Never been a fan of TBF, and I don't think they have done anything enough meaningful for bitcoin
But if the foundation members could jointly provide
some fiat reserve as backing for bitcoin, to ensure its price stability, I might consider join
The dumbest thing i have heard this year.... i hope nothing can top this. This forum never cease to amaze me tho.
To be a currency, you need some degree of price stability, otherwise it is just a speculative commodity with wild price swings. If all the bitcoin-accepting merchant immediately convert coins to fiat money to avoid exchange risk, bitcoin will not become a true net currency that is fiat money independent
With a large bitcoin and fiat money reserve, the volatility can be greatly reduced, to make it function more like a normal currency
I am a fan of most your ideas johnyj, but I don't think your proposed fiat bidwall idea would work. Let's imagine that for several months it actually accomplishes what you want and we see a reduction in bitcoin price volatility. If this happens, then bitcoin becomes more useful as a currency like you said. But if it becomes more useful, then demand to hold bitcoin will increase, thereby pushing up the price. Eventually, the price will explode upwards again, rise too high too fast, and eventually crash--increasing volatility all over again.
So I think the only way to reduce volatility is to increase adoption (and thus bitcoin's market cap) organically .