The conclusion must be taken based on the terms and conditions that apply if Betfury includes this rule then they are on the right side free to do it
But on the contrary, if Betfury does not apply this rule, those who feel disadvantaged can submit complaints, although the Betfury team did not respond at least this would be a bad record and old users or new users can see it in the future. By the way this was not the first time I saw Betfury made a one-sided decision for example in affiliate cases.
Anything outside of the terms and conditions can't be determined unilaterally unless the team has to explain the details of the problem for the purpose of publicizing the reasons why the team should take that decision, but like you said if it's not open to unilateral action then that would add to a bad record so I think if that issue If it can be repaired then the team can use it to minimize problems caused to users.
I have a doubt in all this, if they decide to include this in their terms and conditions or not, is it okay? This is something that I cannot see if it is totally correct and legal, although it is included or not in the terms and conditions, I think they will still have problems, right? The truth is that I have been in Betfury from the beginning, but there are certain things that, according to what I have read in the thread, is something that surprises me, and they should fix all the problems, because a casino that has grown so much should do something fast, I I think that a person who has put money in Betfury and they get to block their account, the most logical thing is that the casino allows them to let them take out the client's money.
-cut-
the only thing that this FTX collapse could affect on BetFury could be the price of the BetFury coin, but looking at the charts I see that this collapse did not affect the altcoin price, and it is somewhat strange that the price has not fallen a lot. and from what I've seen, there aren't many good exchanges that have listed the BFG Token, maybe this is the main reason that altcoin didn't fall much with this collapse
BFG is somewhat outsider and behaves differently when it comes to altcoins. If a token pays dividends in other coins like bitcoin and usdt, it has value outside from the market speculation, no matter what the other coins do.
However as the circulated supply with bfg tokens grows and dividends get smaller, price of those bfg tokens get smaller as well. Even if the market now would go up. So BFG isn't really safe store of value at this point unless they change their tokenomics. Or unless there's going to be huge amount of players in that casino, but can't se that happening without a good reason.
It is a very good analysis and I know that there are many things that can be guided by being successful, if there is not much demand how do they make it possible for them to sustain staking? It is something that I have also asked myself, but I see that the BFG topken is only a part of everything that can be generated from a casino, a casino gets a lot of money and that can be used to inject liquidity and thus have on the other hand a way to win in the very long term, what makes the BFG tokens more interesting is that the more the tokens are burned the more a tokenized economy will be forged and something more tending to deflation, but if the supply of tokens is manipulated this process yes It may take much longer, there must be a limited circulation of tokens and there are many, that is what makes it not become so strong and less so in this market with a bearish trend.