== Bitcoin challenge transaction: ~1000 BTC total bounty to solvers! ==UPDATED== - page 23.

digaran

copper member

Activity: 1330

Merit: 899

🖤😏

Quote from: JohnSuu on June 01, 2023, 01:44:10 AM

guys, windows is closing. we need a new method to solve ECDLP with wallet address only.

Yeah about that, it's the other way around, we solve the address using EC only, the DLP part can be solved through public keys and not addresses.

I have an idea, why not picking a key from the middle of 66 bit range and start adding and subtracting to it using key subtract in address mode, you never know, you might get lucky and find puzzle 66, at least this way you could adjust start and end range of addition and subtraction, then you could for example, add and subtract 1 million keys to your middle of the range key with this stride "10000000000" and then add and subtract the same to another key, repeat that until you see #66 address, but we have no tool capable of doing that by itself, so you'd have to do addition and subtraction a few million times by hand, but if we could modify key subtractor to do that by itself, it would be great.

I wonder who is a wondering developer around these woods? !!!😉

NotATether

legendary

Activity: 1568

Merit: 6660

bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org

Quote from: JohnSuu on June 01, 2023, 01:44:10 AM

guys, windows is closing. we need a new method to solve ECDLP with wallet address only.

What do you mean by "windows is closing"?

Also, you can not solve the ECDLP problem using wallet address, because they are a hash of the public key, not the public key itself. Now it is theoretically possible that you break 160-bit space and find a private key that encodes into the exact same address, which can then be used in transactions to fool script verifiers since they only include the address hash in UTXOs. But that's a completely different matter.

JohnSuu

newbie

Activity: 1

Merit: 0

guys, windows is closing. we need a new method to solve ECDLP with wallet address only.

zielar

full member

Activity: 282

Merit: 114

Quote from: digaran on May 24, 2023, 07:53:45 PM

Wow, look what I found! I found it using my phone, I also have another one on laptop.

0399ae0cf361425cbea86fc0c1fecdff5f61ca8a4c4c28a1db891f3d651dc7f00e

Imagine my face when I realized they are both different keys.🤣

And what? What success have you achieved?

digaran

copper member

Activity: 1330

Merit: 899

🖤😏

Wow, look what I found! I found it using my phone, I also have another one on laptop.

0399ae0cf361425cbea86fc0c1fecdff5f61ca8a4c4c28a1db891f3d651dc7f00e

Imagine my face when I realized they are both different keys.🤣

WanderingPhilospher

full member

Activity: 1232

Merit: 242

Shooters Shoot...

Quote from: noecp on May 24, 2023, 02:15:07 PM

Quote from: WanderingPhilospher on May 10, 2023, 04:30:11 PM

RTX 3060 (non Ti) = 2,400 MKey/s (2.4GKey/s)
RTX 3600 Ti = 2,800 MKey/s (2.8GKey/s)
RTX 3070 = 3,100 MKey/s (3.1GKey/s)
RTX 3090 = 5,250 MKey/s (5.2GKey/s)
RTX 4090 = 7,750 MKey/s (7.7 GKey/s) (yes, you read that right lol)

Great work

Your speed test without power limits ?

I make few fixes and now see small speed up.

now RTX 3070(pl 170w) = 3217 Mkeys/s

I calc only dp32 for #125

I always cut power to 70% and adjust clocks.

Didn’t try without power limits.

I am running DP 32 as well but trailing bits versus leading.

noecp

newbie

Activity: 7

Merit: 5

Quote from: WanderingPhilospher on May 10, 2023, 04:30:11 PM

RTX 3060 (non Ti) = 2,400 MKey/s (2.4GKey/s)
RTX 3600 Ti = 2,800 MKey/s (2.8GKey/s)
RTX 3070 = 3,100 MKey/s (3.1GKey/s)
RTX 3090 = 5,250 MKey/s (5.2GKey/s)
RTX 4090 = 7,750 MKey/s (7.7 GKey/s) (yes, you read that right lol)

Great work

Your speed test without power limits ?

I make few fixes and now see small speed up.

now RTX 3070(pl 170w) = 3217 Mkeys/s

I calc only dp32 for #125
https://gcdnb.pbrd.co/images/8QF3YGOUdTJS.png

akaros

copper member

Activity: 55

Merit: 0

Builder of big stable mining farms since 2011.

I figured out that this setting never came to success Cheesy

because random base key is not in set range Cheesy

Anybody have correct code for this setting?

digaran

copper member

Activity: 1330

Merit: 899

🖤😏

I just noticed, on the third Op post there is a ms windows coming soon! Haven't they come yet @Op? That's some legit viagra they use!🤣

racminer

member

Activity: 245

Merit: 17

Quote from: Lolo54 on May 19, 2023, 08:58:48 AM

Quote from: albert0bsd on May 19, 2023, 08:51:03 AM

Oh, you are rigth seems interesting.
But there is no any output

yes that's right that's why I said it's strange Wink

.....I try to understand how this can happen but Huh

https://mempool.space/address/13zb1hQbWVsc2S7ZTZnP2G4undNNpdh5so

No output

digaran

copper member

Activity: 1330

Merit: 899

🖤😏

At least you guys know your way around explorers somewhat! When I go to one of them, it's like Bob in wonderland. I don't know why is it so hard for them to sort transactions as incoming, and outgoing, but instead they show you 200 other addresses just to inform you that your address has received coins from some other address, well I don't wanna be informed about other transactions of the sending address right away, just show me mine without confusing me with the rest. Lol.

zielar

full member

Activity: 282

Merit: 114

OK you're right. A massacre like this blockchain.com is going to the dogs. The graphic design is getting worse, the information is getting less and less... soon you won't even be able to see balance of any wallet :-)

albert0bsd

hero member

Activity: 862

Merit: 662

Quote from: zielar on May 19, 2023, 04:42:41 PM

Strange thing. Just as strange is the history of the address from which the incoming payment comes. Check the last page (third) of the transaction history... it starts with an outgoing transaction. How in the world was BTC sent from an address to which there was no incoming transaction before?

I've seen that sometimes blockchain . com don't show all the TX history, check that address in https://mempool.space/ , they it show TX before November/22 for that address

https://mempool.space/address/bc1q9v5nh4j2pnll47wfuskzdqwymjz2za4czn2rwy

zielar

full member

Activity: 282

Merit: 114

Strange thing. Just as strange is the history of the address from which the incoming payment comes. Check the last page (third) of the transaction history... it starts with an outgoing transaction. How in the world was BTC sent from an address to which there was no incoming transaction before?

The_Prof

sr. member

Activity: 346

Merit: 250

Quote from: Lolo54 on May 19, 2023, 08:58:48 AM

Quote from: albert0bsd on May 19, 2023, 08:51:03 AM

Oh, you are rigth seems interesting.
But there is no any output

yes that's right that's why I said it's strange Wink

.....I try to understand how this can happen but Huh

It looks like pending inputs from my side. Not sure anyone can confirm. They not outputs, just unconfirmed in. Available but not.

Lolo54

member

Activity: 127

Merit: 32

Quote from: albert0bsd on May 19, 2023, 08:51:03 AM

Oh, you are rigth seems interesting.
But there is no any output

yes that's right that's why I said it's strange Wink

.....I try to understand how this can happen but Huh

albert0bsd

hero member

Activity: 862

Merit: 662

Oh, you are rigth seems interesting.

But there is no any output

Lolo54

member

Activity: 127

Merit: 32

ok albert0bsd but my remark came from the fact that the explorer shows $2.07 sent as well as the difference between the total received and the final balance...so why Huh

albert0bsd

hero member

Activity: 862

Merit: 662

Quote from: Lolo54 on May 19, 2023, 05:23:39 AM

It's strange did you notice that on #66 there is an output awaiting validation 2.07$ Huh

https://www.blockchain.com/fr/explorer/addresses/btc/13zb1hQbWVsc2S7ZTZnP2G4undNNpdh5so
It is not validated so the pubkey is not broadcast but the scale takes it into account without any validation Total Received 6.60036526 BTC Final Bitcoin Balance 6.60028826
It doesn't exist on the other # yet. How can this happen?

It is not an output, is in input to the puzzle 66, nothing strange there.

Lolo54

member

Activity: 127

Merit: 32

It's strange did you notice that on #66 there is an output awaiting validation 2.07$ Huh

https://www.blockchain.com/fr/explorer/addresses/btc/13zb1hQbWVsc2S7ZTZnP2G4undNNpdh5so
It is not validated so the pubkey is not broadcast but the scale takes it into account without any validation Total Received 6.60036526 BTC Final Bitcoin Balance 6.60028826
It doesn't exist on the other # yet. How can this happen?

Topic: == Bitcoin challenge transaction: ~1000 BTC total bounty to solvers! ==UPDATED== - page 23. (Read 56094 times)