Pages:
Author

Topic: Bitcoin-Qt / bitcoind version 0.8.6 released - page 2. (Read 34132 times)

legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1199

WARNING MALWARE!!!

so please do not post MALWARED link in your comment Smiley
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 501
I am having some serious problems with Bitcoin-QT on openSUSE sending bitcoins to another wallet.

I am using:

Bitcoin v0.8.6.0-g03a7d67-beta
QT v4.8.5

This post explains the issue and has all the screen shots:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/i-need-help-with-bitcoin-qt-transferring-of-btc-516059

Thanks,
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
What security features does this upgrade incorporate, or are these wallets still basically candy for CCSM's to freely take people's coin as they please?
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10

WARNING MALWARE!!!
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Anyone know when will bitcoind version 0.8.7 be release?
hopefully by this month!
My estimate for 0.9 is March
RC2 is already out
http://sourceforge.net/projects/bitcoin/files/Bitcoin/bitcoin-0.9.0/test/

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5460062

full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
I think it's going to 0.9 to help address the transaction malleability, dust spam issues, fees reduction etc.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Anyone know when will bitcoind version 0.8.7 be release?
hopefully by this month!
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1022
No Maps for These Territories
Why don't you add these options, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/, instead of whinning.

First I'd like to know if that would be a waste of time or not. Often lack of features is a design decision not a question of code. See also: GNOME project
There would be no opposition to adding a port option in the UI options.

Bandwidth limiting on the other hand is currently stalled until parallel block download is implemented. Currently a single slowed down peer can have too much impact.

Nevertheless you may be indeed able to limit the bandwidth on the OS level, a sample QoS script for Linux is even included in contrib/qos.
legendary
Activity: 4494
Merit: 3178
Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023
"Bitcoin can be used for micropayments" they say.
Who are "they"? Do you want me to beat them up? Bitcoin is neither suitable nor designed for micropayments, it never was, and never will be. Anyone who says otherwise deserves to be punched in the face.

EDIT: Typo
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
Can Bitcoin wallet support other coins like litecoin or Gogecoin at same time? As you know there are so many coins now.
That's like asking if my Swiss bank account supports Nigerian Prince investment fund. Or if Fort Knox will also store my collection of pretty rocks.

These alt-coins are Bitcoin, with the most trivial of changes. They can be taken out at any time by 51% attack by existing miner hashrate or common computing resources. They have been killed in the past just for demonstration, but nobody seems to learn, so now they and their wannabe-rich creators are ignored. Only Namecoin is unique in offering a new feature that won't be included in Bitcoin, and it has a difficulty about 75% that of Bitcoin itself.
Only namecoin attempting to add value?? you need to do your homework before making that kind of statement. I'm no fan of the me2 coins but there are some excellent innovations happening in the alt space.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
Is there any chance for future releases that the upload bandwidth used by bitcoind could have a throttle option?

I don't have one of these new fangled VDSL or Cable connections, I have a 8mbit ADSL connection with a staggering 256k upstream. It gives me an upload speed of 38kb/s. Bitcoin-qt sucks up all of that bandwidth which makes even browsing webpages extremely slow and painful, sometimes impossible. It would be nice if there was an option (other than 'exit') so that bitcoin-qt couldn't hijack my internet connection.
Thats being dealt with via the SPV protocol, already implemented in  MultiBit client.
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
Good news... thanks a lot!

legendary
Activity: 1623
Merit: 1608
Electrum is easy to use but it needs centralized servers. It is not a pure P2P client.

Bitcoin-Qt is pure P2P. Multibit is pure P2P.
SPV is specified in Satoshi's original paper for thin clients; A thin client (multibit or electrum) is NOT P2P because it needs full nodes to function. Anybody can run a full node electrum server. There is no "central" electrum server: you can chose the one you want to connect to.

Multibit IS pure P2P. Schildbach's Android wallet is also pure P2P. They implement the SPV concept of Satoshi. None of the two implementations are are used in validating nodes, but they are pure P2P.

https://plus.google.com/+MikeHearn/posts/hzySWGzHAcJ

Electrum is not P2P and it does not implement Satoshi's SPV concept.

Bitcoin-Qt is P2P and their nodes fully validate transactions.
legendary
Activity: 1221
Merit: 1025
e-ducat.fr
I am new to bitcoin.Which program is best for newbies? Bitcoin-qt or multibit
For newbies, I'd recommend electrum as an SPV client.
Once you become familiar with bitcoin, you would want to be a full node and take the time to download the whole blockchain with bitcoin-qt and strong password for wallet encryption.
Avoid windows.

Electrum is easy to use but it needs centralized servers. It is not a pure P2P client.

Bitcoin-Qt is pure P2P. Multibit is pure P2P.
SPV is specified in Satoshi's original paper for thin clients; A thin client (multibit or electrum) is NOT P2P because it needs full nodes to function. Anybody can run a full node electrum server. There is no "central" electrum server: you can chose the one you want to connect to.
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
i'll wait for the 64-bit version.
legendary
Activity: 1623
Merit: 1608
February 21, 2014, 06:12:03 PM
#99
I am new to bitcoin.Which program is best for newbies? Bitcoin-qt or multibit
For newbies, I'd recommend electrum as an SPV client.
Once you become familiar with bitcoin, you would want to be a full node and take the time to download the whole blockchain with bitcoin-qt and strong password for wallet encryption.
Avoid windows.

Electrum is easy to use but it needs centralized servers. It is not a pure P2P client.

Bitcoin-Qt is pure P2P. Multibit is pure P2P.
legendary
Activity: 1221
Merit: 1025
e-ducat.fr
February 20, 2014, 09:53:47 AM
#98
I am new to bitcoin.Which program is best for newbies? Bitcoin-qt or multibit
For newbies, I'd recommend electrum as an SPV client.
Once you become familiar with bitcoin, you would want to be a full node and take the time to download the whole blockchain with bitcoin-qt and strong password for wallet encryption.
Avoid windows.
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
February 17, 2014, 10:48:03 AM
#97
Thank you very much to tell me about the release of new version. I will definitely try the new version as I was already facing few problems. I hope this update will finally solve the bugs that were becoming a headache for me. Please keep on sharing such news with me, I shall appreciate it
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1199
February 15, 2014, 07:23:59 PM
#96
I have had to reload the blockchain 3 times this year!
Anybody know when the QT version that does not require you to download the chain will be available? Huh

Either it will download blockchain or it will not be QT.

Get electrum

Electrum != QT
Like I said.

So the answer should be: "Such version will never be available. (If it is it will not be QT anymore.)"

there is no such a version of QT..
sr. member
Activity: 475
Merit: 255
February 10, 2014, 02:45:44 PM
#95
I have had to reload the blockchain 3 times this year!
Anybody know when the QT version that does not require you to download the chain will be available? Huh

Either it will download blockchain or it will not be QT.

Get electrum

Electrum != QT
Like I said.

So the answer should be: "Such version will never be available. (If it is it will not be QT anymore.)"
Pages:
Jump to: