In the meantime manager will lose his reputation too. So i don't think that any well reputated manager will love to manage any fraudulent platforms signature campaign.
No no, you misunderstood me. I'm talking about the impact of the signature campaign on the credibility of a platform, if it's a scam platform, there's no impact here.They even not make a single comment on the scam assumption for more than 1 year.
They had hereFirst of all, this account is over a year now. We are not trying to hide behind anything. Admittedly. we had some issues with our account in the past. A fake person will create a new identity to start something else but no, we are real and legit. We are sticking to our account and identity and we will correct all previous issues we had in the past. We learned from those experience and we are trying to do something better and useful as you can see.
Both case is different. BestChange was criticized due to escrow find and we told we should have remove tag when they will pay accordingly. Regarding other accusations they are friendly enough to solve them. But BETNOMI used fake team and they was failed to provide appropriate evidence to proof their legitimacy. So either they run signature campaign or not the fact will never change. I have doubts that any reputed manager will handle their campaign and probably DT members will prevent them to run campaign is they like to run by themselves. Also I believe theymos wouldn't accept their auction if they like to use forum banner ads as well.
We meet in this thought 
The signature campaign will never work for a phishing campaign, the case he gave is asymmetric to compare. 
The biggest priority right now is their reputation 
