Topic: ❤️ BitcoinCasino.to - Guide & Reviews - 1400+ Crypto Casinos List - page 3. (Read 580 times)

I will also say this give room for visitors visiting your website to see and read the reviews. The comments and words should be organic and not edited by team to suit their outcome of course if that happens, you know how disastrous it would be on your website and supposed casino. so it would be in your own interest not to try doing such and lastly, this idea as i have suggested earlier would go a long way in putting your website on main stream if you can be able to compare reviews between various casinos and giving a unique result after going through various stages of  review scale measurement. The output would definitely be useful for gamblers to draw and make their conclusions and final results.

That's correct, not started, as confirmed in an earlier reply. We will always want to form our own opinion based on our own experiences but it makes sense to cross check our final scores with some other reputable sites and reviewers, yes.

We could also consider mentioning others final review scores somewhere (without copying any of their original content of course), if we get permission to do that.


There shouldn't be any casinos listed as "untested" with a star rating anywhere. If you find one let us know so we can correct that. Ratings are for tested casinos only, of course.

Happy to hear that you thought that the website is OK, but I'm not sure which other project/website you're referring to? Just to be clear we're not casino operators.

Maybe they have not yet started their review on the listed casino but i was wondering if they would also do a comparison between their review and other review from other website as well that have already done some review on to getting a validated result when both are being checked or measured in a scale to give an output. I think this would be very much reliable and worth it if they attempt it. it is just an idea.





I noticed same too while going through the list of the casinos on their website. Then how were they able to get a review star measurement for all of them if they have the "untested" ticker on them. I too was  curious about the whole thing.


@BitcoinCasino.to can you attend to this as we await your utmost response.

I saw like two casinos that running signature and Avatar Campaigns in the forum. Such as: FortuneJack with Winz. io. The op site is okay and one thing I also discovered in the website is, they are doing two projects at once. The project of casino website Review and their personal website of casinos gambling. And the op has to do more to create more popularity in the forum. The way they arrange the site is nice, though I have seen such service by other companies as well. But I am not hearing from them again. I am not even hearing from gamblingbro again.

Great question!

So as many of you know several of the most well-known and highly regarded crypto casinos have been around for about 5 to 10 years at this point.

During this time they have been consistently tested and reviewed about by every imaginable guide and comparison site, and discussed in forums like this one, of course.

If we only reviewed and listed a handful of the top brands we would probably just end up rehashing a lot of known information without really bringing anything new to the table. We'd have no real raison d'être.

Also, if you study search trends you'll realize that the more mature a particular gambling market becomes, the more demand grows for new experiences (both games and sites). We're starting to see this in the crypto gambling space as well.

So we simply felt that there was a gap to fill here and so we've been testing and reviewing both established top brands and some new brands.

However the new brands haven't been completely random up to this point. Normally the operator/program has had some kind of track record with other casinos and several brands are fiat/crypto hybrids.

Having said that, we have heard the feedback loud and clear in this thread and going forward we will work hard to catch-up with many great brands that people are missing from us so far.

I visited your website and I noticed many well known crypto gambling websites and casinos are missing from there, and I dont know most of the website listed right now.
Lets first start with Sportsbet that is most active in bitcointalk forum and it has best reputation here, than there is Stake casino also missing from your website.
Few more casinos I can remember and used before are Betnomi, Livecasino, Cloudbet and others.
You can find many of them if you search in forum Gambling board.

Can you explain the criteria you use to rank casinos on your website's front page and other lists? While I recognize some names, there are others that I am not familiar with and I'm not sure how popular they are.

On the other hand, there are casinos which are very popular but I don't understand why they are not on your lists. I guess what I am really asking is how you decide which casinos to include in the rankings?

We haven't yet tested Duelbits (as in creating an account, depositing, playing various games, withdrawing winnings or talking to their support) and hence we haven't been able to review or give them a rating either.

We have just listed them, along with other casinos we are yet to test and review, with the basic information we have collected so far (name, URL, year of establishment, license, crypto/fiat payments) as a freely accessible database to anyone who's interested.

Once we have properly tested and reviewed a casino we'll mark it as reviewed and, if the conclusion was positive, we'll add them to one or several lists with actual recommendations.

maybe he tries to chat with them but sadly they still did not reply/talked with them just like stake.com too, maybe the website need to talk with their representative to be able listed on their website.

I just went to your site to check truly if you have reviews for 1400+ casinos just as you have claimed and indeed I found the list there, but something caught my attention.

For example, Duelbits.com I had to check the review of the casino I'm currently promoting and found several things I'll like you to clear up for me. First, I saw the name Duelbits.com but they was no link for the review it only just showed me the name, the license type etcetera nothing more.
Second, I noticed that most of casinos there including Duelbits.com have "untested" so how do you review a casino you haven't tested before? Is it based on what you saw on their website or what?

Good suggestion regarding a screenshot and yes, it currently does look a bit dull in comparison to some other sites out there.

Regarding authors and bylines it's tricky. If you skip it completely you'll have some people complaining about that. But if you go with full names and unedited profile pictures someone might risk real life abuse because they wrote something that someone didn't like. And if you do something in between someone will be displeased with that as well We'll see if we can come up with something better.

Thanks!

OP, I was thinking you should atleast give us a pictorial excerpts of how your website looks like to make your thread look catchy based on your topic.  I commend you for the copper member account upgrade seems you really have a good managerial skills and you know how to abide by forum policies when you identify with any.

However, I know you are new here and I will advise you to take cognizance of casinos here as there are a million and one of them here with good reputation. This will add more feathers to your wings here.

Your website looks a bit dull and boring could you make the graphics and colouration a bit more attractive and sharp.

We are not kids you know. Why put up a blur and animated image of Jack. M. your supposed author or psuedo owner  if you may like.  It is even better you did not put any image there only write up than putting such there.

Agreed that it's highly relevant but not as straight forward as reviewing some other things due to limitations in supported casinos and games. Will consider, discuss and analyze others implementations. Thanks!

Welcome on your forum introducing as a casino review site, we are very happy to see you here.

I've seen some of the other reviews about the casinos reviewed by this site, but I don't see some of the casinos that I often play here? Like Sportsbet, Bitcasino and Duelbits will you add this to your personal experience playing at the casino?

I'm waiting for more reviews but I hope that in the future there are more casinos on this forum.

Your review website has many types of contents for guests and it is good but I notice that your site does not have any part about Provably Fair Verifier.

You can consider to add it on your site as Review will be not fully completed and correct if you don't use Provably Fair Verifier to test games on a casino you review. It's important for Crypto Casino as gamblers can verify whether a game is provably fair. It gives more trust about one casino and provided games for their users.

Thank you for the suggestions. We'll have all of them reviewed and listed (if they're good, as expected).

We think that there's value to testing and reviewing as many operators as possible, regardless of if they have a thread here or not.

But as we'll be adding more operators we will definitely look into adding some kind of certificate or symbol to our lists to indicate that a particular brand is (or isn't) represented on this forum as well.

Hopefully that will make the list more useful to you and others.

Nice seeing this thread, I hope more casinos are going to be added, especially those that have ANN thread on this forum.

These are just few. What about Flush, Stake, Livecasino, Sportsbet, Duelbit, Rollbit, Roobet, BK8, Duelbit, Trustdice, Betcoin and many others. If you go to gambling board, there are still more.

We don't need to talk to a casino to review them but we prefer to talk to them before more actively promoting them.

If you click on the casino's name in the "Review" column, just next to their rating, you will be taken to the review.

We will consider if it makes more sense to link the logo to the review, rather than to the website, as well.

Thank you for the feedback.