Topic: BitcoinTalk++ script - v0.2.96 - page 40. (Read 114219 times)
image upload. fuck yeah!
There is a bug with the new update. The ticker constantly says 'Contacting ticker...'
Could you check the version you're using? If it's 0.1.39 and the ticker is still broken tell me what is your ticker source
You should have Chrome, I forgot to create the crx file for 0.1.39
It should be working now
There is a bug with the new update. The ticker constantly says 'Contacting ticker...'
New version, only one change
Hope you'll like it
I, for one, will use it a lot
Hope you'll like it
I, for one, will use it a lot
Short input. I'll have much more time soon™ to code/answer again.
Trademark is upside-down.Two Weeks is TW, not TM.
And beside trolling, I'd like to necro one of my oldest suggestions, which was:
Make all those funky functionnalities inbound.
Have you talked with theymos about that?
I really hate having monkey scripts running wild on my computer, and would much prefer a smooth integration into the smf forum code.
If you don't feel like trying and convince theymos, I'm willing to try. I'm a diplomacy beast.
When and where do we discuss scammer tags? https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/staff-member-xdeathwing-is-a-scammer-287622 seems like a decent starter
Well... Here I guess. I don't want to spam the meta forum with BT++ threads.I have not looked at this yet.
Oh wait he has -5/7 !?
Looks like you guys don't like him
Ok I read the whole thread. Well, I'd prefer to give him an untrustworthy tag. It's up to you guys though.
When and where do we discuss scammer tags? https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/staff-member-xdeathwing-is-a-scammer-287622 seems like a decent starter
Short input. I'll have much more time soon™ to code/answer again.
Trademark is upside-down.Two Weeks is TW, not TM.
And beside trolling, I'd like to necro one of my oldest suggestions, which was:
Make all those funky functionnalities inbound.
Have you talked with theymos about that?
I really hate having monkey scripts running wild on my computer, and would much prefer a smooth integration into the smf forum code.
If you don't feel like trying and convince theymos, I'm willing to try. I'm a diplomacy beast.
Short input. I'll have much more time soon™ to code/answer again.
Indeed that's the point. FWIW I never refused sending a password yet.
I'd like to make such a script, it would be easier than what 001sonkit describes.
It would just be a "Request password" button in the BT++ interface that would send a PM to my account "BT++", then the script (a daemon on my server) would send a PM with the password to the account asking for it. Only once (at all) per requesting account to avoid spamming PMs.
Add an option to, when clicking a thread, view all posts (so we don't have to click "All")
AFAIK theymos removed the All button on long threads because on the heavy load it created. I might add it again for these threads but I won't make thread links load all the pages by default.maybe have a cool autoloader that loads page 2 when you reach the bottom of page 1 otherwise,
This is something I'd like to implement.Make a password-gen site, so people don't spam you.
Well he generates it so people can't create new accounts and downvote people who they don't like. This way he can control who get's the power to use it and who not. I think it would be better if the script works when you have reached a certain activity / post number.I'd like to make such a script, it would be easier than what 001sonkit describes.
It would just be a "Request password" button in the BT++ interface that would send a PM to my account "BT++", then the script (a daemon on my server) would send a PM with the password to the account asking for it. Only once (at all) per requesting account to avoid spamming PMs.
@whisk
Not much, maintain the bots, added fishingbot if you havent heard of. Giving out masstip from time to time.... Thats all i guess, I have academic to take care of.
Reply in PM - let's not spam up bitcointalk++.Not much, maintain the bots, added fishingbot if you havent heard of. Giving out masstip from time to time.... Thats all i guess, I have academic to take care of.
In case you haven't heard, I'm [still] banned from that site. Bring your bots onto whiskchat (link in sig) and let's say hai. (oh, don't bring moobot. I added an easter egg that occurs if you type !moo, because I added inline spotify etc, so moobot's kinda obsolete ;P)
On topic:
Make a password-gen site, so people don't spam you.
You quoted it so I have deleted just dont trouble mods around here
On topic: bunch of newbies would perhaps join and for some guys would probably massregister and rig the +1 system
EDIT: Bitcoininfo nice idea to filter out stuff. I actually did a php code some time ago to fetch user data (for my evilness previously, if you have know what I did, you know it. Else I'll just keep it) out of BitcoinTalk。 Itcould be automated with
1: Push button post count and activity check (trust rating too)
2: post in a account verify thread (like BTCJAM's one)
3: Push the button again and get the ID's PW
Make a password-gen site, so people don't spam you.
Well he generates it so people can't create new accounts and downvote people who they don't like. This way he can control who get's the power to use it and who not. I think it would be better if the script works when you have reached a certain activity / post number. 
@whisk
Not much, maintain the bots, added fishingbot if you havent heard of. Giving out masstip from time to time.... Thats all i guess, I have academic to take care of.
Reply in PM - let's not spam up bitcointalk++.Not much, maintain the bots, added fishingbot if you havent heard of. Giving out masstip from time to time.... Thats all i guess, I have academic to take care of.
In case you haven't heard, I'm [still] banned from that site. Bring your bots onto whiskchat (link in sig) and let's say hai. (oh, don't bring moobot. I added an easter egg that occurs if you type !moo, because I added inline spotify etc, so moobot's kinda obsolete ;P)
On topic:
Make a password-gen site, so people don't spam you.
I want to be able to give a few people an extra -1 because they're so dumb!
An error has occurred: Moderators are not superhuman.Thanks for the suggestions!
1/ I know... It was planned but I started to lack time before I had the chance to do it.
2/ That's great. That makes me think that would be cool to make "auto load next page", like with google image. For threads or whatever. I'll look at both when I have some time.
3/ Ok, why not. If nobody's against I'll change that in the next update.
By the way guys: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/05/nsa-gchq-encryption-codes-security
I'll (try to) implement a system replacing SSL in the server.
Would this be an overkill for a tiny script like BT++? Absolutely.
The idea behind that is more selfish, it's to develop and debug such a system. This would be opt-in of course.
I'll implement a pic uploading form right in the bitcointalk pages
See https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/images-on-this-site-288728
ADD THIS:1/ I know... It was planned but I started to lack time before I had the chance to do it.
2/ That's great. That makes me think that would be cool to make "auto load next page", like with google image. For threads or whatever. I'll look at both when I have some time.
3/ Ok, why not. If nobody's against I'll change that in the next update.
By the way guys: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/05/nsa-gchq-encryption-codes-security
I'll (try to) implement a system replacing SSL in the server.
Would this be an overkill for a tiny script like BT++? Absolutely.
The idea behind that is more selfish, it's to develop and debug such a system. This would be opt-in of course.
I'll implement a pic uploading form right in the bitcointalk pages
See https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/images-on-this-site-288728
Add an option to, when clicking a thread, view all posts (so we don't have to click "All") and maybe have a cool autoloader that loads page 2 when you reach the bottom of page 1 otherwise, etc..
+1 for SSL, and pic uploading.
Hey JackJack, been using your service for quite a while. Collected plenty of plus and minus and evened everything out to Zero. Figured out some suggestions 
what's lordsonkit doing out of coinchat? (or whiskchat, doesn't really matter 
)
Now it works again, lol.
Yay! My second +1! Thank you anonymous +1er!
I think the server is down. I do not see any ratings, just empty brackets
Working fine hereDid I mention that the first one to put me a -1 will be banned?
No wonder there aren't griefing haters 
waiting for more awesomeness, wonder what would this do if it is done officially
I'm not at home so I can't check by myself but looks like it works: http://jackjack.alwaysdata.net/btoplusone/note.php?no=21053&json=1&client=thread&clientversion=0.0.1
Anyone else experiencing this?
I'll update as soon as I have more info
Anyone else experiencing this?
I'll update as soon as I have more info
I think the server is down. I do not see any ratings, just empty brackets
I want to be able to give a few people an extra -1 because they're so dumb!
[/joke]
[/joke]
Nice script
Yay! My second +1! Thank you anonymous +1er!
By the way guys: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/05/nsa-gchq-encryption-codes-security
I'll (try to) implement a system replacing SSL in the server.
Would this be an overkill for a tiny script like BT++? Absolutely.
The idea behind that is more selfish, it's to develop and debug such a system. This would be opt-in of course.
well, why not. I'd opt-in!
Jump to: