OP argues that bitcoin is a better SoV because its easier to use as a medium of exchange.
the foolish part is those that want to remove/inhibit/stall its MoE utility to be just a SoV
by removing/stalling/ sidestepping its MoV. by letting people play with promissory unconfirmed tx's on another network and requiring vaulting up coins to even use that other network. is not going to gain value of bitcoin.
What was removed, stalled, or side-stepped? You can use Bitcoin on-chain transactions all day, everyday. Go have a ball.
now you are just being ignorant after months of the same things being said. but your own post history can remind you if you genuinely cant even remmber your own converastions
removed: fee priority mechanisms, prices 2009-2015 were pennies. now they are more
stalled: BITCOIN NETWORK scaling: 2010 the 7tx/s number was known .. (600k tx a day) show me a day exceding 600k tx
sidestepped: many things. read the 2015 roadmap where things were meant to move along in weeks/months to scale BITCOIN NETWORK where the actual results of2019 are a tx format that is a gateway to another network and a bloat expansion (not to scale up) to try avoiding reduction of tx counts to fit bloated new features
the MoV: the very devs you love to defend are the ones shouting that bitcoin cant scale. even you and your buddies are of that mindset that bitcoin cant be MoV and will be SoV
seems you have become ignorant, and even forgetting your own mantra's and mindsets on the issues
vaulted up coins(8 decimals) locked in fortknox(factories) to then play with unaudited promissary transaction mediums(unconfirmed 12decimal tx's) is the same business plan of banks using paper money that 'represents' gold in the 18th century
What are you talking about? Bitcoins sent through the Lightning Network are not "promisory transaction mediums", there are no "promises to pay", they are Bitcoins.
i can write a transaction on a piece of paper and hand it to someone. guess what it wont be considered a bitcoin transaction.
first rule of bitcoin/blockchains.. if its not on the blockchain it didnt happen
learn the terms "confirmed" "settled"
secondly the LN transactions are not blockchain transactions. ther is no guarantee that they will ever be blockchain transactions. so at best they are promises. and we all know promises can be broke.
even the LN devs admit this. that they are a future promise to pay. much like showing off a bank statement that you are well funded but writing an IOU that gets adapted and re-signed before being settled
i say this with actual sincerity
ACTUALLY RESEARCH LN!!!!
oh and let me guess tether is actual dollars will be your next rebutt.. think about why tether is not actual dollar. and think real hard about the reality of LN. not the fluffy pony hopes your buddies promote to you that LN will work out in the end and will be utopia