Topic: Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud) - page 180. (Read 378996 times)
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
whatever you say.
I've made points that no one refuted here.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12357822
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12361309
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12362678
I've also actually written Bitcoin related code.
none of your rhetoric impresses me. you might want to improve it:
http://freedomfeens.com/bs/
I've made points that no one refuted here.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12357822
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12361309
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12362678
I've also actually written Bitcoin related code.
none of your rhetoric impresses me. you might want to improve it:
http://freedomfeens.com/bs/
This thread has gone full retard. Constructive discussion has grinded to a halt. You guys are all like one another, Special Olympics.
I think if you read the thread title, the OP was setting the retard bar pretty low from the off.
Anyone who tries to argue logically with that mentality is the one who is retarded.
This thread was intended as a trollfest - dont spoil it for everyone.
I dont pretend anything. Make a decent point and I will try and respond in kind. Troll, and I will troll you back.
exactly. I've argued sensibly dozens of pages ago. at this point it's time to expose the extremists for the faggots they really insist on being.
LambChop can at least pretend to some intelligence. You're just a noob and have been exposed as so on several occasions
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
This thread has gone full retard. Constructive discussion has grinded to a halt. You guys are all like one another, Special Olympics.
I think if you read the thread title, the OP was setting the retard bar pretty low from the off.
Anyone who tries to argue logically with that mentality is the one who is retarded.
This thread was intended as a trollfest - dont spoil it for everyone.
I dont pretend anything. Make a decent point and I will try and respond in kind. Troll, and I will troll you back.
exactly. I've argued sensibly dozens of pages ago. at this point it's time to expose the extremists for the faggots they really insist on being.
This thread has gone full retard. Constructive discussion has grinded to a halt. You guys are all like one another, Special Olympics.
I think if you read the thread title, the OP was setting the retard bar pretty low from the off.
Anyone who tries to argue logically with that mentality is the one who is retarded.
This thread was intended as a trollfest - dont spoil it for everyone.
I dont pretend anything. Make a decent point and I will try and respond in kind. Troll, and I will troll you back.
This thread has gone full retard. Constructive discussion has grinded to a halt. You guys are all like one another, Special Olympics.
I think if you read the thread title, the OP was setting the retard bar pretty low from the off.
Anyone who tries to argue logically with that mentality is the one who is retarded.
This thread was intended as a trollfest - dont spoil it for everyone.
This thread has gone full retard. Constructive discussion has grinded to a halt. You guys are all like one another, Special Olympics.
I think if you read the thread title, the OP was setting the retard bar pretty low from the off.
Anyone who tries to argue logically with that mentality is the one who is retarded.
This thread was intended as a trollfest - dont spoil it for everyone.
The only revisionism going on there is pretending that XT was never a deadly serious (ie overambitious) attempt at an actual governance coup, which was willing to risk catastrophic consensus failure in order to achieve narrow process and technical changes of strictly limited value.
You are, by retroactively reframing XT as merely some kind of magical motivational poster, desperately trying to avoid the stinging cognitive dissonance of its inglorious defeat.
Team Gavin said things and acted as if XT would destroy Core with a bang, but what happened is XT died with only the faintest of whimpers.
And so, having crushed the enemies of Core, we now enjoy the lamentations of their women.
Just because you keep repeating this, it does not make it true. I have refuted many times now why XT is not the equivalent of a government coup, unless a government coup can be defined as needing 75% consensus. You are, by retroactively reframing XT as merely some kind of magical motivational poster, desperately trying to avoid the stinging cognitive dissonance of its inglorious defeat.
Team Gavin said things and acted as if XT would destroy Core with a bang, but what happened is XT died with only the faintest of whimpers.
And so, having crushed the enemies of Core, we now enjoy the lamentations of their women.
"Government" and "governance" do look really similar written down, but it's funny how the meaning changes so much when you substitute one for the other
Troll harder VertiasSapere, you're too consistently getting information wrong that construes the argument in dismissal of an invisible enemy: people who don't want scaling up. It's so openly transparent now that it's totally pathetic
Its a typo, seriously?
two identical typos in the same sentence, seriously?
Really? The problem is overgeneralising on abstracts, instead of the realistic truth that Hearn has for years proposed ideas that are a risk to Bitcoin. What pro-XT posters have proven is how easy it is for people to believe in a person and his fork who is so potentially destructive to Bitcoin.
The problem with idealism in abstracts is it doesn't predict tyrants. I'd bet if XT garnered 75% of nodes, you'd see the one of two possible scenarios:
Scenario #1
1> Bitcoin becomes centralized (the protocol) via trusted nodes.
2> Bitcoin uses checkpoints to prevent another hostile takeover like its own.
3> Bitcoin replaces anonymity with identity requirements (passports).
4> Bitcoin loses fungibility in favor of tainted coins, red lists, black lists, and white lists.
5> Due to #1-4, it would be hard to use any other implementation.
Scenario #2
Bitcoin self-destructs in the process of scenario #1 being rejected by the masses.
The "benevolent dictator" will become a billionaire in scenario #1. He has so much to gain in scenario #1, scenario #2 is worth the risk to him.
The only revisionism going on there is pretending that XT was never a deadly serious (ie overambitious) attempt at an actual governance coup, which was willing to risk catastrophic consensus failure in order to achieve narrow process and technical changes of strictly limited value.
You are, by retroactively reframing XT as merely some kind of magical motivational poster, desperately trying to avoid the stinging cognitive dissonance of its inglorious defeat.
Team Gavin said things and acted as if XT would destroy Core with a bang, but what happened is XT died with only the faintest of whimpers.
And so, having crushed the enemies of Core, we now enjoy the lamentations of their women.
Just because you keep repeating this, it does not make it true. I have refuted many times now why XT is not the equivalent of a government coup, unless a government coup can be defined as needing 75% consensus. You are, by retroactively reframing XT as merely some kind of magical motivational poster, desperately trying to avoid the stinging cognitive dissonance of its inglorious defeat.
Team Gavin said things and acted as if XT would destroy Core with a bang, but what happened is XT died with only the faintest of whimpers.
And so, having crushed the enemies of Core, we now enjoy the lamentations of their women.
"Government" and "governance" do look really similar written down, but it's funny how the meaning changes so much when you substitute one for the other
Troll harder VertiasSapere, you're too consistently getting information wrong that construes the argument in dismissal of an invisible enemy: people who don't want scaling up. It's so openly transparent now that it's totally pathetic
Its a typo, seriously?
two identical typos in the same sentence, seriously?
This thread has gone full retard. Constructive discussion has grinded to a halt. You guys are all like one another, Special Olympics.
fuck off with your monero alt coin.
this has got to be the mpfaggiest thread in the known universe.
this has got to be the mpfaggiest thread in the known universe.
There goes LambChop's cheerleader again... he doesn't need you buddy.
The voices.... The voices!
That persecution complex of yours is starting to become acute. Maybe you should see a doctor.
I'm sure there is a horse suppository he could prescribe...
Quote from: Jeff_Garzik
“Many [of the core devs are] interested or at least willing to accept a ‘short term bump,’ a hard fork to modify block size limit regime to be cost-based via ‘net-utxo’ rather than a simple static hard limit. 2-4-8 and 17%/year were debated and seemed ‘in range’ with what might work as a short term bump – net after applying the new cost metric.”
fuck off with your monero alt coin.
this has got to be the mpfaggiest thread in the known universe.
this has got to be the mpfaggiest thread in the known universe.
There goes LambChop's cheerleader again... he doesn't need you buddy.
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
fuck off with your monero alt coin.
this has got to be the mpfaggiest thread in the known universe.
this has got to be the mpfaggiest thread in the known universe.
Quote from: iCEBREAKER
This is what I see.
Yes, and this one is good too.
I'll buy your account for 5 XMR, if you'll fork off to forum.bitcoin.com or /v/bitcoinxt (and thus by being among the first to defect from Core's socioeconomic majority demonstrate, instead of merely blustering about, your Gavinista bona fides).
Quote from: iCEBREAKER
This user is currently ignored.
This is what I see. Lost your sense of humour, and now you have lost your imagination... It was funnier when I did it. #MPfagFail
Jump to: