Topic: Bitcoin is Freedom - page 65. (Read 55681 times)
Maybe for someone it will be free to use bitcoin, but it is only when engaged in clandestine or illegal business. Just bitcoin provides such opportunities.
Definitely, Bitcoin gives the financial freedom to the people.It gives freedom from banks which charge high amount for every transactions.It gives freedom from governments which try to impose heavy taxes.
Blockchain itself is absolutely centralized ("there can be only one"), so why would people want to have to do anything with it if they just could as easily, or even more easily, find and communicate with anyone directly without the apprehension that all their actions are written down and saved somewhere for good? On the other hand, there is a dynamic DNS infrastructure which is less centralized than the blockchain technology, doesn't have "memory", and fits perfectly into the current system. In my opinion, the blockchain would be like a bull in a china shop if we wanted to substitute it for name services. So, could you please provide an example (or two) where the blockchain would beat the currently existing systems hands down, without irrelevant verbiage?
I mean social interactions across the Internet, of course
I mean social interactions across the Internet, of course
In prediction markets where the wisdom of the crowd is monetized....In content markets where the content in question is the actual currency, such as music....Now, I know that the bitcoin blockchain isn't equipped for such applications but....that doesn't mean they're not in the conception phase on other chains....The Ethereum network is already milling around some amazing concepts.... http://dapps.ethercasts.com/
Could you explain how the blockchain as an open and authoritative ledger would conceptually work in these cases, and how it would have advantage over the existing technologies? I mean anything beyond just paying someone for something. Let's take, for example, music...
What would the blockchain technology change in this field?
I don't know. Bitcoin does provide a certain level of freedom to some, but it also reinforces and attaches a certain reliance upon technology. If one were to transfer all of their liquid capital into bitcoin, then they would have to remain on the grid in order to participate in the marketplace. And, being attached to the grid comes with a fair amount personal privacy intrusion which cannot be avoided easily.
Correct. The blockchain, by its very nature, is an unalterable ledger with true memory that records anything and everything within its scope. In a world built on the blockchain, privacy would be non-existent. There isn't anything necessarily wrong with this though, I personally have nothing to hide so I don't have any problem with a blockchain world where my every move is monitored. The blockchain, if properly implemented, would actually be immensely beneficial to the system as a whole, you'd be 'sacrificing' privacy for efficiency, transparency and certainty. Now imagine a world where your very brain is connected to the blockchain
I think that day will come....There's so much more going on behind the social networking scene than people care to think about and that is scary! There's so much potential in blockchain technology that its future applications are unimaginable at this point, especially when combined with social networking analytics....Things are happening and they're happening very quickly!
Blockchain itself is absolutely centralized ("there can be only one"), so why would people want to have to do anything with it if they just could as easily, or even more easily, find and communicate with anyone directly without the apprehension that all their actions are written down and saved somewhere for good? On the other hand, there is a dynamic DNS infrastructure which is less centralized than the blockchain technology, doesn't have "memory", and fits perfectly into the current system. In my opinion, the blockchain would be like a bull in a china shop if we wanted to substitute it for name services. So, could you please provide an example (or two) where the blockchain would beat the currently existing systems hands down, without irrelevant verbiage?
I mean social interactions across the Internet, of course
In prediction markets where the wisdom of the crowd is monetized....In content markets where the content in question is the actual currency, such as music....Now, I know that the bitcoin blockchain isn't equipped for such applications but....that doesn't mean they're not in the conception phase on other chains....The Ethereum network is already milling around some amazing concepts.... http://dapps.ethercasts.com/
Yes, it's a freedom from a bankster mafia system but isn't total freedom from the power of money.
I don't know. Bitcoin does provide a certain level of freedom to some, but it also reinforces and attaches a certain reliance upon technology. If one were to transfer all of their liquid capital into bitcoin, then they would have to remain on the grid in order to participate in the marketplace. And, being attached to the grid comes with a fair amount personal privacy intrusion which cannot be avoided easily.
Correct. The blockchain, by its very nature, is an unalterable ledger with true memory that records anything and everything within its scope. In a world built on the blockchain, privacy would be non-existent. There isn't anything necessarily wrong with this though, I personally have nothing to hide so I don't have any problem with a blockchain world where my every move is monitored. The blockchain, if properly implemented, would actually be immensely beneficial to the system as a whole, you'd be 'sacrificing' privacy for efficiency, transparency and certainty. Now imagine a world where your very brain is connected to the blockchain
I think that day will come....There's so much more going on behind the social networking scene than people care to think about and that is scary! There's so much potential in blockchain technology that its future applications are unimaginable at this point, especially when combined with social networking analytics....Things are happening and they're happening very quickly!
Blockchain itself is absolutely centralized ("there can be only one"), so why would people want to have to do anything with it if they just could as easily, or even more easily, find and communicate with anyone directly without the apprehension that all their actions are written down and saved somewhere for good? On the other hand, there is a dynamic DNS infrastructure which is less centralized than the blockchain technology, doesn't have "memory", and fits perfectly into the current system. In my opinion, the blockchain would be like a bull in a china shop if we wanted to substitute it for name services. So, could you please provide an example (or two) where the blockchain would beat the currently existing systems hands down, without irrelevant verbiage?
I mean social interactions across the Internet, of course
Yeah, i can say that i have a freedom with bitcoin, Because whenever i have a time than i am doing work with it, because bitcoin has no time limit like for working hours in a day, if you do work then you can earn and also in earning wise, bitcoin really help me. Many time i say that bitcoin work for me it is a part time job.
I don't know. Bitcoin does provide a certain level of freedom to some, but it also reinforces and attaches a certain reliance upon technology. If one were to transfer all of their liquid capital into bitcoin, then they would have to remain on the grid in order to participate in the marketplace. And, being attached to the grid comes with a fair amount personal privacy intrusion which cannot be avoided easily.
Correct. The blockchain, by its very nature, is an unalterable ledger with true memory that records anything and everything within its scope. In a world built on the blockchain, privacy would be non-existent. There isn't anything necessarily wrong with this though, I personally have nothing to hide so I don't have any problem with a blockchain world where my every move is monitored. The blockchain, if properly implemented, would actually be immensely beneficial to the system as a whole, you'd be 'sacrificing' privacy for efficiency, transparency and certainty. Now imagine a world where your very brain is connected to the blockchain
I think that day will come....There's so much more going on behind the social networking scene than people care to think about and that is scary! There's so much potential in blockchain technology that its future applications are unimaginable at this point, especially when combined with social networking analytics....Things are happening and they're happening very quickly!
I don't know. Bitcoin does provide a certain level of freedom to some, but it also reinforces and attaches a certain reliance upon technology. If one were to transfer all of their liquid capital into bitcoin, then they would have to remain on the grid in order to participate in the marketplace. And, being attached to the grid comes with a fair amount personal privacy intrusion which cannot be avoided easily.
Correct. The blockchain, by its very nature, is an unalterable ledger with true memory that records anything and everything within its scope. In a world built on the blockchain, privacy would be non-existent. There isn't anything necessarily wrong with this though, I personally have nothing to hide so I don't have any problem with a blockchain world where my every move is monitored. The blockchain, if properly implemented, would actually be immensely beneficial to the system as a whole, you'd be 'sacrificing' privacy for efficiency, transparency and certainty. Now imagine a world where your very brain is connected to the blockchain
I don't know. Bitcoin does provide a certain level of freedom to some, but it also reinforces and attaches a certain reliance upon technology. If one were to transfer all of their liquid capital into bitcoin, then they would have to remain on the grid in order to participate in the marketplace. And, being attached to the grid comes with a fair amount personal privacy intrusion which cannot be avoided easily.
Well maybe it does and it doesn't depending on how you use bitcoin. Bitcoin is freedom in the sense of the people if they want to use bitcoin then no one is going to stop them and since it doesn't require information to start up a transaction, that could be consider as freedom and as well as security to all of us.
You have a point when we intend to play gambling by bitcoin even if its banned on your country we could actually bypass them because we could able to access bitcoin anytime which is trully a freedom for those who gamble. Actually there are lots of freedom we could able to mention here on bitcoin just like of having a freedom from tax on all of our assets because we could definitely evade it with the use of bitcoin and also we have the freedom to control all of our money without using banks but still we should remember on the risk involve of it.
I don't know. Bitcoin does provide a certain level of freedom to some, but it also reinforces and attaches a certain reliance upon technology. If one were to transfer all of their liquid capital into bitcoin, then they would have to remain on the grid in order to participate in the marketplace. And, being attached to the grid comes with a fair amount personal privacy intrusion which cannot be avoided easily.
I would like to say that bitcoin is cen percentage freedom and anonymous around the usage. Bitcoin is contained with lots of privacy so that bitcoin will be best currency which is independent on use.
Well, sorta....Many seem to forget that once we start surfing the net, our data is being mined....it wouldn't take much to figure out who, where, what, when, and why we were online for those mining the data. Once we're online, we're exposed, and bitcoin requires a certain degree of web connectivity to participate. It's the peripheral activity that gives us away....
I don't know. Bitcoin does provide a certain level of freedom to some, but it also reinforces and attaches a certain reliance upon technology. If one were to transfer all of their liquid capital into bitcoin, then they would have to remain on the grid in order to participate in the marketplace. And, being attached to the grid comes with a fair amount personal privacy intrusion which cannot be avoided easily.
I would like to say that bitcoin is cen percentage freedom and anonymous around the usage. Bitcoin is contained with lots of privacy so that bitcoin will be best currency which is independent on use.
I don't know. Bitcoin does provide a certain level of freedom to some, but it also reinforces and attaches a certain reliance upon technology. If one were to transfer all of their liquid capital into bitcoin, then they would have to remain on the grid in order to participate in the marketplace. And, being attached to the grid comes with a fair amount personal privacy intrusion which cannot be avoided easily.
Well maybe it does and it doesn't depending on how you use bitcoin. Bitcoin is freedom in the sense of the people if they want to use bitcoin then no one is going to stop them and since it doesn't require information to start up a transaction, that could be consider as freedom and as well as security to all of us.
You have a point when we intend to play gambling by bitcoin even if its banned on your country we could actually bypass them because we could able to access bitcoin anytime which is trully a freedom for those who gamble. Actually there are lots of freedom we could able to mention here on bitcoin just like of having a freedom from tax on all of our assets because we could definitely evade it with the use of bitcoin and also we have the freedom to control all of our money without using banks but still we should remember on the risk involve of it.
I don't know. Bitcoin does provide a certain level of freedom to some, but it also reinforces and attaches a certain reliance upon technology. If one were to transfer all of their liquid capital into bitcoin, then they would have to remain on the grid in order to participate in the marketplace. And, being attached to the grid comes with a fair amount personal privacy intrusion which cannot be avoided easily.
Well maybe it does and it doesn't depending on how you use bitcoin. Bitcoin is freedom in the sense of the people if they want to use bitcoin then no one is going to stop them and since it doesn't require information to start up a transaction, that could be consider as freedom and as well as security to all of us.
I don't know. Bitcoin does provide a certain level of freedom to some, but it also reinforces and attaches a certain reliance upon technology. If one were to transfer all of their liquid capital into bitcoin, then they would have to remain on the grid in order to participate in the marketplace. And, being attached to the grid comes with a fair amount personal privacy intrusion which cannot be avoided easily.
Freedom bitcoin memorize very reliable. Although the course of which can still be expected if bitcoin can get without leaving home and store revenues also being in his house. You will not have to go. Is this not the best that can give bitcoin.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1028
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Yeah I agree bitcoin is freedom.. because I can do anything online from whatever bitcoin can offer.. like playing casinos which can bring so much fun and entertainment.
It isn't 100% freedom. Yeah, you can do stuff like going on the dark web and buying illegal stuff but it's still risky ne caise the governments can track you down anytime. I have even heard the FBI categorizes you as a criminal in the first second you're opening Tor already, so you can be taken down at any time. Be careful about it.
Bitcoin is freedom from banks. It also provides some freedom from government control of our money and what we do with out money.
That's very nice but I wonder if you would agree with me if I told you that like with everything else, too much freedom can't be a good thing? In an ideal world, everyone would be considerate, responsible, honest etc and there wouldn't be any need for control of any kind. Do you really believe that if people are allowed to do whatever they want, everyone would behave nicely? What happens then to the old, young and weak who cannot defend themselves against the strong and smart and don't have anyone to turn to for help, like the government, authorities etc?
You seem to be pro-Bitcoin overall, at least, as far as I can judge, but Bitcoin per se is apparently anti-establishment through its principles and operation (anonymity of payments, decentralized nature of currency issuance, etc) while, at the same time, you are calling on authorities to help "the old, young and weak" and protect them from "the strong and smart". How come? I think you can't have it both ways unless you are being an opportunist of sorts...
If you think that I misunderstood what you meant to say, communicate your idea in simpler terms
Yeah I agree bitcoin is freedom.. because I can do anything online from whatever bitcoin can offer.. like playing casinos which can bring so much fun and entertainment.
It isn't 100% freedom. Yeah, you can do stuff like going on the dark web and buying illegal stuff but it's still risky ne caise the governments can track you down anytime. I have even heard the FBI categorizes you as a criminal in the first second you're opening Tor already, so you can be taken down at any time. Be careful about it.
Yeah I agree bitcoin is freedom.. because I can do anything online from whatever bitcoin can offer.. like playing casinos which can bring so much fun and entertainment.
Jump to: