Author

Topic: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it - page 214. (Read 229705 times)

full member
Activity: 1162
Merit: 237
Shooters Shoot...
Hi there guys,

Considering your experience, how many keys a pc can scan in 1 second?

No kangaroo, no BSGS, but only random combination.


Too many variables, but I will give you a short and sweet answer...

It will depend on your CPU, but on an i7-6700, for straight cracking, for one address, each core does a little over 5 Million keys per second. So if I use 4 cores = 20 Million per second, ect.
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1196
Reputation first.
Hi there guys,

Considering your experience, how many keys a pc can scan in 1 second?

No kangaroo, no BSGS, but only random combination.

newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
Keyhunt with bsgs is giving me 1 Exakeys/second speed. Its 1,000,000,000,000 Megakeys/s in 125 bit range which is quite impressive, Its almost identical to searching 66th puzzle with decent gpu. Correct me if i'm wrong.


I get 2 petakeys/s which is the biggest number I've ever reached in any cracking program. Uses 32 gb of ram .. imagine what you would get with 512 gigs 😍
BSGS cuda gets more speed, but that is with GPU.

I was getting 2^62.04 keys per second; but I know those with 3090s were getting more. I was limited on system RAM to 16GB.

Interesting. What was the gpu?

It's the future of bitcoin hidden treasure hunters Cheesy
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
Keyhunt with bsgs is giving me 1 Exakeys/second speed. Its 1,000,000,000,000 Megakeys/s in 125 bit range which is quite impressive, Its almost identical to searching 66th puzzle with decent gpu. Correct me if i'm wrong.



what's your system? gpu ? cpu?

Its combined 6 Google 300$ trial vm instances of 16 core cpu 64gb ram, and plus my pc. Each vms get ~160-180petakeys/s. Eventually google trial will expire, but worth to try.

My pc i5 12500F cpu with 32gb ram can take 50Petakeys/s.

Keyhunt is only cpu, resource, electric cost friendly option out there.

member
Activity: 185
Merit: 15
Two things you should never abandon: Family & BTC

I am the creator.

You are quite right, 161-256 are silly.  I honestly just did not think of this.  What is especially embarrassing, is this did not occur to me once, in two years.  By way of excuse, I was not really thinking much about the puzzle at all.

I will make up for two years of stupidity.  I will spend from 161-256 to the unsolved parts, as you suggest.  In addition, I intend to add further funds.  My aim is to boost the density by a factor of 10, from 0.001*length(key) to 0.01*length(key).  Probably in the next few weeks.  At any rate, when I next have an extended period of quiet and calm, to construct the new transaction carefully.

A few words about the puzzle.  There is no pattern.  It is just consecutive keys from a deterministic wallet (masked with leading 000...0001 to set difficulty).  It is simply a crude measuring instrument, of the cracking strength of the community.

Finally, I wish to express appreciation of the efforts of all developers of new cracking tools and technology.  The "large bitcoin collider" is especially innovative and interesting!


The 'creator' created a wallet and increasingly changed the front bits to zero's
I wonder why there are still some who don't believe this?

Lol it's like we need a banner 😁 but the thing is some people are trying to find a pattern out of this HD sequence .. so they can unlock all puzzles at once
member
Activity: 119
Merit: 36

I am the creator.

You are quite right, 161-256 are silly.  I honestly just did not think of this.  What is especially embarrassing, is this did not occur to me once, in two years.  By way of excuse, I was not really thinking much about the puzzle at all.

I will make up for two years of stupidity.  I will spend from 161-256 to the unsolved parts, as you suggest.  In addition, I intend to add further funds.  My aim is to boost the density by a factor of 10, from 0.001*length(key) to 0.01*length(key).  Probably in the next few weeks.  At any rate, when I next have an extended period of quiet and calm, to construct the new transaction carefully.

A few words about the puzzle.  There is no pattern.  It is just consecutive keys from a deterministic wallet (masked with leading 000...0001 to set difficulty).  It is simply a crude measuring instrument, of the cracking strength of the community.

Finally, I wish to express appreciation of the efforts of all developers of new cracking tools and technology.  The "large bitcoin collider" is especially innovative and interesting!


The 'creator' created a wallet and increasingly changed the front bits to zero's
I wonder why there are still some who don't believe this?
member
Activity: 185
Merit: 15
Two things you should never abandon: Family & BTC
https://towardsdatascience.com/random-seeds-and-reproducibility-933da79446e3

And how does this random.seed() work?

set some value and then Mersenne twister...

Mersenne twister 19937 bit (624·32 (2^32 = 4294967296) — 31)

for example, we take 3 random

random.seed(blablabla)
random.randrange(1,10)
random.randrange(1,10)
random.randrange(1,10)

we get for each of the 3 in order from the vortex of the first three?

                                 1— 31
random.randrange(1,10) 1,4294967296 (624·2)
random.randrange(1,10) 1,4294967296 (624·3)
random.randrange(1,10) 1,4294967296 (624·4)

and if we take 624 random.randrange(1,10) period ends and a new one begins again

                                 1— 31            next period
random.randrange(1,10) 1,4294967296 (625)624·2
random.randrange(1,10) 1,4294967296 (626)624·3
random.randrange(1,10) 1,4294967296 (627)624·4

and if we have a large sample of random.randrange(36893488147419103232,73786976294838206464) he spends 1 period for 1 sample or 624 and a new one (then why are they not repeated 2^32?)

or he these 19937 bit takes it all at once

in other words, to complete all puzzles with 1 seed() we need to iterate over this seed() to iterate over all variations of this 2^19937 bit ((2^32)^624)?

and seed() itself doesn’t matter (with brute force) you don’t need old computers to run it randomly in order to pick up the date and time, etc. to create the same bitcoin address.


random.seed(1, 2^19937) and all pz

random.randrange(36893488147419103232,73786976294838206464) 66
...
random.randrange(21267647932558653966460912964485513216,42535295865117307932921825928971026432) 125
...
random.randrange(730750818665451459101842416358141509827966271488,1461501637330902918203684832716283019655932542976) 160

and the puzzles themselves need to be multiplied 2^160×2^159×2^158...×2^66

and if it turns out that there may be collisions here , If 2^19937 the most options to open all the puzzles at once through 1 seed()



One of the most interesting topics I've read in a while.. but what makes you think this was the way the creator used to generate the puzzles' sequence? There could be a million ways to be used for this?
jr. member
Activity: 77
Merit: 1
02c584e2cb49a5aabd9ceb1e5128cecd0a7ca96628e76b1491950f021a4852d8ec ?
figure this out guys Smiley

What seems to be the problem?

The pubkey i found it's used to trans the Bitcoin to all puzzle with huge bitcoin last time, maybe we can search from that pubkey ? it's possible ?
just ask, because i need to figure out and learn, thx.
member
Activity: 185
Merit: 15
Two things you should never abandon: Family & BTC
Rounded up 66 puzzle is 36.8934881474191 keys

That is 36.8934881474191 sextillion.


My question

what is or is there a record for the most amount of keys tried in a second via brute forcing ?

I have a script ive worked on for about a month its my own outside the box thinking.
Testing the script achieved what i want it to do.

It will 100% work however like everyone else we are not immortal and time is certainly not on anyones side brute forcing btc.

so thats where im stuck at.

i need 1 billion keys a second tried lol

it will still take time but for puzzle 66 it would take 1 billion keys per second, it would take approximately 37,000 seconds to try37 quintillion keys.

That is equivalent to about 10.28 hours.

One can dream eh.

Anyway if you reply please answer my question on what/if a record exsists.
I think your math is off. Many programs already out can do over 1 billion keys per second, GPU of course.

1 billion keys per second would take you 1,169 years.

I thought so let me go slap chatgpt

Edit maths does work out for what im doing Smiley   Please please point me to where these apps can do 1 billion a sec per key or any info

What if you have 1b keys/sec? The only way this is going to help is if you find a formula that can narrow down your range at least 1000 times less .. other than that go run your devices and try your luck🤞


Exactly i have my own formula. Its completly thinking outside the box.
Like i said it works exactly how its intended and in testing it has been 100% successfull.

Next problem is how could i trust anyone with what i have when it could be poetenially dangerous i certainly aint a coder like most here.

I have been on the grind for the last week with this and one thing stops me speed and customization and i suppose trust i havent been completly transparent on everything tbh.

 Undecided




So basically you have the formula but need a trustworthy person to run it in their fast GPUs .. did i get that right?

If so dm me .. or if you want you can DM older members if that would make you more comfortable.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
Rounded up 66 puzzle is 36.8934881474191 keys

That is 36.8934881474191 sextillion.


My question

what is or is there a record for the most amount of keys tried in a second via brute forcing ?

I have a script ive worked on for about a month its my own outside the box thinking.
Testing the script achieved what i want it to do.

It will 100% work however like everyone else we are not immortal and time is certainly not on anyones side brute forcing btc.

so thats where im stuck at.

i need 1 billion keys a second tried lol

it will still take time but for puzzle 66 it would take 1 billion keys per second, it would take approximately 37,000 seconds to try37 quintillion keys.

That is equivalent to about 10.28 hours.

One can dream eh.

Anyway if you reply please answer my question on what/if a record exsists.
I think your math is off. Many programs already out can do over 1 billion keys per second, GPU of course.

1 billion keys per second would take you 1,169 years.

I thought so let me go slap chatgpt

Edit maths does work out for what im doing Smiley   Please please point me to where these apps can do 1 billion a sec per key or any info

What if you have 1b keys/sec? The only way this is going to help is if you find a formula that can narrow down your range at least 1000 times less .. other than that go run your devices and try your luck🤞


Exactly i have my own formula. Its completly thinking outside the box.
Like i said it works exactly how its intended and in testing it has been 100% successfull.

Next problem is how could i trust anyone with what i have when it could be poetenially dangerous i certainly aint a coder like most here.

I have been on the grind for the last week with this and one thing stops me speed and customization and i suppose trust i havent been completly transparent on everything tbh.

 Undecided


jr. member
Activity: 184
Merit: 3
https://towardsdatascience.com/random-seeds-and-reproducibility-933da79446e3

And how does this random.seed() work?

set some value and then Mersenne twister...

Mersenne twister 19937 bit (624·32 (2^32 = 4294967296) — 31)

for example, we take 3 random

random.seed(blablabla)
random.randrange(1,10)
random.randrange(1,10)
random.randrange(1,10)

we get for each of the 3 in order from the vortex of the first three?

                                 1— 31
random.randrange(1,10) 1,4294967296 (624·2)
random.randrange(1,10) 1,4294967296 (624·3)
random.randrange(1,10) 1,4294967296 (624·4)

and if we take 624 random.randrange(1,10) period ends and a new one begins again

                                 1— 31            next period
random.randrange(1,10) 1,4294967296 (625)624·2
random.randrange(1,10) 1,4294967296 (626)624·3
random.randrange(1,10) 1,4294967296 (627)624·4

and if we have a large sample of random.randrange(36893488147419103232,73786976294838206464) he spends 1 period for 1 sample or 624 and a new one (then why are they not repeated 2^32?)

or he these 19937 bit takes it all at once

in other words, to complete all puzzles with 1 seed() we need to iterate over this seed() to iterate over all variations of this 2^19937 bit ((2^32)^624)?

and seed() itself doesn’t matter (with brute force) you don’t need old computers to run it randomly in order to pick up the date and time, etc. to create the same bitcoin address.


random.seed(1, 2^19937) and all pz

random.randrange(36893488147419103232,73786976294838206464) 66
...
random.randrange(21267647932558653966460912964485513216,42535295865117307932921825928971026432) 125
...
random.randrange(730750818665451459101842416358141509827966271488,1461501637330902918203684832716283019655932542976) 160

and the puzzles themselves need to be multiplied 2^160×2^159×2^158...×2^66

and if it turns out that there may be collisions here , If 2^19937 the most options to open all the puzzles at once through 1 seed()

member
Activity: 185
Merit: 15
Two things you should never abandon: Family & BTC
02c584e2cb49a5aabd9ceb1e5128cecd0a7ca96628e76b1491950f021a4852d8ec ?
figure this out guys Smiley

What seems to be the problem?
jr. member
Activity: 77
Merit: 1
02c584e2cb49a5aabd9ceb1e5128cecd0a7ca96628e76b1491950f021a4852d8ec ?
figure this out guys Smiley
full member
Activity: 1162
Merit: 237
Shooters Shoot...
Keyhunt with bsgs is giving me 1 Exakeys/second speed. Its 1,000,000,000,000 Megakeys/s in 125 bit range which is quite impressive, Its almost identical to searching 66th puzzle with decent gpu. Correct me if i'm wrong.


I get 2 petakeys/s which is the biggest number I've ever reached in any cracking program. Uses 32 gb of ram .. imagine what you would get with 512 gigs 😍
BSGS cuda gets more speed, but that is with GPU.

I was getting 2^62.04 keys per second; but I know those with 3090s were getting more. I was limited on system RAM to 16GB.
member
Activity: 185
Merit: 15
Two things you should never abandon: Family & BTC
Isn't it more efficient to search less pub keys over more steps? In other words, doesn't the process to convert the pub key to a comparable value take longer than it takes to generate the next baby step? I limited my search to 1000 keys based on this thought.



What is the fastest way to search multiple pubkeys? bsgs or kangaroo?? How many pubkeys can I search at one time? Huh Huh Huh


Tried up to 160,000 pubs on keyhunt BSGS before.

How many private keys did you find successfully?

 Zero, Null, Zilch, None, Nil

Welcome to Bitcoin.
I think it’s 6 one way, half a dozen the other.

Running one pub key gets you X speed. Running multiple pub keys at once gets you X/# of pubkeys speed.
Ultimately, #125 is too large of a range, whether you run 1 pub or 1000 pubs. But it can help you narrow down ranges IMO

Problem with running multiple pubs instead of only the puzzle pub, is that you can't (or should not) look for any range less than 2^240 .. because you know that these pubs are randomly generated and not masked with leading zeros. That's why it would be effective enough ( and more feasible) to only search for a puzzle pub key in its range.
member
Activity: 185
Merit: 15
Two things you should never abandon: Family & BTC
Keyhunt with bsgs is giving me 1 Exakeys/second speed. Its 1,000,000,000,000 Megakeys/s in 125 bit range which is quite impressive, Its almost identical to searching 66th puzzle with decent gpu. Correct me if i'm wrong.


I get 2 petakeys/s which is the biggest number I've ever reached in any cracking program. Uses 32 gb of ram .. imagine what you would get with 512 gigs 😍
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 1
Keyhunt with bsgs is giving me 1 Exakeys/second speed. Its 1,000,000,000,000 Megakeys/s in 125 bit range which is quite impressive, Its almost identical to searching 66th puzzle with decent gpu. Correct me if i'm wrong.



what's your system? gpu ? cpu?
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
Keyhunt with bsgs is giving me 1 Exakeys/second speed. Its 1,000,000,000,000 Megakeys/s in 125 bit range which is quite impressive, Its almost identical to searching 66th puzzle with decent gpu. Correct me if i'm wrong.
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 1
Rounded up 66 puzzle is 36.8934881474191 keys

That is 36.8934881474191 sextillion.


My question

what is or is there a record for the most amount of keys tried in a second via brute forcing ?

I have a script ive worked on for about a month its my own outside the box thinking.
Testing the script achieved what i want it to do.

It will 100% work however like everyone else we are not immortal and time is certainly not on anyones side brute forcing btc.

so thats where im stuck at.

i need 1 billion keys a second tried lol

it will still take time but for puzzle 66 it would take 1 billion keys per second, it would take approximately 37,000 seconds to try37 quintillion keys.

That is equivalent to about 10.28 hours.

One can dream eh.

Anyway if you reply please answer my question on what/if a record exsists.
I think your math is off. Many programs already out can do over 1 billion keys per second, GPU of course.

1 billion keys per second would take you 1,169 years.

I thought so let me go slap chatgpt

Edit maths does work out for what im doing Smiley   Please please point me to where these apps can do 1 billion a sec per key or any info

What if you have 1b keys/sec? The only way this is going to help is if you find a formula that can narrow down your range at least 1000 times less .. other than that go run your devices and try your luck🤞


I narrow the key, but every time I drop a bit, the probability of pubkey is twice the previous one.
member
Activity: 185
Merit: 15
Two things you should never abandon: Family & BTC
Rounded up 66 puzzle is 36.8934881474191 keys

That is 36.8934881474191 sextillion.


My question

what is or is there a record for the most amount of keys tried in a second via brute forcing ?

I have a script ive worked on for about a month its my own outside the box thinking.
Testing the script achieved what i want it to do.

It will 100% work however like everyone else we are not immortal and time is certainly not on anyones side brute forcing btc.

so thats where im stuck at.

i need 1 billion keys a second tried lol

it will still take time but for puzzle 66 it would take 1 billion keys per second, it would take approximately 37,000 seconds to try37 quintillion keys.

That is equivalent to about 10.28 hours.

One can dream eh.

Anyway if you reply please answer my question on what/if a record exsists.
I think your math is off. Many programs already out can do over 1 billion keys per second, GPU of course.

1 billion keys per second would take you 1,169 years.

I thought so let me go slap chatgpt

Edit maths does work out for what im doing Smiley   Please please point me to where these apps can do 1 billion a sec per key or any info

What if you have 1b keys/sec? The only way this is going to help is if you find a formula that can narrow down your range at least 1000 times less .. other than that go run your devices and try your luck🤞
Jump to: