search up valuable information and realtime feedbacks on which it could really give out that kind of
awareness on whats going on at least.

Seabet is a good prospect in terms of casinos and its newly launched and will most definitely have incentives for casino players to want to check it out. However, I have worries, new casinos are yet to properly understand the business and how to maintain it.

 What happens when those boisterous storms comes to test their resolve in the space, what happens to my money in the platform?

Multi-accounting is nowhere to be allowed or something that would really be that tolerated and this is why it would really be normal that they would really be blocking into those users who are really that making or recieving money on simultaneous or simply with those multi accounts with the same ip, they do want to be totally different and not really just that limited on a single person.
Whether you do tend to look around these platforms whether it is gambling related or with those PTC's then it would be normal that they would really be banning those who do make
multi account which its never been fair on the first place if we do talk about this.

Once they come to know there is multiple account operating by the same person then they have the right to block account/accounts as multi-accounts not allowed on maximum gambling sites usually those who are taking KYC document from their users.