BTC just need, relative scarcity and the manufacturing cost, nature has the price, the price is the fluctuation, as long as access to the securitization in the human history of human use of the most profound institutional invention, the currency is likely to generate huge profits.
You have a lot of money and you have followers. With followers there is a crowd. The masses will naturally divide.
With differentiation, there is naturally a blank majority. Naturally, there are evil men who have been swindled. Nature has its center and leadership.
This is the history of bitcoin's journey along the way, which is why the BTC creator went to the center to turn the government against the pursuit of liberalism.
But on a philosophical basis, technologists are wrong.
The beginning of human birth is said to be monkeys. No government, no center. No money, no inflation. Government is not the product of power, but the government itself is the product of liberalism.
Because freedom must be evil, freedom itself creates chaos, and chaos leads to the pursuit of order, thus freedom produces power and bad power transition to good power.
In the world of BTC, new centralization has begun:
Global mining is concentrated in the hands of a few. The maintenance and development of bitcoin is concentrated in the hands of few digital farmers. The influence of virtual currency is concentrated in the hands of a few big v.
They are the new army, the new bureaucracy, the new emperor. Are these people trustworthy?
The emergence of BTC is a technological advance in the history of human currency. It makes up for the deficiency of the existing monetary system and should also promote the reform of the existing monetary system.
Like insurrection, it is either extinguished or assimilated into the long river of history.
If there is to be 1 currency for the world, bitcoin would have the best potential for me, as anyone can access it the same way and local governments can't really influence it.