I had no idea that the older tweets from Peter Todd are to be disregarded, how silly of me.
Not silly at all, just dishonest.
When the same person writes about lousy code and then later writes about how the same code has been cleaned up, then yes it is pretty clear that the older comment no longer applies.
Lol I was wondering if you were going to turn up here.
How is it dishonest, I just took a screen cap of the tweet and made it the approximate size of the other one and also I didn't see the need to include all the other irrelevant stuff there as well, for example facebook likes and shares and retweets. I would have had to include all that other meaningless crap just to include the date. There was no intention of deceiving anyone its just a tweet for a tweet thing. Here is the whole thing: https://twitter.com/petertoddbtc/status/507427225927708672
And you are doing the same shit as icebreaker, attack me instead of the point I have raised. Good luck with that strategy.
You raised no meaningful point, since the older tweet you posted is clearly superseded by the newer tweet where he says the code has been cleaned up.
BTW, since you obviously didn't even bother reading the thread before you started posting obviously stupid nonsense, I didn't "turn up", I was already here discussing the Bitcoin fungibility issue, not the off-topic garbage about Monero code you posted.
You are one of the most deceitful persons on this forum and have zero credibility in my book, what off-topic garbage Monero code did I post here. I just put a PT tweet up as a response to the other PT tweet.
And the point I made is that none of you Monero
If all you have is personal attacks on me then bring it on, I know your form all to well smooth.
