Topic: BFL fucked us over again (redux) - page 37. (Read 100109 times)

You can still publish any information, as long as you do it in a way that does not make BCT/Theymos liable.

Easy peasy lemon squeezy.

Better yet, putting a permanent link in one's sig, i.e.: Please no not post so-and-so's SSN found via the following link: https//............

https://forums.butterflylabs.com/the-monarch-discussion/8915-status-current-operations-18.html#post87636

Schlock pretends to be busy with a blah comment from the now defunct BFL site.

While it is a shame, I completely understand it from a liability standpoint.

i'd do the same thing.

However, it appears that you can just post a link to the document and if others find the info then oh well. 

I detect a bit of irony in theymos' post where he says "...insecure legacy..." and "...scam investigation...".

Question: does this mean we can post any such numbers backwards without incurring Inaba's wrath?

It's so sad to see theymos now being Inaba's bitch.

But I think that this means that Bruno cannot be held liable for Josh's SSN, because it was found in a publicly available source. Its being removed further exonerates Bruno of any liability even though there wasn't any liability in that case. So in a way, Josh just helped you out, dude!  

Looks like Josh Zerlan is expanding this battle...




Pretend that AcmeBitcoinWidgets has the above info on their website. I, being a mad man and am in direct competition with them, can no longer post the above info containing non-US government ID numbers, i.e., an address, gleaned from ABW's website in fear of violating the new policy due to security reasons, for it's now possible that I, or some other, will stalk the 123 Elm Street address to meet up with ABW's owner and confront him.

If you think that's crazy, we can no longer post President Obama's SSN on this forum thanks to the new policy due to a security risk to his person.

http://www.lotustalk.com/forums/3312946-post15.html



Funny, Josh Zerlan wasn't versed in the culture he alluded to a year earlier, for the fucker was still driving a Jetta.

Meanwhile...


So, I can no longer post on a public forum public info gleaned elsewhere on the internet because it hurts the Inaba, but he, conspiring with others, was fine with gleaning my vitals off the internet and including such on BFL's database for the sole purpose of lessening BFL's tax liability via a write-off that's 100% NOT RELATED to BFL, but between Josh Zerlan and myself, Bruno Kucinskas.

Josh, you better check to make sure that Chambers Lofts allows pets before filling out an application there after losing your fuckin' BTC-House. And, make sure that Aime packs enough stolen toothbrushes from her employer's practice to have on hand when entertaining your future cellmates to make sure they have the whitest teeth you'll ever cum across.

I, Bruno Kucinskas, am now selling Josh Zerlan's yellow Exige: http://www.lotustalk.com/forums/3233481-post36.html



No reasonable offers refused. 10% discount to those who've previously purchased his vitals from me.



Notice the date. While BFL's customers were awaiting their Monarchs, this cocksucker was online bragging about his fancy car from the comforts of his BTC-House that he just moved into thanks to your orders. FUCKIN' SICKNING!

http://entertainment.manyask.com/viewtopic.php?t=2278374



Question, Josh Zerlan: Exactly what are you feeding your wife's (Aime Broyles) two children, and does she help you prepare the potions?

And, if you think that's creepy, you ain't read nothin' yet: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bfl-fucked-us-over-again-redux-1022931





So, which has more truth: Me, Bruno Kucinskas, driving ~600 miles to jack off in front of Josh Zerlan's bathroom that's most likely impossible to peer into behind his house when his wife comes out of the shower, or Josh Zerlan jacking off in front of Aime Broyles' two children while viewing a pre-teen girl with Down Syndrome learning about periods?

I'm leaning toward the latter, but I'm bias.

Hey, Bruce Peterson, you still standing behind your mentor, Josh Zerlan, or in front of him? Better yet, do you walk on his left or his right when you two go shopping together?

I guess that explains why Josh Zerlan doesn't wear his wedding ring when he attends conferences: Such action (or non-action) would narrow his prospects.


"I sure hope Josh can talk Dave McClain into manning the booth sans his help."

With the exception of the Laissez Faire City liquidator who is a member of this forum, I'm probably the only person on this forum who read most everything pertaining to LFC, posting the nuggets here.

Around the same time frame as when the above exchange was penned and prior to Josh Zerlan joining the Army...

http://health.manyask.com/viewtopic.php?t=17653

http://search.bitcoin-assets.com/?q=josh+zerlan
http://search.bitcoin-assets.com/?q=Sonny+Vleisides

"Can Josh and I call it a day?"

http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?s=c1902ab2060f5f2ebc8504ae9b5478b4&t=1857074&highlight=

 More amazing irony. Willing to trade for a DK2...

 He was once in a position to make all sorts of new friends and business contacts due to his involvement with Bitcoin, that could facilitate such a request today (for free!), but instead, shit all over the faces of customers and critics that called him to account over his outrageous behavior and consumer hostile business practices while at BFL.

 Oh well.

http://hardforum.com/search.php?searchid=29257855&pp=20



BFL's Customers: Sends moneys to BFL for building their product.
BFL: Buys laptops used to burn-in their customer's miners.
IRS Facing Books: Laptops broke and tossed in the garbage, thus WRITE-OFF CITY!
BFL Non-IRS-Facing books: Have Josh Zerlan sell the laptops on one of the forums he participates in.
BFL: Laptops sell, and BFL keeps the moneys that nobody's the wiser except a person "so isolated" nobody listens to him.
BFL's Customers: Where's our refunds?
BFL: Dudes, we told you that we have to sell shit first, and that your refunds are still months away.

Josh: In conclusion, your Honor, I'm a truthteller and Bruno is a liar, thus when you put all those lies he penned on a forum full of monumental assholes together, it's a foregone conclusion that he had plans to kidnap my wife after jacking off behind the house while looking in our master bathroom window when my wife comes out of the shower.

Judge: Can a person see in or out of the glass that the widow of the master bathroom is made out of?
Josh: No.
Judge: Does steam cover the window like it does in most people's bathroom during a shower?
Josh: Yes.
Judge: Are there curtains on the windows?
Josh: Yes.
Judge: Does your wife draw the curtains shut prior to derobing?
Josh: Yes.
Judge: Is that a tree in front of the window?
Josh: Yes.
Judge: So, how could Bruno possibly see your wife naked coming out of the shower?
Josh: Bruno would climb the tree donning a pair of Oculus Rift to witness the event.
Judge: Do you own a dog?
Josh: A couple.
Judge: Do they bark when they hear noises outside?
Josh: Yes, but then it'll be too late, she'd already been incensed.

http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?p=1037281413&highlight=#post1037281413



"I believe that power supply has ~80-85% efficiency. At 80% efficiency, your components are pulling 1080 watts. At 85% efficiency, they're pulling ~1150 watts. Which are both under 1200 watts. Yes, you are fine, and no, you are not overloading it. BTW, Josh, as long as Sonny Vleisides doesn't ask you to recite Ohm's Law, congratulations, in advance, for becoming BFL's new COO. God speed in making VP shortly thereafter."


"Mongo concurs! It will go. It will go. Everything here, including the crew, everything, runs at 70% efficiency or less. Apologies for the echo."

http://ia802308.us.archive.org/32/items/gov.uscourts.mowd.117531/gov.uscourts.mowd.117531.293.1.pdf

DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF BF LABS INC.’S SUR-REPLY
IN OPPOSITION TO THE FTC’S MOTION
TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS’ COUNTERCLAIMS

...

III. CONCLUSION

This Court should deny the FTC’s Motion to Dismiss Defendants’ Counterclaims.
Federal courts have made clear that receivership costs are recoverable against the United States
and its agencies under the EAJA and elsewhere. The FTC overlooks the present state of the law
on this issue, and attempts to impose the Tenth Circuit’s more restrictive analysis when other
federal courts of appeal, including the Eighth Circuit, have disagreed. Because any viable theory
of recovery is sufficient to bar dismissal, the FTC’s Motion fails.

"The FTC overlooks the present state of the law"

Further, Zaina (the restaurant) has a mailing address on the 4th floor of the Chamber Lofts housing project. I'm curious as to what office BFL could've used on the 5th floor that you kindly connected the dots to, PL.