Pages:
Author

Topic: Bitcoin dominance hits 43%, alts surging ahead (Read 7935 times)

legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 2213
Even though I mention the selling on the way up strategy and buying on the way down strategy, there is quite a bit of "devil in the details," and ultimately I don't really believe that it is a good idea to sell to expect to buy back cheaper.  Therefore the amounts that might be permissible to sell on the way up would be relatively small and ONLY as a kind of insurance program (just in case the BTC price goes down, but if it does not go down, then don't expect to buy back, just use the money generated from the sales for funzies).

So, there are some presumptions in my considering even if selling at all is a good idea, and that would relate to having already had reached high accumulation levels and likely to have had overly accumulated, which makes it easier to sell some and it would presume that any coins sold would be in profits and maybe even in many time higher than the basis levels of profits.

For sure, strategies for shitcoins would be much different, and seems kind of dumb to me to sell some BTC and then to fuck around with shitcoins with the proceeds, but yeah, people can do what they want, even if it seems dumb to me.
The overall best practice is to allocate a minimal speculative amount to cash in on the market advantages in the form of selling all the way up and buying all the way down, this amount is quite different from your investment and holdings which should be 70% Bitcoin for long term and 30% for speculations of the bitcoin market and how best you can use the DCA approach to cash in on the gains that the market present time to time, this is the best practice that has helped many to increase their total bitcoin holdings.

The obvious truth is that, considering shitcoin is a total distraction for an investor, who wants to achieve a financially free future because altcoins are made up of tons of shitcoins that only take away from investors and operate Ponzi-like projects that lack the viability to survive the market demands, so best to buy more bitcoin and speculate the market along different market cycle while holding for long term.

Also, there seems to be some evil along this pattern really since the DCA approach needs a lot of market calculation, that is when to buy and when the right time to sell also, this is the major risk basement in the DCA approach, but being able to hold 70% and using only 30% to DCA market speculate it makes you more confident since you are not approaching the entire Bitcoin cycle with just one approach but two which is Hodle and DCA approach.

I don't really have any problems with anything that you mentioned, even though I don't tend to even attempt to be selling that much BTC on the way up, but I can recognize and appreciate how attempting to sell more on the way up would have the potential for greater performance overall - even though if you have not gotten the range of the top of the BTC cycle very well, then you may well have ended up selling all of your 30% allocation.. but sure there can be ways that if the bTC price is continuing to go up, you are still able to continue to sell 30% of the profits and then just pick the increment.. so instead of selling 30% of the principle, you sell 30% of the profits, but then that ends up being a much more conservative sell allocation amount than what you seem to be describing, Ojima-ojo.

An overall problem that comes with any of these kinds of buying on the way down and selling on the way up still remains the attempts to try to figure out ways to pace yourself in such a way that you don't run out of dollars on the way down and you don't run out of BTC (or overly sell too much too soon) on the way up... but either one can be done in stages (incremental spreads) as each of us seem to be on the same page in regards to the idea of having incremental spreads both on the way down and on the way up because no matter what none of us (even the smartest in the world) are really going to be able to predict tops and/or bottoms with any meaningful level of accuracy.

Agree with Jay here, I'm not convinced about the selling on the way up and buying on the way down scheme. I think a lot of the time this leads to break-even rather than profitable, even if can be good for piece of mind. Also generally selling a bull market should only really be done if you're convinced of a drop and otherwise willing to buy back when price has dropped 30-35%, otherwise you risk being left behind.

Understandably selling $20K to $60K in 2021 could well have worked out well for speculators, as long as you're increasing your selling position as price increases, but otherwise remains tricky. I'm sure there are some that sold new ATH territory for say an average of $40K then bought it all back for less at $20K, but those individuals are few and far between. Most notably, this strategy isn't guaranteed to work next cycle, in the same way there are many in 2017 who sold $2K, $4K and $5K, and most likely had to buy back at a higher price or the same, missing a lot of potential gains in the meanwhile. At least that's my impression.

I think the only time to be selling chunks of coin is if you're very confident of a 50%+ drop, which is an opportunity that doesn't come around very often imo. Personally I don't think it was clear in 2021 from $60K to $30K, even if a little more likely in 2022 from around $40K to $20K. Likewise $6.5K to $3.2K in 2018 and 2019 $12K to $6K were reasonable opportunities, while the latter wasn't during a full blown bull market.



Anyway regarding this Bitcoin dominance thread, personally I see the the 47% to $48% as nearby support. The 200 Day MA is at 48% and otherwise it was previous resistance level for two years. I'd estimate it'll be one of the last chances to sell altcoins prior to dominance returning to 60-70% range, if you missed the 40% level that is. We've already seen this year Bitcoin's dominance increase from 40% to 50% during the price increase from around $15K to $30K, so I only really see the dominance continuing to increase from here, somewhat regardless of Bitcoin's price action. But if I had to guess then it's more likely the increase in dominance will continue to correlate with increase in price, given that the local top on price and dominance was in June/July, and price/dominance has corrected to the downside in sync with each other since then.

There's also just too many altcoins that still look like they want to drop another 50% against BTC, so either Bitcoin can increase by 2x to achieve this, or otherwise remain flat for longer and dollar values of altcoins can drop in half. Either way, I don't see altcoin dominance getting stronger anytime soon. 2023 and so far mimicked 2019, so even a considerably correction in Bitcoin's price won't change much imo.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 307
The overall best practice is to allocate a minimal speculative amount to cash in on the market advantages in the form of selling all the way up and buying all the way down, this amount is quite different from your investment and holdings which should be 70% Bitcoin for long term and 30% for speculations of the bitcoin market and how best you can use the DCA approach to cash in on the gains that the market present time to time, this is the best practice that has helped many to increase their total bitcoin holdings.
This method seems quite good if you ask me but what will be a major problem is that it require so much technicalities and experience to implement. Someone that is not highly experienced might run into problems applying this method and it also leaves the chances of greed setting in.

There is also the chances of running into problems because you cannot completely know the top or bottom considering that market moves in an unpredictable manner. Also selling up to 30% of your portfolio with the hopes of replenishing it seems way too high for me. What if price never comes lower to give you the chance to buy low? Won't that be like throwing away your water with the hope of rain following a cloud?

but either one can be done in stages (incremental spreads) as each of us seem to be on the same page in regards to the idea of having incremental spreads both on the way down and on the way up because no matter what none of us (even the smartest in the world) are really going to be able to predict tops and/or bottoms with any meaningful level of accuracy.
This is what I feel is better. This will enable one compensate for any eventualities like sudden reversals and spikes since the tops and bottoms cannot be predicted with accuracy.  I love how you balance the argument
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11105
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
Even though I mention the selling on the way up strategy and buying on the way down strategy, there is quite a bit of "devil in the details," and ultimately I don't really believe that it is a good idea to sell to expect to buy back cheaper.  Therefore the amounts that might be permissible to sell on the way up would be relatively small and ONLY as a kind of insurance program (just in case the BTC price goes down, but if it does not go down, then don't expect to buy back, just use the money generated from the sales for funzies).

So, there are some presumptions in my considering even if selling at all is a good idea, and that would relate to having already had reached high accumulation levels and likely to have had overly accumulated, which makes it easier to sell some and it would presume that any coins sold would be in profits and maybe even in many time higher than the basis levels of profits.

For sure, strategies for shitcoins would be much different, and seems kind of dumb to me to sell some BTC and then to fuck around with shitcoins with the proceeds, but yeah, people can do what they want, even if it seems dumb to me.
The overall best practice is to allocate a minimal speculative amount to cash in on the market advantages in the form of selling all the way up and buying all the way down, this amount is quite different from your investment and holdings which should be 70% Bitcoin for long term and 30% for speculations of the bitcoin market and how best you can use the DCA approach to cash in on the gains that the market present time to time, this is the best practice that has helped many to increase their total bitcoin holdings.

The obvious truth is that, considering shitcoin is a total distraction for an investor, who wants to achieve a financially free future because altcoins are made up of tons of shitcoins that only take away from investors and operate Ponzi-like projects that lack the viability to survive the market demands, so best to buy more bitcoin and speculate the market along different market cycle while holding for long term.

Also, there seems to be some evil along this pattern really since the DCA approach needs a lot of market calculation, that is when to buy and when the right time to sell also, this is the major risk basement in the DCA approach, but being able to hold 70% and using only 30% to DCA market speculate it makes you more confident since you are not approaching the entire Bitcoin cycle with just one approach but two which is Hodle and DCA approach.

I don't really have any problems with anything that you mentioned, even though I don't tend to even attempt to be selling that much BTC on the way up, but I can recognize and appreciate how attempting to sell more on the way up would have the potential for greater performance overall - even though if you have not gotten the range of the top of the BTC cycle very well, then you may well have ended up selling all of your 30% allocation.. but sure there can be ways that if the bTC price is continuing to go up, you are still able to continue to sell 30% of the profits and then just pick the increment.. so instead of selling 30% of the principle, you sell 30% of the profits, but then that ends up being a much more conservative sell allocation amount than what you seem to be describing, Ojima-ojo.

An overall problem that comes with any of these kinds of buying on the way down and selling on the way up still remains the attempts to try to figure out ways to pace yourself in such a way that you don't run out of dollars on the way down and you don't run out of BTC (or overly sell too much too soon) on the way up... but either one can be done in stages (incremental spreads) as each of us seem to be on the same page in regards to the idea of having incremental spreads both on the way down and on the way up because no matter what none of us (even the smartest in the world) are really going to be able to predict tops and/or bottoms with any meaningful level of accuracy.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 507

Even though I mention the selling on the way up strategy and buying on the way down strategy, there is quite a bit of "devil in the details," and ultimately I don't really believe that it is a good idea to sell to expect to buy back cheaper.  Therefore the amounts that might be permissible to sell on the way up would be relatively small and ONLY as a kind of insurance program (just in case the BTC price goes down, but if it does not go down, then don't expect to buy back, just use the money generated from the sales for funzies).

So, there are some presumptions in my considering even if selling at all is a good idea, and that would relate to having already had reached high accumulation levels and likely to have had overly accumulated, which makes it easier to sell some and it would presume that any coins sold would be in profits and maybe even in many time higher than the basis levels of profits.

For sure, strategies for shitcoins would be much different, and seems kind of dumb to me to sell some BTC and then to fuck around with shitcoins with the proceeds, but yeah, people can do what they want, even if it seems dumb to me.
The overall best practice is to allocate a minimal speculative amount to cash in on the market advantages in the form of selling all the way up and buying all the way down, this amount is quite different from your investment and holdings which should be 70% Bitcoin for long term and 30% for speculations of the bitcoin market and how best you can use the DCA approach to cash in on the gains that the market present time to time, this is the best practice that has helped many to increase their total bitcoin holdings.


The obvious truth is that, considering shitcoin is a total distraction for an investor, who wants to achieve a financially free future because altcoins are made up of tons of shitcoins that only take away from investors and operate Ponzi-like projects that lack the viability to survive the market demands, so best to buy more bitcoin and speculate the market along different market cycle while holding for long term.


Also, there seems to be some evil along this pattern really since the DCA approach needs a lot of market calculation, that is when to buy and when the right time to sell also, this is the major risk basement in the DCA approach, but being able to hold 70% and using only 30% to DCA market speculate it makes you more confident since you are not approaching the entire Bitcoin cycle with just one approach but two which is Hodle and DCA approach.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 253
The dominance of bitcoin is getting stronger than altcoins because at this time there are many issues about altcoins, the latest of course is stable coins which are allegedly not backed by real money so that investor confidence in bitcoin continues to increase.
Bitcoin is the real deal. Every other thing is something else. If you want peace of mind in this digital economy, simply put your energy in Bitcoin and watch your money grow.

It is becoming obvious that a lot of people have understood that Bitcoin is the way, that may be the reason for the increase in Bitcoin dominance.
sr. member
Activity: 1484
Merit: 254
The dominance of bitcoin is getting stronger than altcoins because at this time there are many issues about altcoins, the latest of course is stable coins which are allegedly not backed by real money so that investor confidence in bitcoin continues to increase.
hero member
Activity: 2338
Merit: 737
Can you truly know the top? Are there no chances that what you may see as the top my be another re-accumalation zone for further expansion? I feel the best way of going about this is to apply strategy that will enable you meet your financial needs at the same time keep you in the market for future needs. For instance, selling your holding at the supposed "top" might lead you to serious regrets and pains when you realized you just sold off your asset at a very wrong price.
Any human might not know the peak price limit that will be reached on something (including Bitcoin and also on other types of cryptocurrencies). Because the accumulation zone is only made by each person based on what they have seen before and in this case I don't think you are giving advice to a newbie because they certainly already know when they start acting for something. Especially if they already consider Bitcoin as an important asset in their life, of course they won't sell it carelessly if they don't need to do that now.

Quote
The strange thing is that you might even be selling when you do not really have any urgent needs for the money. Like I said before, selling should be based on needs... part of your holding to meet basic needs, not just liquidating your entire holdings because you feel you have seen the top. Remember, the top will be broken because Bitcoin will always rise.  This is my opinion though. 
It is not always selling something on the basis of an urgent need even though someone has held a holding for a long time, because we ourselves will never know what strategy is being carried out by someone else by selling assets that he has kept in his wallet for a long time. Because selling something on the basis of the pressure of money in life is of course very different from selling something because he has seen enough profit for him after holding on for a long time. And we don't even know at what price he bought the assets he was selling, unless he himself said it to the public.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 253

So, there are some presumptions in my considering even if selling at all is a good idea, and that would relate to having already had reached high accumulation levels and likely to have had overly accumulated, which makes it easier to sell some and it would presume that any coins sold would be in profits and maybe even in many time higher than the basis levels of profits.

For sure, strategies for shitcoins would be much different, and seems kind of dumb to me to sell some BTC and then to fuck around with shitcoins with the proceeds, but yeah, people can do what they want, even if it seems dumb to me.
Reaching a high accumulation trench hold before selling os the best possible sell position because is far more better and less risky to sell at the top
Can you truly know the top? Are there no chances that what you may see as the top my be another re-accumalation zone for further expansion? I feel the best way of going about this is to apply strategy that will enable you meet your financial needs at the same time keep you in the market for future needs. For instance, selling your holding at the supposed "top" might lead you to serious regrets and pains when you realized you just sold off your asset at a very wrong price.

The strange thing is that you might even be selling when you do not really have any urgent needs for the money. Like I said before, selling should be based on needs... part of your holding to meet basic needs, not just liquidating your entire holdings because you feel you have seen the top. Remember, the top will be broken because Bitcoin will always rise.  This is my opinion though. 
sr. member
Activity: 924
Merit: 365
Forget Bitcoin domination for now, because Bitcoin Domination is currently unpredictable,
look at the fact that currently Bitcoin dominance is at 47% and altcoin prices are still bearish,
in 2021 Domination above 40% is already bullish but now I don't know.

Bitcoin dominance can not be forgotten, mean while it's really dominating, what is likely not easy to predict is the price movement, but their is really no Altcoin that is more dominant than Bitcoin and that's because Bitcoin holds the market, even for those that are only Altcoins investors, most of them who are awear that the market is lead by Bitcoin still look up the price analysis of Bitcoin because during Bull market, other Altcoins will join the trend but if you must know, Altcoins are reliance on pump and dump and when a token is dumped that it can not recover again, the project owners swings to a new project and try to build another Altcoins that is likely to die off after some months or a year and thats why Bitcoin dominance can't be forgotten because every other project's idea tries to emulate from Bitcoin which they are not really getting it right.
As Dr. Bitcoin_Strange has noted, the dominance of bitcoin cannot be overlooked. It continues to rule and it leads in price. Altcoin follows her wherever the price goes (uptrend or downtrend movement). She is essential to the survival of any altcoin. It gives any altcoin on the crypto market a solid foundation for survival. Even if it controls or dominates one-quarter of the crypto market in the years to come, it cannot be forgotten. It will continue to rule the cryptosphere no matter what. As far as the crypto market is concerned, no other altcoin can replace or takes its position as King of all crypto project. 
sr. member
Activity: 546
Merit: 342
What I see, is just the action of traders who do the action "buy the rumor, sell the news," and then take profits before increasing Bitcoin. indeed, BTC's subdued trading volumes left investors and other traders less excited due to unstable liquidity and the third Litecoin halving event that occurred on Wednesday did not bite much and was not enough to push BTC into the green zone. However, the positive impact is that the number of Investors continues to increase, Crypto Investment Opportunities, especially BTC, increase.

Now the price decline has returned to the market, but I also don't think that this will last long in Bitcoin because with an increase in the number of investors at this time, it will certainly provide another opportunity for an increase in the price of Bitcoin in the market. Because most investors are still very happy to take advantage of the price reduction to buy more, so don't just be carried away by rumors and current news. But try to continue to take advantage of buying opportunities when prices are dropping like now in order to be able to get profits in the near future or bigger profits in the long term because you can also think of it as a future investment in Bitcoin
For you to know a good investor who probably understand the benefits of the dip, it's when that investor sees that dip as the perfect opportunity to accumulate more stacks of BTC to his portfolio since already he is planning on holding for long so such news shouldn't be a burden to him at all because most of these news are actually dropped there in the public to spread FUD among possible crypto (BTC) enthusiast.
full member
Activity: 658
Merit: 189
What I see, is just the action of traders who do the action "buy the rumor, sell the news," and then take profits before increasing Bitcoin. indeed, BTC's subdued trading volumes left investors and other traders less excited due to unstable liquidity and the third Litecoin halving event that occurred on Wednesday did not bite much and was not enough to push BTC into the green zone. However, the positive impact is that the number of Investors continues to increase, Crypto Investment Opportunities, especially BTC, increase.

Now the price decline has returned to the market, but I also don't think that this will last long in Bitcoin because with an increase in the number of investors at this time, it will certainly provide another opportunity for an increase in the price of Bitcoin in the market. Because most investors are still very happy to take advantage of the price reduction to buy more, so don't just be carried away by rumors and current news. But try to continue to take advantage of buying opportunities when prices are dropping like now in order to be able to get profits in the near future or bigger profits in the long term because you can also think of it as a future investment in Bitcoin
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11105
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
So, there are some presumptions in my considering even if selling at all is a good idea, and that would relate to having already had reached high accumulation levels and likely to have had overly accumulated, which makes it easier to sell some and it would presume that any coins sold would be in profits and maybe even in many time higher than the basis levels of profits.

For sure, strategies for shitcoins would be much different, and seems kind of dumb to me to sell some BTC and then to fuck around with shitcoins with the proceeds, but yeah, people can do what they want, even if it seems dumb to me.
Reaching a high accumulation trench hold before selling os the best possible sell position because is far more better and less risky to sell at the top and once rather than getting involved with the market regoruisity since Bitcoin is a volatile asset,  giving a long term perspective to it investment os the ultimate approach to arriving at a financial sufficient investment,  because with the level of dominance that Bitcoin have shown,  it clear that selling all to way up is going to become a big risk since you can't tell we're the price of bitcoin will be and if care if not taken is either you sell at lose since price may increase significantly after sell and you won't have to chance to buy back at that point.

So this is the challenges with frequent buy/sell action,  but when you accumulate all the way up without possible sell,  many of those who have believe in such formula  tens to have accumulated more bitcoins if their hard known the formula.
To avoid state of confusion and not  to risk investment it is better to buy and  hodl and make reasonable profit.  With this long term investment their are always assurance the investment will hit to certain amount that a better profit can be made. The market is just too complicated to know when the price will go up, but if one has made up his or her mind to accumulate Bitcoin and to sell at a target price that is profitable at anytime is just the best. It gives peace of mind and I don't think their any risks patiently hodling to make a better profit.

It seems that people who want to HODL BTC for the long term and to potentially profit greatly from holding it, including having decently good chances of having more options by having bitcoin rather than if they did not have it, need to be very careful in terms of figuring out how many BTC they are going to sell and at which price points.  At the same time, don't get me wrong since it seems to be a way better practice to have some kind of a plan rather than not having a plan, and personally I believe any plan that sells most if not all BTC at various price points is a short-sighted plan that likely either does not understand what bitcoin is or fails/refuses to appreciate the various values in not trying to trade bitcoin.. which also gets back down to not really understanding what bitcoin is.  So if you have one of the best, if not the best, property asset in the world (namely bitcoin), then why are you going to be fucking around with selling very large portions of it, and if you do sell some of it, then perhaps you should just consider shaving off relatively small amounts at various price points along the way, whether you are selling 10% at a time or some other somewhat reasonable and relatively small amount.

And, surely, time is likely your friend.  Let me give a few examples.. spot price currently $29k and 200-week moving average currently $27,218.

Hypothetical HODLer 1:
HH1 has been in BTC for about 10 years, and bought a decent amount of coins between 2014 and 2016, so has an average price per BTC of around $1k per coin... let's say the stash is right around 80 BTC.  (so around $80k invested, and a spot price value of about $2.32 million, and a 200-week moving average price value of about $2.1774 million)

Hypothetical HODLer 2:
HH2 has been in BTC for about 5 years, and bought a decent amount of coins between 2018 and 2020, so has an average price per BTC of around $10k per coin... let's say the stash is right around 15 BTC.  (so around $150k invested, and a spot price value of about $435k, and a 200-week moving average price value of about $408.3k)

Hypothetical HODLer 3:
HH3 has been in BTC for a little more than 3.5 years (since the beginning of 2020), and is still pretty steadily buying BTC on a regular basis, so has an average price per BTC of around $20k per coin... let's say the stash is right around 1 BTC.  (so around $20k invested, and a spot price value of about $29k, and a 200-week moving average price value of about $27.2k).. 

Hypothetical HODLer 4:
HH4 has been in BTC for a little more than 2.5 years (since the beginning of 2021), and is still pretty steadily buying BTC on a regular basis, so has an average price per BTC of around $27.2k per coin... let's say the stash is right around 2.5 BTC.  (so around $68k invested, and a spot price value of about $72.5k, and a 200-week moving average price value of about $68k).. barely at break-even in accordance with 200-week moving average .. and slightly in profits based on spot price.

These four hypothetical persons are in different positions in terms of building their BTC stash, and perhaps ONLY HH1 should feel at very much liberty at all to be selling any of his BTC as the BTC price goes up, and sure there could be various points in which any of the other hypothetical HODLers could choose to sell some (or all) of their BTC, such as:

$50k-ish,

$90k-ish

$120k-ish

$180k-ish

$240k-ish

$490k-ish

$780k-ish


$940k-ish


$1.2 million-ish

$1.5 million-ish


$1.88 million-ish


And perhaps various other price points that are completely individually choosen in regards to whether to sell and if so how much to sell, and so if you know how many BTC that you currently have, and you might be able to project how many BTC that you might have at the various price points that you choose for yourself, then you can figure out how much BTC are you going to sell at each of the above points, and likely your way of thinking about the matters may well be different if you are in a position similar to HH1, HH2, HH3 or HH4.

No one is going to tell you what the answer is in terms of whether to sell and if so how much to sell while you may well be wanting to make sure that you have BTC in case the BTC price goes up rather than corrects as you might anticipate which way you believe the BTC price to be, and you may well end up not being correct in terms of your expectations, and then if you end up being wrong, have you sufficiently/adequately prepared for being wrong.. and was it worth it to even take the risk of lessening your bitcoin stash.. and if you lessen it, is the amount that you lessen it by an acceptable amount in the event that you might end up being wrong?  Questions that each of us need to consider and to answer for ourselves, including figuring out if we sufficiently/adequately understand what bitcoin is.

That is why buying Bitcoin when Bitcoin price is very low is very important,  thus time you can buy as much as possible and hodl but when the price has already gone so high people find it so challenging to buy.

Sure, buying low can give you more options, but it may not really matter very much if HH1's average cost per BTC is $1k, $2k or $3k.. .. Sure, for HH1 it is better to have average costs of $1k per BTC rather than those higher average cost possibilities, but it might not make a real big difference to be fucking around too much in terms of trying to figure out how much of a dip is enough to buy some BTC.. and then the various points in which to buy BTC. 

Many people can ONLY buy BTC as their money comes in, and sure some people are able to divert some of the value of some of their other investments into bitcoin, but they might not be able to do that all at once, and they might need to do it over time, and then there can be questions about whether to use debt or credit to buy bitcoin, which may end up causing a decently good bet (such as bitcoin) to become more risky in terms of losing your BTC stash and also losing other assets if the BTC price does not move in the direction that you had been expecting in the time frame that you had been expecting.

So frequently the answers (including in terms of bitcoin investing) tend to revolve around time-in the market rather than timing the market, just like we see with HH1, HH2, HH3 and HH4 above.  It can take a long time to build up your BTC holdings, while at the same time, those who got into bitcoin earlier, accumulated earlier, tended to HODL and not fuck around with trying to trade their BTC have likely ended up doing better than those who have not been so solidly consistent and convicted in terms of accumulating and HODLing their BTC.

You also have dilemmas when you come into bitcoin, including that when you are still in your early BTC accumulation stages whether you are going to try to attempt to rush your own BTC accumulation phase and to attempt to gamble in terms of the ways that you attempt to accumulate BTC and build your BTC stash, so you may well have some guarantees of continuing to build your BTC stash, but at the same time, if you try to rush your own BTC accumulation process and to build your BTC stash using gambling techniques, you may well end up with fewer BTC than what you could have had due to your unsuccessfully trying to outsmart the market.
hero member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 592
God is great

So, there are some presumptions in my considering even if selling at all is a good idea, and that would relate to having already had reached high accumulation levels and likely to have had overly accumulated, which makes it easier to sell some and it would presume that any coins sold would be in profits and maybe even in many time higher than the basis levels of profits.

For sure, strategies for shitcoins would be much different, and seems kind of dumb to me to sell some BTC and then to fuck around with shitcoins with the proceeds, but yeah, people can do what they want, even if it seems dumb to me.
Reaching a high accumulation trench hold before selling os the best possible sell position because is far more better and less risky to sell at the top and once rather than getting involved with the market regoruisity since Bitcoin is a volatile asset,  giving a long term perspective to it investment os the ultimate approach to arriving at a financial sufficient investment,  because with the level of dominance that Bitcoin have shown,  it clear that selling all to way up is going to become a big risk since you can't tell we're the price of bitcoin will be and if care if not taken is either you sell at lose since price may increase significantly after sell and you won't have to chance to buy back at that point.


So this is the challenges with frequent buy/sell action,  but when you accumulate all the way up without possible sell,  many of those who have believe in such formula  tens to have accumulated more bitcoins if their hard known the formula.
To avoid state of confusion and not  to risk investment it is better to buy and  hodl and make reasonable profit.  With this long term investment their are always assurance the investment will hit to certain amount that a better profit can be made. The market is just too complicated to know when the price will go up, but if one has made up his or her mind to accumulate Bitcoin and to sell at a target price that is profitable at anytime is just the best. It gives peace of mind and I don't think their any risks patiently hodling to make a better profit.
 
That is why buying Bitcoin when Bitcoin price is very low is very important,  thus time you can buy as much as possible and hodl but when the price has already gone so high people find it so challenging to buy.
full member
Activity: 392
Merit: 130
PredX - AI-Powered Prediction Market

So, there are some presumptions in my considering even if selling at all is a good idea, and that would relate to having already had reached high accumulation levels and likely to have had overly accumulated, which makes it easier to sell some and it would presume that any coins sold would be in profits and maybe even in many time higher than the basis levels of profits.

For sure, strategies for shitcoins would be much different, and seems kind of dumb to me to sell some BTC and then to fuck around with shitcoins with the proceeds, but yeah, people can do what they want, even if it seems dumb to me.
Reaching a high accumulation trench hold before selling os the best possible sell position because is far more better and less risky to sell at the top and once rather than getting involved with the market regoruisity since Bitcoin is a volatile asset,  giving a long term perspective to it investment os the ultimate approach to arriving at a financial sufficient investment,  because with the level of dominance that Bitcoin have shown,  it clear that selling all to way up is going to become a big risk since you can't tell we're the price of bitcoin will be and if care if not taken is either you sell at lose since price may increase significantly after sell and you won't have to chance to buy back at that point.


So this is the challenges with frequent buy/sell action,  but when you accumulate all the way up without possible sell,  many of those who have believe in such formula  tens to have accumulated more bitcoins if their hard known the formula.

What I see, is just the action of traders who do the action "buy the rumor, sell the news," and then take profits before increasing Bitcoin. indeed, BTC's subdued trading volumes left investors and other traders less excited due to unstable liquidity and the third Litecoin halving event that occurred on Wednesday did not bite much and was not enough to push BTC into the green zone. However, the positive impact is that the number of Investors continues to increase, Crypto Investment Opportunities, especially BTC, increase.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 507

So, there are some presumptions in my considering even if selling at all is a good idea, and that would relate to having already had reached high accumulation levels and likely to have had overly accumulated, which makes it easier to sell some and it would presume that any coins sold would be in profits and maybe even in many time higher than the basis levels of profits.

For sure, strategies for shitcoins would be much different, and seems kind of dumb to me to sell some BTC and then to fuck around with shitcoins with the proceeds, but yeah, people can do what they want, even if it seems dumb to me.
Reaching a high accumulation trench hold before selling os the best possible sell position because is far more better and less risky to sell at the top and once rather than getting involved with the market regoruisity since Bitcoin is a volatile asset,  giving a long term perspective to it investment os the ultimate approach to arriving at a financial sufficient investment,  because with the level of dominance that Bitcoin have shown,  it clear that selling all to way up is going to become a big risk since you can't tell we're the price of bitcoin will be and if care if not taken is either you sell at lose since price may increase significantly after sell and you won't have to chance to buy back at that point.


So this is the challenges with frequent buy/sell action,  but when you accumulate all the way up without possible sell,  many of those who have believe in such formula  tens to have accumulated more bitcoins if their hard known the formula.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 2213
This is the change compared to my last post:

Bitcoin: +3.197%
Bitcoin forks: +0.018%
Stablecoins: +0.047%
Altcoins: -3.297%
Tethered BTC: +0.035%

Ideally these metrics could be provided priced against Bitcoin, as then it would should Bitcoin in the green and the rest all in the red still  Wink

Also depending on what metric you are looking at, the CMC BTC.D chart is showing Bitcoin dominance at 51.6% now  Cool

This is the turning point for both Bitcoin to the upside and altcoins to the downside (against Bitcoin at least) imo.

It's no coincidence that it comes as Bitcoin is re-testing it's 1 year highs. Bitcoin dominance has already broken it's 2 year highs...
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1217
Latest stats from 21st June 2023. We are very close to 50% Bitcoin market dominance.

Total market cap: $1,151,631,834,178 (-0.91%)

Bitcoin: $572,998,038,537 (49.755%)
Bitcoin forks: $3,318,545,052 (0.288%)
Stablecoins: $124,911,516,388 (10.846%)
Altcoins: $444,195,212,033 (38.571%)
Tethered BTC: $6,208,522,169 (0.539%)

This is the change compared to my last post:

Bitcoin: +3.197%
Bitcoin forks: +0.018%
Stablecoins: +0.047%
Altcoins: -3.297%
Tethered BTC: +0.035%

Hi guys.. it have been a while since I updated this thread!

Latest stats from 30th May 2023.

Total market cap: $1,162,213,128,671 (+14.99%)

Bitcoin: $541,109,637,640 (46.559%)
Bitcoin forks: $3,143,137,738 (0.270%)
Stablecoins: $125,514,604,912 (10.800%)
Altcoins: $486,589,649,239 (41.868%)
Tethered BTC: $5,856,099,142 (0.504%)

This is the change compared to my last post:

Bitcoin: +6.357%
Bitcoin forks: -0.097%
Stablecoins: -3.883%
Altcoins: -2.139%
Tethered BTC: -0.238%
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 677
The higher BTC dominance
The lower alt coins
Many have already become dead coins
I saw 10012 coin's tracked  by coingecko but today was just 1001
With conditions like this, of course, we must be aware that all forms of anything in the end altcoins that do have a lot of shitcoins in them will still die. they will still continue to be in the shadow of sideways which will not allow them to be sure that they will rise.

Talking about domination, of course something like that is a certainty because indeed when looking at all forms, the dominance of bitcoin will never be denied and in fact the longer it will increasingly become a differentiator between bitcoin and shitcoin.
Apart from the many who are looking for it is only a few conditions where some want to find about the pump and some are many influencers who hope that there is something that can be traded to sell to their followers for their own benefit, not too strange about it because they always do the same thing even though the end will only know that the token or coin being sought will die.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 2213
Bitcoin dominance now over 50% for the first time in 2 years. Not much TA needed here, as it looks like a definite break-out to the upside after years of consolidation at the lows.

Given that Bitcoin's price has also been increasing it looks like altcoins have further sideways consolidation to come as Bitcoin continues to recover. I never expected Bitcoin to really find the "textbook support" from $25K old resistance level, simply because it seemed too predictable to me, but alas, here we are now at $27K trying to break-out to the upside also after a two-month downtrend...

Notably a lot of altcoins haven't completely broken down against Bitcoin yet, but instead trying to hold onto the lows, so there's still more liquidity to return to Bitcoin imo.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 315
Top Crypto Casino
The higher BTC dominance
The lower alt coins
Many have already become dead coins
I saw 10012 coin's tracked  by coingecko but today was just 1001
The Sec decision is a blessing in disguise for Bitcoin
They might think they are fighting crypto(Bitcoin) but they are just giving people more reasons to invest in Bitcoin
Personally I changed some of my altcoins to BTC after the SEC debacle and I don't believe I was the only one
I wanted something that would give me a relative peace of mind
They can just smoke something bad and state Ethereum is also a security
Then Boom Bitcoin dominance will soar
We can't really expect the wisest decision from a commission with the likes of Gary gensler as a chairman
Pages:
Jump to: