** XEON (MINI) UPDATE **
This does Not completely fix xeon but sheds a little more light on the issue:
Windows Servers: Running xeon biblepay-64 bit yields only 8000 HPS (less than a laptop)
Windows Servers: Running xeon bible-32bit: Yields 13,000 HPS (almost double) - IE approximately 65% of the computing power of the box.
So hopefully this gives you all a little improvement while I figure out the rest of the story. Im going to install windows7 on my xeon server and see if the OS multitasking has any effect on the xeon as my win7 desktop is pulling 11,000 hps and its a few years old.
Does anyone have a xeon multiproc machine running linux? That would also help us compare linux over windows with the xeon as the proc.
Topic: BiblePay - New Coin Launch - Official Thread - page 59. (Read 119833 times)
I don't care about the lower hashrate/payouts, but it's not really "fair" when linux get 2x hashrate on the same hardware. Just wanted to know why 
Guys- Its not getting ignored- we were moving like a steamroller until F7000 hit, and the issue is things have to be prioritized.
Its a higher priority to address Prod issues than "hashrate" issues.
Now it appears the pool is running again without issues so now I can take a look at the hash rate issues across OS.
The pool is storing the OS flavor per miner now, so I should be able to go in and write a report of average speed per OS flavor.
I do see that windows appears to hash at a much slower rate than linux for some reason.
Im seeing 34,000 HPS on my vultr-debian vs 4,000 on my dual CPU xeon windows web server. Quite a disparity there. Definitely unintentional from our engineering standpoint.
bible_pay: Does Vultr allow a box to run such a high CPU process? Are you running your Vultr box as hard as it can?
No- Im renting a 4 Proc/4core debian box from them, 2.4ghz cores, no overclocking.
tested 2 machines both of on linux ubuntu 16.04
intel 10core = 55449.04 27298.84 63shares
and
intel 2core= 15218.15 35055.84 81shares
this is enigma for me that 2core shit is better like hardcore 10core
edit:// POOL IS DOWN
intel 10core = 55449.04 27298.84 63shares
and
intel 2core= 15218.15 35055.84 81shares
this is enigma for me that 2core shit is better like hardcore 10coreedit:// POOL IS DOWN
Pool is up, but I came in this morning and had flashing red alerts on 7 IPs, so I had to re-enable the anti-ddos; what is your IP? I need to monitor your traffic.
tested 2 machines both of on linux ubuntu 16.04
intel 10core = 55449.04 27298.84 63shares
and
intel 2core= 15218.15 35055.84 81shares
this is enigma for me that 2core shit is better like hardcore 10core
edit:// POOL IS DOWN
intel 10core = 55449.04 27298.84 63shares
and
intel 2core= 15218.15 35055.84 81shares
this is enigma for me that 2core shit is better like hardcore 10coreedit:// POOL IS DOWN
why block subsidy go down to 11k and then go back to 17k today?
The subsidy is linked to the block difficulty.
Nobody is talking (again) about the lack of found blocks. The average is 9.6 minutes instead of the intended 7 minutes, that is, around 150 blocks are found per day instead of ~205.
Here are the stats for the previous 7 days:
Sep 11: 7026-7201 (175)
Sep 12: 7202-7354 (152)
Sep 13: 7355-7503 (148)
Sep 14: 7504-7654 (150)
Sep 15: 7655-7805 (150)
Sep 16: 7806-7952 (146)
Sep 17: 7953-8105 (152)
So there was a noticable increase shortly after the F7000 (although still not enough), but then it went back to the slower block time.
I speculate this issue is closely related to a lot of other issues, so when one of the other issues is fixed, this may be fixed with it, or vice versa.
Here are the stats for the previous 7 days:
Sep 11: 7026-7201 (175)
Sep 12: 7202-7354 (152)
Sep 13: 7355-7503 (148)
Sep 14: 7504-7654 (150)
Sep 15: 7655-7805 (150)
Sep 16: 7806-7952 (146)
Sep 17: 7953-8105 (152)
So there was a noticable increase shortly after the F7000 (although still not enough), but then it went back to the slower block time.
I speculate this issue is closely related to a lot of other issues, so when one of the other issues is fixed, this may be fixed with it, or vice versa.
Do you think this could have something to do with the block difficulties? One of the blocks was 8000 difficulty and a couple 6000. The other thing is that I have noticed is that over the weekend (according to the about page on the pool) the pool load was less than 9%, and then there was a lot of down time on the pool. Maybe it played a role.
I have a question for you clever people. I have noticed that no matter how my hashes per second reflects on the pool, my rewards stay more or less the same. So on 2500 hashes i get the same amount as 5000 hashes. Same amount of threads of course. Any ideas?
Nobody is talking (again) about the lack of found blocks. The average is 9.6 minutes instead of the intended 7 minutes, that is, around 150 blocks are found per day instead of ~205.
Here are the stats for the previous 7 days:
Sep 11: 7026-7201 (175)
Sep 12: 7202-7354 (152)
Sep 13: 7355-7503 (148)
Sep 14: 7504-7654 (150)
Sep 15: 7655-7805 (150)
Sep 16: 7806-7952 (146)
Sep 17: 7953-8105 (152)
So there was a noticable increase shortly after the F7000 (although still not enough), but then it went back to the slower block time.
I speculate this issue is closely related to a lot of other issues, so when one of the other issues is fixed, this may be fixed with it, or vice versa.
Here are the stats for the previous 7 days:
Sep 11: 7026-7201 (175)
Sep 12: 7202-7354 (152)
Sep 13: 7355-7503 (148)
Sep 14: 7504-7654 (150)
Sep 15: 7655-7805 (150)
Sep 16: 7806-7952 (146)
Sep 17: 7953-8105 (152)
So there was a noticable increase shortly after the F7000 (although still not enough), but then it went back to the slower block time.
I speculate this issue is closely related to a lot of other issues, so when one of the other issues is fixed, this may be fixed with it, or vice versa.
I did notice it last week, but I thought this is not priority to fix, so I never raise up yet, just wanted to let Robert concentrate on fixing the other issues (because there are 2 impatient guys keep pushing dev, I think they must be paying dev a lot BTC, lol).
@inblue you remind me
I think it is good time to discuss about this issue now, since wallet and pool are working great right now 
Yes, I waited too because there were obviously more important issues then, and also to have at least 7 days to confirm the average.
why block subsidy go down to 11k and then go back to 17k today?
Nobody is talking (again) about the lack of found blocks. The average is 9.6 minutes instead of the intended 7 minutes, that is, around 150 blocks are found per day instead of ~205.
Here are the stats for the previous 7 days:
Sep 11: 7026-7201 (175)
Sep 12: 7202-7354 (152)
Sep 13: 7355-7503 (148)
Sep 14: 7504-7654 (150)
Sep 15: 7655-7805 (150)
Sep 16: 7806-7952 (146)
Sep 17: 7953-8105 (152)
So there was a noticable increase shortly after the F7000 (although still not enough), but then it went back to the slower block time.
I speculate this issue is closely related to a lot of other issues, so when one of the other issues is fixed, this may be fixed with it, or vice versa.
Here are the stats for the previous 7 days:
Sep 11: 7026-7201 (175)
Sep 12: 7202-7354 (152)
Sep 13: 7355-7503 (148)
Sep 14: 7504-7654 (150)
Sep 15: 7655-7805 (150)
Sep 16: 7806-7952 (146)
Sep 17: 7953-8105 (152)
So there was a noticable increase shortly after the F7000 (although still not enough), but then it went back to the slower block time.
I speculate this issue is closely related to a lot of other issues, so when one of the other issues is fixed, this may be fixed with it, or vice versa.
I did notice it last week, but I thought this is not priority to fix, so I never raise up yet, just wanted to let Robert concentrate on fixing the other issues (because there are 2 impatient guys keep pushing dev, I think they must be paying dev a lot BTC, lol).
@inblue you remind me
I think it is good time to discuss about this issue now, since wallet and pool are working great right now
Nobody is talking (again) about the lack of found blocks. The average is 9.6 minutes instead of the intended 7 minutes, that is, around 150 blocks are found per day instead of ~205.
Here are the stats for the previous 7 days:
Sep 11: 7026-7201 (175)
Sep 12: 7202-7354 (152)
Sep 13: 7355-7503 (148)
Sep 14: 7504-7654 (150)
Sep 15: 7655-7805 (150)
Sep 16: 7806-7952 (146)
Sep 17: 7953-8105 (152)
So there was a noticable increase shortly after the F7000 (although still not enough), but then it went back to the slower block time.
I speculate this issue is closely related to a lot of other issues, so when one of the other issues is fixed, this may be fixed with it, or vice versa.
Here are the stats for the previous 7 days:
Sep 11: 7026-7201 (175)
Sep 12: 7202-7354 (152)
Sep 13: 7355-7503 (148)
Sep 14: 7504-7654 (150)
Sep 15: 7655-7805 (150)
Sep 16: 7806-7952 (146)
Sep 17: 7953-8105 (152)
So there was a noticable increase shortly after the F7000 (although still not enough), but then it went back to the slower block time.
I speculate this issue is closely related to a lot of other issues, so when one of the other issues is fixed, this may be fixed with it, or vice versa.
netDIFF= 8500 
I don't care about the lower hashrate/payouts, but it's not really "fair" when linux get 2x hashrate on the same hardware. Just wanted to know why
Guys- Its not getting ignored- we were moving like a steamroller until F7000 hit, and the issue is things have to be prioritized.
Its a higher priority to address Prod issues than "hashrate" issues.
Now it appears the pool is running again without issues so now I can take a look at the hash rate issues across OS.
The pool is storing the OS flavor per miner now, so I should be able to go in and write a report of average speed per OS flavor.
I do see that windows appears to hash at a much slower rate than linux for some reason.
Im seeing 34,000 HPS on my vultr-debian vs 4,000 on my dual CPU xeon windows web server. Quite a disparity there. Definitely unintentional from our engineering standpoint.
bible_pay: Does Vultr allow a box to run such a high CPU process? Are you running your Vultr box as hard as it can?
I still don't understand one thing, if HPS is used for pool payouts (as is displayed in the block distribution page), what purpose does HPS2 have and why is the leaderboard sorted by HPS2 by default?
I know HPS2 has something to do with shares submitted and luck, but is it used in the pool calculation for payouts or not? If it is used, then why is it not displayed in the block distribution page and HPS is displayed instead?
I know HPS2 has something to do with shares submitted and luck, but is it used in the pool calculation for payouts or not? If it is used, then why is it not displayed in the block distribution page and HPS is displayed instead?
Maybe- Im checking that too. I certainly see a similar net result, but, I dont see any errors in measurements in the code, so Ill keep checking. Either way, the xeon multiprocessor is performing horribly.
I've got one Linux running and five running on Win 7. All are identical except for the Linux is on a USB drive. All are running single processor Xeon chips. Linux shows with genmininginfo 49K, but it basically pulls 25K. Windows shows 15K but pulls low 25K. So the question becomes why does Linux show so high when it really doesn't perform at those levels. Not saying it SHOULD be performing at that level, I'd say the chip is a 22-24K chip on high gen proc, but why does it show basically double what it really does while Windows shows a bit better than half what it really does?
It's a good starting for christian community and it will also reduce waste of time and power and it will also provide highest technology and speed in present currency.
xxkaiwaxx i see that somebody do funny from my help to children...... is not the satisfaction of paying to someone whom I see and need my money as someone who doesnt not? 
ach jaj,kam sme sa to dostaliv dnesnej dobe
ach jaj,kam sme sa to dostaliv dnesnej dobe
Post a screenshot of your $60 "donation". You can blur the private details.
xxkaiwaxx i see that somebody do funny from my help to children...... is not the satisfaction of paying to someone whom I see and need my money as someone who doesnt not?
ach jaj,kam sme sa to dostaliv dnesnej dobe
ach jaj,kam sme sa to dostaliv dnesnej dobe
Ahh my bad. I thought u meant orphan "blocks" lol ^^".
Ill take your word for it then
But to me... that still doesn't give you a license to "rush" the Dev for your cause.
Your not the only one who donates to those in need here
xxkaiwaxx i see that somebody do funny from my help to children...... is not the satisfaction of paying to someone whom I see and need my money as someone who doesnt not?
ach jaj,kam sme sa to dostaliv dnesnej dobe
ach jaj,kam sme sa to dostaliv dnesnej dobe
but still isnt full power like on linux = ROBERT can you check continuously? there is still place for improvement
You and your Oliwer mate are such slave drivers... i wouldnt want to work for u =D =D
How about , pay him? And he "might" actually focus on what "you" want. =D
Who did u pay 60 dollars?
You paid the Dev?
Of course you dont understand me. You can only hear the noise in your own head
but still isnt full power like on linux = ROBERT can you check continuously? there is still place for improvement
You and your Oliwer mate are such slave drivers... i wouldnt want to work for u =D =D
How about , pay him? And he "might" actually focus on what "you" want. =D
We only fight for our right;)
isn't devs get a small amount of coins from each block?
BTW. Hash2 has rised, but vpu usage now is jumping. Before was stable.
P.S. Thank You Bible_pay
isn't devs get a small amount of coins from each block?
BTW. Hash2 has rised, but vpu usage now is jumping. Before was stable.
P.S. Thank You Bible_pay
One of the strongest selling points of this coin is there was ZERO premine for the Dev, there is ZERO block reward for the Dev. The only perk the Dev is getting (and I'm glad he changed his mind on this) is once Sanctuaries go live (i.e., Masternodes) the Sanctuaries get 10%, and the Orphan Fund goes from 10% to "expense" fund at 15%, of which a maximum of 5% can go for anything other than charity. So he did finally carve out a small piece that could go to him, but the Sanctuaries will have to approve which shows a lot of either a) Character or b) Faith.
Jump to: