I figured out the moralistic logic. It's all predicated upon the notion that the world's population exists in an infantile intellectual state, virtually incapable of acting independently on anything more complex than inserting food into the mouth hole.
- Anything that generates a return is a scam because the operators could be misrepresenting data, especially when the business model isn't disclosed and/or is incomprehensible to the uninitiated.
- Therefore we're all scammers and should kill ourselves, except for those who screamed 'scam' because they're more human than human.
- Pirate and payb.tc should kill themselves twice, just because.
- The suicide pact shall commence during the passing of a famous asteroid.
Problem solved. The moral dictators will then be able to sit around and mentally masturbate for the rest of their lives, even though nobody else will be around to care.
Maybe I can extrapolate this to education.
- Pay thousands for a college education.
- Work at a company.
- Get laid off.
- Vilify the college, burn down the company.
The first and last parts are interchangeable. Makes perfect sense - about as much as the witch hunt. It's about as actionable, too.
I risked and (maybe) lost. That's more than Team Ponzi can say; they need to get over their bad selves. Now it's time to get back to doing something more worthwhile than making a mockery of holier-than-thou Internet dictators.
Well, I may be the sucker that lost a shitload of MY Bitcoins ...but I am not the cunt that lost OTHER PEOPLE'S Bitcoins.
Quote from: payb.tc on August 27, 2012, 02:07:34 AM
… i definitely rate personal responsibility way above victimism... people have noone to blame but themselves.
If one of the victims had said that, I might not have replied, but if you say it, a few words are in order.
i am one of the 'victims', therefore didn't bother reading the rest as the logic doesn't follow...
i've lost 5300 btc.
i'm sure micon and the likes will love to hear me publish my exact personal stake.
but clearly, i take sole responsibility for losing those coins.
edit: okay so i read a bit more of your post... if pirate doesn't pay out i've made practically nothing at all from this venture. perhaps 20 btc, haha i'm rich!
As i really love theoretical and philosophical discussions about the wherewithall of ponzis, currency systems and bitcoin, i really think they should have been
posted in the original OP before rather than being discussed only after the shit has hit the fan in the Bitcoinmax thread.
Which mindset produces the "older accounts first"!!?? As long as it works....shut up its an investment which can go wrong...and when pirate busts the "hypothetical" remnants will
be treated as a scammers ponzi loot ? -- those in front of the chain -letter first?Can you confirm your personal responsibility by paying out those 20 coins left to " Andies coins" account before you victimize yourself please?
Even pirate himself closes smaller accounts first...for not being accused to keep bitlane earily quiet ............not so much anymore?
Tell us how the first hypothetical swoop of say 5300 coins would be distibuted ?Thanks for an answer to the layman
Cheers Zyk
P.S.
I want an answer before pirate is PM éd to determine if bitcoinmax is a failed enterprise or a planed scam!!!