Author

Topic: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it - page 226. (Read 229618 times)

member
Activity: 185
Merit: 15
Two things you should never abandon: Family & BTC
for me, it's faster BSGS CUDA

is there any existing BSGS-CUDA linux version available which I could install and try ? I cannot find anything on github. I found a BSGS-CUDA which is Windows only and even then you would need a licensed PureBasic installation for running it. Any linux build available ?

I never found the BSGS-CUDA running on linux/debian, still use the Windows version, There's the github you can download the BSGS-CUDA windows and already compiled.
you just need extract the zip, and put the exe on the same file.

test your luck here, it's safe no random malware.

https://github.com/Etayson/BSGS-cuda/releases/tag/v1.7.3


I try to scan the #65 Puzzle with BSGS-CUDA, using GTX1650Ti

results,

START RANGE= 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000037d72a06
  END RANGE= 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003fffffff
WIDTH RANGE= 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000828d5f9
SUBpoint= (2bdeb0a84d7f1cf940ab6a47875939fcfb52e07e8598de29978f67b3979dc202, a0c47daf4ac0e02a1f3754e25bcd471d9a599db7432d80794df604814fcf75fd)
Save work every 180 seconds

FINDpubkey: 030d282cf2ff536d2c42f105d0b8588821a915dc3f9a05bd98bb23af67a2e92a5b
Cnt:1 [1][ 0 ] = 0 MKeys/s x2^27=2^27.00 t:00:00:00
KEY[1]: 0x000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003d94cd64
   Pub: 030d282cf2ff536d2c42f105d0b8588821a915dc3f9a05bd98bb23af67a2e92a5b
Working time 00:00:00s
Total time 00:00:05s

GPU#0 job finished
GPU#0 thread finished
cuda finished ok

only 5 seconds.

IMO imagine the puzzle maker show pubkey the #66 Puzzle, maybe it's take the same time like 10-20 seconds haha.

You are using a wrong range. Puzz 65 is 17 characters not 8

Puzz 66 range in BSGS would take an hour  a few minutes at most.

----

Btw, is anyone trying their luck with puzz 125? The only discussion i see going here is about 66 lol. Looks like 125 bits is too big to give any kind of hope.
full member
Activity: 1162
Merit: 237
Shooters Shoot...
for me, it's faster BSGS CUDA

is there any existing BSGS-CUDA linux version available which I could install and try ? I cannot find anything on github. I found a BSGS-CUDA which is Windows only and even then you would need a licensed PureBasic installation for running it. Any linux build available ?

I never found the BSGS-CUDA running on linux/debian, still use the Windows version, There's the github you can download the BSGS-CUDA windows and already compiled.
you just need extract the zip, and put the exe on the same file.

test your luck here, it's safe no random malware.

https://github.com/Etayson/BSGS-cuda/releases/tag/v1.7.3


I try to scan the #65 Puzzle with BSGS-CUDA, using GTX1650Ti

results,

START RANGE= 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000037d72a06
  END RANGE= 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003fffffff
WIDTH RANGE= 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000828d5f9
SUBpoint= (2bdeb0a84d7f1cf940ab6a47875939fcfb52e07e8598de29978f67b3979dc202, a0c47daf4ac0e02a1f3754e25bcd471d9a599db7432d80794df604814fcf75fd)
Save work every 180 seconds

FINDpubkey: 030d282cf2ff536d2c42f105d0b8588821a915dc3f9a05bd98bb23af67a2e92a5b
Cnt:1 [1][ 0 ] = 0 MKeys/s x2^27=2^27.00 t:00:00:00
KEY[1]: 0x000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003d94cd64
   Pub: 030d282cf2ff536d2c42f105d0b8588821a915dc3f9a05bd98bb23af67a2e92a5b
Working time 00:00:00s
Total time 00:00:05s

GPU#0 job finished
GPU#0 thread finished
cuda finished ok

only 5 seconds.

IMO imagine the puzzle maker show pubkey the #66 Puzzle, maybe it's take the same time like 10-20 seconds haha.
Lol…what is this?! You ran a 30 bit range in 5 seconds?! Kangaroo can do that in 1 second with CPU only.
Where did you run 65 bit? And those results?
Y’all need to stop unless I’m reading everything wrong lol.
jr. member
Activity: 77
Merit: 1
for me, it's faster BSGS CUDA

is there any existing BSGS-CUDA linux version available which I could install and try ? I cannot find anything on github. I found a BSGS-CUDA which is Windows only and even then you would need a licensed PureBasic installation for running it. Any linux build available ?

I never found the BSGS-CUDA running on linux/debian, still use the Windows version, There's the github you can download the BSGS-CUDA windows and already compiled.
you just need extract the zip, and put the exe on the same file.

test your luck here, it's safe no random malware.

https://github.com/Etayson/BSGS-cuda/releases/tag/v1.7.3

[EDIT]


I try to scan the #65 Puzzle with BSGS-CUDA, using GTX1650Ti [Testing the 30 # puzzle]

results,

START RANGE= 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000037d72a06
  END RANGE= 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003fffffff
WIDTH RANGE= 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000828d5f9
SUBpoint= (2bdeb0a84d7f1cf940ab6a47875939fcfb52e07e8598de29978f67b3979dc202, a0c47daf4ac0e02a1f3754e25bcd471d9a599db7432d80794df604814fcf75fd)
Save work every 180 seconds

FINDpubkey: 030d282cf2ff536d2c42f105d0b8588821a915dc3f9a05bd98bb23af67a2e92a5b
Cnt:1 [1][ 0 ] = 0 MKeys/s x2^27=2^27.00 t:00:00:00
KEY[1]: 0x000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003d94cd64
   Pub: 030d282cf2ff536d2c42f105d0b8588821a915dc3f9a05bd98bb23af67a2e92a5b
Working time 00:00:00s
Total time 00:00:05s

GPU#0 job finished
GPU#0 thread finished
cuda finished ok

only 5 seconds.

IMO imagine the puzzle maker show pubkey the #66 Puzzle, maybe it's take the same time like 10-20 seconds haha.
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 731
Bitcoin g33k
for me, it's faster BSGS CUDA

is there any existing BSGS-CUDA linux version available which I could install and try ? I cannot find anything on github. I found a BSGS-CUDA which is Windows only and even then you would need a licensed PureBasic installation for running it. Any linux build available ?
jr. member
Activity: 77
Merit: 1
are there any comparisons available in relation to speed and success between BSGS-CUDA vs. KANGAROO-CUDA ?

for me, it's faster BSGS CUDA
jr. member
Activity: 67
Merit: 1
ok, but it's still awesome, only if the kangaroo worked according to my ideas, it would be a different coffee
full member
Activity: 1162
Merit: 237
Shooters Shoot...
that speed is interesting 1 day 100 bits public key crack is impressive for one graphics card
No no no, that is for 10 x 3090 GPUs
jr. member
Activity: 67
Merit: 1
that speed is interesting 1 day 100 bits public key crack is impressive for one graphics card
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 731
Bitcoin g33k
are there any comparisons available in relation to speed and success between BSGS-CUDA vs. KANGAROO-CUDA ?
full member
Activity: 1162
Merit: 237
Shooters Shoot...
how long would it take to break 100 binary long private key for kangaroo
I'm asking because I don't have the computing power
let's say you have a 10 gpu rtx 3090, you can write an approximate time, how quickly they would be able to solve it
What is the speed of a 3090 running kangaroo?
I don't know, I'm asking, but let's say it goes at a speed of 2000 mk/s
If at 1200 MK/s = 2.27 days
If at 1500 MK/s = 1.8 days
If at 2000 MK/s = 1.4 days

Also, you said 100 binary, I took that as a private key/pub address in the 100 bit or 2^100 range.

jr. member
Activity: 77
Merit: 1
how long would it take to break 100 binary long private key for kangaroo
I'm asking because I don't have the computing power
let's say you have a 10 gpu rtx 3090, you can write an approximate time, how quickly they would be able to solve it

maybe it's arround hundread mkeys Huh no ones tell about the speed of 3090, but i have a proof about my GPU 1650Ti running BSGS-CUDA

This.

GPU count #1
GPU #0 launched
GPU #0 Free memory: 3302Mb
GPU #0 Total memory: 4095Mb
GPU #0 TotalBuff: 1584.000Mb
Load BIN file:79be667ef9dcbbac55a06295ce870b07029bfcdb2dce28d959f2815b16f81798_67108864_67108 864_htCPU.BIN
  • chunk:1073741824b
START RANGE= 00000000000000000000000000000000103c8c7ff38f37224084fffe50aaaeb0
  END RANGE= 000000000000000000000000000000001fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
WIDTH RANGE= 000000000000000000000000000000000fc373800c70c8ddbf7b0001af55514f
SUBpoint= (9a5eba5978cbe02f4e3676ebdd262e61776b207f9319e86381dad42ce29b39c5, b41712d53d81b41c622f5bdd195d22b6f89eec0886ef6af2a437f57f9fdaa644)
Save work every 180 seconds

FINDpubkey: 0233709eb11e0d4439a729f21c2c443dedb727528229713f0065721ba8fa46f00e
Cnt:5fd66b800000000001 [1][ 379 ] = 379 MKeys/s x2^27=2^55.57 t:18:33:56

I scan and i got 380-370 Mkeys average

maybe you can check this youtube video, he's trying Kangaro with 8x RTX 3090 on Vast.ai

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1BHNer9dZ_M
jr. member
Activity: 67
Merit: 1
how long would it take to break 100 binary long private key for kangaroo
I'm asking because I don't have the computing power
let's say you have a 10 gpu rtx 3090, you can write an approximate time, how quickly they would be able to solve it
What is the speed of a 3090 running kangaroo?
I don't know, I'm asking, but let's say it goes at a speed of 2000 mk/s
full member
Activity: 1162
Merit: 237
Shooters Shoot...
how long would it take to break 100 binary long private key for kangaroo
I'm asking because I don't have the computing power
let's say you have a 10 gpu rtx 3090, you can write an approximate time, how quickly they would be able to solve it
What is the speed of a 3090 running kangaroo?
jr. member
Activity: 67
Merit: 1
how long would it take to break 100 binary long private key for kangaroo
I'm asking because I don't have the computing power
let's say you have a 10 gpu rtx 3090, you can write an approximate time, how quickly they would be able to solve it
jr. member
Activity: 77
Merit: 1
So the point is we cannot do anything to solve the 66, because we need public key, we cannot seek the public key because the address never spent any ammount thoo  Undecided

I do RMD, and PUBRMD, for like 1 years and nothing to found.



#120 never given the hex key too  Roll Eyes

Lol 1 year? It's a staggering 66 bit range bro. 36.8 million trillion keys to go through. Normally searching by sequence with a device providing 300-500 mil key/sec would take you 18000 years. So yeah, don't be so surprised you couldn't find it within a year.

I knew because it's difficult by times to search too, there's no magic tools to solve the puzzle by day,month, years for possible.
last time i scan the 125# puzzle with my 1650Ti, it takes like 800-900 years, im new in this puzzle and learn from people who's tryin to figure the pattern to breach the puzzle.

FUN FACT is you need like 1000-2000 GPU units for breach the #66 with kangaroo, to short the time like 1-2 years.

regards,

There's no pattern here. Even the puzzle creator admitted it.

Kangaroo won't help with 66 because it has a hidden public key. If the public key gets exposed, it's a matter of hours for kangaroo to find the pvt key. 65 bits is peanuts for kangaroo

I know right, still same, we need the public key, because no public keys mean more time.
member
Activity: 185
Merit: 15
Two things you should never abandon: Family & BTC
So the point is we cannot do anything to solve the 66, because we need public key, we cannot seek the public key because the address never spent any ammount thoo  Undecided

I do RMD, and PUBRMD, for like 1 years and nothing to found.



#120 never given the hex key too  Roll Eyes

Lol 1 year? It's a staggering 66 bit range bro. 36.8 million trillion keys to go through. Normally searching by sequence with a device providing 300-500 mil key/sec would take you 18000 years. So yeah, don't be so surprised you couldn't find it within a year.

I knew because it's difficult by times to search too, there's no magic tools to solve the puzzle by day,month, years for possible.
last time i scan the 125# puzzle with my 1650Ti, it takes like 800-900 years, im new in this puzzle and learn from people who's tryin to figure the pattern to breach the puzzle.

FUN FACT is you need like 1000-2000 GPU units for breach the #66 with kangaroo, to short the time like 1-2 years.

regards,

There's no pattern here. Even the puzzle creator admitted it.

Kangaroo won't help with 66 because it has a hidden public key. If the public key gets exposed, it's a matter of hours for kangaroo to find the pvt key. 65 bits is peanuts for kangaroo
jr. member
Activity: 77
Merit: 1
So the point is we cannot do anything to solve the 66, because we need public key, we cannot seek the public key because the address never spent any ammount thoo  Undecided

I do RMD, and PUBRMD, for like 1 years and nothing to found.



#120 never given the hex key too  Roll Eyes

Lol 1 year? It's a staggering 66 bit range bro. 36.8 million trillion keys to go through. Normally searching by sequence with a device providing 300-500 mil key/sec would take you 18000 years. So yeah, don't be so surprised you couldn't find it within a year.

I knew because it's difficult by times to search too, there's no magic tools to solve the puzzle by day,month, years for possible.
last time i scan the 125# puzzle with my 1650Ti, it takes like 800-900 years, im new in this puzzle and learn from people who's tryin to figure the pattern to breach the puzzle.

FUN FACT is you need like 1000-2000 GPU units for breach the #66 with kangaroo, to short the time like 1-2 years.

regards,
member
Activity: 185
Merit: 15
Two things you should never abandon: Family & BTC
So the point is we cannot do anything to solve the 66, because we need public key, we cannot seek the public key because the address never spent any ammount thoo  Undecided

I do RMD, and PUBRMD, for like 1 years and nothing to found.



#120 never given the hex key too  Roll Eyes

Lol 1 year? It's a staggering 66 bit range bro. 36.8 million trillion keys to go through. Normally searching by sequence with a device providing 300-500 mil key/sec would take you 18000 years. So yeah, don't be so surprised you couldn't find it within a year.
jr. member
Activity: 77
Merit: 1
So the point is we cannot do anything to solve the 66, because we need public key, we cannot seek the public key because the address never spent any ammount thoo  Undecided

I do RMD, and PUBRMD, for like 1 years and nothing to found.



#120 never given the hex key too  Roll Eyes
member
Activity: 185
Merit: 15
Two things you should never abandon: Family & BTC
@zahid888: can you explain please what you're trying to explain or show? as far as I know it does not matter if only certain substrings of the searched bitcoin address match or not, that does not help in finding the right key for #66. As we all know, the hash value changes completely if you change only a single character of the initial value. So I don't understand how your output from VanBitkracken is supposed to help.

He is trying to do exactly what the human brain does with the universe; which is trying to find a pattern within chaos. I can't blame him for trying. Personally though, i think giving in to randomness will be the only way to find the exact puzzle address. I believe there's no shortcuts. Just the thought of sequential key search gives me headache lol.

Until we don't have the capability to count in a sequence, we will have to estimate some parts randomly and complete the remaining parts by counting them in the sequence. Besides this, we do not have any other alternative method available.

Therefore, I am dividing Puzzle 66 into two parts and as we know it will start with 2 or 3, I have assumed it will start with 3. Then, I am incrementing the 1 in the 8 hex ("30000000") up to ("3fffffff"). In this process, I am comparing the address of Puzzle 66 with the addresses obtained from incrementing the 8 hex. If the 8 or more character of Puzzle 66's address match with the address obtained from incrementing the 8 hex, I took that 8 hex as first part of 17 hex of P66 and counting the remaining 9 hex using VanBitCracken. This process gave me approximately 427 ranges, and it took me about 70 seconds to complete one range. Thus, it took me about 8 hours to complete 427 ranges. I believe that using some logical approach for counting, instead of generating completely random hex, may lead to a solution. I am aware that this is also a random method, but with a little logic. I know there is unequivocally no shortcut to solve this puzzle. However, unless I have the capacity to count in a sequence, I will have to resort to some shortcut method.

Then i suggest you do it with 20000000000000000:2ffffffffffffffff range too. You never know if the key lies far from the range start or not
Jump to: