when you dont have an answer to an inquiry , attack the questioner. ad hominem
We still need from you some kind of investor information page. if you legally dont want to be accountable to a 'prospectus' thats fine.
but post something up publically.
You are after all standing to raise at least over $150,000. maybe much much more.
I'm not sure if there is an outside "investor" but if there already is one, then what good is a prospectus or investor information page. Put another way, if you start a business and you and I know each other, and you say, "hey west, I'm needing some help with this business and finances", at that point I ask the questions I need to feel good with the investment and it's done. No other document needed.
I don't know of any overt moves to reach investors at this point. Granted, if the coin were to break down walls like Bitcoin, then yeah, investors would start to notice us. But again, have you ever seen a investor information page for BTC, XRP, ETH or any other big coin? You know, the ones that make up 90% of the $200B dollar crypto world? Why you would expect a project that is in it's fourth month and valued at less than two block rewards of BTC makes me wonder why you are so adamant?
As far as standing to raise $150,000, I question if you understand the principle of masternodes? The masternode "cost" should be looked at more like a security deposit. You retain ownership of the cost, it is just frozen while you run the masternode. But you can release it and do whatever you want with it at any time. If you understood this, it's not meant to demean you, just I cannot understand where the high dollar figure comes from given the number you cite is within $25,000 of the total valuation of the minted coins. With no premine, no Dev reward, the only perk the Dev got was to get in on the ground floor so to speak when basic hardware gave very good returns for a week or two.
Yes, a coin based on a religious text does make the bar a bit higher. But to date, the Dev has been very responsive on most issues and has brought the coin from nothing to where it is.
So, two final points:
One: As far as Biblepay, or any cryptocurrency, as a investment (from the classically understood definition), don't risk more than you can afford to lose. And ultimately consider it highly speculative.
Two: If you cannot be satisfied with the answers you have gotten, understand there's basically one person running the show right now. So after your point has been made accept the answers even if you don't agree, or don't accept them and move on to one of the thousand other coins.
i care not what other cryptos are getting away with from non-existent regulations. that seems to be counter argument always. its the wrong standard to go by. you put the Bible in the project (literally in its hash), you better establish an order of accountability above the rest. forum posts peppered with teases and non specifics are like some underground party people are looking to get into. i get it - the more elusive the scheme the more allure and perceived value it tries to conjure
im not sure your math adds up. and i dont know how you can know much Dev (plus partners) have mined ahead of people or currently. Its impossible to know. Obviously Dev isnt stupid and has designed an investment scheme that requires 1.5 million coins (it was 500k, then 1.1 mil, then time to get that xmas bonus so 1.5 mil). The only way to provide people coins to buy those coins is to have them for sale across multiple accounts/miners. Its really not that difficult to see through.
Now you may say, how can "poor o' solo Dev" be able to pull that off, it would cost so much money. The fact is that anyone a year or two ago cognizant of bitcoin could have easily horded a lot and now have LOTS of money to use. In other words USD has deflated drastically and now BTC is king. So a $20 BTC coin can buy $7k of resources. You only need 6 months for the final 'master node' pump/dump scheme. So perhaps a $40 investment in BTC can yield you the mining hash (and thats probably exagerated)
the other tip off is how experienced the Dev is. He obviously appears to have worked with crypto and possible did another coin venture prior to this. So its a hash/rehash.
Keep in mind that these are questions that go through my mind. a simple document with a real person behind it would aliveiate worries of a flyby night operation using the Bible/orphans as its cover. also make masternodes more accesible to the public and not the pyramid investment that is being proposed
To the point of masternodes being a deposit account. what does that matter? the point is to sell the tokens for btc! of course you can keep the tokens! print them out and stuff them in your mattress. its just play money.
the game is to print tokens out of then air (via mining) and sell the hot potato to the next person with real money. and give them confidence the token will be worth something 10-100x in the future.