Topic: BetKing.io is a blatant scam operated by Dean Nolan - page 31. (Read 31310 times)
i wouldn't even pay cheaters, tell me one casino/sportsbook/poker operator in the world who allows multi-accounting. It was stated in the rules before that multi-accounts are not allowed, i have played on all leaderboards (september, october and november). Why would it be allowed on this one?
i salute his decision, i have lost 500 $ in btc in this contest, and others were multi-accounting, it seems fair to refund players.
ThanksAs usual no one in this forum has any idea what they are talking about including Ryan with his snarky comments.
Everyone posting about BKB when they don't know how many tokens I've bought back or own or how many people were happy to switch already to the new project or any actual internal running of the business.
Now we have people jumping to conclusions about the prizes and talking about multi accounting.
Where did I say the contest was cancelled only because of multi accounting?
It's stupid for anyone to call it a scam when no one at all loses money.
Only need to see the posters though, 2 actual participants have posted and zero investors and zero token holders. Just trolls and haters. Pathetic.
Where are the mods in this forum? 5 BetKing threads on front page almost every day clearly against the rules.
But on what planet is "revert all bets, and pay out no prizes!" a legitimate response o.0
Only people who isn't in the right mind would do and say that. He should be well aware about that case before starting such contest and make necessary adjustments and clear rules about it. Honestly, with his past promotions I still think that man is crazy
I don't there were any rules stating multiple accounts weren't allowed. At any rate, that isn't a reason to cancel the whole promotion and not pay out the players who placed fairly.
If anything, the wagers from multi-accounters should be combined which would push other people up the board more. I placed fairly and am quite upset the promotion isn't going to be paid out as described.
If anything, the wagers from multi-accounters should be combined which would push other people up the board more. I placed fairly and am quite upset the promotion isn't going to be paid out as described.
As far as I can tell there's 3 legitimate solutions to multi-accounting problem:
a) Pay the payouts as promised, leaving all entries
b) Remove all entries from accounts run by people who were multi-accounting, and pay out all the prizes to people who weren't multi-accounting
c) Pay out prizes as if all multi-accounts bets were merged into a single account
I think a) makes the most sense unless multi-accounting was clearly not allowed. b) makes the most sense if multi-accounting was clearly forbidden. And c) makes the most sense if the rules were a bit fuzzy, and it felt that multi-accounting was violating the spirit of the promotion.
But on what planet is "revert all bets, and pay out no prizes!" a legitimate response o.0
i wouldn't even pay cheaters, tell me one casino/sportsbook/poker operator in the world who allows multi-accounting. It was stated in the rules before that multi-accounts are not allowed, i have played on all leaderboards (september, october and november). Why would it be allowed on this one?
So you cancel the whole promotion?
It's pretty obvious that Dean did the math and paying people 10% was cheaper than the prizes... we all knew this was going to happen.
Can you please stop bringing this up? It just derails from legitimate criticism, and people stop taking your claims seriously. The 50 BTC jackpot was only winnable under certain circumstances, which no one hit and then he stopped offering the jackpot. Absolutely nothing was done wrong. It's business as usual.
Now this on the other hand, is totally different: He had a program, people should've won it and then he decided to not pay and revert bets under the guise it was abused (even though he himself was promoting the fact it was +EV lol). I honestly don't see how it can be defended at all.
Actually the whole inexplicable "..because abuse" scheme has a rich history with bitcoin scammers. Much like the moneypot scam, where they had the "perpetual" guaranteed price-floor for their token, and then renegged after it "was abused". What was the abuse? Someone asking for them to do the promised buy-back
Now this on the other hand, is totally different: He had a program, people should've won it and then he decided to not pay and revert bets under the guise it was abused (even though he himself was promoting the fact it was +EV lol). I honestly don't see how it can be defended at all.
Actually the whole inexplicable "..because abuse" scheme has a rich history with bitcoin scammers. Much like the moneypot scam, where they had the "perpetual" guaranteed price-floor for their token, and then renegged after it "was abused". What was the abuse? Someone asking for them to do the promised buy-back
I beg to differ regarding the 2017 promotion of 50 BTC Dice Jackpot. The T/Cs were so ambiguous that they could mean anything to anybody. He did not clearly stipulate the conditions under which the promotion could end early. From my perspective if a scammer spends a few bitcoin to pay for paid interviews to be published where he is promoting the fiction and near impossible-to-win 50 BTC Dice Jackpot then he did it to pull customers in. He ended that "promotion" within days without even informing users with a simple polite courteous message stating the promotion would end within 24/48 hours or 7/14 day. With the greatest respect we shall a difference of opinion on that.
As for the latest scam and stunt Dean Nolan pulled it really is laughable but only because of his incompetence though and not because of those that unfortunately for one reason or another had the misfortune of using the betking scam website to bet.
As you rightly stated, the buy-back terms and conditions were changed without general consensus. Anybody complaining was deemed solely by him to be abusing. Furthermore anybody complaining about Dean Nolan unilaterally taking steps to change T/Cs was banned from the Telegram channel and written off in this forum as trolls and "paid by competitors". Scammer Dean Nolan thought he was going to own and operate the biggest online crypto casino but he is nothing more than a thief, a petty criminal. The circumstances of the 2017 ICO are a disgrace, the ICO was designed purely for one reason alone and that was to make Dean Nolan rich by him siphoning off ICO funds for his own pockets and he continues to live off those funds right now but hopefully I will have enough information on him soon enough to have him investigated for fraud.
This latest Christmas wager scam adds to the list of so many others that Dean Nolan has overseen.
I don't there were any rules stating multiple accounts weren't allowed. At any rate, that isn't a reason to cancel the whole promotion and not pay out the players who placed fairly.
If anything, the wagers from multi-accounters should be combined which would push other people up the board more. I placed fairly and am quite upset the promotion isn't going to be paid out as described.
If anything, the wagers from multi-accounters should be combined which would push other people up the board more. I placed fairly and am quite upset the promotion isn't going to be paid out as described.
As far as I can tell there's 3 legitimate solutions to multi-accounting problem:
a) Pay the payouts as promised, leaving all entries
b) Remove all entries from accounts run by people who were multi-accounting, and pay out all the prizes to people who weren't multi-accounting
c) Pay out prizes as if all multi-accounts bets were merged into a single account
I think a) makes the most sense unless multi-accounting was clearly not allowed. b) makes the most sense if multi-accounting was clearly forbidden. And c) makes the most sense if the rules were a bit fuzzy, and it felt that multi-accounting was violating the spirit of the promotion.
But on what planet is "revert all bets, and pay out no prizes!" a legitimate response o.0
This "Christmas wager" scam has the same stench that the infamous "Win 50 BTC Jackpot To Celebreate betking re-launch" scam had: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/must-avoid-betking-what-happened-to-the-50-btc-jackpot-was-it-just-a-fraud-4873939
In that 2017 scam too he pulled in investors by stating there was a 50 BTC Jackpot for Dice Jackpot. Customers no doubt signed up because of that 50 BTC Jackpot claim.
In that 2017 scam too he pulled in investors by stating there was a 50 BTC Jackpot for Dice Jackpot. Customers no doubt signed up because of that 50 BTC Jackpot claim.
Can you please stop bringing this up? It just derails from legitimate criticism, and people stop taking your claims seriously. The 50 BTC jackpot was only winnable under certain circumstances, which no one hit and then he stopped offering the jackpot. Absolutely nothing was done wrong. It's business as usual.
Now this on the other hand, is totally different: He had a program, people should've won it and then he decided to not pay and revert bets under the guise it was abused (even though he himself was promoting the fact it was +EV lol). I honestly don't see how it can be defended at all.
Actually the whole inexplicable "..because abuse" scheme has a rich history with bitcoin scammers. Much like the moneypot scam, where they had the "perpetual" guaranteed price-floor for their token, and then renegged after it "was abused". What was the abuse? Someone asking for them to do the promised buy-back
I don't there were any rules stating multiple accounts weren't allowed. At any rate, that isn't a reason to cancel the whole promotion and not pay out the players who placed fairly.
If anything, the wagers from multi-accounters should be combined which would push other people up the board more. I placed fairly and am quite upset the promotion isn't going to be paid out as described.
If anything, the wagers from multi-accounters should be combined which would push other people up the board more. I placed fairly and am quite upset the promotion isn't going to be paid out as described.
This "Christmas wager" scam has the same stench that the infamous "Win 50 BTC Jackpot To Celebreate betking re-launch" scam had: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/must-avoid-betking-what-happened-to-the-50-btc-jackpot-was-it-just-a-fraud-4873939
In that 2017 scam too he pulled in investors by stating there was a 50 BTC Jackpot for Dice Jackpot. Customers no doubt signed up because of that 50 BTC Jackpot claim. New and older customers would have used other "games" on the website therefore scammer Dean Nolan benefited all round yet without there being a winner and without there being any fan-fare or announcement the "50 BTC Dice Jackpot" was removed. This scammer Dean Nolan paid for ads and interviews to be published where he was stating he was going to offer a 50 BTC Dice Jackpot just to draw people in.
I am so happy that Primedice, Stake and others have taken the lead are widely used betting and gaming sites, nobody hardly uses betking any more. Dean Nolan the scammer even used licenced software for free when he was running the Crash game instead of paying the 2 BTC fee, therefore it was basically theft. What a disgusting fool scammer Dean Nolan is.
I am compiling a list of actions against this scammer and will try to get the law enforcement and tax agencies of the country he lives in to investigate scammer Dean Nolan. Lots of information has been received but I need more. Please contact me with any information about Dean Nolan and his betking scam and his bitsafe scam and anything else he has been involved in. I will not disclose your name but I need people to send in information about this scammer. I need proof that can be presented to the relevant law agencies in the country this scammer lives in.
dont know why u so obsesed about this guy, dont really care, but get a life man youre posting for half an year the same shit..
I don't there were any rules stating multiple accounts weren't allowed. At any rate, that isn't a reason to cancel the whole promotion and not pay out the players who placed fairly.
If anything, the wagers from multi-accounters should be combined which would push other people up the board more. I placed fairly and am quite upset the promotion isn't going to be paid out as described.
If anything, the wagers from multi-accounters should be combined which would push other people up the board more. I placed fairly and am quite upset the promotion isn't going to be paid out as described.
i salute his decision, i have lost 500 $ in btc in this contest, and others were multi-accounting, it seems fair to refund players.
i salute his decision, i have lost 500 $ in btc in this contest, and others were multi-accounting, it seems fair to refund players.
When did he discover the multi-accounts and how?I put that multi-account sock-puppet fool scammer Dean Nolan on IGNORE because that is what he deserves.
i salute his decision, i have lost 500 $ in btc in this contest, and others were multi-accounting, it seems fair to refund players.
When did he discover the multi-accounts and how? He uses the term "we" when everybody knows the scammer Dean Nolan is a one man band who could not code a single line of code even if it were looking directly at him. He hires coders for a few US$ per hour from India and the Philippines to make tweaks on his scam betking website.
Just look at the disgraceful conduct of scammer Dean Nolan in the censored and now locked "betking" thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49014911
" Unfortunately, due to mass cheating and abuse during the contest, we have had to cancel the promotion and the payout of prizes.
We will undo all bets during the promotion period and reset stats, investment and player balances.
No one will lose any money here, except BetKing.
To compensate investors who were invested before the 24th and still now, we will add 10% of the amount to be deducted during the reset to their total investment.
Everyone else will have their balance set to the total deposited minus the total withdrawn during this period.
For anyone who withdrew more than deposited during this time BetKing will take the loss.
Again, no players or investors will have a loss here, only BetKing.
The BetKing website will be offline until the stats and balances are corrected. Withdrawals will be disabled during this time. We also just processed 90% of withdrawals that were pending.
If you have any queries you can contact support at [email protected] "
Did they announce the result yet, i saw people going crazy at the end. I do not know what is the tally at the end. Anyone has any idea?
No surprise the page has been deleted by the scammer Dean Nolan, just like he deleted my posts here in his censored thread
Check these out:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/betkingio-is-a-blatant-scam-operated-by-dean-nolan-4751127
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/betking-500-btc-2250-eth-425-ltc-bankroll-lies-4893439
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.47592095
There is too much evidence in the forum to show Dean Nolan to be a scammer[/quote][/quote]
This post was deleted by scammer Dean Nolan in the Betking thread.
He did say he was leaving and would not return back to bitcointalk but the scammer just could not keep away and runs a censored thread where he deletes any post he wants
How do i get in contact with support ? I dont see any chat on the site. I have my withdrawal pending from yesterday.
You did not care to send your coins to the publicly proven BetKing scam and now you care about support?Are you serious?
no one is playing on the site. i wish he knew that its because of the delay in the little payouts. how will u promise to pay at the end of the day and delay for days. this dean is one stupid motherfucker. his shit is only gonna affect investors. until he starts paying fast and prompt, i and my friends will continue playing in safedice.com
I know you are frustrated at the scam operated by Dean Nolan the betking owner and scammer. Many others have been scammed too but I think calling him that swear name is excessive.
It is best for all people to avoid the betking website and anything related to scammer Dean Nolan.
Does anybody know why the Crypto Gambling Foundation logo and its Verified Operator status has been removed from the betking website?
Jump to: