who from BTT using wikishit? this informations must be on WEB of BBP .....
wiki.js is not open source and can use markdown and be stored on github. So, you can see revision history. MediaWiki is very 90s. There's a lot more recent products that work better. I personally like Confluence from Atlassian, but you gotta pay for that.
My understanding is that ipfs is the groundwork for the dahf (hedge fund) which I thought was a variation of a retirement 401k type fund. I'm not sure. Or it could be one of Rob does whatever he wants projects. He's the lead dev so he wants/has that perogative.
You feel the road map features should be first priority?
As for news and updates, Rob has taken away edit rights on the wiki (at least myself and several others) so we can't update the information. Frankly, mediawiki kinda sucks to work with so I'm glad I don't have access.
There's biblepay.org (official) and third party efforts like purepool, biblepay-central , etc
You want more content on BiblePay.org? What about this forum, Reddit, Twitter, discord?
Please do not just make things up SunK, thats why our communication is bad- and posts end up getting deleted - and frankly, in a non Christian disagreement.
Let's take a step back and forgive each other first. Next, let me explain what irks me: a person who "guesses" and states it as fact, on a public forum (this continually happens with your account and I rashly react by deleting the post).
So jumping ahead to the wiki, I did not remove edit rights because I'm a dictator, I removed them because Slovakia defaced the front page. Hopefully you can understand that after someone defaces the actual investor info page, we need to control access. I have given edit to anyone who wants to make an intelligent edit Like Jaap and Togo. "Mediawiki sucks to work with"? Lets instead glorify the benefits that opensource software gives us. Lets use what we have until we are a $10 mil organization then we can vote on something that everyone likes, or maybe everyone does like wiki in general.
I know I havent shared a lot of info regarding the DAHF vision. Frankly its because I put a lot of hours into the proof of concept, got it working, and the long e-mails from the focus group and SEC attorney are frankly so long and technical, it would make most people turn away from this project. I think at this point it is not going in the roadmap- lets keep it simple and build a stronger foundation without DAHF. Let's be positive - and frame questions that you BELIEVE are negatives as : Hey Rob, I THINK we have a problem with this, can we do this better. Then I reply and tell you if I agree or not- I would not say this if 80% of the time the other person doesn't understand that part of a feature exists because their solution isnt solving what they think.
I'm not sure what you mean by "forgive each other". I don't recall receiving a personal apology from you. Maybe you "forgive each other" without apologizing to the other person?
If I say something is my understanding and it is incorrect, you're welcome to correct with kindness. I was trying to defend why you keep going off the roadmap with random features.
Re: Wiki. You gave me edit rights, then took it away as soon after found disagreement with what I said,
I wonder why?