As long as Runeks does not post, it is probably done... not my prob..
But charity donation
Topic: BFL power consumption / Charity Donation - page 2. (Read 9016 times)
thx
As long as Runeks does not post, it is probably done... not my prob..
But charity donation
As long as Runeks does not post, it is probably done... not my prob..
But charity donation
and claims to have settled with user Runeks but will not provide any proof that he did settle.
link for that?
I wonder all the time why Runeks is so quiet
If they both agreed, OK
To the bet or Josh's claim?
Both links would be great
Bet link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/a-bfl-asic-1000-btc-bet-that-looks-like-inaba-lost-191600
Josh's claim he paid (with no proof just talk as usual): https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1991403
and claims to have settled with user Runeks but will not provide any proof that he did settle.
link for that?
I wonder all the time why Runeks is so quiet
If they both agreed, OK
To the bet or Josh's claim?
Both links would be great
and claims to have settled with user Runeks but will not provide any proof that he did settle.
link for that?
I wonder all the time why Runeks is so quiet
If they both agreed, OK
To the bet or Josh's claim?
and claims to have settled with user Runeks but will not provide any proof that he did settle.
link for that?
I wonder all the time why Runeks is so quiet
If they both agreed, OK
Hm.... For my untestanding this whole debacle would classify him for a scammers tag. Am I right to assume that he made the bet here on bitcointalk? ....
If that's true why didn't he be awarded with one of those beautifull medal of scam?
As always: if I'm wrong, enlighten me with links to facts!?
If that's true why didn't he be awarded with one of those beautifull medal of scam?
As always: if I'm wrong, enlighten me with links to facts!?
Yes he made a bet for 1000 BTC with user Runeks. Josh lost the bet and claims to have settled with user Runeks but will not provide any proof that he did settle.
BFL has so far failed to pay the 1000 BTC donation to a charity because they did not meet their power/speed marks.
Why you say he didnt get a scammer tag yet? Perhaps it is because he spam advertizes on this forum. Theymos appears to be running a double standard here.
I'm giving it some time to see what he does though.
Hm.... For my untestanding this whole debacle would classify him for a scammers tag. Am I right to assume that he made the bet here on bitcointalk? ....
If that's true why didn't he be awarded with one of those beautifull medal of scam?
As always: if I'm wrong, enlighten me with links to facts!?
If that's true why didn't he be awarded with one of those beautifull medal of scam?
As always: if I'm wrong, enlighten me with links to facts!?
What is funny to me is that Josh/BFL was so eager to make the 1000 BTC bet because they were so sure they would hit their target mark on speed/power specs.
Now they been proven to be wrong, lost the bet, now they drag their feet on fulfilling the bet terms saying "we are busy, that bet isn't priority right now."
Well obviously your customers are not your priority now, nor is the bet, so I guess trolling and dragging your feet is priority?? lol
Classic scammer tactic.
Now they been proven to be wrong, lost the bet, now they drag their feet on fulfilling the bet terms saying "we are busy, that bet isn't priority right now."
Well obviously your customers are not your priority now, nor is the bet, so I guess trolling and dragging your feet is priority?? lol
Classic scammer tactic.
they'll probably ship to 90% of the orders before they come out with rev. 5 of the chip in which 1w/gh is met and they try to slip out of the bet on a technicality.
I saw it that way as well https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2028637
Donation is in the last stage of payment....
LOL so funny
Such a fucking crooked "business" they are total condesending jerks and there is little to nothing we can do about it!
Wheres the donation?
Seven months ago the ASIC's were in thier "Final stage of development"
They are still being fucking developed, and only a few, like 5 people have a rev.1 board!!!
Fire that asshole BFL_Josh!, He is horrible for PR!
Wheres the donation?
Seven months ago the ASIC's were in thier "Final stage of development"
They are still being fucking developed, and only a few, like 5 people have a rev.1 board!!!
Fire that asshole BFL_Josh!, He is horrible for PR!
they'll probably ship to 90% of the orders before they come out with rev. 5 of the chip in which 1w/gh is met and they try to slip out of the bet on a technicality.
I saw it that way as well https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2028637
Donation is in the last stage of payment....
A scammer never pays! If Tom finishes his refunds he can pass the scammer tag to Josh and all the others from BFL.
To: INABA/BFL/Josh
Hey dipshit,
Now that you ass-hats have failed to deliver on your power specs and speeds, perhaps it is time to pay up the 1000 BTC to a charity and then prove you actually paid them? Oh wait...you have more important things to do like troll BTCtalk and cuss at your customers.
Since Tom is refusing to actually make the bet he himself proposed between us, I am offering up a guarantee of 1000 BTC to charity (I will take suggestions on which charity to donate this to) if BFL does not meet it's power claims within 10% - meaning if BFL's power consumption is more than 66w for a Single SC, we lose the "bet."
Now, I ask if Tom is willing to step up and back the winning side. He is 100% confident that we will not meet our power claims (which is the genesis of the failed bet), and as such I ask that he pony up 1000 BTC to the same charity if we do make our power claims.
So there it is: Tom is confident that we won't make our power claims, I am confident that we will. I am willing to put up 1000 BTC to show my confidence in BFL products. Is Tom confident enough to do the same or is he just blowing hot air?
Now, I ask if Tom is willing to step up and back the winning side. He is 100% confident that we will not meet our power claims (which is the genesis of the failed bet), and as such I ask that he pony up 1000 BTC to the same charity if we do make our power claims.
So there it is: Tom is confident that we won't make our power claims, I am confident that we will. I am willing to put up 1000 BTC to show my confidence in BFL products. Is Tom confident enough to do the same or is he just blowing hot air?
Hey dipshit,
Now that you ass-hats have failed to deliver on your power specs and speeds, perhaps it is time to pay up the 1000 BTC to a charity and then prove you actually paid them? Oh wait...you have more important things to do like troll BTCtalk and cuss at your customers.
They play the iqnoring game now? Slippery business, I must say.
To: INABA/BFL/Josh
Hey dipshit,
Now that you ass-hats have failed to deliver on your power specs and speeds, perhaps it is time to pay up the 1000 BTC to a charity and then prove you actually paid them? Oh wait...you have more important things to do like troll BTCtalk and cuss at your customers.
Since Tom is refusing to actually make the bet he himself proposed between us, I am offering up a guarantee of 1000 BTC to charity (I will take suggestions on which charity to donate this to) if BFL does not meet it's power claims within 10% - meaning if BFL's power consumption is more than 66w for a Single SC, we lose the "bet."
Now, I ask if Tom is willing to step up and back the winning side. He is 100% confident that we will not meet our power claims (which is the genesis of the failed bet), and as such I ask that he pony up 1000 BTC to the same charity if we do make our power claims.
So there it is: Tom is confident that we won't make our power claims, I am confident that we will. I am willing to put up 1000 BTC to show my confidence in BFL products. Is Tom confident enough to do the same or is he just blowing hot air?
Now, I ask if Tom is willing to step up and back the winning side. He is 100% confident that we will not meet our power claims (which is the genesis of the failed bet), and as such I ask that he pony up 1000 BTC to the same charity if we do make our power claims.
So there it is: Tom is confident that we won't make our power claims, I am confident that we will. I am willing to put up 1000 BTC to show my confidence in BFL products. Is Tom confident enough to do the same or is he just blowing hot air?
Hey dipshit,
Now that you ass-hats have failed to deliver on your power specs and speeds, perhaps it is time to pay up the 1000 BTC to a charity and then prove you actually paid them? Oh wait...you have more important things to do like troll BTCtalk and cuss at your customers.
I think they are awaiting pending liability investigations and trying to figure if they can survive before they touch this topic. Oh, and they'll probably ship to 90% of the orders before they come out with rev. 5 of the chip in which 1w/gh is met and they try to slip out of the bet on a technicality.
bump
1. Now that they "delivered" they did not meet their power specs.
2. So the need to pay 1000 BTC to a charity and have it confirmed.
3. They will delay on this promise and wait until enough suckers buy more BFL products to fund BFL failures (i.e. this promise to donate).
2. So the need to pay 1000 BTC to a charity and have it confirmed.
3. They will delay on this promise and wait until enough suckers buy more BFL products to fund BFL failures (i.e. this promise to donate).
This thread makes me giggle
Jump to: