While I don't want to sit here and fan the flames, let me say this. A sanctuary is a place of refuge. A place of safety. Our sanctuaries will do some financial transactions but as long as the coin continues to resist 3rd party mining software, that task will also be handled by the wallets in play. The primary function of the sanctuary is to vote and govern, lead the coin to a better place, not for the sole financial gain of the sanctuary holders but because of the huge gain to the orphan fund. Consider if this coin does break the top 100, that would mean in rough numbers it would be generating close to $1 Million each month for the orphan fund. Would some users get rich? Yes. But the gains to the charitable arm of the coin would be incredible. And with all of that income, the role of the sanctuaries would be even more important, they'd have to oversee the management and stewardship of that fund. And they will extend refuge and safety to the less fortunate which is one of the biblical mandates (and really a mandate of most religions).
There are a lot of biblical parables and stories, but why are we not talking about the parable of the Talents? The servant buried his money was punished and told he should have at least given it to the money changers to earn interest. Yet the third servant was lauded for making so much more from his initial fund. The Bible is not anti-money nor even anti-wealth, it is merely that as your means increase you have more temptations, thus the story of the rich man versus the camel and the eye of the needle. However, in our modern society, I think it could be equally said it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than 1) a rich man, 2) an attractive man, 3) a very intelligent man. Faith is ultimately easier when you have nothing to lose, you're not really risking anything on the "leap of faith". But that is not to say the former are lost causes, merely that they have to risk a position of advantage in their "leap of faith".
At the end of it all, can we agree that even among Christians of the same denomination there will be a wide range of beliefs on most topics. I'd wager you'd not be able to get a consensus on this specific topic from ten randomly selected ministers. So no matter what path this coin takes on most any topic, there will be a sincere difference of belief by some. That's OK, but lets no belabor non-technical points once our points have been expressed.
That is a great analogy with the parable of the Talents. Thanks.
I don't want to cause a division, and I welcome the community input. What everyone has to understand is I have a responsibility to also protect the investor also, so things that make it to prod are hard to change.