Topic: best upcoming ICO - page 41. (Read 21218 times)

Certainly, allows merely respect the ideas in our mate right here because the tokenmarket leading will be the dependable references that everyone will watch out previously swapping no in spite of everything one have the capacity to be aware of particular coins to uprise later on. All we ought to do is to display and browse those articles on each token websites, there you're going to get the data that will influence you to select what's ideal and adequate swapping thoughts to have afterwards when the token will be in the industry industrial centers. The best rising ICO could be solved once they will be obtainable in the industry exchanging locations

Even if you think his research is basic I still like posts of both of you. I wish everyone in such topics would write something about why he thinks the ICO is good. Just writing the name of ICO is pretty useless. With so many different names mentioned I doubt it makes any help on finding good ICO's. I could go to a page that lists all ICO's, like icoalert for example, if I wanted to find just names of upcoming ICO's. I wish topics like these were more of discussions, not just listing names.

1. They do have a PhD listed as blockchain expert. His linkedin profile doesn't really show any experience in blockchain, but has more than 10 years experience in software development. And blockhain is software. I believe it requiers a bit different approach than "conventional" software projects. But someone having experience with software is probably at least mentally capable of doing blockchains. So his experience is much better than nothing. Especially with blockchain technology beeing new it's not surprising many team members are working on their first blockchain project but that doesn't mean they didn't have any interest and haven't learned anything about them. And they have another guy with 10 year experience in software development. Maybe their team really doesn't seem excellent, but I've seen worse. So let's say it's medicore.

2. I can see how small businesses would benefit a lot from such project. But who will be the lender? The banks or large loan companies that refuse to give loans to small businesses now? Why would using such project make them give out instant loans? The banks are complicating with giving loans because they want to protect themselves from risks. I can't see how that would change. But I admit I just skimmed the whitepaper so maybe it's explained in there.

3. Running business is good, yes. But sometimes is good to check the website of their business to see how much traffic it gets. I've seen ICO's claiming to have working businesses on their websites, but their websites received very little traffic so they were not as successful as they claimed to be.

4. Advisors can be very important for successful crowdsale. If they are big names even if they don't really give any advice just their name causes the ICO to sell out very fast. So they're guarantee the project will collect enough funds.

5. Whitepapers containing only technical stuff are actually bad in my opinion. Maybe not for you personally because you might understand technical stuff very well. But 99% of ICO investors don't understand it and pure technical whitepaper would make ICO loose a lot of potential investors. In my opinion whitepaper should be a document that presents the project to investors and contains everything an investor might be interested in. Even if the whitepaper starts with a Susan dry cleaning shop and sounds unserious because of that it explains to regular people that don't know much about technical or financial stuff quite well what problem they're trying to solve. I think their whitepaper isn't one of the best, but it seems good enough.

The project seems medium to good to me. But one thing the project seems to lack is interest of community. Their website has very low statistics of visits, Telegram group has only 300+ members, just 165 followers on twitter and so on. I think project with such low community interest will have hard time collecting enough funds to succeed.

1. paycent
2. paycent

Take a look at Pally app . Now with 25% discount. Beta version with more than 25 000 downloads on iOS

Pally app - decentralised social travel

https://pally.co

Yeah, I looked a little at Crypterium. They had some decent options for innovative crypto payments. Even if a lot of people here will criticise the idea of crypto banks, but if you look past that, a product that addresses the problems for the majority, which is technological inability or in the case of crypto technical complexity, then we can understand that these types of solutions are needed to bridge people and tech. For that alone, we can consider them.

However, the space for crypto payments/banking/management is so crowded now, it's going to be hard to pick the "right" one among many,

Just an opinion , i think Crypterium its good ICO , because their have a good concept , professional team and based for crypto banks on world (Most successfully project).
Maybe GetChange ICO too , their have a good concept too , like crypterium , but this is singapore based mobile cryptobank.
I think the most success ICO its based on their concept, team and their project like Crypto Bankings , Grocery , Debit Card and Wallet/Exchanger.
CMIIW

Im in watching at stex.exchange ICO and crypterium.
Stex.exchange presale was capped 15k ETH On september 30th.  Ico start Nov14th - 18th an will ends in december.
Crypterium on whatcing.

I find the Bitclave project interesting.
I'm going to participate in it.

Exactly an upcoming ICO, like it is asked here ...

Look at this https://eos.io/
EOS is perspective project and has a lot of investors and many

In my opinion...

ARToken by CAPPASITY
DMarket (PreICO)
Confideal
PlayKey

And will be good ICO as WePower next year

Don't take this personally, but I think your research is basic, which is a start, but it only places that ICO in the average category.

1. Team: financial and IT background, what about cryptocurrency or blockchain background? The solution is using blockchain, where are their developers?

2. Market - credit gap is indeed underserved but you have P2P lending which is picking up the slack from banks

3. Okay, this is a good point. So they know how to run a business.. IT devt with 151k hours is not that big btw!

4. Advisors: Not important. Might hurt if linked to other poor projects.

5. Whitepaper: Pitch story should not be part of whitepaper, neither is token generation really. Whitepaper should purely focus on technical details.

So on a whole, it's OKAY. Better than a lot, but not a lot.

for sure utrust))

Lately I was away from ICO business, I checked out new projects. I hate them most, but found a gem.
I like GUTS project more. It's already working in Nederlands, if they expand their project to overseas it has very big potential.

Crowdholding just posted a new task! 🚀
Tell us about your favorite ICO startup and earn some YUPIEs 💸
https://www.crowdholding.com/project/68/task/283/this-is-our-first-24-hour-task

Really liking the look of their whitepaper, I've joined the telegram for more info. Thanks for the heads up

i think file coin is good ico for now, the devs is so famous and good 

The best upcoming ICO is definetly Guts . I have vey high hopes for this ICO because the project itself is very realistic and doable. I’m looking forward Guts ICO it’s going the be one of the best ICOs of 2017 .

I am doing analysis on Debitum Network project and will be able to share more once I fully complete it, but already now I like the project due to strong points:

1. Team - both financial and IT background, previous on-hand business experience, members working already for at least few years.
2. Market - credit gap for small businesses is huge, underserved by major banks
3. Working businesses - they claim to have two working businesses. One in invoice financing, for which they already raised EUR 3 million and have an invoice turnover of EUR 19 million3. Advisors - looks like business people, not only shiny names on the page. The other is IT development with 151 k project hours clocked.
4. Advisors team - looks like a mix of business people and "mini-stars", likely some of them will remain for post ICO business development.
5. Whitepaper - actually 3 docs (pitch story, position paper, token generation), which include explicit roadmap with detailed use of proceeds and how the ecosystem works.

My few cents. What do you guys think?

Hey, everyone!

CROWDHOLDING ICO is LIVE NOW! Join it today and get a 20% bonus!

Keep Up to date! Our Telegram channel!