Pages:
Author

Topic: ❤️ BitcoinCasino.to - Guide & Reviews - 1400+ Crypto Casinos List - page 2. (Read 580 times)

legendary
Activity: 3276
Merit: 3537
Nec Recisa Recedit
I noticed that many reputable sites are not listed on the main page for casinos that accept bitcoins Sad
but above all 1400 casinos?!? I have not seen all these reviews/list, where I can find it?!?

If you want to test all 14000 ... (that is something really hard and complex to be done, sites can change their status, etc etc) you must be careful because you may encounter many scams and above all "selective scams".
Some sites could recognize and make you withdraw without problems meanwhile they are just scam.
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1026
In Search of Incredible
@OP, you have done a great job. The good thing is that you are publishing the review after testing a casino. Judging by the "List of all Crypto Casinos", you have tested and published the review of 40 casinos only until now. I hope the tested casinos list will be bigger soon. Anyway, I don't see the reason of keeping 'URL' column in that list. The 'year' column stands for the date of launch of the casinos, isn't it? There are some wrong date of launch of some casinos in that column. You should recheck the full list. I have only highlighted 3 casinos in the screenshot, but I found the wrong launch date of more casinos.



copper member
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
Welcome to the forum.
Your website looks good, and I hope the reviews are honest and unbiased as you say, but I'm surprised not to see some of the big names of the industry in there, like Stake.com which is the number 1 casino and sportsbook platform at the moment, and you say you've reviewed and added over 1,400 casinos accepting cryptocurrencies and I think you should have covered the top ones too in that.

Anyway, as a player if you ask me, I would probably want to know if a casino is trustworthy or not, I know my deposit will go through successfully but whether I will also be able to withdraw my winnings if I manage to get any is what a review should cover.

We have identified and listed the basics about 1400 casinos but not yet tested and written reviews of all of them.

As you say, you need to know (at a minimum!) that withdrawals will go through and the entire process of signing up, depositing, playing, withdrawing, testing customer support, documenting the process and formatting and publishing a review simply takes time for each.

We also want to cross-check with forums like Bitcoin Talk and other reputable reviewers so we haven't missed anything.

Happy to hear that you liked the look of the site. Stake will hopefully be added soon.
copper member
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
There could be several different reasons for this but the most common one is that we simply haven't talked to them yet (either due to time constraints on our end -- or someone not getting back to us when reaching out).

The good ones, including Stake, should hopefully all be up there very soon.

Thank you for the feedback!

Does it mean you have indexed and ranked the casino based on your opinion? I mean, which casinos offer you the best affiliate commission, and you listed them on the home page. Whoever did not respond to you did not list them on the home page. You have listed 29 casinos, and I don't think I have heard those names except for a few (Maximum five). That's mean you got a better commission offer from them, and you ranked them based on your benefits. Would you mind telling us what kind of review we can expect from you? I've seen review sites ask for reviews from users and they rank them based on users review.

Good and very valid questions, thanks for bringing them up so we can clarify.

Our lists are currently based on a number of factors such as the review score, the click-through rates of the visitors, the conversion rate of the visitors, the freshness of the brand, the overall reputation of the brand and more. It's not fixed forever and we'll be moving things around based on both data and user feedback.

While compensation as a ranking factor could theoretically make sense the commissions usually doesn't differ that much and so it's more interesting to observe which casinos our visitors choose and ultimately stick with.

If we recommend terrible casinos the visitors likely won't convert anyway and so it wouldn't matter what the commission is. Plus, they would start losing trust in the site. That's why we're asking for feedback and take it very seriously.

We'll always be open to reviewing our methodology but we think it makes sense at this point at least.


With regards to our selection of brands it's been covered earlier in the thread but just to recap:

Since we have identified over 1400 casinos and are reviewing them manually we've had to prioritize the order in which we work through them. So far we've tried to mix some very established, well known and generally acclaimed brands with some newer and less known brands.

The main reason for this is that we wouldn't serve much of a purpose (in our opinion, at least) if we just listed exactly same brands as others.

There's also players actively looking for new brands and/or information about a particular new brand. In those cases we can offer more value than just review no. 387 of a brand that everyone already knows.

As for user reviews we think that those are a good idea and that's why we have enabled visitor comments on every review now. We'll consider to adding user ratings (e.g. 1-5 stars) as well but we'd need to make sure that they aren't abused by operators trying to boost their own brands (or shoot down competitors). So far it seems to work pretty well for Gosu (as an example) though so we're open to the idea.

Feel free to check out our existing reviews to get an idea for what you can expect more of in the future.
sr. member
Activity: 2296
Merit: 348
Welcome to the forum.
Your website looks good, and I hope the reviews are honest and unbiased as you say, but I'm surprised not to see some of the big names of the industry in there, like Stake.com which is the number 1 casino and sportsbook platform at the moment, and you say you've reviewed and added over 1,400 casinos accepting cryptocurrencies and I think you should have covered the top ones too in that.

Anyway, as a player if you ask me, I would probably want to know if a casino is trustworthy or not, I know my deposit will go through successfully but whether I will also be able to withdraw my winnings if I manage to get any is what a review should cover.
hero member
Activity: 462
Merit: 767
Instant cryptocurrency exchange with own reserves!
There could be several different reasons for this but the most common one is that we simply haven't talked to them yet (either due to time constraints on our end -- or someone not getting back to us when reaching out).

The good ones, including Stake, should hopefully all be up there very soon.

Thank you for the feedback!

Does it mean you have indexed and ranked the casino based on your opinion? I mean, which casinos offer you the best affiliate commission, and you listed them on the home page. Whoever did not respond to you did not list them on the home page. You have listed 29 casinos, and I don't think I have heard those names except for a few (Maximum five). That's mean you got a better commission offer from them, and you ranked them based on your benefits. Would you mind telling us what kind of review we can expect from you? I've seen review sites ask for reviews from users and they rank them based on users review.
copper member
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
Next to the "Casino" column with the logos there is a "Review" column with ratings. The casino name below the rating links to the review. It should be easy to find but if it's not obvious we'll have to re-consider the implementation.
I checked the site on my mobile and I clicked on the reviews button in the drop-down menu which led me to the same list on the homepage where a couple of points were specified. Clicking on it led me to the site. Are the reviews just those points?

Our conclusion, based on the number of reports vs their overall popularity and usage (and the aforementioned other professional reviews), differs from yours.
Bitstarz is regarded as a scam site within this forum due to definitive proof against them.

On mobile the column names won't be visible. Click on the casino name below a star rating to see the detailed review. The logo and Play button links to the casino itself, the casino name (in plain text) links to our review.

Since we take feedback from seasoned members here seriously we have just removed Bitstarz from our primary lists while we are re-evaluating everything that has been written on Bitcoin Talk about them up until this point.

Our review of them will technically remain live in the meantime but won't be easily accessible.
hero member
Activity: 3178
Merit: 977
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
Next to the "Casino" column with the logos there is a "Review" column with ratings. The casino name below the rating links to the review. It should be easy to find but if it's not obvious we'll have to re-consider the implementation.
I checked the site on my mobile and I clicked on the reviews button in the drop-down menu which led me to the same list on the homepage where a couple of points were specified. Clicking on it led me to the site. Are the reviews just those points?

Our conclusion, based on the number of reports vs their overall popularity and usage (and the aforementioned other professional reviews), differs from yours.
Bitstarz is regarded as a scam site within this forum due to definitive proof against them.
hero member
Activity: 3038
Merit: 617

Anyone who have been in the forum for years have read about BitStarz reputation and users  accusing them. And since you mentioned you first need to talk to a casino before you give your review I guess there is a done deal happening. Just an impression that others could also have.

But I can understand if its meant for users not from around here and the casino doesn't have withdrawal fee and some free spin upon registration. Still attractive to new users.
copper member
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
Number 1 : Bitstarz? Seriously? This alone dismisses this site as a proper crypto casino comparison site frankly speaking. Anyone with a half-decent brain is aware of the fact that Bitstarz is a shady site through and through.

Also, I couldn't find any proper reviews when I clicked on various sites in the list. I recommend avoiding this site until these issues get fixed.

Next to the "Casino" column with the logos there is a "Review" column with ratings. The casino name below the rating links to the review. It should be easy to find but if it's not obvious we'll have to re-consider the implementation.

The current sorting shouldn't be perceived as the definite or final list as we still have many, many more casinos to review. We will also try to mix older and more established casinos with newer ones, as explained previously in the thread.

But now that you can hopefully find the reviews you can check them out and hopefully learn more about our reasoning.

Now regarding Bitstarz, our own experiences have been very positive and, as you're probably aware, most other major comparison sites (e.g. BCKings, Gosu, CoinGambling, BBC etc) have given them favorable to very favorable reviews so in that sense our rating is very consistent with the current consensus.

Having said that, we have read and noted the criticism that they have received as well. It seems like most issues are related to some players gambling from expressively restricted regions and occasionally getting issues with KYCs and/or withdrawals. However, similar issues have been reported on occasion with most of the larger and popular operators. Very few (if anyone?) with any substantial market share has zero complaints.

Our conclusion, based on the number of reports vs their overall popularity and usage (and the aforementioned other professional reviews), differs from yours.

But we have noted your opinion and respect it, of course. Thanks for letting us know.
hero member
Activity: 3178
Merit: 977
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
Number 1 : Bitstarz? Seriously? This alone dismisses this site as a proper crypto casino comparison site frankly speaking. Anyone with a half-decent brain is aware of the fact that Bitstarz is a shady site through and through.

Also, I couldn't find any proper reviews when I clicked on various sites in the list. I recommend avoiding this site until these issues get fixed.
copper member
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
At first glance on the title. I read the name of this review site as Bitcasino. Even with after multiple scan on your thread gives me same impression that this is Bitcasino that makes me interested what’s inside.

The review site is neat and easy use unlike other low class review site that full of ads all over the webpage. It’s good to see that OP is active here and I hope to add more casino that is active here in forum rather than those that is not available here.

If possible you can create a category for casino with ANn thread on Bitcointalk and none so that it can be easily distinguished by readers since casino that active here is more trusted since they are easy to approach with casino concerns.

Yesterday, based on feedback in this thread, we added a "+ BitcoinTalk Thread" note as a feature next to these casinos in our lists. Hopefully that should make it pretty easy to distinguish them.

However, we could also create a separate page with a unique list that only includes casinos with ANN threads. We'll get to work on that.
hero member
Activity: 2716
Merit: 698
Dimon69
At first glance on the title. I read the name of this review site as Bitcasino. Even with after multiple scan on your thread gives me same impression that this is Bitcasino that makes me interested what’s inside.

The review site is neat and easy use unlike other low class review site that full of ads all over the webpage. It’s good to see that OP is active here and I hope to add more casino that is active here in forum rather than those that is not available here.

If possible you can create a category for casino with ANn thread on Bitcointalk and none so that it can be easily distinguished by readers since casino that active here is more trusted since they are easy to approach with casino concerns.
hero member
Activity: 1652
Merit: 521
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
First, I saw the name Duelbits.com but they was no link for the review it only just showed me the name, the license type etcetera nothing more.
Maybe they have not yet started their review on the listed casino but i was wondering if they would also do a comparison between their review and other review from other website as well that have already done some review on to getting a validated result when both are being checked or measured in a scale to give an output. I think this would be very much reliable and worth it if they attempt it. it is just an idea.
In the previous response the OP said that they haven't done any testing on Duelbits so it's only natural that there aren't any reviews on this one gambling site yet.
After all in this forum there are many gambling sites listed so it takes them time to do the testing and provide reviews on every casino that is on the list.
By the way, the idea that you convey is quite good where from each casino review site you can see a different and more real about the reviews in each casino.
Maybe this idea can be considered by the OP and the working team.
copper member
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
First, I saw the name Duelbits.com but they was no link for the review it only just showed me the name, the license type etcetera nothing more.
Maybe they have not yet started their review on the listed casino but i was wondering if they would also do a comparison between their review and other review from other website as well that have already done some review on to getting a validated result when both are being checked or measured in a scale to give an output. I think this would be very much reliable and worth it if they attempt it. it is just an idea.

That's correct, not started, as confirmed in an earlier reply. We will always want to form our own opinion based on our own experiences but it makes sense to cross check our final scores with some other reputable sites and reviewers, yes.

We could also consider mentioning others final review scores somewhere (without copying any of their original content of course), if we get permission to do that.

I will also say this give room for visitors visiting your website to see and read the reviews. The comments and words should be organic and not edited by team to suit their outcome of course if that happens, you know how disastrous it would be on your website and supposed casino. so it would be in your own interest not to try doing such and lastly, this idea as i have suggested earlier would go a long way in putting your website on main stream if you can be able to compare reviews between various casinos and giving a unique result after going through various stages of  review scale measurement. The output would definitely be useful for gamblers to draw and make their conclusions and final results.

Thank you for your thoughtful feedback. As mentioned we would want and need permission to aggregate ratings from others and we'd have to think a bit about how it would be best implemented (if we got it). But it would indeed be useful for players.



First, I saw the name Duelbits.com but they was no link for the review it only just showed me the name, the license type etcetera nothing more.
Maybe they have not yet started their review on the listed casino but i was wondering if they would also do a comparison between their review and other review from other website as well that have already done some review on to getting a validated result when both are being checked or measured in a scale to give an output. I think this would be very much reliable and worth it if they attempt it. it is just an idea.

That's correct, not started, as confirmed in an earlier reply. We will always want to form our own opinion based on our own experiences but it makes sense to cross check our final scores with some other reputable sites and reviewers, yes.

We could also consider mentioning others final review scores somewhere (without copying any of their original content of course), if we get permission to do that.

Second, I noticed that most of casinos there including Duelbits.com have "untested" so how do you review a casino you haven't tested before? Is it based on what you saw on their website or what?

I noticed same to then how were they able to get a review star measurement for all of them if they have the "untested" ticker on them. I too was  curious about the whole thing.

@BitcoinCasino.to can you attend to this as we await your utmost response.

There shouldn't be any casinos listed as "untested" with a star rating anywhere. If you find one let us know so we can correct that. Ratings are for tested casinos only, of course.

That would be nice. Your review should be based on your actual experience rather than just copying someone else's work.
It may take time to come up with a comprehensive review but this will give more substance to your project.
And newcomers may find it useful if you would be transparent and honest about your experience on the site.
There are a lot of casino and sportsbooks to review but you have all the time to do your work, unless this project is a solo one.
I also believe once the team will review the top casinos found in the forum, they will soon find out that they may have new set of top rated crypto casinos.

It's not a solo project but we're a small team and hence it takes time to do it properly. But we'd rather take our time than churn out generic descriptive (or even AI generated) content that some others unfortunately do these days.

Regarding our recommendations you're likely right; our lists will probably change over time. However, the most important thing is that players can learn whether or not they can generally trust a particular casino. Besides that there will always be subjective opinions about things like the look and feel of the brand, the game selection, various features, bonus structures etc.



<...>
Having said that, we have heard the feedback loud and clear in this thread and going forward we will work hard to catch-up with many great brands that people are missing from us so far.

I appreciate that you have taken the feedback from this thread into consideration.  I agree that, by testing and reviewing both established top brands and newer brands, you will be able to provide a more comprehensive overview of the market and offer readers a wider range of options to choose from. Just be careful with casinos that have a dubious reputation or a history of problems. This is important because there are many scammers out there who want to take advantage of people and it’s your responsibility not to provide them with free advertising.

You can also use the feedback from this forum to find out which brands our members like most. I'm sure they will appreciate it if you included their suggestions in future articles!
Keep up the good work!

We heed your warning and that's why we've enabled comments for every brand review as well. We'll look into any feedback we receive through comments, or through this forum or in private.

We will also look into how we can possibly incorporate player feedback from Bitcoin Talk directly into the reviews as well. It's not obvious how to fairly aggregate and present an "average" opinion but we'll give it a thought.

Thank you for helping us improve.



I really like OP's supper activeness in this thread it's a prove that they are ready for business unlike some sites that just come to the forum, create their ANN thread and then disapear or reply comments/suggestions here once every week. If you continue like this I'm sure you are going to get some more suggestions that will help your review site better than the current site.

Btw, I saw something it's not a big deal though but i was hoping you could take a look at it and see if it's just me or if it happens to others as well.
In the top navigation bar when you are using desktop in full screen mode, if you click on "More" > "Crypto Gambling" it suppose to bring out more options but in full screen the options are hidden.
Although it works well when the site is reduced.


Thank you for the encouragement and the bug report, we'll look into this right away. As others have already mentioned it seems to be related to the menu going out of bounds at a certain resolution.



Btw, I saw something it's not a big deal though but i was hoping you could take a look at it and see if it's just me or if it happens to others as well.
In the top navigation bar when you are using desktop in full screen mode, if you click on "More" > "Crypto Gambling" it suppose to bring out more options but in full screen the options are hidden.
Although it works well when the site is reduced.


It works well for me both in full screen and reduced size of my browser. It is missing for me if I reduced the size too much (50%).



Welcome to OP in this crypto gambling community, I havent explored your review site much I'm impressed it with the quality of your website. It looks simple but eye-catching and easy to navigate. Honestly I'm shocked to see that you have 1400+ list of crypto casinos. I have to bookmark your site to check what is new and maybe I can find new interesting offer from casinos that I have never used before.

"Simple" and "easy to navigate" were two of the main things that we were going for so really happy to hear that that was your first impression. There are definitely more flashy sites out there but we think that our users care more about the actual substance.

Also appreciate the welcome messages and constructive feedback so far. Warms your heart a bit after putting in many hours of work to build something.

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
hero member
Activity: 1456
Merit: 940
🇺🇦 Glory to Ukraine!
Btw, I saw something it's not a big deal though but i was hoping you could take a look at it and see if it's just me or if it happens to others as well.
In the top navigation bar when you are using desktop in full screen mode, if you click on "More" > "Crypto Gambling" it suppose to bring out more options but in full screen the options are hidden.
Although it works well when the site is reduced.


I believe it could be related to the resolution of your screen. Personally, on my desktop in full-screen mode, I can see all the menu items without any issues. However, when I reduce the window size, I do encounter the problem you described.
legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1312
Btw, I saw something it's not a big deal though but i was hoping you could take a look at it and see if it's just me or if it happens to others as well.
In the top navigation bar when you are using desktop in full screen mode, if you click on "More" > "Crypto Gambling" it suppose to bring out more options but in full screen the options are hidden.
Although it works well when the site is reduced.


It works well for me both in full screen and reduced size of my browser. It is missing for me if I reduced the size too much (50%).



Welcome to OP in this crypto gambling community, I havent explored your review site much I'm impressed it with the quality of your website. It looks simple but eye-catching and easy to navigate. Honestly I'm shocked to see that you have 1400+ list of crypto casinos. I have to bookmark your site to check what is new and maybe I can find new interesting offer from casinos that I have never used before.

hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 541
Bitcoin Casino Est. 2013
I really like OP's supper activeness in this thread it's a prove that they are ready for business unlike some sites that just come to the forum, create their ANN thread and then disapear or reply comments/suggestions here once every week. If you continue like this I'm sure you are going to get some more suggestions that will help your review site better than the current site.

Btw, I saw something it's not a big deal though but i was hoping you could take a look at it and see if it's just me or if it happens to others as well.
In the top navigation bar when you are using desktop in full screen mode, if you click on "More" > "Crypto Gambling" it suppose to bring out more options but in full screen the options are hidden.
Although it works well when the site is reduced.
hero member
Activity: 1456
Merit: 940
🇺🇦 Glory to Ukraine!
<...>
Having said that, we have heard the feedback loud and clear in this thread and going forward we will work hard to catch-up with many great brands that people are missing from us so far.

I appreciate that you have taken the feedback from this thread into consideration.  I agree that, by testing and reviewing both established top brands and newer brands, you will be able to provide a more comprehensive overview of the market and offer readers a wider range of options to choose from. Just be careful with casinos that have a dubious reputation or a history of problems. This is important because there are many scammers out there who want to take advantage of people and it’s your responsibility not to provide them with free advertising.

You can also use the feedback from this forum to find out which brands our members like most. I'm sure they will appreciate it if you included their suggestions in future articles!
Keep up the good work!
hero member
Activity: 2744
Merit: 588
First, I saw the name Duelbits.com but they was no link for the review it only just showed me the name, the license type etcetera nothing more.
Maybe they have not yet started their review on the listed casino but i was wondering if they would also do a comparison between their review and other review from other website as well that have already done some review on to getting a validated result when both are being checked or measured in a scale to give an output. I think this would be very much reliable and worth it if they attempt it. it is just an idea.

That's correct, not started, as confirmed in an earlier reply. We will always want to form our own opinion based on our own experiences but it makes sense to cross check our final scores with some other reputable sites and reviewers, yes.

We could also consider mentioning others final review scores somewhere (without copying any of their original content of course), if we get permission to do that.

Second, I noticed that most of casinos there including Duelbits.com have "untested" so how do you review a casino you haven't tested before? Is it based on what you saw on their website or what?

I noticed same to then how were they able to get a review star measurement for all of them if they have the "untested" ticker on them. I too was  curious about the whole thing.

@BitcoinCasino.to can you attend to this as we await your utmost response.

There shouldn't be any casinos listed as "untested" with a star rating anywhere. If you find one let us know so we can correct that. Ratings are for tested casinos only, of course.

That would be nice. Your review should be based on your actual experience rather than just copying someone else's work.
It may take time to come up with a comprehensive review but this will give more substance to your project.
And newcomers may find it useful if you would be transparent and honest about your experience on the site.
There are a lot of casino and sportsbooks to review but you have all the time to do your work, unless this project is a solo one.
I also believe once the team will review the top casinos found in the forum, they will soon find out that they may have new set of top rated crypto casinos.
Pages:
Jump to: