Topic: BFL Single in the wild (BOUNTY RECEIVED!!!) - page 14. (Read 42497 times)
Awesome, thanks for the updates. Definitely have to look into purchasing one.
very exciting. its cool to see a turn key solution.
What a game changer!
Did you play around with flags, oc?
This is what i have in my .bat file to start cgminer...
Code:
cgminer -o http://pool.com:8332 -u name -p pw -o http://pool2.com:8332 -u name -p pw -o http://pool3.com:8332 -u uname -p pw --failover-only -S COM5 --disable-gpu
following
Did you play around with flags, oc?
No wattage reader around here, I'm too busy hashing away!
I think Inaba said around 85w....
I wouldn't rely on the specs provided for the rig box. Let's wait until we get some updated information from BFL.
Those specs were from back when the Single was still predicted as 1GH/s @ 20watts. I'm not complaining about the end result of 832MH/s @ 83 watts, but its bound to make the Rig Box Stats shift somewhat.
I wouldn't be surprised if the added heat made the enclosure impossible to engineer.
But what about a 10 unit, 8.32GH/s model? I'd jump at that in a second.
Those specs were from back when the Single was still predicted as 1GH/s @ 20watts. I'm not complaining about the end result of 832MH/s @ 83 watts, but its bound to make the Rig Box Stats shift somewhat.
I wouldn't be surprised if the added heat made the enclosure impossible to engineer.
But what about a 10 unit, 8.32GH/s model? I'd jump at that in a second.
Even "shifting somewhat", it's several times more efficient. So provided it's even close to their claims, it's immense.
As promised, here is a screen shot of cgminer after ~12 hours of mining...
I wouldn't rely on the specs provided for the rig box. Let's wait until we get some updated information from BFL.
Those specs were from back when the Single was still predicted as 1GH/s @ 20watts. I'm not complaining about the end result of 832MH/s @ 83 watts, but its bound to make the Rig Box Stats shift somewhat.
I wouldn't be surprised if the added heat made the enclosure impossible to engineer.
But what about a 10 unit, 8.32GH/s model? I'd jump at that in a second.
Those specs were from back when the Single was still predicted as 1GH/s @ 20watts. I'm not complaining about the end result of 832MH/s @ 83 watts, but its bound to make the Rig Box Stats shift somewhat.
I wouldn't be surprised if the added heat made the enclosure impossible to engineer.
But what about a 10 unit, 8.32GH/s model? I'd jump at that in a second.
If this is real, then the "Rig Box" would be still a much much more efficient beast in comparison.
50.4 Giga Hash / S @ 2,500w @ $24,980
About $4M in these would take over the network.
50.4 Giga Hash / S @ 2,500w @ $24,980
About $4M in these would take over the network.
I don't know if temperature sensor stickers exist and can be used (kind of like Telatemps, but a bit different).
If they do exist, you can put a sticker on all your singles and the one that gets cold is the one you are looking for.
Kind of like this would be cool:
If they do exist, you can put a sticker on all your singles and the one that gets cold is the one you are looking for.
Kind of like this would be cool:
The actual firmware supports temperature-monitoring, and the miner software can access it.
We may add a blink-on-user-request feature to the firmware. This way, any unit that the miner
asks for, can start blinking at a fast pace, making visual detection of the unit-in-question
easier.
Regards,
I don't know if temperature sensor stickers exist and can be used (kind of like Telatemps, but a bit different).
If they do exist, you can put a sticker on all your singles and the one that gets cold is the one you are looking for.
Kind of like this would be cool:
If they do exist, you can put a sticker on all your singles and the one that gets cold is the one you are looking for.
Kind of like this would be cool:
If you have 100 devices on 1 usb port, you definitely make use of usbhubs.
If you have a root hub with 5 ports with each 5 another 5 port hub and on those each a 4 port hub you have a totel of 5*5*4 = 100 ports.
You can just unplug 1 of the 5 hubs on the root hub and see if 24 more or 25 more devices fail. If 24 more fail you found the hub with the broken device.
A lot faster than trying each of the 100
If you have a root hub with 5 ports with each 5 another 5 port hub and on those each a 4 port hub you have a totel of 5*5*4 = 100 ports.
You can just unplug 1 of the 5 hubs on the root hub and see if 24 more or 25 more devices fail. If 24 more fail you found the hub with the broken device.
A lot faster than trying each of the 100
subscribing and finding some money to buy one of these bad boys
Greetings,
Regarding USB limitations, out of each real USB port (a port that directly comes out of your motherboards
southbridge, not an internal HUB), around 100 units can function without restriction. Thus, if your computer
has 3 real USB ports (EHCI or OHCI), you can hookup around 300 BitFORCE units to it. BitFORCE does not
take any power from the USB port it connects to, and acts as a stand-alone self-powered unit.
Good Luck,
Regarding USB limitations, out of each real USB port (a port that directly comes out of your motherboards
southbridge, not an internal HUB), around 100 units can function without restriction. Thus, if your computer
has 3 real USB ports (EHCI or OHCI), you can hookup around 300 BitFORCE units to it. BitFORCE does not
take any power from the USB port it connects to, and acts as a stand-alone self-powered unit.
Good Luck,
The thing is, if you have 100 devices connected to the same USB port and one of them has problems, it's gonna take a while until you figure out which one is it. Or am I wrong?
It really depends on whether they are all BitFORCE units or it's a mixture of different devices (Mouse, WebCam, HDD, etc). We had no problem connecting
many units to the same USB ports using HUBs. It is not recommended, however, to connect a High-speed and Full-Speed or Low-Speed device to the same
port (This applies in general to the USB protocol ). The reason being is that the controller must reduces bus-speed to send SOF (Start Of Frame) packets
or data packets to full-speed/low-speed units and switch back to high-speed again. This will reduce overall efficiency of the bus.
Regarding trouble-shooting, that is something to be determined based on your specific setup. Generally, if a USB 'device' fails, the HUB disconnects it and
it goes offline.
Regards,
Greetings,
Regarding USB limitations, out of each real USB port (a port that directly comes out of your motherboards
southbridge, not an internal HUB), around 100 units can function without restriction. Thus, if your computer
has 3 real USB ports (EHCI or OHCI), you can hookup around 300 BitFORCE units to it. BitFORCE does not
take any power from the USB port it connects to, and acts as a stand-alone self-powered unit.
Good Luck,
Regarding USB limitations, out of each real USB port (a port that directly comes out of your motherboards
southbridge, not an internal HUB), around 100 units can function without restriction. Thus, if your computer
has 3 real USB ports (EHCI or OHCI), you can hookup around 300 BitFORCE units to it. BitFORCE does not
take any power from the USB port it connects to, and acts as a stand-alone self-powered unit.
Good Luck,
The thing is, if you have 100 devices connected to the same USB port and one of them has problems, it's gonna take a while until you figure out which one is it. Or am I wrong?
giga, have you ordered any more? one thing i'm curious to see is how multiple 'singles' would go being run on 1 pc.
would there be any bandwidth or power issues with the usb port?
would there be any bandwidth or power issues with the usb port?
Greetings,
Regarding USB limitations, out of each real USB port (a port that directly comes out of your motherboards
southbridge, not an internal HUB), around 100 units can function without restriction. Thus, if your computer
has 3 real USB ports (EHCI or OHCI), you can hookup around 300 BitFORCE units to it. BitFORCE does not
take any power from the USB port it connects to, and acts as a stand-alone self-powered unit.
Good Luck,
Does it work with Bamt?
It will when 0.5 comes out.
I heard 0.5 comes out today
Well, lodcrappo stated it might come out later today. It wasn't a guarantee.
yup, your right.
I also told him that he should bundle it with a usb stick or specifically this one (http://www.sandisk.com/products/usb-flash-drives/cruzer-fit-usb-flash-drive)
which i told him I get for about $6. He should then charge 4-5 btc or $20 total (usb included) so he can continue support the project.
Interesting idea. Anyway, we probably should get back on topic.
Don't want to derail yet another BFL thread.Jump to: