I don't fully agree. What is the real benefit of getting listed on small exchanges with a very low volume? If you have a token that you want to get listed, you always need to aim high and try to get listed on the places with a high amount of volume.
There is no benefit from listing on small exchanges. As an example, the BFG token is already traded on smaller centralized exchanges such as hotbit, cointiger, and coinsbit. The problem is that listing on these exchanges turned out to be absolutely useless because there is minimal activity and no liquidity. However, even if the BFG is someday added to one of the top exchanges, it won't guarantee a huge volume. I mean, the developers' actions are also crucial since it depends first of all on them whether there will be an increased demand for the token or not.
I couldn't agree more with you, if low volume exchanges are what you are looking for, it will be a total failure, and it would be a shame because many years ago a project that was only one currency failed for these simple reasons:
1.-They did not put the currency in an Exchange 1A.
2.-They did not pay attention to the community.
That was enough for all the investors to not support their project anymore, they left, they made a big Dump and took the coin from 20USD to almost 2USD and currently it is less than 1usd, it was something really sad, I hope and I hope you can listen to the community and they can try to put the token in a good exchange, I think the casino has a way to do it, they cannot say NO to success, and for me so far the casino has been very successful and they have done things well, of course until now, I think it's time to jump into something much better.
Not recommended for people who are in rush since for sure it will take 24 hours or more before you can receive the amount you transact and what worse is sometimes you feel stress and seek for accelerators which you believe to help your transaction to fasten up. Better to use always what network recommends since this is more the safest and fastest way for us to have smooth transaction on timely manner.
I always choose the slow withdrawal as I don't mind if it arrives in 2h or 24h. But since they introduced the BSC chain to withdraw BTC and ETH, I always use this. Fees are a lot lower and the transactions go a lot faster, so it is a win/win!
I also always use slow withdrawal when I move BTC! I don't mind waiting... if I wish faster I simply go with BSC! Tron was the great alternative... but when the BSC chain appeared it was even better! I always point out how "fast and cheap" is important for people who really like to gamble (of course, not only for that...) and move funds from casinos to wallets, or between casinos! I decided to not use Ethereum, and all ETH tokens, ever again because of the high fees from the last years...
Well, the truth is that I have never used the BSC chain, but I imagine that it is very fast, recently I used the normal chain of the Bitcoin network and the transfer lasted 4 hours, which seemed a bit slow to me, I am not used to it lasting so much, but really when I use the ERC-20 network it is because I really need to do something urgently, because it seems to me that the fees are very high, and currently they are not so high, but about 1 year ago, year and means that I needed to make a transfer of ERC-20 to Binance, that was a very exaggerated fee, I did not find a way to do it with less money, I did the same way, but I try to avoid that ERC-20 chain, the Betfury tokens or any currency that you have in Betfury, I consider that it is the normal rate that they should charge, they cannot assume such a high fee.