Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it - page 39.

frozenen

newbie

Activity: 25

Merit: 0

I don't think is puzzle creator messing with us but someone with huge GPU farm that is now dedicated puzzle hunter Undecided

@Tepan

for next 67 Bit.

67 BIT PUZZLE
46346217550346335726 | XXXXXXXXX8929167990784 | XXXXXXXX868880000 |
46346217550346335726 | XXXXXXXXX146718502912 | XXXXXXXXc12500000 |
46346217550346335726 | XXXXXXXXX364268752896 | XXXXXXXXfbc140000 |
46346217550346335726 | XXXXXXXXX581819002880 | XXXXXXXX365d80000 |

any of these close to your range formula prediction?
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000005C07854E9A752E2B7
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000005CE2BEFE8ECF8155E
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000006816CC8B49ABBF2E5
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000068F2063B3E061258C
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000007020FC0913D01FDAE
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000070FC35B9082A73055
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000007C9C2ABE149EE5411

Prediction apps is what I'm messing around with..

Akito S. M. Hosana

jr. member

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

So 1Digaran1 cracked puzzle 130 with backdoor ?

mjojo

newbie

Activity: 11

Merit: 0

Quote from: Tepan on September 23, 2024, 07:10:20 AM

Quote from: Gord0nFreeman on September 23, 2024, 06:03:56 AM

You remind me of a fork of Digaran, with his endless attempts at pseudo-mathematical attacks on Elliptic Curve. You all just need to focus on your families instead of wasting your lives on nonsense.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I understand that you have a different perspective, and I respect that. However, I have my own view on this, and it's based on certain facts and research that I believe are valid. I'm happy to have a conversation where we can both share our ideas, but it's important for both of us to stay open-minded and respectful.

Grin

[Edit]

pseudo-mathematical attacks on elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) can occur, but they typically refer to attempts to undermine the security of elliptic curves using flawed, incomplete, or incorrect mathematical reasoning. These attacks are not based on sound cryptographic research but rather on misinterpretations or speculative ideas without sufficient mathematical backing.

If someone claims that "pseudo-mathematical attacks on ECC" are nonsense but simultaneously relies on brute force or waits for some miraculous mathematical breakthrough that has no solid proof yet, they might just be stuck in a charming little daydream of wishful thinking. Tongue

After all, nothing says "I understand cryptography" quite like banking on an imaginary genius to solve a problem that stumps the world's best mathematicians any day now, right? Huh

closed for debate, thanks. Cheesy

agree with you ECC have backdoor and NSA knew it

Tepan

jr. member

Activity: 77

Merit: 1

Quote from: Gord0nFreeman on September 23, 2024, 06:03:56 AM

You remind me of a fork of Digaran, with his endless attempts at pseudo-mathematical attacks on Elliptic Curve. You all just need to focus on your families instead of wasting your lives on nonsense.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I understand that you have a different perspective, and I respect that. However, I have my own view on this, and it's based on certain facts and research that I believe are valid. I'm happy to have a conversation where we can both share our ideas, but it's important for both of us to stay open-minded and respectful.

Grin

[Edit]

pseudo-mathematical attacks on elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) can occur, but they typically refer to attempts to undermine the security of elliptic curves using flawed, incomplete, or incorrect mathematical reasoning. These attacks are not based on sound cryptographic research but rather on misinterpretations or speculative ideas without sufficient mathematical backing.

If someone claims that "pseudo-mathematical attacks on ECC" are nonsense but simultaneously relies on brute force or waits for some miraculous mathematical breakthrough that has no solid proof yet, they might just be stuck in a charming little daydream of wishful thinking. Tongue

After all, nothing says "I understand cryptography" quite like banking on an imaginary genius to solve a problem that stumps the world's best mathematicians any day now, right? Huh

closed for debate, thanks. Cheesy

AlanJohnson

member

Activity: 122

Merit: 11

Quote from: Feron on September 23, 2024, 06:04:34 AM

lol that's just the beginning not the end

Beginning of what ?

Look all the posts months back ... all the python/c++/rust scripts and all the discussions and theories here - it was all pointless cause nobody here has enough computational power which this "puzzle" is all about.

It shouldn't be called puzzle at all. It is a brute force measuring tool plus there are suspicious activities here that may point the creator of this thing is not playing fair.

Feron

jr. member

Activity: 67

Merit: 1

lol that's just the beginning not the end

Gord0nFreeman

newbie

Activity: 22

Merit: 1

Quote from: Tepan on September 23, 2024, 06:00:42 AM

Quote from: Gord0nFreeman on September 23, 2024, 05:58:16 AM

Quote from: nomachine on September 23, 2024, 05:47:26 AM

Quote from: CY4NiDE on September 23, 2024, 05:18:56 AM

Where is the evidence to back all this fud about the creator of this challenge?

There is no evidence, but there is also no proof that anyone has solved Puzzle 130 using Kangaroo and a massive number of GPUs. I can’t believe anyone would be so crazy as to invest that much hardware in this. It would be more profitable to mine BTC for the same amount of time.

The Creator just wants to turn everyone into a human centipede in the search for the 67th and 68th bits. As he himself stated, there is no connection between all the keys, they were random, so this isn't a puzzle—it's just a GPU strength test, pure brute force. Kangaroo was an outstanding tool for its time and purpose, searching by public key, but there’s nothing heroic or scientific about brute-forcing the lower bits, because there’s no public key there. The experiment on studying Bitcoin's encryption strength is over! Thank you all, you’re free to go!

nah, i dont aggree with this, imo bitcoin is work with computational power, but else of formula is make from human things.
still can be breach out with math, look out theres other challenge to unlock bitcoin with math.

You remind me of a fork of Digaran, with his endless attempts at pseudo-mathematical attacks on Elliptic Curve. You all just need to focus on your families instead of wasting your lives on nonsense.

Tepan

jr. member

Activity: 77

Merit: 1

Quote from: Gord0nFreeman on September 23, 2024, 05:58:16 AM

Quote from: nomachine on September 23, 2024, 05:47:26 AM

Quote from: CY4NiDE on September 23, 2024, 05:18:56 AM

Where is the evidence to back all this fud about the creator of this challenge?

There is no evidence, but there is also no proof that anyone has solved Puzzle 130 using Kangaroo and a massive number of GPUs. I can’t believe anyone would be so crazy as to invest that much hardware in this. It would be more profitable to mine BTC for the same amount of time.

The Creator just wants to turn everyone into a human centipede in the search for the 67th and 68th bits. As he himself stated, there is no connection between all the keys, they were random, so this isn't a puzzle—it's just a GPU strength test, pure brute force. Kangaroo was an outstanding tool for its time and purpose, searching by public key, but there’s nothing heroic or scientific about brute-forcing the lower bits, because there’s no public key there. The experiment on studying Bitcoin's encryption strength is over! Thank you all, you’re free to go!

nah, i dont aggree with this, imo bitcoin is work with computational power, but else of formula is make from human things.
still can be breach out with math, look out theres other challenge to unlock bitcoin with math.

Gord0nFreeman

newbie

Activity: 22

Merit: 1

Quote from: nomachine on September 23, 2024, 05:47:26 AM

Quote from: CY4NiDE on September 23, 2024, 05:18:56 AM

Where is the evidence to back all this fud about the creator of this challenge?

There is no evidence, but there is also no proof that anyone has solved Puzzle 130 using Kangaroo and a massive number of GPUs. I can’t believe anyone would be so crazy as to invest that much hardware in this. It would be more profitable to mine BTC for the same amount of time.

The Creator just wants to turn everyone into a human centipede in the search for the 67th and 68th bits. As he himself stated, there is no connection between all the keys, they were random, so this isn't a puzzle—it's just a GPU strength test, pure brute force. Kangaroo was an outstanding tool for its time and purpose, searching by public key, but there’s nothing heroic or scientific about brute-forcing the lower bits, because there’s no public key there. The experiment on studying Bitcoin's encryption strength is over! Thank you all, you’re free to go!

nomachine

member

Activity: 499

Merit: 38

Quote from: CY4NiDE on September 23, 2024, 05:18:56 AM

Where is the evidence to back all this fud about the creator of this challenge?

There is no evidence, but there is also no proof that anyone has solved Puzzle 130 using Kangaroo and a massive number of GPUs. I can’t believe anyone would be so crazy as to invest that much hardware in this. It would be more profitable to mine BTC for the same amount of time.

Akito S. M. Hosana

jr. member

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: kTimesG on September 23, 2024, 05:13:33 AM

1 billion computers running at 100% usage for 24 hours.

This number only shows how impossible it is to solve.

ihsotas91

newbie

Activity: 16

Merit: 0

I think rather than brute forcing I like playing vanity game, it is more exciting..

^{import sqlite3
import random
from bit import Key
import bitcoin

# Connect to vanity_addresses.db for storing found vanity addresses
vanity_conn = sqlite3.connect('vanity_addresses.db')
vanity_cursor = vanity_conn.cursor()

# Create a table in vanity_addresses.db to store vanity addresses and private keys
vanity_cursor.execute('''
   CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS vanity_addresses (
   address TEXT PRIMARY KEY,
   private_key TEXT
   )
''')
vanity_conn.commit()

def generate_vanity_address(prefix):
   while True:
   private_key = random.randint(2**66, 2**67)

   key = Key.from_int(private_key)
   addr = key.address
   addr_uncompressed = bitcoin. privkey_to_address(private_key)

   if addr.startswith(prefix):
   # Insert found vanity addresses into the vanity_addresses.db database
   vanity_cursor.execute(
   'INSERT INTO vanity_addresses (address, private_key) VALUES (?, ?)', (addr, str(private_key)))
   vanity_conn.commit()

   if addr_uncompressed.startswith(prefix):
   # Insert found vanity addresses into the vanity_addresses.db database
   vanity_cursor.execute(
   'INSERT INTO vanity_addresses (address, private_key) VALUES (?, ?)', (addr_uncompressed, str(private_key)))
   vanity_conn.commit()

prefix = '1BY8G'

generate_vanity_address(prefix)}

coinprober

newbie

Activity: 2

Merit: 0

More and more skeptical of these puzzles, the creators are playing a trick on us Angry

CY4NiDE

member

Activity: 43

Merit: 10

"Here is my own assumption being profered as straight facts without any proof"

Where is the evidence to back all this fud about the creator of this challenge?

ihsotas91

newbie

Activity: 16

Merit: 0

Quote from: frozenen on September 23, 2024, 04:19:21 AM

I guess finders are never gonna share solutions for 120, 125 and 130?
lol are you guys gonna try vanity 1Prestige1zSYorBdz94KA2UbJW3hYLTn4 instead of search 67?

possibility of finding 67 via vanity > possibility to find 1Prestige between 0 and 2^256 Grin

kTimesG

member

Activity: 165

Merit: 26

Quote from: Feron on September 23, 2024, 04:21:05 AM

It will not be the creator, the more people search for puzzle addresses, the greater the chance of solving them
To give an example, if 1,000,000 computers start solving puzzle 67, there is a good chance you will solve it in one day

Wrong example. I think you meant 1 billion computers running at 100% usage for 24 hours.

Tepan

jr. member

Activity: 77

Merit: 1

https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/91ec88f5d6d6cc727e0205d3aa3709fee507df05140d187846cf22aef784621a

someone just took out the 130 bit.
dang, it's creator or someone else did samething with 66 bit ?

  "outputs": [
   {
   "address": "1Prestige1zSYorBdz94KA2UbJW3hYLTn4",
   "pkscript": "76a914fab6c492ff6de8e5080faa86847e3374dcf042ce88ac",
   "value": 1299999680,
   "spent": false,
   "spender": null
   }

ngl, the way you can break the puzzle is from recent history of priv key has been found, if someone found it, and not tell the key, the puzzle is broken, you just need to think this is PUZZLE, and every piece is work together to assemble the next lossless piece.

Feron

jr. member

Activity: 67

Merit: 1

so you shouldn't invest in it, just run the code on the cpu and voila, you can still try to guess the beginning of the range to speed up the solution

Feron

jr. member

Activity: 67

Merit: 1

maybe hundreds of people puzzling addresses, but if the whole planet started looking for them, then those addresses would just get dusty

AlanJohnson

member

Activity: 122

Merit: 11

Quote from: Akito S. M. Hosana on September 23, 2024, 04:13:01 AM

I've been trying to solve puzzle 130 for two years now. 6 GPUs. The puzzle creator is kidding with us. Yes, we are all donkeys. Cry

First (puzzle 66) there was a mockery with addresses like 1YouDeserveNothingxxxxxxx...

Now (puzzle 130) is going to address 1Prestige1xxxxxxxxxxxxx...

Puzzle 120 and 125 didn't even take altcoins ...

I knew it was a waste of time... It's still exciting but not worth to invest too much time or resources.

Topic: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it - page 39. (Read 230559 times)