I do not really like the idea of it preventing or smoothing spikes though since this is indeed the excitement crypto traders like and are excited by.
If the purpose of making Bay was to give traders something to play around with, you would have a point. But that's not what we are here for. Let the other coins play the p&d games. We are building this for mass adoption, and you can't get that with the volatility that crypto is known for.
Edit: That said, I believe the peg will give some very interesting opportunities for traders.
Well traders playing around with can be otherwise described as giving investors incentive to hold and accumulate for speculative reasons. If you eliminate the incentive for speculation compared to other projects you now have lost the vast vast majority involved in crypto today.
These speculative reasons right now are the reason crypto has any real value.
I stick firmly to the opinion giving people the financial incentive through interest rates to accumulate and hold and disincentive to dump and churn is the most successful manner to increase interest in this project.
The pegging for me is mostly important in preventing a crash almost like when the stock exchange is taken down under extreme circumstances
Strictly the pegging would become most useful once bay is at a dollar or greater. Pegging now as I understand it will not be as useful as it will be once you have a much wider interest in the project.
For me the locking or making coins unavailable to trade on the live market will only work if those locking their coins are given increasing incentives to lock increasing amounts for increasing periods.
The idea is very interesting but I don't see how it can become useful to bay right now at this stage until you have a huge user base and real world adoption and much higher value per token. Activated in its current form to smooth or prevent spikes will perhaps discourage speculators in this sphere. Since all crypto has at this point is speculators that could be unwise.
I mean of course if I do not understand the pegging exactly and you can explain how my reasoning is incorrect I will be more than happy to listen.
I have been thinking about this more and more lately and although I see vast and interesting applications for the pegging I do not see them at this stage for bitbay. Perhaps when we are top 10 then yes.
It is very strange but in the last 3 days I have had 2 respected developers (from large cap coins ) PM me and mention they had been following the bitbay thread with keen interest they went on to say the tiered levels of interest based upon amount of tokens accumulated and duration held is an idea they are already working on in slighly different variations.
All the work on the pegging is not wasted and is very important for creating wide spread adoption based on real work application for a currency for the decentralised market and all other things but for now i would put that on hold for when that is viable and work on a method right now to increase incentive to accumulate and hold for speculators which is all we have right now here in crypto.
First build the value to a top 10 top 20 project then flip the pegging switch and build out adoption based on real world usage and application.
I would have anyone point out the flaws in my reasoning because I have enjoyed my education on this board so far. I am very open minded. Being proven wrong and given greater insight is something i like.
Play to what we have here now - speculators -
Force attention here now - market cap
Solidify cap and work on real world adoption through stability - flip the rolling peg on...
Even though I am not even a top holder of bitbay it is the project i would like to see succeed the most.
Decentralised trustless market places and exchanges are the missing pieces to this crypto puzzle right now.