@generalizethis
while i do think it's a smart approach to not blindly believe in every coin a bct-member is trying to shill because they're heavily invested in it themselves, i don't understand your overly negative attitude towards spectrecoin.
i've been following this project for a couple of months now, and so far, the developer has delivered everything he promised.
if you are genuinely interested in technical aspects, you can ask the dev. any question on the project's slack channel.
It's a pretty major claim to be offering anonymous POS, so big that it should be in the top 25 if true--the fact that the devs have avoided major press releases and have eschewed code audits and haven't even offered a white paper to outline how they intend to implement this great feat should be worrisome for any potential investor. I'm not sure why anyone wouldn't want at least the examinable proof to this claim, and no one should buy based on promises. It's called hype for a reason and be prepared to be disappointed if you buy into it.
And I'm not going out of my way to waste my time on their slack. Either put out a white paper or let us review the code, anything less is unacceptable.
Any coin that claims to be private and has a rich list is already suspect--add industry changing innovations and I'm ready to call scam. So provide proof or stfu. I'm getting annoyed that my points are being questioned as they should be self evident.
--They claim anonymous POS even though this doesn't exist and they haven't given an answer as to how they will achieve it.
--There is no historical evidence provided to show the devs are capable of such an inovation.
You only need to address those two points. I will happily invest if you could manage that satisfactorily--serioulsy, I love new stuff if it seems reasonable that it will work as promised.
