anyway the takeaway is this:
the win was real, you really could win that on the game, i did - no cheats
bitcasino do pay, but.. if you win too much they will become detectives
bitcoin is way over valued and going back to sub 4k
Topic: Bitcasino.io 171btc winner discussion - page 4. (Read 1924 times)
Langel is such an unrepentant liar, he rushed and deleted his post on this topic, every of his tactics are suspicious of him being a scammer as accused by the casino account handler. He probably have shut the door for innocent people who would be trapped in this kind of situation. Good thing investigation was carried out to ascertain his atom of lies.
The thread by LAngel has been archived - http://archive.is/feqpv
Below, you will see the publicly available proof from the Blockchain supporting our findings that there is indeed a pattern of a single individual
who we know to be manipulating and exploiting games across casino operators, and that LAngel is not as legitimately lucky as would have you believe.
Transaction 1 where 0.483 BTC is moved to 14t9Ff3yUgwcQm5HsAsL5Rq7meBBCDT8g5
68c63caf998c3e84f342caa988d1e439f8cd78174aa389185b3e4a06f0ecf27b
Transaction 2 where 0.1 BTC is deposited from 14t9Ff3yUgwcQm5HsAsL5Rq7meBBCDT8g5 to Account 1 deposit address in Bitcasino 3G4r8XMKgvKFq3M29kNuV9RE6kvq7eY5Qh
7dbd1fe62c6afb93ecaa8ce0eed7cb0e90210de93151eb29f894a81c32cacc25
Transaction 3 where 0.196 BTC is sent from 14t9Ff3yUgwcQm5HsAsL5Rq7meBBCDT8g5 to a new address 1BCeQTQWvq5gzk8yEBzwGrWuLYjHmvf3P2
571a8a4c2f6d59044e669f5f5956e4544970fce7aea21feb3d32caa577b35497
Transaction 4 where inputs from 1BCeQTQWvq5gzk8yEBzwGrWuLYjHmvf3P2 and 13mEeWBYtd4huuuWGTFbEvbH192uMGh3tF send 4.5 BTC to a Casino Operator 1 deposit address 1BnqgnQFVpevz7idhBHpdD2Axy7L9ZC42U and 0.134 BTC to a new address 1DFQ7ofFWf1yffqwQL1Jdv445ZeYxSuGiD 90eea9f590e77ce6e9e70de79911ef38275e0d22642b54c02d34343c3b59bbdb
Transaction 5 where inputs from 18qF5tBd175jfz3AwjtsbebTfn8nkfRGDm and 1DFQ7ofFWf1yffqwQL1Jdv445ZeYxSuGiD are sending 0.5 BTC to Bitcasino onto Account 2 deposit address 3Bn9pecZA6r3Z1bCYdh4GV5tM3DYXxMhzF and 0.055 BTC to a new address 1J14KoZVUXrG3P4Rcs6URZQ1dJHY77tVWQ 5a9b14457a493e6c237d1e38dd1b80082af45e217a77782fdd605fd5e09dd4ee
Transaction 6 where inputs 1J14KoZVUXrG3P4Rcs6URZQ1dJHY77tVWQ and 1JkAF2owb3QgXG1UN53yREFvogTWeLs1TZ fund a deposit of 0.5 BTC to a players deposit address 38492UnXhifAE4Yag26Lbp6beoxB1cLTDT within Casino Operator 2 52777ed072b6fdd1c3cbb8b14ce7fb37556d302a0e9eaa64e801731c8b92fcb3
The above combination transactions prove that the addresses involved are in possession of a single entity responsible of the deposits to
Bitcasino Account 1, Account 2 and also to Casino Operator 1 and Casino Operator 2.
Collection of the entity’s mentioned addresses:
14t9Ff3yUgwcQm5HsAsL5Rq7meBBCDT8g5
1BCeQTQWvq5gzk8yEBzwGrWuLYjHmvf3P2
1DFQ7ofFWf1yffqwQL1Jdv445ZeYxSuGiD
1J14KoZVUXrG3P4Rcs6URZQ1dJHY77tVWQ
Account 1 Bitcasino deposit address:
3G4r8XMKgvKFq3M29kNuV9RE6kvq7eY5Qh
Account 2 Bitcasino deposit address:
3Bn9pecZA6r3Z1bCYdh4GV5tM3DYXxMhzF
Casino Operator 1 deposit address:
1BnqgnQFVpevz7idhBHpdD2Axy7L9ZC42U
Casino Operator 2 deposit address:
38492UnXhifAE4Yag26Lbp6beoxB1cLTDT
Blockchain links to each relevant transaction:
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/68c63caf998c3e84f342caa988d1e439f8cd78174aa389185b3e4a06f0ecf27b
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/7dbd1fe62c6afb93ecaa8ce0eed7cb0e90210de93151eb29f894a81c32cacc25
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/571a8a4c2f6d59044e669f5f5956e4544970fce7aea21feb3d32caa577b35497
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/90eea9f590e77ce6e9e70de79911ef38275e0d22642b54c02d34343c3b59bbdb
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/5a9b14457a493e6c237d1e38dd1b80082af45e217a77782fdd605fd5e09dd4ee
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/52777ed072b6fdd1c3cbb8b14ce7fb37556d302a0e9eaa64e801731c8b92fcb3
Given the 100% match, our fraud team’s extensive findings supported by GameArt’s investigation and the history we have with this user
the account will not be unfrozen and the funds will not be paid out. There is no settlement, this is false information.
Which part of this 'proof' shows LAngel cheated in this particular instance of 171 BTC win?
are not legitimate and are a result of fraudulently manipulating GameArt’s Dawn of Olympus.
@Bitcasino.io If you know there is a part of your game design that can be exploited, why are you running it in the first place? Whoever wins BIG at a later date, can be denied of payment due to this same line of reasoning. The onus is on to you to fix your game design, not the gambler IMHO.Below, you will see the publicly available proof from the Blockchain supporting our findings that there is indeed a pattern of a single individual
who we know to be manipulating and exploiting games across casino operators, and that LAngel is not as legitimately lucky as would have you believe.
Transaction 1 where 0.483 BTC is moved to 14t9Ff3yUgwcQm5HsAsL5Rq7meBBCDT8g5
68c63caf998c3e84f342caa988d1e439f8cd78174aa389185b3e4a06f0ecf27b
Transaction 2 where 0.1 BTC is deposited from 14t9Ff3yUgwcQm5HsAsL5Rq7meBBCDT8g5 to Account 1 deposit address in Bitcasino 3G4r8XMKgvKFq3M29kNuV9RE6kvq7eY5Qh
7dbd1fe62c6afb93ecaa8ce0eed7cb0e90210de93151eb29f894a81c32cacc25
Transaction 3 where 0.196 BTC is sent from 14t9Ff3yUgwcQm5HsAsL5Rq7meBBCDT8g5 to a new address 1BCeQTQWvq5gzk8yEBzwGrWuLYjHmvf3P2
571a8a4c2f6d59044e669f5f5956e4544970fce7aea21feb3d32caa577b35497
Transaction 4 where inputs from 1BCeQTQWvq5gzk8yEBzwGrWuLYjHmvf3P2 and 13mEeWBYtd4huuuWGTFbEvbH192uMGh3tF send 4.5 BTC to a Casino Operator 1 deposit address 1BnqgnQFVpevz7idhBHpdD2Axy7L9ZC42U and 0.134 BTC to a new address 1DFQ7ofFWf1yffqwQL1Jdv445ZeYxSuGiD 90eea9f590e77ce6e9e70de79911ef38275e0d22642b54c02d34343c3b59bbdb
Transaction 5 where inputs from 18qF5tBd175jfz3AwjtsbebTfn8nkfRGDm and 1DFQ7ofFWf1yffqwQL1Jdv445ZeYxSuGiD are sending 0.5 BTC to Bitcasino onto Account 2 deposit address 3Bn9pecZA6r3Z1bCYdh4GV5tM3DYXxMhzF and 0.055 BTC to a new address 1J14KoZVUXrG3P4Rcs6URZQ1dJHY77tVWQ 5a9b14457a493e6c237d1e38dd1b80082af45e217a77782fdd605fd5e09dd4ee
Transaction 6 where inputs 1J14KoZVUXrG3P4Rcs6URZQ1dJHY77tVWQ and 1JkAF2owb3QgXG1UN53yREFvogTWeLs1TZ fund a deposit of 0.5 BTC to a players deposit address 38492UnXhifAE4Yag26Lbp6beoxB1cLTDT within Casino Operator 2 52777ed072b6fdd1c3cbb8b14ce7fb37556d302a0e9eaa64e801731c8b92fcb3
The above combination transactions prove that the addresses involved are in possession of a single entity responsible of the deposits to
Bitcasino Account 1, Account 2 and also to Casino Operator 1 and Casino Operator 2.
Collection of the entity’s mentioned addresses:
14t9Ff3yUgwcQm5HsAsL5Rq7meBBCDT8g5
1BCeQTQWvq5gzk8yEBzwGrWuLYjHmvf3P2
1DFQ7ofFWf1yffqwQL1Jdv445ZeYxSuGiD
1J14KoZVUXrG3P4Rcs6URZQ1dJHY77tVWQ
Account 1 Bitcasino deposit address:
3G4r8XMKgvKFq3M29kNuV9RE6kvq7eY5Qh
Account 2 Bitcasino deposit address:
3Bn9pecZA6r3Z1bCYdh4GV5tM3DYXxMhzF
Casino Operator 1 deposit address:
1BnqgnQFVpevz7idhBHpdD2Axy7L9ZC42U
Casino Operator 2 deposit address:
38492UnXhifAE4Yag26Lbp6beoxB1cLTDT
Blockchain links to each relevant transaction:
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/68c63caf998c3e84f342caa988d1e439f8cd78174aa389185b3e4a06f0ecf27b
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/7dbd1fe62c6afb93ecaa8ce0eed7cb0e90210de93151eb29f894a81c32cacc25
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/571a8a4c2f6d59044e669f5f5956e4544970fce7aea21feb3d32caa577b35497
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/90eea9f590e77ce6e9e70de79911ef38275e0d22642b54c02d34343c3b59bbdb
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/5a9b14457a493e6c237d1e38dd1b80082af45e217a77782fdd605fd5e09dd4ee
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/52777ed072b6fdd1c3cbb8b14ce7fb37556d302a0e9eaa64e801731c8b92fcb3
Given the 100% match, our fraud team’s extensive findings supported by GameArt’s investigation and the history we have with this user
the account will not be unfrozen and the funds will not be paid out. There is no settlement, this is false information.
yahoo,
Consider editing your OP so you don't mislead the community.
The guy is a hacker, wasn't paid anything, and he chose to remove his video; Bitcasino didn't ask him to do it.
Basically what happened here is a user ended up winning 171 bitcoins on bitcasino.io playing their casino games. The user ended up getting his account locked and contacted the site and was asked for KYC. Casino asking for KYC is a normal practice in the industry, Locking the account while this process is ongoing, not so sure.
I am happy the guy is getting paid some of his money owed, but what I think is a bit odd is he was asked to remove the video and was given 28% of his win.
None of this is true now.
1). He never received 4 BTC
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54755309
2). He removed the video on his own; no one asked him to.
Consider editing your OP so you don't mislead the community.
The guy is a hacker, wasn't paid anything, and he chose to remove his video; Bitcasino didn't ask him to do it.
Basically what happened here is a user ended up winning 171 bitcoins on bitcasino.io playing their casino games. The user ended up getting his account locked and contacted the site and was asked for KYC. Casino asking for KYC is a normal practice in the industry, Locking the account while this process is ongoing, not so sure.
I am happy the guy is getting paid some of his money owed, but what I think is a bit odd is he was asked to remove the video and was given 28% of his win.
None of this is true now.
1). He never received 4 BTC
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54755309
2). He removed the video on his own; no one asked him to.
anyway the takeaway is this:
the win was real, you really could win that on the game, i did - no cheats
bitcasino do pay, but.. if you win too much they will become detectives
bitcoin is way over valued and going back to sub 4k
It isn't real it was just your fantasy, you can live with it. Good thing if it will be to sub 4k, now you sounded like a trader but that's kind of off-topic here.the win was real, you really could win that on the game, i did - no cheats
bitcasino do pay, but.. if you win too much they will become detectives
bitcoin is way over valued and going back to sub 4k
You clearly are lying, you admit then on another response you don't.
alright, i maintain, that... i was lucky and the win was real
i should have been paid
but then, should I? I cheated in the past.
i dont know.
whatever
i should have been paid
but then, should I? I cheated in the past.
i dont know.
whatever
I think we can settle this , can anyone check the transactions that happened between 11:00-12:00 AM forum time ? user LAngel claimed he received the first 4 BTC of his settlement at that time . so if someone actually has the time to go through the blocks mined in that time we should get some clear evidence if LAngel is lyeing or not.
I searched on the blockachain
The only 2 transactions with exactly 4 BTC are
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/6912671b6fce16570df427d09809fe1522fc261dbb2bc0306e1d626df3153d49
To 2 address so you can exclude it
https://www.blockchain.com/it/btc/tx/c8d60b0dfc50cdd19c01739e18f08f24f58e84bf37065ddcca56f0185840593e
Spitted to 6 addresses...
TDLR, there is no transaction from 11 AM to 12 AM forum time from one single address to another address with exactly 4 BTC
are not legitimate and are a result of fraudulently manipulating GameArt’s Dawn of Olympus.
Did you find how the game was exploited?it was a legitimate hit. a totally legitimate, non tampered, not cheated, win.
but granted i cheated in the past, but thats not relevant.
Thanks for confirming you've cheated. That means you've lost any benefit of the doubt. but granted i cheated in the past, but thats not relevant.
it was a legitimate hit. a totally legitimate, non tampered, not cheated, win.
but granted i cheated in the past, but thats not relevant.
Since you are here, would you answer:but granted i cheated in the past, but thats not relevant.
Why would you said that it was settled for 48 BTC?
but since i have no right to complain because i cheated in the past...well
i deserve 48 btc, so let me have my fantasy okay?
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
alright, i maintain, that... i was lucky and the win was real
i should have been paid
but then, should I? I cheated in the past.
i dont know.
whatever
I usually do not lose my mind but now I think I lost myself.i should have been paid
but then, should I? I cheated in the past.
i dont know.
whatever
Just STFU!
it was a legitimate hit. a totally legitimate, non tampered, not cheated, win.
but granted i cheated in the past, but thats not relevant.
Since you are here, would you answer:but granted i cheated in the past, but thats not relevant.
Why would you said that it was settled for 48 BTC?
but since i have no right to complain because i cheated in the past...well
i deserve 48 btc, so let me have my fantasy okay?
That's funnier. I give that to you since you already admit you cheated before. If you have cheated before, I guess would mean you could also do that again. And now you also cheated your way to close the thread by claiming there is a settlement. You cheated people here, the end up giving you merits for the thread you created about your winnings.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
it was a legitimate hit. a totally legitimate, non tampered, not cheated, win.
but granted i cheated in the past, but thats not relevant.
Since you are here, would you answer:but granted i cheated in the past, but thats not relevant.
Why would you said that it was settled for 48 BTC?
but since i have no right to complain because i cheated in the past...well
i deserve 48 btc, so let me have my fantasy okay?
Why would you think you deserve 48 BTC, why not 171+ BTC?
Would you admit that you have played a dirty game with the emotion of this forum members?
Did you notice that I and yahoo was ready to fight for you? We somehow saw injustice to you and gave our best with the community but now I feel I was cheated and I think others feel the same.
it was a legitimate hit. a totally legitimate, non tampered, not cheated, win.
but granted i cheated in the past, but thats not relevant.
but granted i cheated in the past, but thats not relevant.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
it was a legitimate hit. a totally legitimate, non tampered, not cheated, win.
but granted i cheated in the past, but thats not relevant.
Since you are here, would you answer:but granted i cheated in the past, but thats not relevant.
Why would you said that it was settled for 48 BTC?
hero member
Activity: 2660
Merit: 651
Want top-notch marketing for your project, Hire me
the account will not be unfrozen and the funds will not be paid out. There is no settlement, this is false information.
Can you confirm that you meant to say that the bitcasino.io account of user LAngel is still frozen and there were no settlement of giving him 48 BTC?By the way, I am still swallowing the information you have provided. So, I will be giving my full feedback later once I will have a clear understanding.
The account is frozen and will stay frozen. We have never made any settlements with the user in question.
Cheers,
Karl
Bitcasino.io
Very detailed explanation from Karl of bitcasino.io. I already thought that there is something wrong on the post of LAngel about winnings on Dawn of Olympus casino. I play that slot many times and I never encounter that x5700 on free spin alone. His luck during his free spin is a bit extraordinary.
And I believe that he will used the video during his game as alibi so that his cheat will be cover and also to get support here in forum which is quite effective because personally I believe on his winnings due to the video.
I never tryout the game before but everything about LAngel winning is fishy and it better that casino owner to figure out a way spot game manipulators to afford future complications.And I believe that he will used the video during his game as alibi so that his cheat will be cover and also to get support here in forum which is quite effective because personally I believe on his winnings due to the video.
it was a legitimate hit. a totally legitimate, non tampered, not cheated, win.
but granted i cheated in the past, but thats not relevant.
Since you accept that you have once cheated before in your previous game nothing will stop you from doing it again.but granted i cheated in the past, but thats not relevant.
it was a legitimate hit. a totally legitimate, non tampered, not cheated, win.
but granted i cheated in the past, but thats not relevant.
Since you are here, would you answer:but granted i cheated in the past, but thats not relevant.
Why would you said that it was settled for 48 BTC?
Sadly, that casino has always an advantage over the gambler.
As Bitcasino.io Support mentioned, casino has always instruments to investigate if a person played and won fair or not fair. But if a gambler losses, he can not check if he had lost fair of game algoritm was modified. And house edge everywhere makes statement "House always win" proven.
As Bitcasino.io Support mentioned, casino has always instruments to investigate if a person played and won fair or not fair. But if a gambler losses, he can not check if he had lost fair of game algoritm was modified. And house edge everywhere makes statement "House always win" proven.
As a gambler, it will be in your best interest to never put your self in such situation. Legitimate or not big winnings like that on any casino will always draw attention.
Indeed.
Casinos are not your friends. They running a business. They are there to make money. That money they are making is your money.
If you think you can outsmart them, you better be very smart. But then, why waste your smarts on casinos if you are that smart...
If the stories about the LAngel were true, he was one of those smartypants. Looks like his greed outsmarted him in this situation. He probably could have gone under the radar if he tried to win and withdraw smaller amounts instead.
Sadly, that casino has always an advantage over the gambler.
As Bitcasino.io Support mentioned, casino has always instruments to investigate if a person played and won fair or not fair. But if a gambler losses, he can not check if he had lost fair of game algoritm was modified. And house edge everywhere makes statement "House always win" proven.
As Bitcasino.io Support mentioned, casino has always instruments to investigate if a person played and won fair or not fair. But if a gambler losses, he can not check if he had lost fair of game algoritm was modified. And house edge everywhere makes statement "House always win" proven.
As a gambler, it will be in your best interest to never put your self in such situation. Legitimate or not big winnings like that on any casino will always draw attention.
Looks like he ‘won’ 36 btc at FortuneJack?
Yeah, I don't really see the link. I think you're searching down the wrong alley here, honestly. Especially since the user is disparaging LAngel, rather than doing anything that is in support of his claims. Apart from the whole "10000x" comment, which I think most skeptical gamblers would agree with...After all, I'm quite cynical when it comes to casinos and their ToS.
The account is frozen and will stay frozen. We have never made any settlements with the user in question.
Cheers,
Karl
Bitcasino.io
Thanks for the confirmation. End of another drama which have already wasted so many users valuable time. Cheers,
Karl
Bitcasino.io
the reason he lied about the settlement is to give an excuse to close the thread without admitting he cheated
Think I know who it is anyway real name Jason he's British hit my dice site many moons ago
Think I know who it is anyway real name Jason he's British hit my dice site many moons ago
Check out this guys post history ^^^ https://archive.is/ThlMB
LAngel = Forgotoldaccount ?
Looks like he ‘won’ 36 btc at FortuneJack?
Jump to: