Topic: BetKing.io is a blatant scam operated by Dean Nolan - page 15. (Read 31064 times)

my reply was ...... but you also state in the same comment you qouted that it was a "One man Operation" ..... just like your guys understanding of definitions you also do not understand logic . JollyGood do you see the irony now? Or are you truly so ignorant that it is above you?

And his reply was......





I am eating popcorn waiting to read the story he eventually inevitably will post  

Like I said where is proof? You guys really seem to struggle with definitions.

Where's BetKing.io?  
http://archive.is/6uUQZ

I believe you claim to be both an ICO and bankroll investor? If so, what happened to your money? 

Where is your proof?

The site is gone. Dean took the money for himself and even had the audacity to state he lost the bankrolls in each currency. He should be in prison.

https://cryptics.tech/andrew-gurar/

This was one of many names that was listed in the betking Telegram channel before it vanished. I think he was a moderator there and from what I recall also an investor who seemed to be defending some of the accusations being made against serial scammer Dean Nolan. I decided to run a quick search today to see who he was as investors might thinking about commencing legal action:






Does anybody have a list containing betking investors from the 2017 ICO and those with large BKT token holdings?

I want to reach out to them and make a donation towards any legal action costs they will incur either as single cases or a collective class action if they consider legal action against serial scammer Dean Nolan. I would also like to share my case file with various extensive bits of information which might help them as they compile their case.

Don’t worry, I won’t write anything else.  I have already made sure that you have no honor.

Yes I noticed so I also tagged him too. Pointless incoherent posting with absolutely relation to the subject matter deserved him getting tagged.



  Please do not give him the opportunity for posting more betking related basketball and sports news here



When he was trying to sell the betking website serial scammer Dean Nolan made it clear how easy it was to keep the site going and how it all worked itself apart from cold-wallet to hot-wallet top up and answering emails there was nothing to do.

I still feel there is more to this than meets the eye. I understand when you say getting the site back online is an ultra-low priority for him but he did make payment to the user of 26 LTC in combination of 20.6 LTC and the rest in ETH after he requested it via email because of the site being down. The fact the site is down is shocking. The betking Telegram was ended ages ago. How can investors talk to each other now to work out a strategy if they want to discuss legal options or discuss how to get their investment back?

Sure, the imbecile serial scammer Dean Nolan has made millions from the whole betking scam (just the 30 million BKB he stole and sold at the guaranteed buy-back price pocketed him $2.74 million so add to that the other amounts he siphoned-off then it makes a big amount of the $6.5 million ICO funds went directly to him) but there are users with BKT tokens that cannot trade now, there are investors with zero BKB as they swapped them for BKT and they are almost useless. As long as he keeps the site up he can try to ward off any legal action by claiming he is trying to make it successful but if he lets it slide like it is now he is opening himself up for litigation by investors.

As for his trashy bitsafe exchange and payment processing ICO - time will tell...

I meant information about the resource.  Judging by the title of the topic, the author is negatively opposed to Bet.king and therefore I decided to read the information on the Internet, and not just on the forum.  I expressed my opinion on the project in the framework, as expressed by other users.  No one disproves that the resource is not working.

 I guess getting the site back online is an ultra-low priority for him, as he's already got all the investors money and moved on. But it's also pretty important for him to try keep it up, so he can at least pretend he tried but it was a commercial failure instead of admitting he just scammed investors by changing the investment terms to his sole benefit.

I'm still really curious to see his next payments ICO, although I doubt he'll be able to put his name on it.

Please tell us more about Betkings basketball system and sports news.

For context your post said:

"""
I have not fully tested it myself, but I like the presence of a group where sports news, memes are published, with the ability to write comments for discussion, and not every group can boast of this.  I believe that a clear advantage is the availability of a forecast for the basketball system
"""

which has pretty much zero applicability to what betking offered (and not to mention, the site has been down for days now).

Guys, since when is it forbidden to post your opinion on the forum?  It seems to me that you have unjustly negatively evaluated me.

Before writing my post, I really read all the information about the resource.  I can provide a link and I can not ignore other people's reviews.  And your actions are very bad for me.

Signature spammer.  Tagged him already.

Even if you were to re-read the trash you posted you would not be able to make sense of it.

You try to pass it off as unambiguous and generic so it falls in to all categories but the truth is it seems your only motive is to post for the sake of promoting the signature.

Added you to my IGNORE list

Loyce, you are right he probably is not in prison because the domain was renewed but also because yesterday it seems he paid the 20.6 LTC that the user was asking for:
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ltc/address.dws?LLx7MAtdmpoNMtYfZ36qMYsL7ammVkkh7Y.htm

Now regarding the last post he made begging for Yolodice investors to move their funds to betking... that had more than a stench of desperation.

Just like you I also have seen those same techniques scammers use where they deny anything is wrong and seek more free money. Without a shadow of doubt I think he had ulterior motives. It crossed my mind maybe he was looking for funding as one final push before his exit strategy but I am not sure that is what happened.

There is definitely more going on here than meets the eye but it is hard to tell because on one hand he is not "fixing" the site even though he has investors to answer to who hold a share of the business but he is still paying out funds in account balances to users requesting via email because they cannot access the website.

And its gone