Pages:
Author

Topic: Bitcoin is in deep trouble. Litecoin to take its place soon. - page 3. (Read 9266 times)

full member
Activity: 882
Merit: 102
PayAccept - Worldwide payments accepted in seconds
Bitcoin is far from being in deep trouble. Litecoin is not likely to replace it. And if Litecoin does, that's almost like a kind of patricide.

It's called "black swan event", dumbo.

We just accidentally pump LTC to 1 bln cap before BTC gets dumped to half that cap. Consecutively LTC rises further, everyone migrates to 'Litecointalk' and this forum is renamed 'Gavincointalk' and that'll be the end of the story.

Or there is a resolution of the 1 MB problem in Bitcoin with an increase in the blocksize limit and some sort of allowance for further increases in the future. Bitcoin booms and those alts that have a fixed blocksize limit get dumped into oblivion, starting of course with Litecoin.

Edit: I have nothing against Litecoin, but seriously the Litecoin community has had ample time to show some innovation and deal with this issue. This has been going on in Bitcoin since 2010 long before Litecoin even existed.

Unlikely. A meltdown in btc marketcap leading up to the fork event can be expected. The thing is pretty much irreversible already. The clock is ticking for BTC suicide and there is nothing anyone can do about it. People are jumping ships which is the only rational thing to do.
This LTC pump is just leading up to a much larger pump. Deniers like you will be the ones buying at the top.  Smiley

Even if Gavincoin doesn't take hold and is dismissed by the community it still keeps lurking in the shadow and will put investors in unease. So btc is really tarnished now.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
35% profit vs 5% profit...
LTC wins  Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1050
Monero Core Team
Bitcoin is far from being in deep trouble. Litecoin is not likely to replace it. And if Litecoin does, that's almost like a kind of patricide.

It's called "black swan event", dumbo.

We just accidentally pump LTC to 1 bln cap before BTC gets dumped to half that cap. Consecutively LTC rises further, everyone migrates to 'Litecointalk' and this forum is renamed 'Gavincointalk' and that'll be the end of the story.

Or there is a resolution of the 1 MB problem in Bitcoin with an increase in the blocksize limit and some sort of allowance for further increases in the future. Bitcoin booms and those alts that have a fixed blocksize limit get dumped into oblivion, starting of course with Litecoin.

Edit: I have nothing against Litecoin, but seriously the Litecoin community has had ample time to show some innovation and deal with this issue. This has been going on in Bitcoin since 2010 long before Litecoin even existed.
full member
Activity: 882
Merit: 102
PayAccept - Worldwide payments accepted in seconds
Bitcoin is far from being in deep trouble. Litecoin is not likely to replace it. And if Litecoin does, that's almost like a kind of patricide.

It's called "black swan event", dumbo.

We just accidentally pump LTC to 1 bln cap before BTC gets dumped to half that cap. Consecutively LTC rises further, everyone migrates to 'Litecointalk' and this forum is renamed 'Gavincointalk' and that'll be the end of the story.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Bitcoin is far from being in deep trouble. Litecoin is not likely to replace it. And if Litecoin does, that's almost like a kind of patricide.
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1050
Monero Core Team
Why anyone would purchase Litecoin to hedge against the 1 MB blocksize limit issue in Bitcoin is beyond me. Litecoin has a similar fixed blocksize problem as Bitcoin. Furthermore if I suspect the 1 MB limit in Bitcoin is resolved it will still remain in Litecoin. To me, if one is looking to alt-coins to hedge against the 1 MB blocksize limit issue in Bitcoin, I would start with those alt-coins that to not have a fixed blocksize limit baked into the protocol and have adaptive blocksize limits instead. This is what led me to Monero.



You still don't get it that the opposite of what you think is the case. People buying not alts because BTC blocks are too small, they buy alts because 1MB blocksize is just fine and consensus is worth more than that.
Gavincoin does not have its priorities right. A controversial hardfork creates a serious need for a hedge.

Litecoins' network consensus is not threatened like that of BTC.
With a threatened network consensus BTC is over value.

Yes, of course. if one belives that the 1 MB blocksize limit is good for Bitcoin and should remain in place for ever, then one should hedge against a possible fork in Bitcoin to increase the blocksize. In this situation Litecoin is a very good choice. Furthermore one should stay well away from a coin with adaptive blocksize limits such as Monero.
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001
Damn, sold too soon yet made some on the peercoin pump or whatever it's supposed to be called. Something strange indeed is happening in cryptoworld. This summer/fall is likely to make many people wealthy if they have the right stuff in their bags.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 1000
Your money, your risk, you have to do your own due diligence.
You can also look around for some so called 2.0 coins, though I do not have much faith in them.

Regardless of the due diligence, your money is always at risk.

Its just a matter of reducing that risk factors that you invest specifically.
full member
Activity: 153
Merit: 100
Your money, your risk, you have to do your own due diligence.
You can also look around for some so called 2.0 coins, though I do not have much faith in them.
member
Activity: 212
Merit: 22
Amazix
Why anyone would purchase Litecoin to hedge against the 1 MB blocksize limit issue in Bitcoin is beyond me. Litecoin has a similar fixed blocksize problem as Bitcoin. Furthermore if I suspect the 1 MB limit in Bitcoin is resolved it will still remain in Litecoin. To me, if one is looking to alt-coins to hedge against the 1 MB blocksize limit issue in Bitcoin, I would start with those alt-coins that to not have a fixed blocksize limit baked into the protocol and have adaptive blocksize limits instead. This is what led me to Monero.



You still don't get it that the opposite of what you think is the case. People buying not alts because BTC blocks are too small, they buy alts because 1MB blocksize is just fine and consensus is worth more than that.
Gavincoin does not have its priorities right. A controversial hardfork creates a serious need for a hedge.

Litecoins' network consensus is not threatened like that of BTC.
With a threatened network consensus BTC is over value.
sr. member
Activity: 440
Merit: 250
Bitcoin is always in trouble apparently, lets all get scared and sell because the OP has warned us  Cheesy I hold both litecoin and bitcoin and imo both bitcoin and litecoin is going to last the long run but only because bitcoin, litecoin taking bitcoin with it haha.
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 10611
not sure about the dead of an altcoin(like litecoin or monero) if bitcoin fails, remember that they do not share the same network, why scrypt asic should stop mining if bitcoin fails?

a niche market will continue to grow on another alt bif bitcoin fails, so don't expect the end of crypto just because the king is down
i don't think dying of an altcoin due to (if) bitcoin fails is because of them not sharing the same network.
obviously they are being mines separately on a separate network, but if for some reason bitcoin fails, (which is not going to happen any time soon) i seriously doubt that people would choose another altcoin instead. they would simply give crypto up.
because what is the grantee that if something like bitcoin with that much support failed then some shitcoin like litecoin which was already dead can stay alive afterwards.
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1057
Litecoin!?!!! LOL!
Litecoin to replace Bitcoin. Yes, wishful thinking and best joke for today.
hero member
Activity: 772
Merit: 500
Its not manipulation but its his opinion its all up to you if your going to follow and dump your btc for ltc. its anyone game when it comes to altcoin.
legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
BTC | LTC | XLM | VEN | ARDR
Litecoin is just a clone of bitcoin, there is not much innovation. If bitcoin goes down, litecoin will go with it.

If Bitcoin goes down due to Gavin block increase debate, LTC will thrive.

So funny, no matter what you think you know, this isn't about knowledge but purely emotions and manipulation by whales. There is no right and wrong, we all DONT know what's gonna happen... Personally I THINK (emphasis on THINK) one of the anonymous coins will thrive soon, be it Dash or Monero, we'll see Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1000
Litecoin is just a clone of bitcoin, there is not much innovation. If bitcoin goes down, litecoin will go with it.

If Bitcoin goes down due to Gavin block increase debate, LTC will thrive.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Litecoin is just a clone of bitcoin, there is not much innovation. If bitcoin goes down, litecoin will go with it.
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
not sure about the dead of an altcoin(like litecoin or monero) if bitcoin fails, remember that they do not share the same network, why scrypt asic should stop mining if bitcoin fails?

a niche market will continue to grow on another alt bif bitcoin fails, so don't expect the end of crypto just because the king is down
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
Well this thread did make me wonder if it was created in 2013
Seeing the 2015 timestamp I admit did suprise me a bit as it does still retain the largest market cap after Bitcoin and the clear gap between 3rd and 4th is much more firmly established than last year.
http://coinmarketcap.com/
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1007
i dunno, there's only a handful of alts that actually have a decent level of liquidity.... mainly LTC, DASH and DOGE. so those are worth watching.... it's all up to the charts. i don't pay any mind to fundamentals.

Fundamentals are only for the hypers who can only sell their shit scam coin to new users by showing them their cool fancy stuff that is almost always still in development.. LTC doesn't need that. It's good for what it was intended for..
Pages:
Jump to: