Target Audience
Cryptologists, Scientists, Engineers, Financial Analysts, Accountants,
Investors, Programmers, and crypto-coin enthusiasts.
Wait, but what about Christians? Also orphan sponsors, charity donors/givers? Shouldn't these even be first on the list?
was thinking the same thing
Forgive me if I misunderstood, but isn't it the job of the main node holders to decide who gets what once the coin is actually set in its ways? Or what list are we talking about?
Yes, mostly, but I think its important to set the ground rules now before I hand the reigns over.
I basically say up front that I wont accept: Not communicating to our orphans or receiving their communication, providing bad customer service, a greed based ecosystem, hashing outside of full nodes, being ashamed of integrating our Christian features, using charities of less than 75% efficiency, and keeping the initial parameters (such as 10% to tithes), etc.
Then once the masternodes go live, the community can make changes within the bounds of these parameters, but, to be clear to our investors, not outside the bounds of the initial parameters.
Just to be 100% transparent, the only parameter than I feel actually should be changed during go live of sanctuaries, and I believe I will push for this when we start our slack channel: a 5% allocation back to IT for the welfare and well being of our future. I think we need to carve out 5% out of our sanctuary superblocks for allocation to be split between IT, PR, and Charity ops support (charity support being rewards to people who write to our orphans). This imo, will be well spent and will guarantee the bright future of day to day operation. The payroll would be in the form that sanctuaries approve the expense, but the renumeration goes back to our 7 or so developers and 5-7 or so helpers in the field manning certain positions.
I feel that we could merge that change in at the time we go live with sanctuaries, update the OP, and live with those parameters permanently going forward in a decentralized fashion.