Pages:
Author

Topic: 🎲BetFury.io|​​​💫 Stellar network & XLM 💫|📈BFG farming on BabySwap - page 79. (Read 82201 times)

sr. member
Activity: 2142
Merit: 254

I doubt that high rollers enjoy Martingale using it while gambling. Of course, if a user has a few bitcoins, then using such a strategy as Martingale might allow him to avoid losing the entire deposit due to a long losing streak. However, it also means that every time a user should start gambling with a minimum bet of literally 1 sat because even 25-30 losses in a row will be an unpleasant experience for a high roller.
Can a high roller enjoy gambling with an initial bet of 1 sat? I don't think so.

If you start with 1 satoshis, you can have some losses but I think the high rollers start at some higher numbers maybe even a few bitcoin in one bet lol.
I think there is still a lot of ignorance about the Martingale strategy; I have a buddy that I went to the casino with recently (in real life) and he kept talking about that with Martingale you couldn't loose and that is not possible to have 20-25 losses in a row.
legendary
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2229
But then again, martingale in itself is not a strategy used by or made for pleb Players, it can only be enjoyed by high rollers with big bank roll, if you are a pleb gambler like myself, you will end up burning away all your money without knowing what the money was used for.

I doubt that high rollers enjoy Martingale using it while gambling. Of course, if a user has a few bitcoins, then using such a strategy as Martingale might allow him to avoid losing the entire deposit due to a long losing streak. However, it also means that every time a user should start gambling with a minimum bet of literally 1 sat because even 25-30 losses in a row will be an unpleasant experience for a high roller.
Can a high roller enjoy gambling with an initial bet of 1 sat? I don't think so.
legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 1082
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Quote from: abel1337 link=topic=5276159.msg62390133#msg62390133 date= 1686493574
That's how casino counter the martingale strategy. Most of the bankroll won't keep up if they experience 20x losing streak. You need to have a ridiculous amount of capital to keep up with a very small base bet if you experience that kind of losing streak. This is why I don't do martingale only strategy on a casino since I've lost so much money just by doing it. It's an effective strategy but the risk of it will certainly drain all your bank rolls. I suggest to just use different strategies when you are doing a gambling session or mix some strategies.

This is the reality. Martingale method is only effective on short term bets since its good for recovery. Player should set a stop loss are loss limit when using this kind of strategy to avoid being rekt in long term. I’m using martingale on blackjack but instead of increasing my bet on single sit, I just add another sit to have 2 hands that equivalent to martingale x2 bet. This way I still increase my bet while having 2 chances at the same time.

Using this strategy on dice is very risky because dice result is pure random and long lose streak can happened anytime if the player is bad luck.


There have been many discussions but I don't think Martingale is ever a good strategy. In the past, like so many members I used it a lot and in the beginning it always went well. I kept doing it and offcourse it went wrong 2 times. Sometimes I still want to try it again but most of the times I can stop myself from doing it.
Martingale is good but only is you are lucky, it could help a gambler amass great wealth, but the fact remains that,  it is purely luck based, and one thing with pure luck based  games or strategies is that a gambler will always end up losing every thing in the long run, no matter how much you win..

But then again, martingale in itself is not a strategy used by or made for pleb Players, it can only be enjoyed by high rollers with big bank roll, if you are a pleb gambler like myself, you will end up burning away all your money without knowing what the money was used for.
sr. member
Activity: 2142
Merit: 254
Quote from: abel1337 link=topic=5276159.msg62390133#msg62390133 date= 1686493574
That's how casino counter the martingale strategy. Most of the bankroll won't keep up if they experience 20x losing streak. You need to have a ridiculous amount of capital to keep up with a very small base bet if you experience that kind of losing streak. This is why I don't do martingale only strategy on a casino since I've lost so much money just by doing it. It's an effective strategy but the risk of it will certainly drain all your bank rolls. I suggest to just use different strategies when you are doing a gambling session or mix some strategies.

This is the reality. Martingale method is only effective on short term bets since its good for recovery. Player should set a stop loss are loss limit when using this kind of strategy to avoid being rekt in long term. I’m using martingale on blackjack but instead of increasing my bet on single sit, I just add another sit to have 2 hands that equivalent to martingale x2 bet. This way I still increase my bet while having 2 chances at the same time.

Using this strategy on dice is very risky because dice result is pure random and long lose streak can happened anytime if the player is bad luck.


There have been many discussions but I don't think Martingale is ever a good strategy. In the past, like so many members I used it a lot and in the beginning it always went well. I kept doing it and offcourse it went wrong 2 times. Sometimes I still want to try it again but most of the times I can stop myself from doing it.
legendary
Activity: 2884
Merit: 1117
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Very interesting point you brought up about your BetFury experience. It seems to me that, while a tad inconvenient, the log-outs could be an added layer of security. The age-old saying comes to mind: "Better safe than sorry." You never know who could have a go at your PC while you are away - and if you're anything like me, I'd rather not risk my crypto assets.

However, I  agree with the prior response suggesting to look into your security settings. Most platforms have a setting where you can control your session durations. Also, have you considered a password manager? They can securely store your passwords and log you in automatically when you return. It could be a win-win situation for you - security and convenience all in one.

Finally, it might be worth reaching out to BetFury's customer service. If you're experiencing this, there's a chance others are too. And hey, if it's a bug, they'll appreciate you bringing it to their attention.
When you are trying to use as much security as possible, you should also remember that you shouldn't put too much stress into yourself neither. If adding more and more security makes it even harder for you, then you are doing something a wee bit more excessive then needed. It's better to have a situation where you will handle your part easily and make it harder for others instead.

Like having 2fa is good enough, and if you are logged in then you are logged in but if others want to log in they will need your 2fa. That makes it a bit easier, that way others would have a hard time logging into your account but you would have no issues about it and that should be the case, never make it harder for yourself, make it harder for others.
legendary
Activity: 3178
Merit: 1054
Quote from: abel1337 link=topic=5276159.msg62390133#msg62390133 date= 1686493574
That's how casino counter the martingale strategy. Most of the bankroll won't keep up if they experience 20x losing streak. You need to have a ridiculous amount of capital to keep up with a very small base bet if you experience that kind of losing streak. This is why I don't do martingale only strategy on a casino since I've lost so much money just by doing it. It's an effective strategy but the risk of it will certainly drain all your bank rolls. I suggest to just use different strategies when you are doing a gambling session or mix some strategies.

This is the reality. Martingale method is only effective on short term bets since its good for recovery. Player should set a stop loss are loss limit when using this kind of strategy to avoid being rekt in long term. I’m using martingale on blackjack but instead of increasing my bet on single sit, I just add another sit to have 2 hands that equivalent to martingale x2 bet. This way I still increase my bet while having 2 chances at the same time.

Using this strategy on dice is very risky because dice result is pure random and long lose streak can happened anytime if the player is bad luck.


If anyone wants to use the Martingale strategy, he should make up his mind before the game, that he will quit after how many unsuccessful bets.
People lose a lot in Martingale because they do not set a limit as to when they will stop in case of consecutive losses and thus lose their whole balance portfolio in the gambling site.

Most people use Martingale strategy on dice games and i guess Martingale strategy is best designed to play on dice but only if we play it with proper risk management.

its hard to stop you when you are hopeful to win back the lose. its the reason why you double down. if you have been using martingale from time to time. you may not be able to remember how many times you fell for it.

its always what happens. the more you lose the more you double down as well until you have nothing left in your account. there could be time when you want to stop because you are wining and that i believe you may have done so. but after a day or two you still come back.


legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1159
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Quote from: abel1337 link=topic=5276159.msg62390133#msg62390133 date= 1686493574
That's how casino counter the martingale strategy. Most of the bankroll won't keep up if they experience 20x losing streak. You need to have a ridiculous amount of capital to keep up with a very small base bet if you experience that kind of losing streak. This is why I don't do martingale only strategy on a casino since I've lost so much money just by doing it. It's an effective strategy but the risk of it will certainly drain all your bank rolls. I suggest to just use different strategies when you are doing a gambling session or mix some strategies.

This is the reality. Martingale method is only effective on short term bets since its good for recovery. Player should set a stop loss are loss limit when using this kind of strategy to avoid being rekt in long term. I’m using martingale on blackjack but instead of increasing my bet on single sit, I just add another sit to have 2 hands that equivalent to martingale x2 bet. This way I still increase my bet while having 2 chances at the same time.

Using this strategy on dice is very risky because dice result is pure random and long lose streak can happened anytime if the player is bad luck.


If anyone wants to use the Martingale strategy, he should make up his mind before the game, that he will quit after how many unsuccessful bets.
People lose a lot in Martingale because they do not set a limit as to when they will stop in case of consecutive losses and thus lose their whole balance portfolio in the gambling site.

Most people use Martingale strategy on dice games and i guess Martingale strategy is best designed to play on dice but only if we play it with proper risk management.
hero member
Activity: 2856
Merit: 783
Reward: 10M Shen (Approx. 5000 BNB) Bounty
Quote from: abel1337 link=topic=5276159.msg62390133#msg62390133 date= 1686493574
That's how casino counter the martingale strategy. Most of the bankroll won't keep up if they experience 20x losing streak. You need to have a ridiculous amount of capital to keep up with a very small base bet if you experience that kind of losing streak. This is why I don't do martingale only strategy on a casino since I've lost so much money just by doing it. It's an effective strategy but the risk of it will certainly drain all your bank rolls. I suggest to just use different strategies when you are doing a gambling session or mix some strategies.

This is the reality. Martingale method is only effective on short term bets since its good for recovery. Player should set a stop loss are loss limit when using this kind of strategy to avoid being rekt in long term. I’m using martingale on blackjack but instead of increasing my bet on single sit, I just add another sit to have 2 hands that equivalent to martingale x2 bet. This way I still increase my bet while having 2 chances at the same time.

Using this strategy on dice is very risky because dice result is pure random and long lose streak can happened anytime if the player is bad luck.
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1145
Enterapp Pre-Sale Live - bit.ly/3UrMCWI
Not usual but it can happen, 40 red losing streaks are something that you can't imagine happening if you are the one who's playing, those who are using martingale system who hopes that they can recover their losses after winning their next bet would be empty if that long losing streak take place.
That's why the Martingale strategy requires big money when you really face a losing streak of more than 20x, let alone having to lose 40x in a row, that's definitely a big loss and drains all of our money, that's why I never really believe in dice or casino games others are called "Probably Fair", but again it's up to the gamblers how they stop playing before the dealer drains your money.

Martingale strategy with big bankroll will make your gambling experience worst if ever you ever a losing streak like that or more because you are increasing your base bet exponentially. Thinking how terribe it can be on Martingale strategy makes my spine tingle. Assuming you invest your life savings on your bankroll just to have a room for long lose streak and then this kind of catastrophe hits you hard that wipe your money without you being notice it.

This is the important thing I learned on playing gambling. Just use bankroll that you can afford to lose since this kind of long lose streak can hit anytime since we are always exposed to risk the longer we play.


That's how casino counter the martingale strategy. Most of the bankroll won't keep up if they experience 20x losing streak. You need to have a ridiculous amount of capital to keep up with a very small base bet if you experience that kind of losing streak. This is why I don't do martingale only strategy on a casino since I've lost so much money just by doing it. It's an effective strategy but the risk of it will certainly drain all your bank rolls. I suggest to just use different strategies when you are doing a gambling session or mix some strategies.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1154
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Martingale strategy with big bankroll will make your gambling experience worst if ever you ever a losing streak like that or more because you are increasing your base bet exponentially. Thinking how terribe it can be on Martingale strategy makes my spine tingle. Assuming you invest your life savings on your bankroll just to have a room for long lose streak and then this kind of catastrophe hits you hard that wipe your money without you being notice it.

This is the important thing I learned on playing gambling. Just use bankroll that you can afford to lose since this kind of long lose streak can hit anytime since we are always exposed to risk the longer we play.
I once was talking with a guy that i thought was intelligent as he was good in chess. And he was defending the martingale strategy to me and nothing i said made trough him. He was convinced that if you had enough money it would work. I tried to argue that eventually it's likely that there will be a losing strike that wipes your balance, no matter how small your bets are or how much money you had.

And if you had so much money what are you playing with small bets anyway. It would take ages to give him any meaningful wins. Then he started to argue that if he had infinite amount of money it would work.

That made me stop talking. I wasn't going to argue about the absurdity of infinity, but it was very telling to me how far people with gambler's fallacy are willing to go to not face the reality.
hero member
Activity: 1260
Merit: 607
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Not usual but it can happen, 40 red losing streaks are something that you can't imagine happening if you are the one who's playing, those who are using martingale system who hopes that they can recover their losses after winning their next bet would be empty if that long losing streak take place.
That's why the Martingale strategy requires big money when you really face a losing streak of more than 20x, let alone having to lose 40x in a row, that's definitely a big loss and drains all of our money, that's why I never really believe in dice or casino games others are called "Probably Fair", but again it's up to the gamblers how they stop playing before the dealer drains your money.

Martingale strategy with big bankroll will make your gambling experience worst if ever you ever a losing streak like that or more because you are increasing your base bet exponentially. Thinking how terribe it can be on Martingale strategy makes my spine tingle. Assuming you invest your life savings on your bankroll just to have a room for long lose streak and then this kind of catastrophe hits you hard that wipe your money without you being notice it.

This is the important thing I learned on playing gambling. Just use bankroll that you can afford to lose since this kind of long lose streak can hit anytime since we are always exposed to risk the longer we play.

hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 672
Top Crypto Casino

It is really not surprising to see a 40 consecutive losses especially in dice.  Even in slots which often gives small amount just to break the dead spin streak gives 30 plus consecutive dead spin (read streak) when we are spinning for too long.  I always experienced that scenario since I am the kind of slot player that seldom hop to different games and often ends up playing in a single slot game.

In slots having a lot of consecutive losses happens pretty frequently especially on high volatile games. On the in-house games like Dice or limbo or crash it can also happen but more rarely. The longest "bad" streak I saw was about 20-25 consecutive losses (luckily for myself I was not playing Martingale than or otherwise I would have busted my entire bankroll lol).

Not usual but it can happen, 40 red losing streaks are something that you can't imagine happening if you are the one who's playing, those who are using martingale system who hopes that they can recover their losses after winning their next bet would be empty if that long losing streak take place.

Though, if you experienced that long red losing bets for sure the aggressiveness inside you will lead you to lose more than your expected budget.

I have seen that happening myself with the Crash game, the game crashed more than 20 times in sequel and many players have lost a lot of money during that gameplay. Those games are totally unpredictable and anytime the game could get annoyed for the gamblers when they see it failing in a sequel of 15 times or more. I tried a strategy on that game which was to bet only if I can see 10 times the game crashing as red, and I would start betting at 11th time, but the strategy was a complete failure because in such constant red multipliers a gambler will empty up the wallet if using Martingale strategy, and I mingled up my strategy with the Martingale's strategy.

The Martingale strategy is a total failure and anyone who uses it in such games will empty up his full balance. I think it's not a good way for a gambler to use that strategy on games where failure ratio is unpredicted because a user could empty up the account balance within minutes of gambling. When it comes to Crash game then I recommend everyone to avoid that strategy if they don't want their account to be emptied. Try to avoid it in such games and dice is also among these games so a good gambler would never go with such strategy in online casino games.
legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1038
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Not usual but it can happen, 40 red losing streaks are something that you can't imagine happening if you are the one who's playing, those who are using martingale system who hopes that they can recover their losses after winning their next bet would be empty if that long losing streak take place.
That's why the Martingale strategy requires big money when you really face a losing streak of more than 20x, let alone having to lose 40x in a row, that's definitely a big loss and drains all of our money, that's why I never really believe in dice or casino games others are called "Probably Fair", but again it's up to the gamblers how they stop playing before the dealer drains your money.

Never be tempted by big money targets, always enjoy the results you get, you don't need to be big, at least win a little, as long as you are consistent, that's more than enough, even though I can't do that, I think other people might be able to do it, as long as they are consistent with small achievements, that's enough .
hero member
Activity: 3010
Merit: 629

It is really not surprising to see a 40 consecutive losses especially in dice.  Even in slots which often gives small amount just to break the dead spin streak gives 30 plus consecutive dead spin (read streak) when we are spinning for too long.  I always experienced that scenario since I am the kind of slot player that seldom hop to different games and often ends up playing in a single slot game.

In slots having a lot of consecutive losses happens pretty frequently especially on high volatile games. On the in-house games like Dice or limbo or crash it can also happen but more rarely. The longest "bad" streak I saw was about 20-25 consecutive losses (luckily for myself I was not playing Martingale than or otherwise I would have busted my entire bankroll lol).

Not usual but it can happen, 40 red losing streaks are something that you can't imagine happening if you are the one who's playing, those who are using martingale system who hopes that they can recover their losses after winning their next bet would be empty if that long losing streak take place.

Though, if you experienced that long red losing bets for sure the aggressiveness inside you will lead you to lose more than your expected budget.
You're so unlucky if you experienced such and it might discourage you to play that particular game again. Well, I don't stay in games that giving me bad experience, the reason why i'm not a fan of slot. Fortunately on the game where I usually play (live games), I never encounter yet of having consecutive losses (20-40 like others have experienced already). But even so, the ending is still favor in the house as i'm often finishing my gambling time with losses.
legendary
Activity: 2996
Merit: 1054
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

It is really not surprising to see a 40 consecutive losses especially in dice.  Even in slots which often gives small amount just to break the dead spin streak gives 30 plus consecutive dead spin (read streak) when we are spinning for too long.  I always experienced that scenario since I am the kind of slot player that seldom hop to different games and often ends up playing in a single slot game.

In slots having a lot of consecutive losses happens pretty frequently especially on high volatile games. On the in-house games like Dice or limbo or crash it can also happen but more rarely. The longest "bad" streak I saw was about 20-25 consecutive losses (luckily for myself I was not playing Martingale than or otherwise I would have busted my entire bankroll lol).

Not usual but it can happen, 40 red losing streaks are something that you can't imagine happening if you are the one who's playing, those who are using martingale system who hopes that they can recover their losses after winning their next bet would be empty if that long losing streak take place.

Though, if you experienced that long red losing bets for sure the aggressiveness inside you will lead you to lose more than your expected budget.
sr. member
Activity: 2142
Merit: 254

It is really not surprising to see a 40 consecutive losses especially in dice.  Even in slots which often gives small amount just to break the dead spin streak gives 30 plus consecutive dead spin (read streak) when we are spinning for too long.  I always experienced that scenario since I am the kind of slot player that seldom hop to different games and often ends up playing in a single slot game.

In slots having a lot of consecutive losses happens pretty frequently especially on high volatile games. On the in-house games like Dice or limbo or crash it can also happen but more rarely. The longest "bad" streak I saw was about 20-25 consecutive losses (luckily for myself I was not playing Martingale than or otherwise I would have busted my entire bankroll lol).
hero member
Activity: 1918
Merit: 564
Oh wow, 40 consecutive red is a wild. I haven't seen that kind of number on a losing streak in my whole life. I will personally reflect on myself if on that kind of losing streak. If you manage to lose 40 times in a row means you have balls of steel to try to gamble again and an incredible amount of unluckiness on your side. Our luck can't be measured but if we experience a bad day, it would be nice to still have money to take home and not letting all of your money getting burned on a casino. Casino can easily remove your luck even if you won multiple times on different days, Casino only took hours to get back all of the profits that you gained on several days of playing.
It's funny how you say it, but yes, honestly losing or having 40 reds is very possible and that makes one very angry, because it is obvious that one thinks that the game is rigged and it is something that is not out of the ordinary That is why I have always said that things here when it comes to playing with the dice, what I learned is that you should play little and if you want to play hard, make big bets almost at the beginning, because the results are quick Otherwise, the things that can be Obtained in the long term by Playing and playing are very low , the chances of winning , this is my Personal Opinion.

It is really not surprising to see a 40 consecutive losses especially in dice.  Even in slots which often gives small amount just to break the dead spin streak gives 30 plus consecutive dead spin (read streak) when we are spinning for too long.  I always experienced that scenario since I am the kind of slot player that seldom hop to different games and often ends up playing in a single slot game.
copper member
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1179
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
It's funny how you say it, but yes, honestly losing or having 40 reds is very possible and that makes one very angry, because it is obvious that one thinks that the game is rigged and it is something that is not out of the ordinary That is why I have always said that things here when it comes to playing with the dice, what I learned is that you should play little and if you want to play hard, make big bets almost at the beginning, because the results are quick Otherwise, the things that can be obtained in the long term by Playing and playing are very low , the chances of winning , this is my Personal Opinion.

On a 50% winning chance? I never encounter a losing streak like this even on Blackjack. This is probably the highest record I saw because I only got 20+ before when I'm using a dice bot. Do you remember what dice site you are using at that time to make sure that bets are probably fair? Is not that it's impossible to happen but it's very rare to see that kind of train wreck.

I think you can only get that kind of streak using tons of roll.
legendary
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1873
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Even with high bankroll martingale can easily eat and deplete you fund especially when you encounter a series of reds in your roll. 20+ red streak can possibly make your bankroll negative  and we all know that 20+ read streak is very possible.  I even experience this in spinning a slot. 20+ dead spin.  Imagine if I martingale my bet and I experience that 20+ streak. 
If someone doesn't realize that getting to 10+ is a sign, he should stop immediately and doesn't stop gambling. Instead, he will only run out of money if he uses big bets, especially if he gets 20+ a series of reds.

For slot games, usually after getting several losses, we can get a win which, even though it's a small win, can make us continue to gamble. So for gambling, I think it's really worth it if we stick with small bets even though we have a big bankroll because it sure hurts to see all our balances used up that day.
Usually that is true, but not every single time. You could get a lot of losses that will eventually make you run out of money and there is no return from there, it just doesn't work like that. I have seen people turn just a few dollars into thousands of dollars and then end up losing it all back again. Casinos have house edge on their side which means that it would not be possible for anyone to just keep on gambling and win.

If you gamble long enough, then you are going to end up with a loss eventually and that is the end of it, that's just going to be the case for sure, without a doubt. I hope that it gets to a point where it will not be possible for anyone to just keep on gambling for a long time and still not face 20+ losses in a row, if you keep gambling, you will reach that one day.
Reaching 20 losses in a row is not much, I have seen up to 40 losses in a row , that when I was playing at that time I came to think that the casino did not want to let me win more and that they were signing me up to lose, but then I began to Investigate about the probably fair and from there a great interest came from many people who wanted to beat the system, and remembering those times where I played so much, I wonder if the AI in the near future if it has that capacity, because it is not difficult for it nothing to learn, it is a matter of days , for you to Learn something at a master level.


honestly it's hard to imagine that a person can lose 40 consecutive times, to be honest that person even playing dice at auto bet won't have so much bad luck to the point of losing a lot consecutively, but nothing is impossible in gambling, if the person loses more than 5 consecutive times in sports betting, then this person needs to stop playing with greater urgency, otherwise this person will be walking towards addiction and will sell everything he has to continue playing, because in games of chance in which luck depends on winning if the person is not lucky enough to win something considerable even when he has played many games then he needs to stop playing that game and try another game

I saw a lot of people playing plinko for example and so I thought about playing too, at first I managed to convert from 5$ to 13$ but for some strange reason since I started losing, I didn't stop losing until I reached 0$, honestly that day I felt bad, but so bad that I stopped playing plinko forever, until my day turned bad, I couldn't understand how it was possible to lose so much, from 13 to 0 in a short time, but today I see that gambling that depend on luck are not worth playing because I won't be lucky to win something
Oh wow, 40 consecutive red is a wild. I haven't seen that kind of number on a losing streak in my whole life. I will personally reflect on myself if on that kind of losing streak. If you manage to lose 40 times in a row means you have balls of steel to try to gamble again and an incredible amount of unluckiness on your side. Our luck can't be measured but if we experience a bad day, it would be nice to still have money to take home and not letting all of your money getting burned on a casino. Casino can easily remove your luck even if you won multiple times on different days, Casino only took hours to get back all of the profits that you gained on several days of playing.
It's funny how you say it, but yes, honestly losing or having 40 reds is very possible and that makes one very angry, because it is obvious that one thinks that the game is rigged and it is something that is not out of the ordinary That is why I have always said that things here when it comes to playing with the dice, what I learned is that you should play little and if you want to play hard, make big bets almost at the beginning, because the results are quick Otherwise, the things that can be Obtained in the long term by Playing and playing are very low , the chances of winning , this is my Personal Opinion.

legendary
Activity: 2884
Merit: 1117
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
P.S. I am paranoid and dont save imporand pages to bookmarks, as I am scared that someone will replace it with fake page Cheesy
Your fear is too much, after all, how can you give other people access to a laptop or browser, isn't it even though it's on your cellphone, you can lock your cellphone so that other people can't access it or use a laptop, you can also set it to lock the account on your laptop, unless you often sharing laptops with people maybe you need to worry if not, why worry.

Even so, it is indeed your concern for something good to maintain security for yourself, but as long as your browser is accessed only by yourself, you don't need to worry too much, it will be safe, believe me because no stupid hacker will replace a fake page in your browser unless he knows you're a rich man who has a lot of money in his laptop. but even though there is a lot of money in your laptop browser, you certainly won't be sharing your laptop or browser either.  Cheesy
I am not entirely sure if anyone could replace your bookmarked pages with something else, it is not going to be that easy. It is obvious that you are going to be hacked if that ever happens and if you are hacked then I am pretty sure that's the last thing you need to worry about.

I have been known to download some viruses here and there, due to my job I do end up searching online a lot, I need to read a lot, everyday I spend 2 hours reading and learning about crypto so that I can be better at my job when writing about it, it could be unrelated to crypto as well and some of the websites I visit do have virus that they want you to download and sometimes I do, not a big problem since I have a beast anti-virus software (not gonna shill here) but even with that, I never got my bookmarks ever changed.
Pages:
Jump to: