Topic: ❤️ BitcoinCasino.to - Guide & Reviews - 1400+ Crypto Casinos List (Read 580 times)

Sorry for being brutally honest, bitcasino.to. But this looks bad. You are addressing the speech to students, so you need to use you instead of we. Saying that you are in need of money doesn't look good and makes you less credible. Just a friendly advice: replace "we" in the above quoted sentence with "" you". Am not an English native speaker, but this is how I interpreted it.

By popular request from this forum and elsewhere we have several new additions like Stake, BC.Game, Flush and others. More coming soon!

Thanks for pointing this out. We trust the judgment of Gosu and proven authorities like Casinomeister, AskGamblers and Casino Guru as well.

Unfortunately there will probably always be some controversies associated with major casino operators so we'll just have to continue keeping track and re-evaluating as we go. That's our responsibility as serious casino guides.

I would like to include one thing here as you have already given the reference of other websites including BTCGOSU. Most of the gamblers and forum members have their trust on btcgosu. Therefore, forum members shouldn't raise questions here if they trust BTCGOSU decisions. 'efialtis' had published an article for Bitcointalk forum members after adding BitStarz review on the site: BTCGOSU adds BitStarz Casino

Agreed. Thank you for taking the time to provide feedback and help us improve further.

You are welcome OP. You see that is one of the reasons you and I are here so as to make inputs and genuine review so as to render services and to derive satisfaction from services rendered. Comments, reviews and inputs are part of the process of making and noting errors in every organisation. It helps the organisation go along way by molding them to the standard and taste of the society so they could stand out and tall in the society. You and your organisation are not exempted in this particular exercise too. It is nice you did the right thing by acknowledging the fact that you need things done accurately and properly. You have a good project to go by. I wish you and your organisation good luck.

We did indeed do our due diligence and the consensus outside of this forum is that it's a solid operator, which is also the opinion of some members of this forum as well.

Quick case in point including some of the largest and most respected comparison sites, both general and crypto-focused:

https://www.askgamblers.com/online-casinos/reviews/bitstarz-casino (including 522 user ratings)
https://casino.guru/BitStarz-Casino-review (including 428 user ratings)
https://www.casinomeister.com/casino-reviews/bitstarz/
https://lcb.org/casinos/bitstarz
https://bitcoincasinokings.com/reviews/bitstarz/
https://cryptomaniaks.com/bitstarz-review
https://www.coinbuzz.com/casino-reviews/stars-casino/
https://coingambling.info/reviews/bitstarz-casino/
https://www.btcgosu.com/review/bitstarz-casino/

And so on.

We respect that there's a difference in opinions here (which should be obvious since we've agreed to re-review the concerns that have been raised) but our original review score was not really deviating from the norm.

Hopefully that's enough clarification about the original inclusion of this particular operator. Thanks for giving us some food for thought.

All you have said is not in any ways a concern to me but for good opinion and Service delivery I had to make an input.
It is generally known about bitstarz to be a Scam casino but on your review site it fit a clear pass  meaning it has no issues. If I may ask did you really do a proper survey by also asking gamblers who have patronized the casino before because in only doing so, you can be able to get something tangible information about the casino to write about  but it seems you didn't looking at your response in you agreeing to removing it for the intereem means you did not  do due diligence before giving it a pass on your website.

Lastly, you said you write from your experience playing it as a casino then I do not think you can get a concrete information to do a review without looking outward to other gamblers who have patronized the casino. You alone can not get what it takes to get or do a clean review as it would be distorted and inaccurate. Do well to include other modalities for your review to be adequate.

Do not forget that a tree can not make up a forest likewise you too can not just make up a review on your own.

The problem is you are promotin here in the forum which Bitstarz have known proven scam incident that didn't took care many years ago when they have a chance. You can refer here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=30726. for the reference of their previous scam accusation.

We respect your experience but even if the casino is working for you safely then you will ignore the fact that they have an active case. You are promoting a review site which aims for players to guide them on choosing proper casino based on your judgement. What if Bitstarz scam the person that you invite since they have a record of scamming someone? Would you take the blame?

If you're referring to Bitstarz, yes, our review was positive because our own experience has been positive. It's also one of the oldest and most popular crypto casinos and has been reviewed positively by most major review sites (BCKings, Gosu, CoinGambling, BBC), as we've previously pointed out.

If you choose any major crypto casino and google their brand name + "scam" you will find numerous claims, even if the casino is generally considered legitimate. Try it with Stake for example. Illegitimate claims can make it difficult to identify legitimate claims and popular operators all get them.

Having said that we have already removed Bitstarz while we're re-reviewing their particular claims.

Also, our reviews are not based on what a casino tells us about themselves but based on our experiences actually playing at the casino.

Hope that clarifies things.

Preventing shady casinos from existing and helping to showcase genuine and quality casinos I believe is one of the major reasons why reviews are done and I stand to be corrected if I am wrong but  from observations, I have seen a good review feedback from your website on a shaddy casino well known for their negative attitude and here you are telling us you talk with casinos before you review them and I ask you a question, who in the best place is better option asking questions about a casino? Are the casinos the ones patronizing their games? Who in the next place do you think should be able to respond to questions as regards to user experience of a casino.

Asking a casino some questions about their services is like you making them be a judge in their own case which is not right and you do not expect an honest feedback or response from them because they would want to seal up their loopholes making them look alright and reliable when in the real sense they are not. I think the idea of asking casino questions is not ok to go buy because you would never get an honest answer from them but rather public opinion for instance gamblers who have patronized the casino can be in a better position to say something. If there is anything a review site should possibly want from a casino I guess it should be their policies, terms and conditions of service. These would help set the records for them while the gamblers do the sayings on their experience with the casino.

I believe that the current selection has been explained in the thread but let me know if it's still unclear. We're also currently in the process of reviewing several more of the most well known brands so you should see them soon.


Yes, you got it right regarding the process itself. We understand that we currently miss several brands that really deserve to be acknowledged but we'll get to them as soon as possible.

We obviously want to avoid promoting anyone that is generally known for being shady (we're currently re-reviewing the feedback on Bitstarz, as mentioned) but we'll want to list some lesser known brands that we've had a good experience of.

I agree with you because reviewing of 1400 online casinos isn't a child's play and can't be done in a short span. In order to review a casino you'll have to test the review for 1-7 days depending on the structure and quality of the casino. You will have to test many of the games the casino is offering and you'll have to spend enough money for the testing. Even, if you are good at testing then still you'll have to give it proper time because in a review all the details are to ne added.

I don't even think that there are 1400 online casinos out there which are working and providing service. Because most of those casinos might be set to scam the people, and only few good ones in the list would be the legit casinos that are truly working to entertain and server the gamblers. The OP should list all those sites which are truly providing valuable services, and only those sites should be reviewed in the initial stage. In the top list only the best online casinos should be placed not the ones who have been known for their shady business.

I already asked them that same thing a little while ago. They don't seem to have any specific criteria, or maybe they just don't want to share them.

Here is what they replied:

but i just wondering how they make the list for Best Bitcoin and Crypto Casinos 2023 because a lot of websites that from the list that i don't know.
is it just based on which website you reviewed first? or are there any other criteria?

To clarify, they didn't actually review 1400 online casinos. What they actually did was compile a list of nearly 1400 casino-related domain names. Many of these casinos are no longer operational, and some of the domains simply serve as mirror sites for the same casinos.

So, while the number may seem impressive at first glance, you shouldunderstand that the actual count of functional and unique online casinos may be significantly lower than the stated figure. And when it comes to the reviews and full casino descriptions, it seems that there are approximately 40 available in total.

Thank you for highlighting these, their years of establishment have now been updated along with some others. The 1400+ list could have more inaccuracies but everything should be correct in the reviews since it's normally double or triple checked at that stage.

The reasons for discrepancies is that there's sometimes mismatches between various sources (About pages vs ANN threads vs third-party databases or other reviews vs domain registration dates that are actually later than claimed launched dates etc) but we'll make sure to quickly adjust anything that is inaccurate.


Agreed, and that's why we clearly state: "The goal is to maintain a complete database and source of reference, so we're neither recommending every single casino on this list nor implying that they are to be trusted. On the contrary, many of these online casinos are likely not to be trusted." on the 1400+ page.

We will keep testing and adding the reputable casinos to the pages which actually contains recommendations.


Agreed. Country restrictions will always be a bit tricky since some operators are allowing access through VPN and some aren't - but some of those who are might occasionally claim issues with it later at withdrawal.

We obviously try to test for this but since we never know for sure how and when it's being applied we need to cross check with more sources, like feedback on this forum and other professional reviews, to form a general opinion.

This is so basic since we can determine a casino is reputable easily since for sure all the discussion happen in the thread can be a basis to anyone since for sure people share their sentiments or experience to determine what is current status of the casino. If we look at here we can say that all post is positive so meaning Bitcasino is excellent on delivering good platform to forum users here.

If we compare to other one which is also well known scam casino their thread has been actively criticize and been receive a lot of negative post against them.

First of all we need to understand is that if the casino is legit and have good reputation. A gambler needs a gambling site to be honest and fair in his games. Moreover the casino also needs to be good in customer support in case of any problems arise in the site. If the site requires KYC or they are allowed in my country or not, these information should also be mentioned in the review. At last if possible share any ongoing contest or bonus they are running and mention it’s requirements.

Great job bitcoincasino's team!
Reviewing 1400+ casino is too much work, I didn't even know there were that many crypto casinos!
To be honest, I didn't take a deep look at your website but I can ensure you that i'll do it as soon as I can.
It's always a pleasure to discover a new reviews website.