Topic: BiblePay | 10% to Orphan-Charity | RANDOMX MINING | Sanctuaries (Masternodes) - page 4. (Read 243376 times)

How do the BBP payouts from foundation.biblepay.org differ from those at rx.biblepay.org? I have found them to be very different. The foundation payouts seem to trickle in with very small amounts, where the rx BBP payouts were much more substantial.

Has there been any more thought on whether to deprecate the rx site over the foundation site? Thanks!

foundation Pool reader error

What's your RAM setup on each, double or quad channel ? Quantity ?

The wcg suddenly does not work today. Everything works fine before. I just double checked I am in the Biblepay team and 'Display my Data' is checked.

I tried to reassociate cpid
exec associate ：
Sorry, we found you as a researcher in WCG, but we were unable to locate you on the team.  You may still participate but the daily escrow requirements are higher for non Bible Pay researchers. NOTE:  Your RAC must be > 256 if you are not on team bible pay.  Please navigate to web.biblepay.org, click PODC research, and type in your CPID in the search box.  If your rac < 256 please build up your RAC first, then re-associate.

exec rac:
"Command": "rac",
  "cpid": "-----------",
  "temporary_cpid": "--------",
  "Error": "Your CPID is linked to your CPK, but we are unable to find your research records in WCG; most likely because you are not in team Bible Pay yet.",
  "Step 1": "Log into your WCG account at 'worldcommunitygrid.org' with your WCG E-mail address and WCG password.",
  "Step 2": "Click Settings | My Profile.  Record your 'Username' and 'Verification Code' and your 'CPID' (Cross-Project-ID).",
  "Step 3": "Click Settings | Data Sharing.  Ensure the 'Display my Data' radio button is selected.  Click Save. ",
  "Step 4": "Click My Contribution | My Team.  If you are not part of Team 'BIBLE PAY' click Join Team | Search | Bible Pay | Select Bible Pay | Click Join Team | Save.",
  "Step 5": "NOTE: After choosing your team, and starting your research, please give WCG 24 hours for the CPID to propagate into BBP.  In the mean time you can start Boinc research - and ensure the computer is performing WCG tasks. ",
  "Step 6": "From our RPC console, type, exec associate your_username your_verification_code",
  "Step 7": "Wait for 5 blocks to pass.  Then type 'exec rac' again, and see if you are linked!  ",
  "Step 8": "Once you are linked you will receive daily rewards.  Please read about our minimum stake requirements per RAC here: wiki.biblepay.org/PODC"

What should I do to fix the problem?

If what you say is true, its not so weird. There is a power and performance setting from the governor:

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/CPU_frequency_scaling#Scaling_governors

I've used it before in Ubuntu to set the CPU to performance. It uses more wattage, generates more heat, but it also gives you more hash. Its probably not the ideal setting from an energy use to hash perspective (the last 10% isn't worth it IMO) but it may be something to look at.

I wonder how much RAM afeno has.

Well, the last idea for me would be: is it possible that one server keeps the CPU at some weird power saving mode? You can quickly check this with "lscpu" having a look at the MHz or you can (if it's really the same hardware all in all) compare the CPU temperature under full load with "sensors" (package lm-sensors). Good luck!

Thanks for the Tips. With hugepages enabled and 12 threads Im getting some more H/s. But I still have a huge difference between the two identical servers. Both running the same command. And htop shows 99-100% CPU utilization in both servers.... Very strange....

EDIT:
With 12 cores and hugepages enabled, the difference is even bigger:

Server1:
[2020-04-14 11:07:12.505] speed 10s/60s/15m 1655.8 1657.6 1654.0 H/s max 2204.9 H/s

Server2:
[2020-04-14 11:05:46.498] speed 10s/60s/15m 6188.6 6223.6 6235.3 H/s max 6273.5 H/s

Any idea what I can check? As said, both servers are showing 12 cores at 100% cpu utilization. (htop)

Only 9 BBP went to Orphan Foundation address and rest went to different address.

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bbp/tx.dws?ce43919dd566e280094a543db773e797f29e6033087f70c92a0ce495ec5b368e.htm

Hopefully B87VtiTPNKvghHntMwiHyz9efiexVukfC5 is an address you own.

That doesn't seem right. Are you sure you are starting them with the same command/script from the same operating system? I guess you have ubuntu, plz check with "htop" for the CPU load.

btw: some tipps for xmrig:

• use the number of physical threads your System has, which is 12 (2x6), not 24
• for slightly better performance enable "hugepages" in your system or start the miner as root (xmrig can configure RAM itself)
• for even better performance you could enable "1GB-hugepages" (just google xmrig 1gb-hugepages ubuntu), but this would require a lot more RAM than you currently have (at least 40 GB)

It leave my wallet, i'm desapointed. Thanks for answering, and looking at the log, i may have copy the wrong adress.
B87VtiTPNKvghHntMwiHyz9efiexVukfC5 is the one

That should be the orphan foundation address . I don't see a 838,000 BBP transaction. Do you have a specific tx id?  Did that leave your wallet or enter your wallet?

I have two servers exactly identical. Same CPU, same ram, same HDD, same ISP.
Once is giving me 1300 H/s and the other one is 4300 H/s

Server1
[2020-04-13 15:28:33.072] speed 10s/60s/15m 1287.2 1370.7 1374.7 H/s max 1440.7 H/s

Server2
[2020-04-13 15:29:02.897] speed 10s/60s/15m 4397.6 4414.0 4384.7 H/s max 4607.8 H/s


Both servers are showing this when startig :

Any idea why such H/s difference in the two servers?

Hi, may anyone know what's this adress is ?
BB2BwSbDCqCqNsfc7FgWFJn4sRgnUt4tsM
Just reconnect to my wallet more than one years ago since my last connection and saw a transaction of 838 000 BBP, that i didn't do since i'm holding.
Thanks

I do not remember if I've said this in the past, but I'm saying it again

Update to anyone who messages me privately,
from this point forward anything sent to me is subject to being posted publicly

I want conversations out in the open, not in the dark

=

Rob, I believe you broke the Bitcointalk forum rules, its as simple as that


I would love to see full message logs of what was communicated between you and the admins for more clarification

=

I'm not against moving main communications to your forum Rob, but I am against losing the visibility we have in the #1 crypto forum, I feel that we should still use this forum to at least post updates about BiblePay (whether it be this thread or another thread), Im against moving completely away from Bitcointalk

Rob Andrews, Founder of BiblePay (BBP) July 2017
is also the Founder of Gridcoin (GRC) October 2013


From reading the BiblePay forum thread, sounds like Rob is saying that his bible_pay account got banned,
so he is posting from another account that he owns, the gridcoin account

=

Bitcointalk has a bunch of rules, Ive had my posts deleted in the past
and Ive had a Bitcointalk mod (Flying Hellfish) give me a -1 trust rating for talking about BiblePay

I also spent months trying to get an ad banner for BiblePay on Bitcointalk with Theymos
and he kept moving the goal posts on us and never let us advertise LOL

=

Unofficial list of (official) Bitcointalk.org rules, guidelines, FAQ
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/unofficial-list-of-official-bitcointalkorg-rules-guidelines-faq-703657

The admins generally dont like thread bumping (only one person posting multiple posts in a row),
it seems you can get away with 2 in a row, sometimes 3, but after that you definitely risk getting posts deleted
(if an admin notices or someone reports you)

=

Id love for BiblePay as a community to keep posting on Bitcointalk (in all subsections), since it is the #1 cryptocurrency forum

I hope Bitcointalk admins can understand that Rob is not posting to bump the thread or to spam, each post is genuinely a legit post, Could the posts get grouped up? sure, and we can adapt to that if that is their rules

Wait, what? So this thread is done and we suddenly move everything to the BBP forum? And why is this mayor announcement coming from a user "Gridcoin" and not from "bible_pay"?

Anyway, registration at forum.biblepay.org is still not working, because apparently the Pope's last name is not Bergoglio???

All,

This thread is being moved to:
https://forum.biblepay.org/index.php?topic=517.msg7221#msg7221


Please update your bookmarks.

If you have any questions you can contact Rob who started this thread at [email protected].

Thanks for the reply, i was talking indeed about biblepay.miningpool.fun, i received a reward, but i also switched to  the foundation pool.. So i dont know if the reward came from miningpool.fun or the foundation pool.

Is there any pool u suggest, is there a difference between the foundationpool and miningpool.fun (i mean on fee, payouts etc, i know the foundation pool got some cool options for ''staking'')? The positive thing about the foundation pool is that i can see the block rewards, so i can make my calculation and check my incomming transactions.
On miningpool.fun u cant find any stats, except the shares + walletaddress (not the payouts, not the estimated etc).

XMR is fine, i know how minexmr works (good pool anyway).

    BIBLEPAY is getting STRONGER 


One of our strengths is CHAINLOCKS, a feature that is not in BITCOIN.  We enabled Chainlocks at block 187000.

                                                 
We are the only coin with Monero-RandomX in the Bitcoin branch.


    ! Great job to everyone who helped bring us to this point !

---

Please see this wiki page first:
http://wiki.biblepay.org/Preventing_Preimage_Attacks

While implementing dual hash mining, I encountered the Preimage attack vector, and decided to use our equation for dual hash mining instead of classic merged mining (they are almost the same, but a couple small differences exist on the pool side and in the wallet). 

Yes, the good news is the underlying wallet does support every RandomX coin (not just XMR). 
Our block solution requires a RandomX header (from any RX based coin), proof that you are mining at the right height, and, the dual-hash (blake) solution.

However, there are a couple practical things stopping us from simply starting a second line of pools for coins other than XMR:
1) Accountability - sporks.  The spork allows us to enforce solutions that only come from pools we trust (pools that promise to pay each months orphanage liquidation).  We initially chose XMR so we can easily liquidate the earnings.
2) A new branch of Nomp or foundation.biblepay.org Pool specifically branched and code tailored for that other coin.  This is a minor change, to nomp for example, but - it is a real change requiring developer hours and testing.

So my actual view on the matter is I wanted to see the viability of XMR + BBP for a few months, and know that it will certainly generate orphan revenue, and be a success or not a success.  Then rerelease a pool with a little more orphan security  (one that prevents people from circumventing the tithe completely).  The biblepay core wallet has all the code necessary for security already in production.  The only rules that we really need in baby step 2 is enforcement of the 10% tithe on the miners.  This can certainly be done on the pool side.

So to make end-to-end security I think we will need to :  monitor the pool liquidations of each address, add the sporks before the end of this month for the known pools, and enable the enforcement of hashpower for the 10% tithe over the monitored span  (on the pool side).

Now in the future, if we grow signifigcantly I dont see why we cant focus on a second pool type (for another coin).  If anyone is very zealous about this you can start now; you wont really need me to run the other pool.  I would be open to working with that person and enabling the spork for that pool, if they promise to give the 10% for orphan charity back to the designated orphans, etc.   

Miners want to know if BiblePay can only mine BBP and XMR. Could BiblePay mine other altcoins that use RandomX so BBP, XMR, and this other altcoin? I think the term "merged-mining" gets thrown around a lot like DogeCoin with LiteCoin. You seem to have specifically used dual mining which I feel is a different technology than merged-mining. Am I correct in this assumption?